RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Determine the effectiveness of a medial off-loader brace with sensor monitoring capabilities and associated phone application in improving outcomes for individuals with knee osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: Randomized clinical trial of participants with knee OA, aged 40-75 with two groups: 1) brace-only 2) brace+sensor (sensor providing walking time, knee range of motion and 7-day activity streak). Both groups received a prefabricated custom-fitted medial off-loader brace and 12-week self-guided exercise therapy program. Baseline and post-intervention assessments included subjective and objective outcomes. RESULTS: 60 participants were recruited (n = 30/group). The brace+sensor group demonstrated higher study retention(88.89%) compared to the brace-only group(73.33%). Significant improvement in KOOS knee pain and other KOOS sub-scores compared to baseline was observed for both groups. However, only the brace+sensor group improved beyond the established minimal clinically important difference for KOOS pain(11.31+/-13.87). KOOS ADL was also significantly improved in the brace+sensor group compared to brace only group(p = 0.049). Both treatment groups had significant improvement in functional outcomes(10 m walk, 5x sit-to-stand, p < 0.05). Only the brace+sensor group had significant improvements in the 6-minute walk test(p = 0.02) and reduction in participant weight(p = 0.01) at 12 weeks. CONCLUSION: Incorporating wearable technology in standard bracing for individuals with knee OA has potential in improving clinical outcomes.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Neighborhoods with more social determinants of health (SDOH) risk factors have higher rates of infectivity, morbidity, and mortality from COVID-19. Patients with severe COVID-19 infection can have long-term functional deficits leading to lower quality of life (QoL) and independence measures. Research shows that these patients benefit greatly from inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRF) admission, but there remains a lack of studies investigating long-term benefits of rehabilitation once patients are returned to their home environment. OBJECTIVE: To determine SDOH factors related to long-term independence and QoL of COVID-19 patients after IRF stay. DESIGN: Multisite cross-sectional survey. SETTING: Two urban IRFs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome measures were Post-COVID Functional Status Scale (PCFS) and Short Form-36 (SF-36) scores. Secondary outcomes were quality indicator (QI) scores while at IRF and a health care access questionnaire. Results were analyzed using analysis of variance and multivariate logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: Participants (n = 48) who were greater than 1 year post-IRF stay for severe COVID-19 were enrolled in the study. Higher SF-36 scores were associated with male gender (p = .002), higher income (≥$70,000, p = .004), and living in the city (p = .046). Similarly, patients who were of the male gender (p = .004) and had higher income (≥$70,000, p = .04) had a greater odds of a 0 or 1 on the PCFS. Age was not associated with differences. Women were more likely to seek follow-up care (p = .014). Those who sought follow-up care reported lower SF-36 overall and emotional wellness scores, p = .041 and p = .007, respectively. Commonly reported barriers to health care access were financial and time constraints. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with SDOH risk factors need to be supported in the outpatient setting to maintain functional gains made during IRF stays. Female gender, income, and urban setting are potential predictors for long-term QoL and independence deficits after rehabilitation for COVID-19 infection. Low emotional wellness is an indicator for patients to seek out care as far out as 1 year from their rehabilitation stay.