Patient-Reported Wait Times and the Impact of Living with Chronic Pain on their Quality of Life: A Waiting Room Survey in Chronic Pain Clinics in Ontario, Manitoba, and Quebec.

Background: Wait times at Canadian multidisciplinary pain clinics have been reported as excessive for nearly 2 decades. Aims: The aim of this study was to gain insight into the patient experience of waiting for chronic pain specialty care. Methods: A cross-sectional survey of new patients waiting for an appointment was conducted in six multidisciplinary pain clinics, including one pediatric clinic, in Ontario, Quebec, and Manitoba between February 2020 and October 2022. Participants were asked about the length of time they waited for their appointment since being referred, their quality of life, health care professionals seen while waiting, and an open-ended question, "Is there anything else you'd like to tell us?" Results: Among the 493 adult and 100 pediatric respondents, 53% of adults and 82% of children reported wait times under 6 months, whereas 22% of adults and 4% of children waited longer than a year. Between 52% and 63% of adults and 29% to 48% of children reported being affected by chronic pain "quite a bit" or "extremely" on measures of quality of life. The most visited health care professionals while waiting for a pain clinic appointment were family doctors/nurse practitioners for adults and physiotherapists for children. Qualitative analysis of open-ended question responses revealed eight themes: system navigation issues, administrative issues, decreased quality of life, distress, self-advocacy, coping strategies, communication, and distrust. Conclusions: Our findings provide real-time regional snapshots into the impact of long wait times experienced by Canadians living with chronic pain. There is an urgent need to better support patients during the waiting period. Expanding technologies such as electronic consultation hold great promise.

Contexte: Les temps d'attente dans les cliniques multidisciplinaires de traitement de la douleur au Canada sont jugés excessifs depuis près de deux décennies.Objectifs: L'objectif de cette étude était de mieux comprendre l'expérience des patients en attente de soins spécialisés pour la douleur chronique.Méthodes: Une enquête transversale sur les nouveaux patients en attente d'un rendez-vous a été menée dans six cliniques multidisciplinaires de traitement de la douleur, dont une clinique pédiatrique, en Ontario, au Québec et au Manitoba, entre février 2020 et octobre 2022. Les participants ont été interrogés sur le temps d'attente pour leur rendez-vous depuis qu'ils avaient été référés, sur leur qualité de vie, sur les professionnels de la santé qu'ils avaient consultés pendant qu'ils attendaient, et sur une question ouverte : « Y a-t-il autre chose que vous aimeriez nous dire? ¼Résultats: Parmi les 493 adultes et les 100 enfants interrogés, 53 % des adultes et 82 % des enfants ont déclaré des temps d'attente inférieurs à six mois, tandis que 22 % des adultes et 4 % des enfants ont attendu plus d'un an. Entre 52 % et 63 % des adultes et 29 % à 48 % des enfants ont déclaré être affectés par la douleur chronique « assez ¼ ou « extrêmement ¼ sur les mesures de la qualité de vie. Les professionnels de la santé les plus consultés pendant l'attente d'un rendez-vous à la clinique de la douleur étaient les médecins de famille/infirmières praticiennes pour les adultes et les physiothérapeutes pour les enfants. L'analyse qualitative des réponses aux questions ouvertes a révélé huit thèmes : les problèmes de navigation dans le système; les problèmes administratifs; la diminution de la qualité de vie; la détresse; l'autonomie; les stratégies d'adaptation; la communication et la méfiance.Conclusions: Nos résultats offrent des instantanés régionaux en temps réel des répercussions des longs temps d'attente sur les Canadiens souffrant de douleur chronique. Il est urgent de mieux soutenir les patients pendant la période d'attente. Les technologies en expansion, telles que la consultation électronique, sont très prometteuses.

Experience-based design: Empowering individuals while they wait for interprofessional chronic pain care.

