Same-day discharge after coronary stenting and femoral artery device closure: A randomized study in stable and low-risk acute coronary syndrome patients.

OBJECTIVE: To compare same-day (SD) vs. delayed hospital discharge (DD) after single and multivessel coronary stenting facilitated by femoral closure device in patients with stable angina and low-risk acute coronary syndrome (ACS). METHODS: University of Southern California patients were screened and coronary stenting was performed in 2480 patients. Four hundred ninety-three patients met screening criteria and consented. Four hours after percutaneous coronary intervention, 100 were randomized to SD (n=50) or DD (n=50). Patients were followed for one year; outcomes-, patient satisfaction-, and cost analyses were performed. RESULTS: Groups were well distributed, with similar baseline demographic and angiographic characteristics. Mean age was 58.1±8.8years and 86% were male. Non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction and unstable angina were the clinical presentations in 30% and 44% of the SD and DD groups, respectively (p=0.2). Multivessel stenting was performed in 36% and 30% of SD and DD groups, respectively (p=0.14). At one year, two patients from each group (4%) required unplanned revascularization and one patient in the SD group had a gastrointestinal bleed that required a blood transfusion. Six SD and four DD patients required repeat hospitalization (p=0.74). There were no femoral artery vascular complications in either group. Patient satisfaction scores were equivalent. SD discharge was associated with $1200 savings per patient. CONCLUSIONS: SD discharge after uncomplicated single and multivessel coronary stenting of patients with stable, low-risk ACS, via the femoral approach facilitated by a closure device, is associated with similar clinical outcomes, patient satisfaction, and cost savings compared to overnight (DD) hospital stay.

Interanimal variability in preexisting collaterals is a major factor determining outcome in experimental angiogenesis trials.

Despite numerous animal trials reporting that cell therapy promotes collateral flow, clinical trials have not convincingly shown benefit. Patient-related risk factors are often used to explain these discrepancies. However, during the course of our own angiogenesis studies using mice, we noted large anatomical variability in collateral vessels. The purpose of the present investigation was to define how important this factor might be in determining intervention outcomes. Hindlimb ischemia was induced in BALB/c mice by ligating the superficial femoral artery. After 24 h, animals were treated by injecting the adductor muscle with either control media or cultured mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). Blood flow recovery was measured using laser-Doppler [laser-Doppler perfusion imaging (LDPI) ratio]. In a second experiment, mice were stratified 24 h after arterial ligation before treatment by using a simple clinical score of the ligated leg: 1, able to flex, mild discoloration; 2, no flexion, mild discoloration; 3, severe discoloration; and 4, any necrosis. Without stratification, blood flow recovery significantly increased in the MSC-treated group (P < 0.05, n = 6 MSC group, n = 7 media group). In the experiment employing stratification, all differences between the groups disappeared (n = 11 MSC group, n = 10 media group; P = 0.3). Furthermore, we found a striking inverse correlation between clinical score on day 1 and the LDPI ratio on day 28 (P < 0.0001; n = 79). Anatomical confirmation of the disparity in preexisting collaterals was found in two different mouse strains using microscopic computed tomography. In conclusion, there is substantial interanimal variability in preexisting collateral flow, and this variability can importantly influence outcome. To overcome this, either animals must be stratified before treatment, the number of animals must be increased substantially, or, preferably, both.