RESUMO
Actinic keratosis (AK) is a frequent precancerous skin lesion that mostly affects chronically sun-exposed areas. Chronic sun damage leads to various mutations in onco-suppressor and oncogenic genes which cause an uncontrolled proliferation of atypical keratinocytes. Untreated AKs may evolve in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC), with the consequent need for dermato-surgical excision or even for systemic immunotherapy in case of invasive/metastatic cSCCs. Epidemiology data on AK prevalence are various, however, the literature unanimously reports an increasing prevalence due to the aging of the population. Clinically AKs appear as a scaly, erythematous macule or papule or hyperkeratotic plaque. Management of AKs and the field of cancerization is important to avoid the natural evolution into squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs). Both physical and topical treatments are approved for managing AKs. Patient compliance with topical regimens is usually low due to the length of the posology and frequent skin adverse events. A recently approved tirbanibulin-based ointment, showed potential for inhibiting cell proliferation and blocking SRC-kinases, implicated in the progression of AKs in SCCs. The advantage of this new treatment is the practical posology, with a daily application for 5 consecutive days on AKs of the face-scalp area. Local skin reactions are usually mild and do not require treatment discontinuation. The short course of this new therapy and its excellent tolerance massively increased patient compliance. This article reviews what is currently known about this new therapy from its mechanism of action to clinical trial outcomes regarding safety, effectiveness, and patient adherence to the treatment.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Guselkumab is a monoclonal antibody approved for treating moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Long-term data on the effectiveness and safety of guselkumab in a real-world setting are still limited. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a 104-week monocentric retrospective study on 102 psoriasis patients, all treated with guselkumab for at least 16 weeks. At each visit, we used the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI): effectiveness endpoints were the percentages of patients achieving 75%/90%/100% (PASI 75/90/100) improvement in PASI compared with baseline. The Kaplan-Meier curve was used to assess the drug survival. RESULTS: At week 16, PASI 90 and PASI 100 were achieved by 49.02% and 32.35% of patients. At week 52, PASI 90 and PASI 100 were achieved by 71.58% and 55.79% of patients. After 2 years, PASI 90 and PASI 100 were achieved by 79.63% and 61.11% of patients. Obese and overweight patients had comparable PASI 90 and PASI 100 responses throughout the study. At week 104, no significant differences were observed between bio-naïve and bio-experienced patients regarding all effectiveness endpoints. No significant safety signals were reported in our study. After 24 months, 91.57% of our cohort was still on treatment with guselkumab. CONCLUSION: Our findings, although limited by the study's retrospective nature, confirm that guselkumab is a safe and effective therapeutic option for a "real-life" cohort of patients with psoriasis. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(8):632-639. doi:10.36849/JDD.7486R1.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Psoríase , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Humanos , Psoríase/tratamento farmacológico , Psoríase/diagnóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/efeitos adversos , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/administração & dosagem , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto , IdosoRESUMO
Rarely, the gram-negative bacteria Klebsiella pneumoniae causes skin infections that are frequently challenging to identify. We present a case of an atypical presentation of this specific disease in terms of its site, lack of risk factors, and length of illness.