OBJECTIVES: Chronic pain is highly prevalent and a leading cause of disability. Long wait times for interprofessional care provide an opportunity to introduce web-based interventions that improve psychosocial function and patients' readiness and ability to manage their condition. Here we describe the process of partnering with people with lived experience (PWLE) to develop an online self-management program enhanced by motivational interviewing. We also report the multiphase usability testing of the program. METHODS: PWLE were included in all aspects of this project from program inception to content creation, module development, usability testing, and knowledge dissemination. Phase 1 included the development of the interactive, web-based modules. This process involved weekly meetings and asynchronous content creation with a core team of interprofessional pain experts, researchers, and PWLE. Phase 2 included usability testing by our PWLE and clinical expert advisory. Phase 3 included survey-based usability testing with a sample of 10 PWLE. RESULTS: We created a chronic pain & motivational empowerment program includes a series of eight interactive educational web-based modules. Topics included: setting expectations, chronic pain explained, biopsychosocial factors, empowered management, self-awareness & compassion & acceptance, values, goal setting, and communication. The program is accompanied by a reflection journal and can be enhanced by one-on-one coaching sessions using a motivational interviewing approach. Phase two usability testing resulted in numerous content changes and the addition of accessibility features. Phase 3 usability testing with PWLE found the program highly accessible and easy to use. CONCLUSIONS: The engagement of our PWLE team member and advisors made the online program more relevant, sensitive and helpful to the needs of people with pain. PRACTICAL VALUE: This PWLE-centric project sets the foundation for future work to examine the feasibility and effectiveness of the program for supporting individuals with chronic pain self-manage.

Scaling-Up eConsult: Promising Strategies to Address Enabling Factors in Four Jurisdictions in Canada.

BACKGROUND: Effective healthcare innovations are often not scaled up beyond their initial local context. Lack of practical knowledge on how to move from local innovations to large-system improvement hinders innovation and learning capacity in health systems. Studying scale-up processes can lead to a better understanding of how to facilitate the scale-up of interventions. eConsult is a digital health innovation that aims to connect primary care professionals with specialists through an asynchronous electronic consultation. The recent implementation of eConsult in the public health systems of four Canadian jurisdictions provides a unique opportunity to identify different enabling strategies and related factors that promote the scaling up of eConsult across jurisdictions. METHODS: We conducted a narrative case study in four Canadian provinces, Quebec, Ontario, Manitoba, and Newfoundland & Labrador, over a 3-year period (2018-2021). We observed provincial eConsult committee meetings (n=65) and national eConsult forums (n=3), and we reviewed internal documents (n=93). We conducted semi-structured interviews with key actors in each jurisdiction (eg, researchers, primary care professionals, specialists, policy-makers, and patient partners) (n=40). We conducted thematic analysis guided by the literature on factors and strategies used to scale up innovations. RESULTS: We identified a total of 31 strategies related to six key enabling factors to scaling up eConsult, including: (1) multi-actor engagement; (2) relative advantage; (3) knowledge transfer; (4) strong evidence base; (5) physician leadership; and (6) resource acquisition (eg, human, material, and financial resources). More commonly used strategies, such as leveraging research infrastructure and bringing together various actors, were used to address multiple enabling factors. CONCLUSION: Actors used various strategies to scale up eConsult within their respective contexts, and these helped address six key factors that seemed to be essential to the scale-up of eConsult.

"Her Heart Matters"-Making Visible the Cardiac Pain Experiences of Women with Physical Disabilities and Heart Disease: A Qualitative Study.

BACKGROUND: Women with physical disabilities are faced with challenges in many aspects of life-education, work, income, relationships, as well as their general health. These women are at a greater risk of developing heart disease. This study aimed to explore the cardiac pain experiences of women with physical disabilities and heart disease within a Canadian healthcare context. METHODS: In this qualitative study, 8 women with physical disabilities and heart disease from across Canada were interviewed. They were asked about their pre-, peri-, and post-diagnostic experiences in the Canadian healthcare system. Transcripts of the interviews were analyzed using a hermeneutic phenomenological approach inspired by Ricoeur. RESULTS: Two main themes were uncovered in the analysis of the transcripts, as follows: (i) the diagnostic journey; and (ii) life with cardiac symptoms and a disability. The women indicated that they had experienced difficulties in utilizing the Canadian healthcare system prior to receiving a cardiac diagnosis, including long waitlists, expensive and unreliable transport, issues with accessibility, and dealing with providers' attitudinal barriers regarding disability. Receiving a diagnosis was challenging due to poor relationships with healthcare providers; however, having a same-sex provider seemed essential to receiving adequate care. Self-managing a disability and heart disease had significant physical and psychological impact, which was lightened by financial and social supports, modified lifestyle choices, and self-advocacy. CONCLUSIONS: Women with physical disabilities are often forgotten in discussions encompassing equity and inclusion. The participants' experiences offer insight into what changes are needed within the Canadian healthcare system in order to improve outcomes for these women.

