"I'm Not Going Home With a Catheter": Patient-Perceived Outcomes Associated With Perioperative Intermittent Catheterization.

IMPORTANCE: Indwelling catheters are a known source of dissatisfaction for postoperative patients. There is a paucity of data describing patient-perceived outcomes associated with the alternative of intermittent self-catheterization (ISC). OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to describe patient satisfaction and outcomes associated with ISC after outpatient female pelvic reconstructive surgery. STUDY DESIGN: This was a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study at an academic tertiary referral center from September 2018 to June 2021. Participants completed preoperative ISC instruction that included an instructional video, 1:1 demonstration with a health care provider, and provision of ISC supplies. Participants were instructed to perform ISC postoperatively until they had 2 consecutive outpatient PVRs less than one-half the voided volume. Participant satisfaction was assessed 2 weeks postprocedure, with adverse events evaluated at 6 weeks. RESULTS: One hundred sixty participants completed preoperative ISC instruction and were included in this analysis. Mean age was 52.1 (SD +/- 11.4) years, mean body mass index was 28.9 (SD +/- 5.8), and mean time from ISC instruction to surgery was 16.4 (SD +/- 15.7) days. Most participants reported no difficulty with ISC (124/160 [78%]) and had high levels of satisfaction (148/151 [98%]). Difficulty performing ISC was not associated with time since ISC instruction ( P = 0.32), difficulty noted at ISC instruction by the health care provider ( P = 0.24), or the duration of ISC instruction ( P = 0.16). On multiple logistic regression, age, body mass index, and prolapse beyond the hymen did not predict difficulty learning or performing ISC. At 6 weeks postprocedure, 22 of 155 participants (14%) endorsed symptoms of a urinary tract infection, and 15 of 160 (9%) had a culture-proven urinary tract infection. CONCLUSIONS: Women undergoing outpatient pelvic reconstructive surgery report ease and satisfaction with ISC.

Postpartum urinary retention: a survey of obstetrics and gynaecology residents in the United States.

Postpartum urinary retention (PUR) is a common and potentially morbid condition if not recognised and managed promptly. We surveyed obstetrics and gynaecology (OBGYN) residents to determine residents' knowledge of the management of PUR. A total of 168 OBGYN residents in ACGME accredited programmes in the United States completed the survey. A percentage of 30.3 reported having a PUR prevention protocol at their institution, 43.3% reported not having a protocol and 26.7% did not know whether a protocol existed. About 89.3% of participants reported having previously taken care of a patient with PUR and 17.1% reported prior formal teaching on the management of PUR. Those who reported having a protocol were more likely to report feeling comfortable managing PUR. Overall, knowledge was low for management of PUR. Given the potential morbidity associated with inadequate management of PUR, formal education and standardisation through national guidelines may help improve care of patients with PUR.Impact statementWhat is already known on this subject? PUR is a common condition and if left untreated may lead to long-term impacts on patients' health. Early recognition of the condition and appropriate management can prevent these complications. Protocols have been shown to improve patient outcomes. Thus, it has been postulated that the implementation of protocols could improve recognition of the condition.What do the results of this study add? No previous studies have looked at the impact of PUR management protocols on physicians in training. Because physicians in training are often the first-in-line to manage patients at academic institutions, we sought to determine the proportion of obstetrics and gynaecology residents in the United States who report having a PUR management protocol at their institution and how this impacts their reported comfort at caring for patients with PUR, knowledge on PUR risk factors and recognition of scenarios concerning for PUR. While awareness of a PUR protocol did not lead to increased knowledge of risk factors or increased recognition of scenarios concerning for PUR, it did increase resident comfort with managing PUR patients. We also found that overall PUR knowledge was low.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Based on our findings, OBGYN residents would benefit from having protocols at their institutions since it increased their comfort at managing patients with PUR. Further, formal education on PUR is likely needed to improve knowledge of risk factors and recognition of scenarios concerning for PUR.