Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
1.
N Engl J Med ; 381(24): 2304-2314, 2019 12 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31633896

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Observational studies suggest that beta-blockers may reduce the risk of exacerbations and death in patients with moderate or severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), but these findings have not been confirmed in randomized trials. METHODS: In this prospective, randomized trial, we assigned patients between the ages of 40 and 85 years who had COPD to receive either a beta-blocker (extended-release metoprolol) or placebo. All the patients had a clinical history of COPD, along with moderate airflow limitation and an increased risk of exacerbations, as evidenced by a history of exacerbations during the previous year or the prescribed use of supplemental oxygen. We excluded patients who were already taking a beta-blocker or who had an established indication for the use of such drugs. The primary end point was the time until the first exacerbation of COPD during the treatment period, which ranged from 336 to 350 days, depending on the adjusted dose of metoprolol. RESULTS: A total of 532 patients underwent randomization. The mean (±SD) age of the patients was 65.0±7.8 years; the mean forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) was 41.1±16.3% of the predicted value. The trial was stopped early because of futility with respect to the primary end point and safety concerns. There was no significant between-group difference in the median time until the first exacerbation, which was 202 days in the metoprolol group and 222 days in the placebo group (hazard ratio for metoprolol vs. placebo, 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.84 to 1.32; P = 0.66). Metoprolol was associated with a higher risk of exacerbation leading to hospitalization (hazard ratio, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.29 to 2.83). The frequency of side effects that were possibly related to metoprolol was similar in the two groups, as was the overall rate of nonrespiratory serious adverse events. During the treatment period, there were 11 deaths in the metoprolol group and 5 in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with moderate or severe COPD who did not have an established indication for beta-blocker use, the time until the first COPD exacerbation was similar in the metoprolol group and the placebo group. Hospitalization for exacerbation was more common among the patients treated with metoprolol. (Funded by the Department of Defense; BLOCK COPD ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02587351.).


Assuntos
Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos beta 1/uso terapêutico , Metoprolol/uso terapêutico , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos beta 1/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , Volume Expiratório Forçado , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Metoprolol/efeitos adversos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Falha de Tratamento
2.
Ann Am Thorac Soc ; 15(1): 89-101, 2018 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29087741

RESUMO

The Long-Term Oxygen Treatment Trial demonstrated that long-term supplemental oxygen did not reduce time to hospital admission or death for patients who have stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and resting and/or exercise-induced moderate oxyhemoglobin desaturation, nor did it provide benefit for any other outcome measured in the trial. Nine months after initiation of patient screening, after randomization of 34 patients to treatment, a trial design amendment broadened the eligible population, expanded the primary outcome, and reduced the goal sample size. Within a few years, the protocol underwent minor modifications, and a second trial design amendment lowered the required sample size because of lower than expected treatment group crossover rates. After 5.5 years of recruitment, the trial met its amended sample size goal, and 1 year later, it achieved its follow-up goal. The process of publishing the trial results brought renewed scrutiny of the study design and the amendments. This article expands on the previously published design and methods information, provides the rationale for the amendments, and gives insight into the investigators' decisions about trial conduct. The story of the Long-Term Oxygen Treatment Trial may assist investigators in future trials, especially those that seek to assess the efficacy and safety of long-term oxygen therapy. Clinical trial registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00692198).


Assuntos
Oxigenoterapia , Oxigênio/uso terapêutico , Admissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Geografia , Humanos , Assistência de Longa Duração , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto , Qualidade de Vida , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Fatores de Tempo , Estados Unidos
3.
N Engl J Med ; 370(23): 2201-10, 2014 Jun 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24836125