CONTEXTE: Les femmes qui présentent une incapacité physique doivent composer avec des défis dans de nombreux aspects de leur vie, notamment en ce qui touche l'éducation, le travail, le revenu, les relations et la santé en général. Le risque de cardiopathie est plus important dans leur cas. Cette étude visait à examiner comment la douleur cardiaque est vécue par les femmes présentant une incapacité physique et une cardiopathie dans le contexte des soins de santé au Canada. MÉTHODOLOGIE: Dans le cadre de cette étude qualitative, huit femmes présentant une incapacité physique et une cardiopathie ont participé à des entrevues menées à l'échelle du Canada. Elles ont été interrogées sur leurs expériences au sein du système de santé canadien au cours des périodes précédant, entourant et suivant le diagnostic. Les transcriptions des entrevues ont été analysées en fonction d'une approche phénoménologique herméneutique inspirée par Ricœur. RÉSULTATS: Deux grands thèmes ressortent de l'analyse des transcriptions, à savoir : (i) le parcours diagnostique; (ii) la vie avec des symptômes cardiaques et une incapacité physique. Les femmes interrogées ont indiqué qu'elles avaient éprouvé des difficultés dans leur parcours au sein du système de santé canadien avant de recevoir un diagnostic en cardiologie, évoquant à cet égard les longues listes d'attente, les services de transport coûteux et peu fiables, les problèmes d'accessibilité et les obstacles liés à l'attitude des fournisseurs de soins vis-à-vis de l'incapacité physique. Le fait de recevoir un diagnostic a été éprouvant en raison de rapports difficiles avec les fournisseurs de soins de santé; cependant, le fait d'avoir un fournisseur de soins de sexe féminin semblait être une condition essentielle à une prestation de soins adéquate. L'autoprise en charge d'une incapacité physique et d'une cardiopathie a eu des répercussions physiques et psychologiques importantes qui ont pu être allégées par le soutien financier et social, des modifications des habitudes de vie et l'autonomie sociale. CONCLUSIONS: Les femmes qui présentent une incapacité physique sont souvent laissées pour compte dans les discussions portant sur l'équité et l'inclusion. Le vécu des participantes donne un aperçu des changements qui doivent être apportés au sein du système de santé canadien afin d'améliorer les résultats chez ces femmes.

Development of a national pain management competency profile to guide entry-level physiotherapy education in Canada.

BACKGROUND: National strategies from North America call for substantive improvements in entry-level pain management education to help reduce the burden of chronic pain. Past work has generated a valuable set of interprofessional pain management competencies to guide the education of future health professionals. However, there has been very limited work that has explored the development of such competencies for individual professions in different regions. Developing profession-specific competencies tailored to the local context is a necessary first step to integrate them within local regulatory systems. Our group is working toward this goal within the context of entry-level physiotherapy (PT) programs across Canada. AIMS: This study aimed to create a consensus-based competency profile for pain management, specific to the Canadian PT context. METHODS: A modified Delphi design was used to achieve consensus across Canadian university-based and clinical pain educators. RESULTS: Representatives from 14 entry-level PT programs (93% of Canadian programs) and six clinical educators were recruited. After two rounds, a total of 15 competencies reached the predetermined endorsement threshold (75%). Most participants (85%) reported being "very satisfied" with the process. CONCLUSIONS: This process achieved consensus on a novel pain management competency profile specific to the Canadian PT context. The resulting profile delineates the necessary abilities required by physiotherapists to manage pain upon entry to practice. Participants were very satisfied with the process. This study also contributes to the emerging literature on integrated research in pain management by profiling research methodology that can be used to inform related work in other health professions and regions.