Assuntos
Dermatite Atópica , Compostos Heterocíclicos com 3 Anéis , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Humanos , Dermatite Atópica/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Masculino , Adulto , Compostos Heterocíclicos com 3 Anéis/administração & dosagem , Compostos Heterocíclicos com 3 Anéis/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fármacos Dermatológicos/administração & dosagem , Fármacos Dermatológicos/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a heterogeneous disease, associated with comorbidities, and high healthcare consumptions and costs. This study assessed the burden before and after treatment with dupilumab in adults with severe AD from 2018 to 2020, from the perspective of the Italian National Health Service (SSN). METHODS: From Fondazione Ricerca e Salute's administrative healthcare database (~5 million inhabitants/year), adults treated with dupilumab from 09/01/2018 to 31/12/2020 (index date) and a five-year lookback were identified. Age, sex and comorbidities at baseline, concomitant drugs, overnight hospitalizations, outpatient specialist services and direct costs charged to the SSN one year before/after index date were assessed. RESULTS: Of 337 adults treated with dupilumab (5.8x100,000 adult inhabitants/2019; 8.0x100,000/2020; 55% males; mean age 43±19), 68% (228/337) had ≥12-month follow-up available. Asthma was a common comorbidity (23% patients). Rates of patients treated with nearly all concomitant AD-related therapies reduced from 12 months before to 12 months after dupilumab treatment: antibacterials (from 59% to 50%), systemic corticosteroids (55% to 29%), antihistamines (54% to 38%) and cyclosporine (52% to 7%). A similar trend was observed among patients with asthma as comorbidity. Within 12 months before/after dupilumab, patients hospitalized halved from 14% to 7%, and patients receiving outpatient specialist care reduced from 72% to 65%. Annual mean direct total costs per patient treated with dupilumab charged to the SSN, net of dupilumab cost, were 1384 and 773, before and after dupilumab dispensation, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Before dupilumab, observed patients had higher healthcare resource consumptions and direct SSN costs than after dupilumab.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Dermatite Atópica , Humanos , Dermatite Atópica/tratamento farmacológico , Dermatite Atópica/economia , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/economia , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Itália , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/economia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Comorbidade , Adulto Jovem , Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Asma/economia , Recursos em Saúde/economia , Recursos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
The definition of paradoxical psoriasis (PP) encompasses 2 main scenarios, namely, (i) new-onset psoriasis in patients treated for a different disease and (ii) worsening as well as phenotypical change of pre-existing psoriasis. Originally restricted to the appearance of an untoward psoriasiform reaction under TNF inhibitors, the term has gained new meaning, with the progressive observation of psoriasis-like eruptions also with other medications. Although the conceptual framework of PP has expanded, a molecular and clinicotherapeutic classification is still lacking. In addition, a certain degree of confusion surrounds the correct terminology to indicate these eruptions. In this paper, evidence on the epidemiology, clinical features, pathogenesis, and treatment of PP is reviewed, providing a perspective on possible pathogenesis-driven therapeutic approaches.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION/AIMS: Laboratory and clinical data suggest a link between neurologically mediated inflammation and psoriasis, but the risk and features of peripheral neuropathy in psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis remain unknown. The aim of this exploratory study was to evaluate the risk and to describe the features of peripheral neuropathy in patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. METHODS: One hundred patients with psoriasis and/or psoriatic arthritis and 100 control subjects were consecutively enrolled. Diagnostic confirmation included electrophysiological examination, skin biopsy, and nerve ultrasound for confirmed polyneuropathy. RESULTS: Nine patients were diagnosed with confirmed polyneuropathy, while none of the control subjects had the condition (relative risk [RR] = 19.00, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.12-322.11). Specific relative risks for polyneuropathy were 22.09 (95% CI = 1.17-416.43) in psoriasis patients and 18.75 (95% CI = 1.07-327.62) in psoriatic arthritis patients. The observed polyneuropathy in all nine patients was length-dependent, symmetrical, and predominantly sensory, with minimal or no disability. Comorbidities and exposure to therapies known to increase the risk of polyneuropathy were more frequent in psoriasis and/or psoriatic arthritis patients compared to controls (42% vs. 4%, p = .0001). Analyzing data after excluding possible contributory causes, the risk of polyneuropathy in patients with psoriasis and/or psoriatic arthritis was not significant. DISCUSSION: Psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis appear to be associated with an increased risk of polyneuropathy. This increased risk seems to be linked to the higher prevalence of contributing factors for polyneuropathy, rather than a direct increase in neuropathy risk specifically related to psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis.
