Non-CGRP Antagonist/Non-Triptan Options for Migraine Disease Treatment: Clinical Considerations.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Although the association between CGRP and migraine disease is well-known and studied, therapies can target other pathways to minimize migraine symptoms. It is important to understand the role of these medications as options for migraine treatment and the varied mechanisms by which symptoms can be addressed. In the present investigation, the role of non-CGRP antagonist/non-triptan options for migraine disease therapy is reviewed, including NSAIDs, ß-blockers, calcium channel blockers, antidepressants, and antiepileptics. Pharmacologic therapies for both acute symptoms and prophylaxis are evaluated, and their adverse effects are compared. RECENT FINDINGS: At present, the Food and Drug Association has approved the beta-blockers propranolol and timolol and the anti-epileptic drugs topiramate and divalproex sodium for migraine prevention. Clinicians have other options for evidence-based treatment of episodic migraine attacks. Treatment decisions should consider contraindications, the effectiveness of alternatives, and potential side effects. NSAIDs are effective for the acute treatment of migraine exacerbations with caution for adverse effects such as gastrointestinal upset and renal symptoms. Beta-blockers are effective for migraine attack prophylaxis but are associated with dizziness and fatigue and are contraindicated in patients with certain co-morbidities, including asthma, congestive heart failure, and abnormal cardiac rhythms. Calcium channel blockers do not show enough evidence to be recommended as migraine attack prophylactic therapy. The anti-epileptic drugs topiramate and divalproex sodium and antidepressants venlafaxine and amitriptyline are effective for migraine exacerbation prophylaxis but have associated side effects. The decision for pharmacologic management should ultimately be made following consideration of risk vs. benefit and discussion between patient and physician.

Financial management and perioperative leadership in the ambulatory setting journal title: Best practice in clinical research.

A large portion of US healthcare is ambulatory. Strong leadership is vital for the safety and efficiency of perioperative patients in this setting. Good leaders communicate respectfully and openly and ensure effective systems in the delivery of high-level healthcare. In general, to promote patient safety and treatment efficacy, ambulatory care leaders must improve communication. Effective administration is unattainable without leadership and communication in an operating room. When considering outpatient perioperative therapy, it is equally crucial to consider medical costs. Given the unsustainable rate of healthcare spending growth, all attempts to improve our present systems are necessary. Ambulatory care facilities must utilize data regarding resource consumption to be financially viable related to escalating expenses. The present review describes perioperative and financial leadership in the ambulatory setting, effective systems, and relevant clinical strategies.