Contexte: Contexte: Les stratégies nationales nord-américaines préconisent des améliorations sensibles à la formation de base en matiére de prise en charge de la douleur afin de contribuer à la réduction du fardeau de la douleur chronique. Des travaux antérieurs ont généré un ensemble de compétences interprofessionnelles utile en matiére de prise en charge de la douleur afin de guider la formation des futurs professionnels de la santé. Cependant, trés peu de travaux ont porté sur l'acquisition de telles compétences pour des professions individuelles dans différentes régions. L'uisition de compétences spécifiques à une profession adaptées au contexte local est une première étape nécessaire pour leur intégration dans les systèmes réglementaires locaux. Notre groupe travaille à cet objectif dans le cadre de programmes de formation de base en physiothèrapie partout au Canada.Objectifs: Cette étude visait à créer un profil de compétences consensuel pour la prise en charge de la douleur, propre au contexte canadien de la physiothérapie.Méthodes: Un devis Delphi modifié a étè utilisé pour parvenir à un consensus parmi des formateurs en milieu universitaire et clinique en matière de douleur en milieu universitaire et clinique.Résultats: Des représentants de 14 programmes de formation de base en physiothérapie (93 % des programmes canadiens) et de six formateurs en milieu clinique ont été recrutés. Après deux tours, 15 compétences ont atteint le seuil d'approbation prédéterminé (75 %). La plupart des participants (85 %) ont déclaré être « très satisfaits ¼du processus.Conclusions: Ce processus a permis de dégager un consensus sur un nouveau profil de compétences en matiére de prise en charge de la douleur propre au contexte canadien de la physiothérapie. Ce profil délimite les habiletés requises des physiothérapeutes pour prendre en charge la douleur en début de pratique. Les participants ont été très satisfaits du processus. Cette étude contribue également à la littérature émergente sur la recherche intégrée en matière de prise en charge de la douleur en définissant une méthodologie de recherche qui peut être utilisée pour éclairer des travaux similaires dans d'autres professions de la santé et dans d'autres régions.

Evaluating the efficacy of intranasal oxytocin on pain and function among individuals who experience chronic pain: a protocol for a multisite, placebo-controlled, blinded, sequential, within-subjects crossover trial.

INTRODUCTION: Current treatments for chronic pain (eg, opioids) can have adverse side effects and rarely result in resolution of pain. As such, there is a need for adjuvant analgesics that are non-addictive, have few adverse side effects and are effective for pain management across several chronic pain conditions. Oxytocin is a naturally occurring hormone that has gained attention for its potential analgesic properties. The objective of this trial is to evaluate the efficacy of intranasal oxytocin on pain and function among adults with chronic pain. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a placebo-controlled, triple-blind, sequential, within-subject crossover trial. Adults with chronic neuropathic, pelvic and musculoskeletal pain will be recruited from three Canadian provinces (British Columbia, Alberta and Newfoundland and Labrador, respectively). Enrolled patients will provide one saliva sample pretreatment to evaluate basal oxytocin levels and polymorphisms of the oxytocin receptor gene before being randomised to one of two trial arms. Patients will self-administer three different oxytocin nasal sprays twice daily for a period of 2 weeks (ie, 24 IU, 48 IU and placebo). Patients will complete daily diaries, including standardised measures on day 1, day 7 and day 14. Primary outcomes include pain and pain-related interference. Secondary outcomes include emotional function, sleep disturbance and global impression of change. Intention-to-treat analyses will be performed to evaluate whether improvement in pain and physical function will be observed posttreatment. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Trial protocols were approved by the Newfoundland and Labrador Health Research Ethics Board (HREB #20227), University of British Columbia Clinical Research Ethics Board (CREB #H20-00729), University of Calgary Conjoint Health Research Ethics Board (REB20 #0359) and Health Canada (Control # 252780). Results will be disseminated through publication in peer-reviewed journals and presentations at scientific conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04903002; Pre-results.

Medical cannabis or cannabinoids for chronic pain: a clinical practice guideline.