Assuntos
Artrite Psoriásica , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso Periférico , Psoríase , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Artrite Psoriásica/complicações , Artrite Psoriásica/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Psoríase/complicações , Psoríase/epidemiologia , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso Periférico/epidemiologia , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso Periférico/etiologia , Adulto , Estudos Prospectivos , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
PURPOSE: Currently, in the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis (PsO) there is a lack of evidence demonstrating optimal biologic treatment response with respect to disease duration. The aim of this post-hoc analysis, using real world data from the Psoriasis Study of Health Outcomes (PSoHO), is to provide evidence if early intervention with biologics is associated with better treatment outcomes and if there is any difference among drug classes or individual biologics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For this post-hoc analysis patients were categorised into two subgroups according to shorter (≤2 years) or longer (>2 years) disease duration. Analysis was performed on anti-interleukin (IL)-17A cohort vs other biologics cohort, anti-IL-17A vs other drug classes, and pairwise comparisons of ixekizumab vs individual biologics, provided that the statistical models converged. Analysis investigated the association of disease duration with the proportion of patients achieving 100% improvement in Psoriasis Area Severity Index score (PASI 100) at week 12. Adjusted comparative analyses, reported as odds ratio (OR), were performed using Frequentist Model Averaging (FMA) for each cohort or treatments within each subcategory of the subgroups. RESULTS: At week 12, anti-IL-17A and other biologics cohorts displayed minimal differences in numerical response rate for PASI 100 with respect to disease duration. The anti-IL-17A cohort showed a higher numerical PASI 100 response rate compared to the other biologic cohort irrespective of disease duration (≤2 years: 36.7% vs 21.8%; >2 years: 35.8% vs 21.9%). CONCLUSION: Overall, the results do not clearly indicate that treating patients early is critical in achieving optimal patient outcomes. Furthermore, patients treated with ixekizumab show numerically higher response rates relative to other individual biologics irrespective of disease duration.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Produtos Biológicos , Interleucina-17 , Psoríase , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Humanos , Psoríase/tratamento farmacológico , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Produtos Biológicos/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Resultado do Tratamento , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Interleucina-17/antagonistas & inibidores , Fatores de Tempo , Fármacos Dermatológicos/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: There are several treatment options for plaque psoriasis (PsO), but uncertainty remains around the optimal sequencing of treatments. The aims of this study were to investigate how adopting a best-treatment-first treatment sequence impacts patient outcomes and healthcare systems and to quantify the cost of treatment failure to the healthcare system. METHODS: A 3-year state-transition treatment-sequencing model which identifies all possible treatment sequences in PsO was adapted to the Italian healthcare setting. Treatments considered in the model are those with European Medicines Agency marketing authorization and reimbursement in Italy as of December 2022. Italian market share data (2019-2021) and list prices (2022) informed the current prescribed sequences; these sequences were compared against all possible sequences to determine opportunities for improvement. Both the national perspective in Italy as well as the local perspective from seven regions were considered. The cost of treatment failure was informed through a questionnaire circulated to Italian dermatologists. RESULTS: Overall, 1284 possible treatment sequences are possible when four lines of treatment are considered for patients with moderate-to-severe PsO in Italy. Within the estimated range of treatment failures across those sequences (0.97-2.56 per patient over 3 years), current prescribing behavior from the national perspective suggests patients will face 1.44 failures on average; this highlights the potential for improvement. For every treatment failure, the cost borne by the Italian National Healthcare Service (NHS) is 676.80. Overall, prescribing more optimized treatment sequences results in a 22.95% reduction in failures with a 2.27% increase in costs. The regional analyses found similar trends. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that selecting the most effective treatment sequences for incident patients provides the greatest opportunity to reduce treatment failures and maximize patient outcomes with a modest impact on costs. While regional variations exist, there is room for improvement across the board, which could translate to more efficient local healthcare systems.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Genital involvement in atopic dermatitis(AD) can have a significant impact on the patient's quality of life. However, inspection of genital areas is not usually conducted during routine examination and patients may be reluctant to inform the clinician or show this area. OBJECTIVE: to evaluate the efficacy of tralokinumab in AD patients with genital involvement. METHODS: Adult patients with moderate/severe AD and genital involvement receiving tralokinumab have been analyzed. Primary endpoints were EASI, DLQI, PP-NRS, genital-IGA (g-IGA) and genital itching (GI) at week 16. RESULTS: out of 48 patients with moderate/severe AD under treatment with tralokinumab, 12 patients (25%) showed a genital involvement. Seven patients reported itching in the genital area (58%), while none reported a positive history of genital infections. Median scores at T0 were EASI 17.5, PP-NRS 8 and DLQI 14. After 16 weeks of treatment, we observed a median EASI of 3, a median PP-NRS of 1 and a median DLQI of 1. Finally, concerning the genital response, after 16 weeks of treatment, we observed a statistically significant decrease in mean GI and g-IGA scores. CONCLUSION: despite the small size of our sample, tralokinumab can be considered as a valid treatment option for AD with genital involvement.