Reducing tobacco and nicotine use among women in treatment for substance use disorder: evaluation of the knit to quit program.

INTRODUCTION: Tobacco and nicotine use are prevalent in residential substance use disorder (SUD) treatment programs that serve pregnant and parenting women. This study evaluated a group intervention that integrates knitting instruction, psychoeducation, and social support to improve readiness to quit and reduce tobacco and nicotine use among this population. METHODS: Clients and staff in four residential SUD treatment programs were assigned to a six-week group intervention or a wait-list control group. Intervention implementation and preliminary effectiveness were assessed using surveys, interviews, and observational measures. RESULTS: From pre- to post-test, knowledge related to tobacco and nicotine use increased and number of cigarettes smoked per day and nicotine dependence decreased, on average. Additionally, the intervention group reported lower levels of nicotine dependence relative to the control group. Participants described knitting as an enjoyable replacement for smoking and a strategy to regulate stress and emotions. CONCLUSIONS: Smoking cessation interventions that include knitting are promising and warrant further testing.

Feasibility, Acceptability, and Usefulness of a Screening Tool for Caregiver Learning Differences in Early Childhood Home Visiting: Staff and Caregiver Perspectives.

Early childhood home visiting programs are well positioned to improve equity and reduce health disparities for families headed by caregivers with intellectual disabilities and other learning differences. Early identification of learning differences through screening may help home visiting staff tailor services and thus improve family engagement and outcomes. Using a mixed methods design, this study assessed potential determinants and outcomes related to implementation of a screening tool for learning differences adapted for the home visiting context. Participants were six home visiting staff and nine caregivers from multiple home visiting programs in one state. Staff completed surveys at enrollment and each time they conducted a screen with a caregiver. Staff also completed semi-structured interviews after conducting screens with at least two caregivers. Caregivers completed semi-structured interviews after taking part in a screen. At study enrollment, staff felt it was important to know if caregivers had learning differences, yet some believed caregivers would not like being asked about them. Survey and interview data aligned with theoretical determinants of implementation success, including staff competencies related to screening (e.g., knowledge, skills), perceived fit of screening with staff role and organizational context, and beliefs that the screening would improve engagement of caregivers and service delivery. Staff perceived the tool to be acceptable, feasible, and useful, although some acknowledged that caregivers might feel uncomfortable if the tool was not used carefully. Overall, caregivers found the tool to be acceptable and most believed it was helpful for the home visitor to have information about their learning experiences and needs. Findings lend initial support for the use of an adapted screening tool to identify potential learning differences.

Service Coordination in Early Childhood Home Visiting: a Multiple-Case Study.

Early childhood home visiting is a preventive service delivery strategy that aims to promote child and parent health, positive parenting, child development and school readiness, and family economic self-sufficiency. To meet families' needs, programs provide a combination of direct services, and referrals and linkages to community-based services. Service coordination is therefore a critical component of home visiting's role within the early childhood system of care. This multiple-case study describes facilitators and barriers to service coordination, as identified by home visiting program staff and families. We interviewed program managers, supervisors, home visitors, and families from four local home visiting programs in the eastern USA with diverse contextual characteristics that showed evidence of having strong coordination. Using multiple-case study methodology, we analyzed the data to understand key facilitators and barriers to service coordination for each case and identify and describe common themes across cases. Facilitators included interagency relationships and collaboration; a culture of teamwork; dedicated, well-connected staff; supervision; trusting relationships with families; and warm handoffs. Barriers to service coordination were limited availability and accessibility of local resources, perceived stigma among other service providers, and families' ambivalence toward some services. Home visiting staff and families emphasized that relationships at multiple levels are fundamental to service coordination, barriers are complex, and coordination is time- and labor-intensive. Coalitions that bring together diverse stakeholder groups at the state and local levels can provide meaningful coordination support to the early childhood services.

Systematic Review of Community- and Home-Based Interventions to Support Parenting and Reduce Risk of Child Maltreatment Among Families With Substance-Exposed Newborns.

Substance-exposed newborns (SENs) are at increased risk of child maltreatment, out-of-home placement, and poor health and developmental outcomes. The purpose of this systematic review is to synthesize existing research on community- and home-based interventions designed to improve parenting and reduce risk of maltreatment for families with SENs, applying a program logic framework. The review includes studies that used preexperimental, quasi-experimental, and experimental designs. Twelve interventions were identified. Of the nine studies that used more rigorous experimental or quasi-experimental designs, five showed positive effects on at least one parenting or child maltreatment outcome, although some studies showed high risk of bias. Full coherence among the intended participants, theory of change, and program components was observed for only two interventions. The findings suggest a need for more rigorous research to develop and test interventions that are grounded in theory and prior research and that address the unique needs of families with SENs.