CLINICAL QUESTION: What is the role of medical cannabis or cannabinoids for people living with chronic pain due to cancer or non-cancer causes? CURRENT PRACTICE: Chronic pain is common and distressing and associated with considerable socioeconomic burden globally. Medical cannabis is increasingly used to manage chronic pain, particularly in jurisdictions that have enacted policies to reduce use of opioids; however, existing guideline recommendations are inconsistent, and cannabis remains illegal for therapeutic use in many countries. RECOMMENDATION: The guideline expert panel issued a weak recommendation to offer a trial of non-inhaled medical cannabis or cannabinoids, in addition to standard care and management (if not sufficient), for people living with chronic cancer or non-cancer pain. HOW THIS GUIDELINE WAS CREATED: An international guideline development panel including patients, clinicians with content expertise, and methodologists produced this recommendation in adherence with standards for trustworthy guidelines using the GRADE approach. The MAGIC Evidence Ecosystem Foundation (MAGIC) provided methodological support. The panel applied an individual patient perspective. THE EVIDENCE: This recommendation is informed by a linked series of four systematic reviews summarising the current body of evidence for benefits and harms, as well as patient values and preferences, regarding medical cannabis or cannabinoids for chronic pain. UNDERSTANDING THE RECOMMENDATION: The recommendation is weak because of the close balance between benefits and harms of medical cannabis for chronic pain. It reflects a high value placed on small to very small improvements in self reported pain intensity, physical functioning, and sleep quality, and willingness to accept a small to modest risk of mostly self limited and transient harms. Shared decision making is required to ensure patients make choices that reflect their values and personal context. Further research is warranted and may alter this recommendation.

Interventions to Influence Opioid Prescribing Practices for Chronic Noncancer Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

CONTEXT: This study is a systematic review of interventions to improve adherence to guideline recommendations for prescribing opioids for chronic noncancer pain. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Investigators searched CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, the Cochrane Library, and Joanna Briggs Institute Evid Based Pract database from inception until June 3, 2019. Interventional studies to improve adherence to recommendations made by opioid guidelines for chronic noncancer pain in North America were eligible if outcomes included adherence to guideline recommendations or change in quantity of opioids prescribed. Data were extracted independently and in duplicate. Quantitative synthesis was performed using random effects meta-analysis. Confidence in evidence was determined using the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: A total of 20 studies (8 controlled and 12 prospective cohort) involving 1,491 providers and 72 clinics met inclusion. Interventions included education, audit and feedback, interprofessional support, shared decision making, and multifaceted strategies. Multifaceted interventions improved the use of urine drug testing (n=2, or =2.31, 95% CI=1.53, 3.49, z=3.98, p<0.01; high-certainty evidence), treatment agreements (n=2, or =1.96, 95% CI=1.47, 2.61, z=4.56, p<0.01; moderate-certainty evidence), and mental health screening (n=2, 2.57-fold, 95% CI=1.56, 4.24, z=2.32, p=0.02; low-certainty evidence) when prescribing opioids for chronic noncancer pain. Very low-certainty evidence suggests that several interventions improved the use of treatment agreements, urine drug testing, and prescription drug monitoring programs. CONCLUSIONS: Mostly very low-certainty evidence supports a number of interventions for improving adherence to risk management strategies when prescribing opioids for chronic noncancer pain; however, the effect on patient important outcomes (e.g., overdose, addiction, death) is uncertain.

Developing guidelines to support injured workers who live and work with chronic pain.

BACKGROUND: Living and working with chronic pain requires persons to alter lifestyles and have the knowledge as well as support to manage unforeseen challenges. Knowledge for persons living with pain who want to participate in meaningful paid and unpaid work is not easily accessible. While there is literature on chronic pain management, work transitions and return to work, less emphasis has been placed on the complexity of living and working with chronic pain. The Creating a Way Forward Project was envisioned to address this gap and to identify the informational needs of workers with pain, health/helping professionals (workers' advisors, return to work specialists, legal representatives), and stakeholders. The overarching aim of the project was to use evidence and experiential knowledge to inform the development of a foundation for educational guides and toolkits to support workers with pain to achieve their outcomes for remaining at work. METHODS: Phase one of the project involved a scoping review of chronic pain and work. Phase two involved stakeholder consultations, a focus group and knowledge integration of the literature and experiential insights. Knowledge synthesis drew on a Template Analysis of multiple sources of data. RESULTS: Knowledge domains and key components were identified for persons with pain and for the health/helping professions. CONCLUSION: These domains reflect a foundation for knowledge in practical training and the development of curriculum for education in self-management program and in inter professional health profession education. These knowledge domains provide a basis for future research in integrated approaches and knowledge use toward improving transitions for persons living with chronic pain who want to participate in productive paid and unpaid work. Ongoing research in knowledge domains that health providers and persons with pain need will expand the potential for improving health outcomes in living with and managing pain.