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais , Dermatite Atópica , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Humanos , Dermatite Atópica/tratamento farmacológico , Dermatite Atópica/patologia , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Resultado do Tratamento , Prurido/tratamento farmacológico , Prurido/etiologia , Qualidade de Vida , Adulto Jovem , Doenças dos Genitais Femininos/tratamento farmacológico , Doenças dos Genitais Masculinos/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The introduction of biological therapies has revolutionized the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. In particular, ixekizumab, an inhibitor of interleukin-17A, has shown great results in terms of efficacy and safety in both clinical trials and real-world experiences. However, there is a lack of long-term real-world data available for ixekizumab. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter real-life study to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ixekizumab in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score (PASI) was collected at baseline and after 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years. The occurrence of any adverse events was recorded at each time point. RESULTS: We enrolled 1096 patients treated with ixekizumab for at least 1 year. At week 52, the percentages of PASI 90 and PASI 100 were 85.04% and 69.07%, respectively. After 5 years of treatment with ixekizumab, out of 145 patients, a PASI 90 response was achieved by 86.90% of patients, while complete skin clearance was reached by 68.28% of patients. We did not observe any new significant safety findings throughout the study period. CONCLUSION: This study supports the long-term effectiveness and safety of ixekizumab in a real-world setting.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: Tildrakizumab is a selective inhibitor of IL-23 approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in two dosages. We conducted a 16-week multicenter retrospective study to compare the effectiveness and safety of tildrakizumab 200 mg versus tildrakizumab 100 mg in patients with a high disease burden or high body weight. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our retrospective study included 134 patients treated with tildrakizumab 200 mg and 364 patients treated with tildrakizumab 100 mg from 28 Italian Dermatology Units affected by moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. The patients had a body weight above 90 kg or a high disease burden (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index [PASI] ≥ 16 or the involvement of difficult-to-treat areas). We evaluated the effectiveness of tildrakizumab at the week-16 visit in terms of PASI90, PASI100 and absolute PASI ≤ 2. RESULTS: After 16 weeks of treatment with tildrakizumab 200 mg, PASI90 was reached by 57.5% of patients and PASI100 by 39.6% of patients. At the same time point, 34.3% and 24.2% of patients treated with tildrakizumab 100 mg achieved PASI90 and PASI100, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that tildrakizumab 200 mg has better effectiveness than tildrakizumab 100 mg in patients with a body weight ≥ 90 kg and a high disease burden.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Peso Corporal , Psoríase , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Humanos , Psoríase/tratamento farmacológico , Psoríase/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Masculino , Feminino , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/administração & dosagem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Resultado do Tratamento , Peso Corporal/efeitos dos fármacos , Itália , Fármacos Dermatológicos/administração & dosagem , Fármacos Dermatológicos/uso terapêutico , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , IdosoRESUMO
The autoantigens LL37 and ADAMTSL5 contribute to induce pathogenetic T-cells responses in a subset of psoriatic patients. Whether the presence of LL37-and/or ADAMTS5-reactive T-cells influences the clinical response to treatment is still unknown. The aim of the study is to evaluate the clinical responses to the anti-IL-23 risankizumab in LL37 and/or ADAMTSL5-reactive patients in comparison with non-reactive ones and to assess whether genetics (HLA-Cw06.02) or BMI influences the response to treatment. Patients were screened at baseline for the presence of circulating LL37 or/and ADAMTSL5-reactive T-cells and were treated as per protocol with risankizumab. Effectiveness data (PASI scores) were collected at weeks 4, 16, 28, 40 and 52. Data were also analyzed based on HLA-Cw06.02 status and BMI. The overall response to treatment of patients with autoreactivity to LL37 or ADAMTSL5 did not differ compared to the non-reactive cohort as measured as PASI75/90/100 at different time points; however, subjects that had autoreactive T-cells to both LL37 and ADAMTS5 demonstrated suboptimal response to treatment starting at week16. HLA-Cw06:02+ patients demonstrated faster response to risankizumab at week 4 compared to HLA-Cw06:02-. Additionally, the response to treatment was influenced by the BMI with slower responses seen in overweight and obese patients at week 4 and week16. In conclusion, while the presence of either LL37-and ADAMTS5-reactive circulating T-cells do not influence the clinical response to risankizumab, the presence of the double reactivity to both LL37 and ADAMTS5 decreases the clinical responses. Moreover, we evidenced that HLA-Cw06+ respond faster to IL-23 inhibition and that BMI, associated to autoreactivity, can influence the speed in response.
