Estimation of the carbon footprint of arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs in France.

AIM: The main objective of this study was to estimate the carbon impact of arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs in France. The secondary objective was to assess the effectiveness of the following measures in reducing the carbon footprint associated with this technique: outpatient treatment, arthroscopic water filtration, surgery under locoregional anesthesia. HYPOTHESIS: The hypothesis was that the carbon footprint could be significantly improved with the implementation of these three procedures. METHODS: A continuous series of 26 patients who underwent surgery for a rotator cuff tear involving only one tendon between November 2020 and April 2021 were included. The evaluation protocol consisted of three parts: 1/ use of volatile anesthetic agents; 2/ electrical consumption linked to the procedure; 3/ emissions related to patient and staff travel, delivery of implants and waste management. Another series of 26 patients operated between November 2018 and April 2019 who had none of these three factors were matched. RESULTS: The carbon impact of arthroscopic repair of the rotator cuff was estimated at 334.61±18.82kgCO2eq. The implementation of the three methods for improvement made it possible to significantly reduce emissions by 40.9±1.71kgCO2eq (12.2%) (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Performing surgery under locoregional anesthesia, on an outpatient basis with water purification, reduces the carbon impact of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair by more than 12%. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, retrospective case control.

Systematic review of carbon footprint of surgical procedures.

The ecological sustainability of the operating room (OR) is a matter of recent interest. The present systematic review aimed to review the current literature assessing the carbon footprint of surgical procedures in different surgical fields. Following to the PRISMA statement checklist, three databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library) were searched by independent reviewers, who screened records on title and abstract first, and then on the full text. Risk of bias was evaluated using the MINORS system. Over the 878 articles initially identified, 36 original studies were included. They considered ophthalmologic surgical procedures (30.5%), general/digestive surgery (19.4%), gynecologic procedures (13.9%), orthopedic procedures (8.3%), neurosurgery (5.5%), otolaryngology/head and neck surgery (5.5%), plastic/dermatological surgery (5.5%), and cardiac surgery (2.8%). Despite a great methodological heterogeneity, data showed that a single surgical procedure emits 4-814 kgCO2e, with anesthetic gases and energy consumption representing the largest sources of greenhouse gas emission. Minimally invasive surgical techniques may require more resources than conventional open surgery, particularly for packaging and plastics, energy use, and waste production. Each OR has the potential to produce from 0.2 to 4kg of waste per case with substantial differences depending on the type of intervention, hospital setting, and geographic area. Overall, the selected studies were found to be of moderate quality. Based on a qualitative synthesis of the available literature, the OR can be targeted by programs and protocols implemented to reduce the carbon footprint and improve the waste stream of the OR.

Assessment of several postoperative protocols after rotator cuff repair: A network meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: There are presently 3 postoperative protocols after rotator cuff repair: strict immobilization, passive motion and early active motion. There is no consensus as to which is to be preferred. The aim of the present study was to conduct a network meta-analysis to determine whether one particular protocol shows advantages in terms of healing, motion, clinical scores and complications. METHODS: A search of the PubMed, Embase and Central databases extracted all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing at least 2 protocols. Eighteen RCTs were thus included, for a total 1704 patients (mean age, 58.1 years) and 1726 shoulders. RESULTS: Strict immobilization was associated with lower flexion at 1 year than passive motion (mean difference, 2.66 [95% CI, 0.42-6.20]) and active motion (mean difference, 3.76 [95% CI, 0.17-7.80]). There were no differences between protocols for external rotation, healing at 1 year or Constant, ASES and STT scores in the short and medium terms. There was no difference in complications rate. CONCLUSION: Early motion, whether passive or active, leads to greater flexion than does strict immobilization. No other differences were found between the protocols. Taking certain prognostic factors (lesion size, patient age, activity level, etc.) into account could guide specific rehabilitation according to type of lesion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I, network meta-analysis.