Development and usability testing of HEARTPA♀N: protocol for a mixed methods strategy to develop an integrated smartphone and web-based intervention for women with cardiac pain.

INTRODUCTION: More women experience cardiac pain related to coronary artery disease and cardiac procedures compared with men. The overall goal of this programme of research is to develop an integrated smartphone and web-based intervention (HEARTPA♀N) to help women recognise and self-manage cardiac pain. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This protocol outlines the mixed methods strategy used for the development of the HEARTPA♀N content/core feature set (phase 2A), usability testing (phase 2B) and evaluation with a pilot randomised controlled trial (RCT) (phase 3). We are using the individual and family self-management theory, mobile device functionality and pervasive information architecture of mHealth interventions, and following a sequential phased approach recommended by the Medical Research Council to develop HEARTPA♀N. The phase 3 pilot RCT will enable us to refine the prototype, inform the methodology and calculate the sample size for a larger multisite RCT (phase 4, future work). Patient partners have been actively involved in setting the HEARTPA♀N research agenda, including defining patient-reported outcome measures for the pilot RCT: pain and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). As such, the guidelines for Inclusion of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Clinical Trial Protocols (SPIRIT-PRO) are used to report the protocol for the pilot RCT (phase 3). Quantitative data (eg, demographic and clinical information) will be summarised using descriptive statistics (phases 2AB and 3) and a content analysis will be used to identify themes (phase 2AB). A process evaluation will be used to assess the feasibility of the implementation of the intervention and a preliminary efficacy evaluation will be undertaken focusing on the outcomes of pain and HRQoL (phase 3). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was obtained from the University of Toronto (36415; 26 November 2018). We will disseminate knowledge of HEARTPA♀N through publication, conference presentation and national public forums (Café Scientifique), and through fact sheets, tweets and webinars. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03800082.

Prescriber adherence to guidelines for chronic noncancer pain management with opioids: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This review quantified prescriber adherence to opioid prescribing guidelines for chronic noncancer pain (CNCP). METHOD: We searched CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, the Cochrane Library, and the Joanna Briggs Institute EBP Database from inception until June 3, 2019. Studies that focused on provider adherence to opioids guidelines for CNCP in North America were eligible. Four reviewers screened studies, extracted data, and assessed study quality. RESULTS: Thirty-eight studies were eligible, comprising 17 cross-sectional studies (n = 11,835 providers) and 22 chart reviews (n = 22,512 patients). Survey data indicated that adherence was 49% (95% CI [40, 59]) for treatment agreements, 33% (95% CI [19%, 47%]) for urine drug testing, 48% (95% CI [26%, 71%]) for consultation with drug monitoring program, 57% (95% CI [35%, 79%]) for assessing risk of aberrant medication-taking behavior, and 61% (95% CI [35%, 87%]) for mental health screening. Chart review data indicated that the proportion of patients with documentation was 40% (95% CI [29, 51]) for treatment agreements, 41% (95% CI [32%, 50%]) for urine drug testing, 40% (95% CI [2%, 78%]) for consultation with drug monitoring program, 41% (95% CI [20%, 64%]) for assessing risk of aberrant medication-taking behavior, and 22% (95% CI [9%, 33%]) for mental health screening. Year of publication, practice guideline referenced, and risk of bias explained significant heterogeneity. No study evaluated whether nonadherence to recommendations reflected well-justified deviations to care. CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to guideline recommendations for opioids for CNCP is low. It is unclear whether nonadherence reflects thoughtful deviations in care. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Healthcare provider knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and practices surrounding the prescription of opioids for chronic non-cancer pain in North America: protocol for a mixed-method systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Evidence from diverse areas of medicine (e.g., cardiovascular disease, diabetes) indicates that healthcare providers (HCPs) often do not adhere to clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) despite a clear indication to implement recommendations-a phenomenon commonly termed clinical inertia. There are a variety of reasons for clinical inertia, but HCP-related factors (e.g., knowledge, motivation, agreement with guidelines) are the most salient and amenable to intervention aimed to improve adherence. CPGs have been developed to support the safe and effective prescription of opioid medication for the management of chronic non-cancer pain. The extent of physician uptake and adherence to such guidelines is not yet well understood. The purpose of this review is to synthesize the published evidence about knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and practices that HCPs hold regarding the prescription of opioids for chronic non-cancer pain. METHODS: An experienced information specialist will perform searches of CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE, and PsycINFO bibliographic databases. The Cochrane library, PROSPERO, and the Joanna Briggs Institute will be searched for systematic reviews. Searches will be performed from inception to the present. Quantitative and qualitative study designs that report on HCP knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, or practices in North America will be eligible for inclusion. Studies reporting on interventions to improve HCP adherence to opioid prescribing CPGs will also be eligible for inclusion. Two trained graduate-level research assistants will independently screen articles for inclusion, perform data extraction, and perform risk of bias and quality assessment using recommended tools. Confidence in qualitative evidence will be evaluated using the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation-Confidence in the Evidence from Qualitative Reviews (GRADE-CERQual) approach. Confidence in quantitative evidence will be assessed using the GRADE approach. DISCUSSION: The ultimate goal of this work is to support interventions aiming to optimize opioid prescribing practices in order to prevent opioid-related morbidity and mortality without restricting a HCP's ability to select the most appropriate treatment for an individual patient. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42018091640 .