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Retrospective studies have shown that statins decrease the rate and severity of exacerbations, the rate of hospitalization, and mortality in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We prospectively studied the efficacy of simvastatin in preventing exacerbations in a large, multicenter, randomized trial. METHODS: We designed the Prospective Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial of Simvastatin in the Prevention of COPD Exacerbations (STATCOPE) as a randomized, controlled trial of simvastatin (at a daily dose of 40 mg) versus placebo, with annual exacerbation rates as the primary outcome. Patients were eligible if they were 40 to 80 years of age, had COPD (defined by a forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1] of less than 80% and a ratio of FEV1 to forced vital capacity of less than 70%), and had a smoking history of 10 or more pack-years, were receiving supplemental oxygen or treatment with glucocorticoids or antibiotic agents, or had had an emergency department visit or hospitalization for COPD within the past year. Patients with diabetes or cardiovascular disease and those who were taking statins or who required statins on the basis of Adult Treatment Panel III criteria were excluded. Participants were treated from 12 to 36 months at 45 centers. RESULTS: A total of 885 participants with COPD were enrolled for approximately 641 days; 44% of the patients were women. The patients had a mean (±SD) age of 62.2±8.4 years, an FEV1 that was 41.6±17.7% of the predicted value, and a smoking history of 50.6±27.4 pack-years. At the time of study closeout, the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were lower in the simvastatin-treated patients than in those who received placebo. The mean number of exacerbations per person-year was similar in the simvastatin and placebo groups: 1.36±1.61 exacerbations and 1.39±1.73 exacerbations, respectively (P=0.54). The median number of days to the first exacerbation was also similar: 223 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 195 to 275) and 231 days (95% CI, 193 to 303), respectively (P=0.34). The number of nonfatal serious adverse events per person-year was similar, as well: 0.63 events with simvastatin and 0.62 events with placebo. There were 30 deaths in the placebo group and 28 in the simvastatin group (P=0.89). CONCLUSIONS: Simvastatin at a daily dose of 40 mg did not affect exacerbation rates or the time to a first exacerbation in patients with COPD who were at high risk for exacerbations. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research; STATCOPE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01061671.).


Assuntos
Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases/uso terapêutico , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Sinvastatina/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Volume Expiratório Forçado , Humanos , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases/efeitos adversos , Lipídeos/sangue , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/fisiopatologia , Qualidade de Vida , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Sinvastatina/efeitos adversos , Falha de Tratamento , Capacidade Vital
4.
Clin Infect Dis ; 55(5): e35-44, 2012 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22652582

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although the 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23) protects against invasive disease in young healthy persons, randomized controlled trials in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have demonstrated no benefit in the intention-to-treat population. We previously reported that the 7-valent diphtheria-conjugated pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PCV7) is safe and induced greater serotype-specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) and functional antibody than did PPSV23 1 month after vaccination. We hypothesized that these advantages would persist at 1 and 2 years. METHODS: One hundred eighty-one patients with moderate to severe COPD were randomized to receive PPSV23 (n = 90) or PCV7 (1.0 mL; n = 91). We measured IgG by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and assessed functional antibody activity by a standardized opsonophagocytosis assay, reported as a killing index (OPK). We determined differences in IgG and OPK between vaccine groups at 1 and 2 years. RESULTS: Relative to PPSV23, PCV7 induced greater OPK at both 1 and 2 years for 6 of 7 serotypes (not 19F). This response was statistically greater for 5 of 7 serotypes at 1 year and 4 of 7 at 2 years. Comparable differences in IgG were observed but were less often statistically significant. Despite meeting Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria for PPSV23 administration, almost 50% of individuals had never been vaccinated. No differences in the frequency of acute exacerbations, pneumonia, or hospitalization were observed. CONCLUSIONS: PCV7 induces a greater functional antibody response than PPSV23 in patients with COPD that persists for 2 years after vaccination. This superior functional response supports testing of conjugate vaccination in studies examining clinical end points. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT00457977.


