Remote blood pressure management for postpartum hypertension: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

BACKGROUND: Recognizing the importance of close follow-up after hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, many centers have initiated programs to support postpartum remote blood pressure management. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of remote blood pressure management to determine the scalability of these programmatic interventions. STUDY DESIGN: This was a cost-effectiveness analysis of using remote blood pressure management vs usual care to manage postpartum hypertension. The modeled remote blood pressure management included provision of a home blood pressure monitor, guidance on warning symptoms, instructions on blood pressure self-monitoring twice daily, and clinical staff to manage population-level blood pressures as appropriate. Usual care was defined as guidance on warning symptoms and recommendations for 1 outpatient visit for blood pressure monitoring within a week after discharge. This study designed a Markov model that ran over fourteen 1-day cycles to reflect the initial 2 weeks after delivery when most emergency department visits and readmissions occur and remote blood pressure management is clinically anticipated to be most impactful. Parameter values for the base-case scenario were derived from both internal data and literature review. Quality-adjusted life-years were calculated over the first year after delivery and reflected the short-term morbidities associated with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy that, for most birthing people, resolve by 2 weeks after delivery. Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the strength and validity of the model. The primary outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, which was defined as the cost needed to gain 1 quality-adjusted life-year. The secondary outcome was incremental cost per readmission averted. Analyses were performed from a societal perspective. RESULTS: In the base-case scenario, remote blood pressure management was the dominant strategy (ie, cost less, higher quality-adjusted life-years). In univariate sensitivity analyses, the most cost-effective strategy shifted to usual care when the cost of readmission fell below $2987.92 and the rate of reported severe range blood pressure with a response in remote blood pressure management was <1%. Assuming a willingness to pay of $100,000 per quality-adjusted life-year, using remote blood pressure management was cost-effective in 99.28% of simulations in a Monte Carlo analysis. Using readmissions averted as a secondary effectiveness outcome, the incremental cost per readmission averted was $145.00. CONCLUSION: Remote blood pressure management for postpartum hypertension is cost saving and has better outcomes than usual care. Our data can be used to inform future dissemination of and support funding for remote blood pressure management programs.

Standardized Clinical Assessment and Management Plan to Reduce Readmissions for Postpartum Hypertension.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of a postpartum hypertension standardized clinical assessment and management plan on postpartum readmissions and emergency department (ED) visits. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study of patients with postpartum hypertension (either chronic hypertension or hypertensive disorders of pregnancy) who delivered at a single tertiary care center for 6 months after enacting an institution-wide standardized clinical assessment and management plan (postintervention group). Patients in the postintervention group were compared with patients in a historical control group. The standardized clinical assessment and management plan included 1) initiation or uptitration of medication for any blood pressure (BP) higher than 150/100 mm Hg or any two BPs higher than 140/90 mm Hg within a 24-hour period, with the goal of achieving normotension (BP lower than 140/90 mm Hg) in the 12 hours before discharge; and 2) enrollment in a remote BP monitoring system on discharge. The primary outcome was postpartum readmission or ED visit for hypertension. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between standardized clinical assessment and management plan and the selected outcomes. A sensitivity analysis was performed with propensity score weighting. A planned subanalysis in the postintervention cohort identified risk factors associated with requiring antihypertensive uptitration after discharge. For all analyses, the level of statistical significance was set at P <.05. RESULTS: Overall, 390 patients in the postintervention cohort were compared with 390 patients in a historical control group. Baseline demographics were similar between groups with the exception of lower prevalence of chronic hypertension in the postintervention cohort (23.1% vs 32.1%, P =.005). The primary outcome occurred in 2.8% of patients in the postintervention group and in 11.0% of patients in the historical control group (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.24, 95% CI 0.12-0.49, P <.001). A matched propensity score analysis controlling for chronic hypertension similarly demonstrated a significant reduction in the incidence of the primary outcome. Of the 255 patients (65.4%) who were compliant with outpatient remote BP monitoring, 53 (20.8%) had medication adjustments made per protocol at a median of 6 days (interquartile range 5-8 days) from delivery. Non-Hispanic Black race (aOR 3.42, 95% CI 1.68-6.97), chronic hypertension (aOR 2.09, 95% CI 1.13-3.89), having private insurance (aOR 3.04, 95% CI 1.06-8.72), and discharge on antihypertensive medications (aOR 2.39, 95% CI 1.33-4.30) were associated with requiring outpatient adjustments. CONCLUSION: A standardized clinical assessment and management plan significantly reduced postpartum readmissions and ED visits for patients with hypertension. Close outpatient follow-up to ensure appropriate medication titration after discharge may be especially important in groups at high risk for readmission.