Researching what matters to improve chronic pain care in Canada: A priority-setting partnership process to support patient-oriented research.

BACKGROUND: Chronic pain affects more than 6 million Canadians. Patients need to be involved in setting research priorities to ensure a focus on areas important to those who will be most impacted by the results. AIMS: The aim of this study was to leverage patient experiences to identify chronic pain research priorities in Canada. METHOD: The process was informed by the James Lind Alliance. After gathering an exhaustive list of questions using surveys, town hall meetings, interviews, and social media consultations, we used a computerized Delphi with four successive iterations to select the final list of research priorities. The final Delphi round was conducted by a panel of ten patients living with chronic pain and ten clinicians from different disciplines. RESULTS: We received more than 5000 suggestions from 1500 people. The Delphi process led to the identification of 14 questions fitting under the following 4 themes: (1) improving knowledge and competencies in chronic pain; (2) improving patient-centered chronic pain care; (3) preventing chronic pain and reducing associated symptoms; and (4) improving access to and coordination of patient-centered chronic pain care. Challenges included the issue of chronic pain being ubiquitous to many diseases, leading to many initial suggestions focusing on these diseases. We also identified the need for further engagement efforts with marginalized groups in order to validate the priorities identified or identify different sets of priorities specific to these groups. CONCLUSION: The priorities identified can guide patient-oriented chronic pain research to ultimately improve the care offered to people living with chronic pain.

Contexte: La douleur chronique affecte plus de six millions de Canadiens. Les patients doivent participer à l'établissement des priorités de recherche afin de s'assurer que l'accent soit mis sur les aspects les plus importants aux yeux de ceux qui seront les plus touchés par les résultats.Buts: Tirer parti de l'expérience des patients afin d'établir les priorités de la recherche en matière de douleur chronique au Canada.Méthode: Le processus s'est impiré de la James Lind Alliance. Après avoir dressé une liste exhaustive de questions à l'aide d'enquêtes, d'assemblées publiques, d'entrevues et de consultations via les médias sociaux, nous avons utilisé un processus Delphi informatisé comprenant quatre itérations successives afin de sélectionner la liste finale de priorités de recherche. Le dernier tour du processus Delphi a été mené par un panel composé de 10 patients souffrant de douleur chronique et de 10 cliniciens issus de différentes disciplines.Résultats: Nous avons reçu plus de 5 000 suggestions provenant de 1 500 personnes. Le processus Delphi a permis de déterminer 14 questions qui relèvent des quatre thèmes suivants : (1) améliorer les connaissances et les compétences en matière de douleur chronique ; (2) améliorer les soins axés sur le patient pour contrer la douleur chronique; (3) prévenir la douleur chronique et réduire les symptômes qui y sont associés ; et (4) améliorer l'accès aux soins axés sur le patient pour contrer la douleur chronique et la coordination entre ces soins. Parmi les défis qui se sont présentés, on compte le fait que la douleur chronique soit omniprésente dans de nombreuses maladies, de sorte qu'un grand nombre des suggestions initialement formulées portaient sur ces maladies. Nous avons également déterminé que davantage d'efforts devaient être déployés pour assurer la participation des groupes marginalisés dans le but de valider les priorités déterminées ou déterminer d'autres priorités spécifiques à ces groupes.Conclusion: Les priorités déterminées peuvent orienter la recherche axée sur le patient pour contrer la douleur chronique dans le but ultime d'améliorer les soins offerts aux personnes qui souffrent de douleur chronique.

