[APACHE II and SAPS II as predictors of brain death development in neurocritical care patients]. / APACHE II y SAPS II como predictores de evolucion a muerte encefalica en pacientes neurocriticos.

AIM: To assess the prognostic value of APACHE II and SAPS II scales to predict brain death evolution of neurocritical care patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective observational study performed in a tertiary hospital. Include 508 patients over 16 years old, hospitalized in ICU for at least 24 hours. The variables of interest were: demographic data, risk factors, APACHE II, SAPS II and outcome. RESULTS: Median age: 41 years old (IR: 25-57). Males: 76.2%. Most frequent reason for admission: trauma (55.3%). Medians: Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), 10 points; APACHE II, 13 points; SAPS II, 31 points; and ICU stay, 5 days. Mortality in the ICU was 28.5% (n = 145) of whom 44 (8.7%) evolved to brain death. Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that GCS, APACHE II and SAPS II scores, as well as ICU stay days behaved as predictors of brain death evolution. However, the multivariate analysis performed including APACHE II and SAPS II scores showed that only APACHE II maintained statistical significance, despite the good discrimination of both scores. CONCLUSION: Transplant coordinators might use the APACHE II score as a tool to detect patients at risk of progression to brain death, minimizing the loss of potential donors.

TITLE: APACHE II y SAPS II como predictores de evolucion a muerte encefalica en pacientes neurocriticos.Objetivo. Evaluar si las escalas pronosticas APACHE II (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II) y SAPS II (Simplified Acute Physiology Score II) son capaces de predecir la evolucion a muerte encefalica en pacientes neurocriticos. Pacientes y metodos. Estudio retrospectivo, observacional, realizado en un hospital de tercer nivel. Se incluyo a 508 pacientes mayores de 16 años, ingresados con patologia neurocritica aguda, con estancia en la unidad de cuidados intensivos de al menos 24 horas. Las variables de interes fueron: datos demograficos, factores de riesgo, APACHE II, SAPS II y resultado pronostico. Resultados. Mediana de edad: 41 años (rango intercuartilico: 25-57). Varones: 76,2%. Motivo de ingreso mas frecuente: traumatismo (55,3%). Medianas: escala de coma de Glasgow (GCS), 10 puntos; APACHE II, 13 puntos; SAPS II, 31 puntos; y estancia en cuidados intensivos, cinco dias. La mortalidad en la unidad de cuidados intensivos fue de 145 (28,5%). De ellos, 44 (8,7%) evolucionaron a muerte encefalica. El analisis de regresion logistica univariante mostro que la GCS, las escalas APACHE II y SAPS II, y los dias de estancia en la unidad de cuidados intensivos se comportaron como variables predictoras de evolucion a muerte encefalica. Sin embargo, en el analisis multivariante realizado con APACHE II y SAPS II, se evidencio que solo APACHE II mantiene significacion estadistica, a pesar de la buena discriminacion de ambas escalas. Conclusion. Los coordinadores de trasplantes podrian usar la escala APACHE II como una herramienta para detectar pacientes con riesgo de evolucion a muerte encefalica, minimizando la perdida de potenciales donantes.

Short-term Results From a Training Program to Improve Organ Donation in Uncontrolled Donation After Circulatory Death.

BACKGROUND: In all organ transplantation programs, election of the proper protocol relies primarily on the professionals involved in the detection of potential donors. The objective of our study was to assess the impact of a series of prehospital training sessions, as well as to develop several positive feedback strategies within the uncontrolled organ donation after circulatory death (uDCD) program in our city. METHODS: A before-after intervention study was carried out in 3 steps. First, professionals enrolled in the Emergency Health Services Agency-061 (EPES-061) program underwent specific training to identify potential donors. Second, a specific logotype was designed to alert emergency health care professionals that in cases where cardiopulmonary resuscitation was ineffective and after treatment of all potentially reversible causes, the "chain of survival" should be considered a "chain of opportunities." Third, a positive feedback strategy was put in place, whereby each time a donation was procured, the EPES-061 personnel that had identified the potential donor were notified by phone and in a personal letter. RESULTS: The mean age for donors was 50.5 years of age (interquartile range 37-52.5), and 89.5% of all donations came from male subjects. Positive feedback letters and phone calls, including information on final outcome, were provided to the appropriate personnel in 100% of the cases. Postintervention information showed an increase in both eligible and utilized donors. CONCLUSIONS: Interventions outside the hospital setting that facilitate optimal implementation of the uDCD program are an essential part of this strategy to increase the donor pool and make the wait shorter for transplant patients.

Non-Heart-Beating Donor Program: Results After 3 Years of Experience.

BACKGROUND: Non-heart-beating donation (NHBD) is a useful way to obtain organs and tissues. Therefore, since 2012 we have had an NHBD protocol in the metropolitan area of Seville. The aim of this work was to present the results obtained after 3 years of program. METHODS: Prospective observational study carried out from 2012 to 2014. We included all patients with an extrahospitalary sudden death who did not survive despite cardiopulmonary resuscitation, becoming a potential donors (PD). Variables included number of consultations, PD, allowed donor (AD), real donor (RD), and family or legal refusals; minutes of out-hospital care, in-hospital care, cannulation, and perfusion of the RD; and number of organs and tissues removed and viable proportion. Nonallowed donors were grouped according to the discarding cause. RESULTS: We received 97 consultations, of which 40 were performed as PD. Of these, 24 were AD (60%) and 22 RD (55%). There were only 2 family refusals. In 2012, 10 patients were donors, 5 in 2013, and 7 in 2014. The out-hospital median time was 71 (interquartile range [IQR] 60-76) minutes, in-hospital 29 (26-34) minutes, cannulation 28 (24-33) minutes, and perfusion 135 (105-177) minutes. Eighteen tissues and 43 organs were extracted, of which 32 were implanted (75%), with kidneys (96%) being more frequent. Nonallowed donors numbered 12 in 2012, 4 in 2013, and 1 in 2014, and out-hospital causes were the most frequent discard reason. CONCLUSIONS: NHBD is a useful program in our city with a low refusal rate (8%), an average of 1.45 organs per donor, and kidney the most frequent organ.

Donation in Private Clinics as an Alternate Strategy to Increase the Pool of Donors.

In recent years, the donation process is being characterized by a decreased number of brain deaths and a logistical shift toward cardiac-death donation, both controlled and uncontrolled, in Spain. As we know, cardiac-death donors produce fewer usable organs than brain-death donors. Therefore, many of the Spanish transplant coordinators are working to find new strategies that bring efficiency to donor detection. Since 2012, at the Virgen del Rocío University Hospital, Seville, we have been trying to obtain more donors with the use of a huge logistical and administrative effort of all the elements that make up the donation and transplantation teams, because we have sought to get organ donors in all private clinics in the city. The result of this effort has succeeded in increasing the donation rate in Seville to 3 donors and >6 usable organs per year. This paper also analyzes the characteristics of these donors, comparing our results with our community and the country. The conclusion of all this, we believe, encourages persevering in those efforts and endorses a strategy that could be applied in other parts of the world with good results in terms of transplanted organs.