Superior capsular reconstruction - A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Since Mihata's 2012 proposal to arthroscopically reconstruct the superior capsule of patients with massive irreparable cuff tears, many studies have reported the clinical results of this technique using different types of grafts (fascia lata autograft, dermal allograft, porcine dermal xenograft or long head of biceps autograft). PURPOSE: The objective of this meta-analysis was to report the clinical and radiological results of these superior capsule reconstructions. METHODS: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyzes (PRISMA) recommendations were used to conduct this systematic review. A bibliographic search was performed of the electronic databases MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase and the Cochrane Library. The quality of the studies was assessed according to the MINORS criterion (Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies). The inclusion criteria were studies in English evaluating superior capsular reconstruction. RESULTS: No level I or II studies met the inclusion criteria. Eighteen studies were selected from the 97 identified, including 637 shoulders (64% male) with a mean age of 62 years [95% CI: 60.3-63.5]. At the mean follow-up of 24.3 months (12-60), the range of motion was significantly increased from 82.6° [60.0-105.2] to 141.9° [109.9-173.8] in abduction, from 113.1° [98.3-127.9] to 153.3° [147.4-159.2] in elevation, from 35.5° [30.9-40.2] 43.4° [35.4-51.3] in external rotation and from 7.2 [5.4-9] to 9.9 [8.9-10.9] in internal rotation. Functional scores were significantly improved from 5.4 [4.8-5.9] to 1.3 [0.9-1.7] points for VAS, from 42.5 [15.7-69.3] to 59.3 [30.1-88.6] points for Constant, from 39.0% [38.1-39.8] to 79.8% [76.4-83.3] for the SSV, and from 48.2 [45.2-51.1] to 81.2 [77.2-85.1] points for the ASES. The healing rate was 76.1% [64.4-84.9]. The complication rate was 5.6% [1.8-16.3] and the reverse shoulder arthroplasty revision rate was 7.1% [3.8-12.8]. CONCLUSION: Superior capsule reconstructions allow satisfactory clinical and radiological results to be obtained at 2 years of follow-up. Due to the small number of high quality comparative studies available, its true place in the therapeutic arsenal cannot be fully confirmed. However, it seems that the best indication for this technique is isolated irreparable rupture of the supraspinatus, in cases of medical treatment failure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III; meta-analysis of heterogeneous studies.

Local infiltration analgesia versus interscalene nerve block for postoperative pain control after shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, comparative noninferiority study involving 99 patients.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of local infiltration analgesia (LIA) and interscalene nerve block (ISB) for early postoperative pain control after total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). The hypothesis was that LIA is not inferior to ISB. METHODS: A prospective, randomized controlled study was performed in 2014-2016. All patients who underwent TSA for shoulder osteoarthritis were included. Patients in the ISB group received a continuous infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine by perineural catheter for 48 hours. The surgeon injected 110 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine, 30 mg of ketoprofen, and 0.5 mg of epinephrine before TSA in the LIA group and inserted a catheter into the glenohumeral joint. The next morning, 10 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine, 30 mg of ketoprofen, and epinephrine were injected through the catheter, which was then removed. The primary outcome was the mean shoulder pain score for the 48-hour postoperative period on a numerical scale (0-10). The secondary outcomes were postoperative opioid requirements, complications, and shoulder function at the 1-month follow-up visit. The sample size was calculated for a noninferiority study. RESULTS: The study included 99 patients (50 LIA and 49 ISB patients) with a mean age of 72 ± 9.6 years. Although no significant difference in the mean pain score was found between the 2 groups for the 48-hour postoperative period (1.4 ± 0.9 for LIA vs 1.7 ± 1 for ISB, P = .19), the LIA group had significantly less severe pain (P = .003) and less opioid consumption (P = .01) in the recovery room. No complications occurred. A negative but nonsignificant correlation was found between postoperative pain and Constant score at the 1-month follow-up. CONCLUSION: LIA is not less effective than ISB for early postoperative pain control after TSA.