Self-management of cardiac pain in women: an evidence map.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the current evidence related to the self-management of cardiac pain in women using the process and methodology of evidence mapping. DESIGN AND SETTING: Literature search for studies that describe the self-management of cardiac pain in women greater than 18 years of age, managed in community, primary care or outpatient settings, published in English or a Scandinavian language between 1 January 1990 and 24 June 2016 using AMED, CINAHL, ERIC, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Proquest, PsychInfo, the Cochrane Library, Scopus, Swemed+, Web of Science, the Clinical Trials Registry, International Register of Controlled Trials, MetaRegister of Controlled Trials, theses and dissertations, published conference abstracts and relevant websites using GreyNet International, ISI proceedings, BIOSIS and Conference papers index. Two independent reviewers screened using predefined eligibility criteria. Included articles were classified according to study design, pain category, publication year, sample size, per cent women and mean age. INTERVENTIONS: Self-management interventions for cardiac pain or non-intervention studies that described views and perspectives of women who self-managed cardiac pain. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES MEASURES: Outcomes included those related to knowledge, self-efficacy, function and health-related quality of life. RESULTS: The literature search identified 5940 unique articles, of which 220 were included in the evidence map. Only 22% (n=49) were intervention studies. Sixty-nine per cent (n=151) of the studies described cardiac pain related to obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD), 2% (n=5) non-obstructive CAD and 15% (n=34) postpercutaneous coronary intervention/cardiac surgery. Most were published after 2000, the median sample size was 90 with 25%-100% women and the mean age was 63 years. CONCLUSIONS: Our evidence map suggests that while much is known about the differing presentations of obstructive cardiac pain in middle-aged women, little research focused on young and old women, non-obstructive cardiac pain or self-management interventions to assist women to manage cardiac pain. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42016042806.

Determining the impact of a new physiotherapist-led primary care model for back pain: protocol for a pilot cluster randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Back pain is a leading contributor to disability, healthcare costs, and lost work. Family physicians are the most common first point of contact in the healthcare system for people with back pain, but physiotherapists (PTs) may be able to support the primary care team through evidence-based primary care. A cluster randomized trial is needed to determine the clinical, health system, and societal impact of a primary care model that integrates physiotherapists at the first visit for people with back pain. Prior to conducting a future fully powered cluster randomized trial, we need to demonstrate feasibility of the methods. Therefore, the purpose of this pilot study will be to: 1) Determine feasibility of patient recruitment, assessment procedures, and retention. 2) Determine the feasibility of training and implementation of a new PT-led primary care model for low back pain (LBP) 3) Explore the perspectives of patients and healthcare providers (HCPs) related to their experiences and attitudes towards the new service delivery model, barriers/facilitators to implementation, perceived satisfaction, perceived value, and impact on clinic processes and patient outcomes. METHODS: This pilot cluster randomized controlled trial will enroll four sites and randomize them to implement a new PT-led primary care model for back pain or a usual physician-led primary care model. All adults booking a primary care visit for back pain will be invited to participate. Feasibility outcomes will include: recruitment and retention rates, completeness of assessment data, PT training participation and confidence after training, and PT treatment fidelity. Secondary outcomes will include the clinical, health system, cost, and process outcomes planned for the future fully powered cluster trial. Results will be analyzed and reported descriptively and qualitatively. To explore perspectives of both HCPs and patients, we will conduct semi-structured qualitative interviews with patients and focus groups with HCPs from participants in the PT-led primary care sites. DISCUSSION: If this pilot demonstrates feasibility, a fully powered trial will provide evidence that has the potential to transform primary care for back pain. The full trial will inform future service design, whether these models should be more widely implemented, and training agendas. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03320148 . Submitted for registration on 17 September 2017.