Gender differences in dietary intakes: what is the contribution of motivational variables?

BACKGROUND: Differences between men and women with respect to dietary intakes and eating behaviours have been reported and could be explained by gender differences in motivational variables associated with the regulation of food intake. The main objectives of the present study were to identify gender differences in dietary intakes, eating behaviours and motivational variables and to determine how motivational variables were associated with dietary intakes and eating behaviours in men and women. METHODS: Sixty-four men and 59 premenopausal women were included in the present study and presented cardiovascular risk factors. The Regulation of Eating Behaviours scale was completed to assess motivational variables. A validated food frequency questionnaire was administered to evaluate dietary intakes and subjects completed the Three-Factor Eating questionnaire to assess eating behaviours. RESULTS: Men had higher energy intake, energy density and percentage of energy from lipids and lower percentage of energy from carbohydrates than women (P ≤ 0.04). Men also had a lower emotional susceptibility to disinhibition than women (P = 0.0001). Women reported a higher score for eating-related self-determined motivation [i.e., eating-related self-determination index (SDI)] than men (P = 0.002). The most notable gender difference in the pattern of associations was that eating-related SDI was negatively associated with energy density (r = -0.30; P = 0.02), only in women. CONCLUSIONS: Women had a better dietary profile and higher eating-related SDI than men. However, gender differences in dietary variables might be explained by a potential gender-specific pattern of association of eating-related SDI with dietary intakes and eating behaviours.

Effects of the traditional Mediterranean diet on adiponectin and leptin concentrations in men and premenopausal women: do sex differences exist?

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Most of the interventional studies have investigated the impact of the diet on adiponectin and leptin concentrations only in men or in women. Consequently, it is still unknown whether the consumption of a healthy diet influences in a sex-specific manner these adipocytokines. We examined sex differences in the effects of the Mediterranean diet (MedDiet) on adiponectin and leptin concentrations, and determined whether changes in these adipocytokines are associated with changes in cardiovascular risk factors in both sexes. SUBJECTS/METHODS: Participants were 38 men and 32 premenopausal women (24-53 years) with slightly elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations (3.4-4.9 mmol/l) or total cholesterol/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C)⩾5.0. Adiponectin, leptin and cardiovascular risk factors were measured before and after a 4-week fully controlled isoenergetic MedDiet. RESULTS: Adiponectin concentration decreased in response to the MedDiet, but this decrease reached statistical significance only in men (P<0.001 for men and P=0.260 for women; sex-by-time interaction, P=0.072). Adjustments for body weight or waist circumference did not change results obtained. Changes in adiponectin were positively associated with concomitant variations in HDL-C in men (r=0.52, P=0.003) and with variations in apolipoprotein A-1 and insulin sensitivity as calculated by both the homeostasis model assessment index for insulin sensitivity and Cederholm indices in women (respectively, r=0.44, P=0.021; r=0.79, P<0.001 and r=0.47, P=0.020). The MedDiet had no impact on leptin and the leptin-to-adiponectin ratio in both sexes. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest a sex difference in adiponectin response to the short-term consumption of the MedDiet, with only men experiencing a decrease. Also sex-specific patterns of associations between changes in adiponectin concentration and changes in cardiovascular risk factors were observed.

Relationship of mid-thigh adiposity to the metabolic syndrome in postmenopausal women.

BACKGROUND: In postmenopausal women, a population at risk for the metabolic syndrome, the relative contribution of central fat versus peripheral muscle fat to the metabolic risk profile is unknown. This study explored the relationship between muscle fat infiltration derived from computed tomography (CT) scans and metabolic syndrome. METHODS: Mid-thigh CT scans measured the surface of muscle with low attenuation (LAMS) [0-34 Hounsfield units (HU)], which represented the specific component of fat-rich muscle. Insulin sensitivity was evaluated by an euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp. National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP ATP III) criteria were used to determine the presence of the metabolic syndrome. RESULTS: A total of 103 postmenopausal women were studied. Metabolic syndrome was found in 43 women with significantly higher levels of abdominal adiposity, higher LAMS (27 +/- 8 vs. 23 +/- 7 cm(2)), and lower insulin sensitivity compared to those without the metabolic syndrome. Women with higher levels of LAMS presented higher metabolic risk features such as higher blood pressure, abdominal adiposity, inflammatory markers, and blood lipid levels. LAMS and visceral adipose tissue correlated significantly with the presence of metabolic syndrome, but these relationships were lost when LAMS was adjusted for visceral adipose tissue but not when visceral adipose tissue was adjusted for LAMS. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that postmenopausal women who present with metabolic syndrome had increased fat-rich mid-thigh muscle. Moreover, women with more fat-rich muscle had many features of the metabolic syndrome. These relations were weakened when visceral adipose tissue was taken into account suggesting that LAMS may play a relatively smaller role, compared to VAT, in the contribution to the metabolic syndrome.

Disinhibition, as assessed by the Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire, is inversely related to psychological well-being in postmenopausal women.

UNLABELLED: Psychological correlates of obesity remain under controversy. As eating behaviors and dieting history have been previously related to obesity status, these dietary variables may contribute to identify overweight and obese individuals who are at higher risk of having an impaired psychological well-being. OBJECTIVE: The main purpose of this cross-sectional study was to verify the hypothesis of a relationship between weight status and psychological well-being, and to examine whether cognitive dietary restraint, disinhibition, susceptibility to hunger and dieting history could be related to psychological well-being. DESIGN AND SUBJECTS: In a sample of 101 postmenopausal women, we performed anthropometric measurements (weight, height and body mass index (BMI)), and measured psychological well-being (PER Questionnaire). The Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ) and a questionnaire about dieting history (dieters: had already been on a diet; non-dieters: had never been on a diet) were also administrated. RESULTS: A trend for a significant relationship was observed between BMI and psychological well-being (r=-0.17; P=0.08). Significant negative relationships were observed for disinhibition, susceptibility to hunger and all their subscales with psychological well-being (-0.28

Effect of dietary lipid source on conjugated linoleic acid concentrations in milk fat.