Assuntos
Infecções Pneumocócicas/prevenção & controle , Vacinas Pneumocócicas/imunologia , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/imunologia , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/microbiologia , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Vacina Pneumocócica Conjugada Heptavalente , Humanos , Imunoglobulina G/sangue , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fagocitose/imunologia , Infecções Pneumocócicas/imunologia , Vacinas Pneumocócicas/administração & dosagem , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/sangue
5.
N Engl J Med ; 365(8): 689-98, 2011 Aug 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21864166

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Acute exacerbations adversely affect patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Macrolide antibiotics benefit patients with a variety of inflammatory airway diseases. METHODS: We performed a randomized trial to determine whether azithromycin decreased the frequency of exacerbations in participants with COPD who had an increased risk of exacerbations but no hearing impairment, resting tachycardia, or apparent risk of prolongation of the corrected QT interval. RESULTS: A total of 1577 subjects were screened; 1142 (72%) were randomly assigned to receive azithromycin, at a dose of 250 mg daily (570 participants), or placebo (572 participants) for 1 year in addition to their usual care. The rate of 1-year follow-up was 89% in the azithromycin group and 90% in the placebo group. The median time to the first exacerbation was 266 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 227 to 313) among participants receiving azithromycin, as compared with 174 days (95% CI, 143 to 215) among participants receiving placebo (P<0.001). The frequency of exacerbations was 1.48 exacerbations per patient-year in the azithromycin group, as compared with 1.83 per patient-year in the placebo group (P=0.01), and the hazard ratio for having an acute exacerbation of COPD per patient-year in the azithromycin group was 0.73 (95% CI, 0.63 to 0.84; P<0.001). The scores on the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (on a scale of 0 to 100, with lower scores indicating better functioning) improved more in the azithromycin group than in the placebo group (a mean [±SD] decrease of 2.8±12.8 vs. 0.6±11.4, P=0.004); the percentage of participants with more than the minimal clinically important difference of -4 units was 43% in the azithromycin group, as compared with 36% in the placebo group (P=0.03). Hearing decrements were more common in the azithromycin group than in the placebo group (25% vs. 20%, P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Among selected subjects with COPD, azithromycin taken daily for 1 year, when added to usual treatment, decreased the frequency of exacerbations and improved quality of life but caused hearing decrements in a small percentage of subjects. Although this intervention could change microbial resistance patterns, the effect of this change is not known. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00325897.).


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Azitromicina/uso terapêutico , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Azitromicina/efeitos adversos , Infecções Bacterianas/prevenção & controle , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Feminino , Humanos , Macrolídeos/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nasofaringe/microbiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
6.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19888357

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of changing anticholinergic therapy in patients with COPD from ipratropium to tiotropium on pulmonary function. METHODS: We examined records of patients prescribed high-dose ipratropium, who were subsequently converted to tiotropium. Spirometric values were obtained within 2 days of the change in medication and after 56 to 224 days of the switch to tiotropium. RESULTS: 15 subjects were documented to have filled a prescription for ipratropium-containing medications the month prior to the change. Medication compliance over the 6 months prior to the switch in these patients was 72% +/- 31% (mean +/- SD) for ipratropium compared to 87% +/- 14% for tiotropium over the 6-month period after the switch (P = 0.1). FEV(1) improved from 1.12 +/- 0.39 L at baseline to 1.37 +/- 0.49 L after the change to tiotropium (P = 0.01). FVC also improved from 2.45 +/- 0.73 L at baseline to 2.72 +/- 0.69 L after the change (P = 0.04). Maximal voluntary ventilation was also increased from 39.67 +/- 10.7 L/min to 45.13 +/- 15.8 L/min (P = 0.045). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that replacing high-dose ipratropium with tiotropium therapy significantly improves pulmonary function in a clinical setting.