Assuntos
Psoríase , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Resultado do Tratamento , Psoríase/tratamento farmacológico , Psoríase/imunologia , Linfócitos T/imunologia , Linfócitos T/metabolismo , Autoantígenos/imunologia , Proteína ADAMTS5/metabolismo , Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Interleucina-23 , Índice de Massa Corporal , Autoimunidade , Proteínas ADAMTS , Antígenos HLA-CRESUMO
The development of flares or new-onset of immune-mediated dermatologic diseases, including psoriasis, has occurred with the worldwide spreading of the COVID-19 pandemic. We report the case of a 38-year-old woman who came to our department with a severe flare of plaque psoriasis four weeks after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Her Psoriasis Area Severity Index was 25, and her Dermatology Life Quality Index was 18. Our initial decision was to prescribe acitretin, but the patients reported adverse events. For this reason, we started risankizumab with complete skin clearance after 16 weeks. The patient is still on treatment, and no adverse events have been reported to date.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Nail psoriasis is highly prevalent among patients with psoriasis yet remains one of the most challenging areas to treat. To better understand the treatment landscape for psoriatic nail disease, more studies are needed that compare the effectiveness of different biologics for patients with nail psoriasis. This study contributes to this objective by directly comparing the effectiveness of approved biologics in improving nail psoriasis for patients up to month 12 in a real-world setting. METHODS: Psoriasis Study of Health Outcomes (PSoHO) is an ongoing 3-year, prospective, non-interventional cohort study of adults with chronic moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis initiating or switching to a new biologic. This study assessed the change in modified Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (mNAPSI) score from baseline to months 3, 6 and 12 for 763 patients and compared the effectiveness of anti-interleukin (IL)-17A biologics versus other approved biologics, as well as ixekizumab versus secukinumab, guselkumab, risankizumab and adalimumab. Comparative adjusted analyses used frequentist model averaging (FMA). Least square mean difference (LSMD) in mNAPSI scores are presented as observed. RESULTS: Irrespective of the severity of nail psoriasis at baseline, the anti-IL-17A cohort had greater mean mNAPSI reductions from baseline compared to the other biologics cohort through month 12, reaching significance at months 3 and 6 in the adjusted analysis. For patients with moderate-to-severe nail psoriasis, ixekizumab showed numerically higher mean reductions in mNAPSI scores compared to all other studied biologics, reaching significance versus guselkumab at all timepoints and risankizumab at month 6. CONCLUSION: This real-world study showed that patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis and any severity of concomitant nail involvement had significantly faster and more substantial improvements in nail psoriasis up to month 6 in the anti-IL-17A cohort compared to the other biologics cohort. Of the individual biologics studied, ixekizumab showed the highest numerical improvements in nail psoriasis at month 12. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EUPAS24207.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Several systemic therapies have been approved for the treatment of severe AD. In particular, Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi), including abrocitinib, baricitinib, and upadacitinib, recently received approval for the treatment of patients with severe AD after being evaluated in several clinical trials. However, a few concerns have been raised regarding their long-term safety and the management of these drugs in real-world clinical practice. In this article we described the results of a Delphi consensus aimed at describing the knowledge on JAKi and focusing, in particular, on providing clinical recommendations for dermatologists in daily practice regarding the use of these drugs. METHODS: Twelve Italian dermatologists reviewed the most recent literature regarding the efficacy and safety profiles of JAKi and proposed 24 statements. RESULTS: Agreement was reached for statements focusing on three main topics: (1) place in therapy of JAKi in patients with moderate-to-severe AD; (2) effectiveness and safety of JAK inhibitors in different phenotypes; (3) different approaches to the management of patients treated with JAKi in clinical practice. The panel proposed several recommendations regarding all the statements. CONCLUSION: Given the wide use of JAKi in clinical practice, it is crucial to establish a specific follow-up for each patient's phenotype in order to achieve the best possible clinical outcome and minimize potential adverse events.
RESUMO
Upadacitinib is a selective Janus kinase inhibitor approved for the treatment of severe atopic dermatitis (AD). This systematic review aims to summarize the most recent data in terms of effectiveness and safety of upadacitinib in the treatment of severe AD in a real-world setting. The review included a comprehensive search of databases, including PubMed, Google Scholar and Web of Science, according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. The literature search initially identified 242 studies. Of these, 214 were excluded after reviewing their titles and abstracts. We then conducted a full-text review of 25 studies, of which 17 met our inclusion criteria and were therefore included in our systematic review. The analysis of real-world studies showed high effectiveness of upadacitinib, in terms of both clinical signs and subjective symptoms, in different patient populations, including those resistant to other treatments. No new significant safety concerns have emerged as compared to randomized clinical trials.