Conjugated linoleic acids (CLA) found in ruminant milk fat are a byproduct of incomplete biohydrogenation of lipids by ruminal bacteria. We examined the effect of different dietary fat supplements and processing methods on CLA. In trial 1, dietary supplements of Ca salts of fatty acids from canola oil, soybean oil, and linseed oil increased CLA content of milk fat by three- to fivefold over the control diet. Trials 2 and 3 examined the effect of processing methods for heat treatment of full fat soybeans. In trial 2, extrusion, micronizing, and roasting resulted in two- to threefold greater concentrations of CLA in milk fat than the control diet (raw ground soybeans). In trial 3, different temperatures of extrusion (120, 130, and 140 degrees C) increased the CLA content of milk fat to a similar extent; CLA averaged 19.9 mg/g of fatty acids for the extrusion treatments compared with 4.2 mg/g of fatty acids for the control diet (raw ground soybeans). Fish oil (200 and 400 ml/d) was examined in trial 4 and both levels resulted in CLA concentrations in milk fat that were about threefold greater than the control diet. In trial 5, grain and silage from a high oil corn hybrid increased the CLA content of milk fat; however, responses were modest with the CLA concentration (mg/g of fatty acids) averaging 4.6 and 2.8 for diets with high oil hybrid and normal hybrid, respectively. Similarly, dietary supplements of animal fat byproducts (tallow plus yellow grease; trial 6) resulted in modest increases in the CLA content of milk fat. Overall, several dietary manipulations involving lipid sources and processing methods were identified that allow for a marked increase in the conjugated linoleic acid content of milk fat.

Conjugated linoleic acids alter milk fatty acid composition and inhibit milk fat secretion in dairy cows.

Conjugated linoleic acids (CLA) have positive health effects in experimental models. Our objective was to determine the effect of CLA supplementation on milk of dairy cows. A commercial source of CLA was infused abomasally to by-pass rumen fermentation. The supplement contained 61.2% CLA; the major CLA isomers were cis/trans 8,10, cis/trans 9,11, cis/trans 10,12 and cis/trans 11,13. Four Holstein cows were used in a 4 x 4 Latin square design. Treatments were 5-d infusions of 0, 50, 100 and 150 g/d of CLA supplement. Infusion increased milk fat content of CLA from 6.8 mg/g fat (zero dose) to 63.6 mg/g fat (highest dose). All of the major CLA isomers in the supplement were transferred to milk fat in a dose-dependent manner. Apparent efficiency of transfer to milk fat was 22.5, 22.5, 10.2 and 26.3% for cis/trans 8,10, cis/trans 9,11, cis/trans 10,12 and cis/trans 11,13, respectively. CLA infusion had no effect on milk protein and little effect on milk yield (21.5, 20.4, 20.9 and 18.3 kg/d for 0, 50, 100 and 150 g/d CLA supplement, respectively). However, CLA infusion dramatically reduced milk fat. On average, the content and yield of milk fat were reduced by 52 and 55%, respectively. The role of specific CLA isomers and mechanism(s) for the reduction in milk fat have not been established, although the pattern of milk fatty acids demonstrated effects were most pronounced on de novo fatty acid synthesis and the desaturation process. Overall, dietary supplemention of CLA increased milk fat content of CLA, altered milk fatty acid composition and markedly reduced the content and yield of milk fat.

Milk yield and composition during abomasal infusion of conjugated linoleic acids in dairy cows.

Conjugated linoleic acids refer to a mixture of positional and geometric isomers of linoleic acid with conjugated double bounds. Three supplements of conjugated linoleic acids which differed in isomer enrichment were infused into the abomasum of lactating dairy cows to determine postruminal effect on milk yield and composition. Four Holstein cows were used in a 4 x 4 Latin square design. Treatments were 3-d abomasal infusion of 1) control, 5 kg of skim milk (carrier for conjugated linoleic acid supplements), 2) conjugated linoleic acid supplement 1 (28.8 g/d; 6.9 g of cis/trans 9,11; 6.4 g of cis/trans 8,10), 3) conjugated linoleic acid supplement 2 (48.5 g/d; 7.1 g of cis/trans 9,11; 4.1 g of cis/trans 8,10; 8.3 g of cis/trans 10,12; 5.5 g of cis/trans 11,13), and 4) conjugated linoleic acid supplement 3 (16.3 g/d; 7.1 g of cis/trans 9,11; 7.2 g of cis/trans 10,12). Infusions increased the conjugated linoleic acids content of milk fat from 0.43 g/100 g of fat for the control treatment to 1.02, 1.52, and 0.95 g/100 g of fat for conjugated linoleic acid supplements 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Apparent efficiency of transfer in milk fat was 25.2, 33.5, 21.0, and 28.4% for cis/trans 8,10, cis/trans 9,11, cis/trans 10,12, and cis/trans 11,13, respectively. Infusion of conjugated linoleic acids had no effect on dry matter intake, milk yield, and milk protein content. However, conjugated linoleic acid supplements reduced the content and yield of milk fat by 28 and 25%, respectively. The similarity of response for the different conjugated linoleic acid supplements did not allow us to identify the specific role of different isomers, but the changes in milk fatty acid composition indicated that effects were primarily on de novo fatty acid synthesis and the desaturation process.