Assuntos
Broncodilatadores/administração & dosagem , Ipratrópio/administração & dosagem , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Derivados da Escopolamina/administração & dosagem , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Broncodilatadores/farmacologia , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Feminino , Humanos , Ipratrópio/farmacologia , Masculino , Auditoria Médica , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cooperação do Paciente , Testes de Função Respiratória , Derivados da Escopolamina/farmacologia , Espirometria , Brometo de Tiotrópio
7.
Ann Intern Med ; 143(5): 317-26, 2005 Sep 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16144890

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) frequently develop exacerbations, leading to major clinical and health resource use ramifications. OBJECTIVE: To prospectively evaluate the effectiveness of a long-acting inhaled anticholinergic bronchodilator, tiotropium, in reducing COPD exacerbations and exacerbation-related health care utilization. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind study. SETTING: 26 Veterans Affairs medical centers. PATIENTS: 1829 patients with moderate to severe COPD (mean baseline FEV(1), 36% predicted). INTERVENTION: Once-daily tiotropium (18 microg) or placebo for 6 months. Patients otherwise received usual care, except for other anticholinergic bronchodilators. MEASUREMENTS: The coprimary end points were the percentage of patients with a COPD exacerbation and the percentage of patients with a COPD-related hospitalization. RESULTS: Tiotropium significantly reduced the percentage of patients experiencing 1 or more exacerbations compared with placebo (27.9% vs. 32.3%, respectively; difference, -5.7 percentage points [95% CI, -10.4 to -1.0 percentage points]; P = 0.037). Fewer tiotropium patients were hospitalized because of COPD exacerbation (7.0% vs. 9.5%, respectively; difference, -3.0 percentage points [CI, -5.9 to -0.1 percentage points]; P = 0.056), although this difference was of borderline statistical significance. Analysis of secondary outcomes indicates that tiotropium may lengthen the time to first COPD exacerbation (P = 0.028) and reduce health care utilization for exacerbations, including the frequency of hospitalizations (P = 0.047), unscheduled clinic visits (P = 0.019), and days of antibiotic treatment (P = 0.015). Tiotropium did not statistically significantly reduce all-cause hospitalization rates. LIMITATIONS: Trial participants were enrolled from 1 health care system, and 99% were men. The follow-up period extended for only 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Tiotropium reduces COPD exacerbations and may reduce related health care utilization in patients with moderate to severe COPD.


Assuntos
Broncodilatadores/administração & dosagem , Antagonistas Colinérgicos/administração & dosagem , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Derivados da Escopolamina/administração & dosagem , Administração por Inalação , Idoso , Broncodilatadores/efeitos adversos , Antagonistas Colinérgicos/efeitos adversos , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Derivados da Escopolamina/efeitos adversos , Brometo de Tiotrópio , Falha de Tratamento
8.
Rio de Janeiro; Elsevier; 8 ed; 2005. 259 p.
Monografia em Português | LILACS, HSPM-Acervo | ID: lil-667236
9.
Clin Chest Med ; 25(1): 47-52, 2004 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15062596

RESUMO

Pulmonary complications of therapy for RA or other benign conditions are often difficult to diagnose and treat. Clinical presentation of lung disease that is due to noncytotoxic drugs may vary from a mild, nonspecific cough to fulminant respiratory failure. The differential diagnosis of pulmonary disease should include drug toxicity, progression of the primary illness, and opportunistic infection. An objective assessment of the patient's baseline pulmonary status, as well as his treatment history, is crucial to differentiate drug-induced pathology from the primary process. Diagnostic work-up should include chest radiograph, repeat pulmonary function testing, and high-resolution CT of the chest. Bronchoscopy for tissue pathology or specific BAL cytokine markers also may yield useful information; occasionally, open-lung biopsy is required. If pulmonary disease that results from noncytotoxic drug therapy is suspected, the drug should be discontinued until the disease process is understood clearly.


Assuntos
Pneumopatias/induzido quimicamente , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/efeitos adversos , Antirreumáticos/efeitos adversos , Aspirina/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Hidroclorotiazida/efeitos adversos , Doença Iatrogênica , Nefropatias/induzido quimicamente , Pneumopatias/patologia , Doenças Pulmonares Intersticiais/induzido quimicamente , Metotrexato/efeitos adversos , Entorpecentes/efeitos adversos , Compostos Organoáuricos , Síndrome
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA