Innovative minimally invasive options to treat drug-resistant epilepsies.

Despite the regular discovery of new molecules, one-third of epileptic patients are resistant to antiepileptic drugs. Only a few can benefit from resective surgery, the current gold standard. Although effective in 50-70% of cases, this therapy remains risky, costly, and can be associated with long-term cognitive or neurological side effects. In addition, patients are increasingly reluctant to have a craniotomy, emphasizing the need for new less invasive therapies for focal drug-resistant epilepsies. Here, we review different minimally invasive approaches already in use in the clinic or under preclinical development to treat drug-resistant epilepsies. Localized thermolesion of the epileptogenic zone has been developed in the clinic using high-frequency thermo-coagulations or magnetic resonance imaging-guided laser or ultrasounds. Although less invasive, they have not yet significantly improved the outcomes when compared with resective surgery. Radiosurgery techniques have been used in the clinic for the last 20years and have proven efficiency. However, their efficacy is not better than resective surgery, and various side effects have been reported as well as the potential risk of sudden unexpected death associated with epilepsy. Recently, a new strategy of radiosurgery has emerged using synchrotron-generated X-ray microbeams: microbeam radiation therapy (MRT). The low divergence and high-flux of the synchrotron beams and the unique tolerance to MRT by healthy brain tissues, allows a precise targeting of specific brain regions with minimal invasiveness and limited behavioral or functional consequences in animals. Antiepileptic effects over several months have been recorded in animal models, and histological and synaptic tracing analysis suggest a reduction of neuronal connectivity as a mechanism of action. The possibility of transferring this approach to epileptic patients is discussed in this review.

PRODIG (Prevention of new onset diabetes after transplantation by a short term treatment of Vildagliptin in the early renal post-transplant period) study: study protocol for a randomized controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Post-transplant diabetes is a frequent and serious complication of kidney transplantation. There is currently no treatment to prevent or delay the disease. Nevertheless, identification of risk factors make it possible to target a population at risk of developing de novo diabetes. We hypothesized that a short-term treatment with vildagliptin may prevent new onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT) in high-risk patients. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial. Patients undergoing first kidney transplantation will be included from ten French transplant centers. Included patients will be randomized (1:1) to receive either vildagliptin 100 or 50 mg/day (depending on glomerular filtration rate) during 2 months (the first dose being administered before entering the operating theatres) or placebo. Additional antidiabetic therapy could be administered according to glycemic control. The primary outcome is the proportion of diabetic patients 1 year after transplantation, defined as patients receiving a diabetic treatment, or having a fasting glucose above 7 mmol/l, and/or with an abnormal oral glucose tolerance test. Secondary outcomes include glycated hemoglobin, the occurrence of acute rejection, infection, graft loss and patient death at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after transplantation. Outcomes will be correlated to clinical and general characteristics of the patient, cardiovascular history, nephropathy, dialysis history, transplantation data, biological data, health-related quality of life, and the cost-effectiveness of prevention of diabetes with vildagliptin. DISCUSSION: We have scarce data on the pharmacological prevention of post-transplant diabetes. If our hypothesis is verified, our results will have a direct application in clinical practice and could limit diabetes-associated morbidity, reduce cardiovascular complications, increase quality of life of renal transplant patients, and consequently promote graft and patient survival. Our results may possibly serve for non-transplant patients carrying a high-risk of diabetes associated with other co-morbidities. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02849899 . Registered on 8 February 2016.

Antithymocytes globulins: Time to revisit its use in kidney transplantation?

T cell depletion by polyclonal antithymocyte globulins (ATG) has been used for many years in both organ and hematopoietic cell transplantation as an induction and rejection therapy. Nevertheless, its use remains largely empirical and many clinical questions, such as the determination of an individualized dose, therapeutic relevance of nondepletive effects, or prediction of long-term effects, are still unresolved. This review evaluates the evidence-based knowledge and the uncertainties concerning ATG, and suggests perspectives and opportunities for modern use of this old drug.

Pre-transplant end-stage renal disease-related immune risk profile in kidney transplant recipients predicts post-transplant infections.

BACKGROUND: End-stage renal disease (ESRD) is associated with premature aging of the T-cell system. Nevertheless, the clinical significance of pre-transplant ESRD-related immune senescence is unknown. METHODS: We studied whether immune risk phenotype (IRP), a typical feature of immune senescence, may affect post-transplant infectious complications. A total of 486 patients were prospectively studied during the first year post transplant. IRP was defined as positive cytomegalovirus serology with at least 1 of the following criteria: CD4/CD8 ratio <1 and/or CD8 T-cell count >90th percentile. RESULTS: We found that 47 patients (9.7%) had pre-transplant IRP. IRP+ patients did not differ from IRP- patients for any clinical characteristics, but exhibited more pronounced immune senescence. Both opportunistic infections (43% vs. 6%, P < 0.001) and severe bacterial infection (SBI) (40% vs. 25%, P = 0.028) were more frequent in IRP(+) patients. In multivariate analysis, IRP was predictive of both opportunistic infection (hazard ratio [HR] 2.97 [95% confidence interval {CI} 1.53-5.76], P = 0.001), and SBI (HR 2.33 [95% CI 1.34-3.92], P = 0.008). Acute rejection rates were numerically much lower in IRP+ patients. A total of 418 patients (86%) had biological evaluation 1 year post transplant. Among 41 IRP+ patients, 35 (85%) remained IRP+ 1 year post transplant. CONCLUSION: Pre-transplant IRP is associated with an increased risk of post-transplant infection.

Polycystic kidney size and outcomes on peritoneal dialysis: comparison with haemodialysis.

BACKGROUND: For many nephrologists, patients with polycystic kidney disease (PKD) have an increased risk of complications and technique failure on peritoneal dialysis (PD) due to enlarged kidneys. The literature showed that PD can be as good a therapeutic option as haemodialysis (HD) for patients with PKD. However, no study has focused on the impact of polycystic kidney size on outcomes for patients on PD. METHODS: This is a retrospective monocentric study. Fifty-eight patients with PKD started dialysis between January 2000 and December 2010: 24 on PD and 34 on HD. Kidney size assessed by abdominal computed tomography scans was available for 45 patients (19 on PD and 26 on HD). PD technique survival, specific PKD complications and mechanical and infectious PD complications, as need for pre-transplant nephrectomy and kidney transplantation, were considered. RESULTS: The two cohorts were similar in terms of age and body surface area. The median kidney size was not significantly different between PD and HD patients [19.1 cm (12.5-32.5) versus 16.5 cm (11.8-33.8), respectively, P = 0.13]. However, we identified an increased number of PD patients with larger kidneys [(>25 cm) (27.8% on PD versus 7.7% on HD (P = 0.07)]. Neither cystic (infection or haemorrhage) nor mechanical complications (hernias and leaks) were different in PD or HD. Ten patients experienced PD-related peritonitis, mainly due to non-enteric bacterial pathogens. The main reason for stopping PD and HD was transplantation. Six PD patients underwent nephrectomy in order to access the transplant programme. Among them, five were maintained on PD after surgical procedure with good adequacy dialysis criteria. CONCLUSIONS: We observed no deleterious impact of kidney size on outcomes on PD when compared with HD. A large kidney size in patients with PKD is not a contraindication to PD. Patients for whom a pre-transplant nephrectomy is mandatory can also safely opt for PD as a dialysis method.

Subclinical Epstein-Barr virus viremia among adult renal transplant recipients: incidence and consequences.

The natural history and clinical significance of posttransplant Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection remain largely unknown. The aims of this study are to describe the incidence, risk factors and consequences of EBV infection after kidney transplantation. A total of 383 consecutive patients having received a kidney transplant between January 2002 and December 2010 were included. EBV polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed every 2 weeks for 3 months, and every 4 weeks for the next 9 months. A total of 155 of the 383 patients (40%) had at least one positive viremia during the first year posttransplant. The median time to viremia was day 31 posttransplant (14-329). A total of 73 (47%) had EBV viremia > 10(3) log and 23 (15%) had positive viremia for more than 6 months. EBV D+/R- patients (12/18 (67%) versus 143/365 (39%), p = 0.02) and those having received antithymocyte globulins (ATG) (54% vs. 35%; p<0.001) were more likely to develop EBV infection. EBV infection (hazard ratio [HR], 3.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.72-8.29; p = 0.01) was associated with the occurrence of opportunistic infections. A positive EBV PCR during the first 6 months posttransplant was associated with graft loss (HR, 3.04; 95% CI, 1.36-6.79; p = 0.014). EBV reactivation is frequent after transplantation and reflects overimmunosuppression. Prospective studies should examine the association between EBV and graft loss.

CT in predicting abdominal cocoon in patients on peritoneal dialysis.

AIM: To evaluate the computed tomography (CT) signs of encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis (EPS) in patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD) as predictive factors for the evolution to abdominal cocoon (AC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinical features and CT signs of 90 patients on PD were retrospectively reviewed. According to the clinical features, they were divided into three groups (asymptomatic, moderate, or severe). Clinical results were correlated with previously reported CT signs of EPS, i.e., peritoneal thickening, peritoneal calcifications, loculated fluids, small bowel faeces sign, small bowel obstruction, clustered bowel loops, pseudo sac, signs of bowel ischaemia or necrosis. AC was defined at CT by the association of clustered bowel loops and a pseudo sac. Statistical analysis was performed using the Fisher's exact test and the t-test. RESULTS: Although demonstrated in symptomatic patients (p=0.041), the occurrence of AC was not correlated with the severity of the symptoms (p=0.16). Among the CT signs, the presence of loculated fluids (p=0.011), a small bowel faeces sign (p=0.002); and small bowel obstruction (p=0.0001) were found to be statistically correlated with the appearance of an AC. Moreover, the association of loculated fluids, small bowel faeces sign, small bowel obstruction was extremely sensitive and specific in the development of AC (sensitivity=67%, specifity=100%, positive predictive value=100%, negative predictive value=96%). CONCLUSION: CT should be carried out in every symptomatic patient on PD. Indeed, the association of loculated fluid, small bowel faeces sign, and small bowel obstruction enables the prediction of the development of AC, which is likely to curtail PD and require surgery.

Influence of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) gene promoter polymorphism -765 on graft loss after renal transplantation.

A G-->C polymorphism has been identified in the human cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) gene promoter at position -765 with C allele leading to a decreased promoter activity with low prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) production. PGE2 has strong immunomodulatory properties that could influence graft survival. We studied the association between this polymorphism and allograft failure in two independent cohorts of renal transplant recipients (RTRs) including a total of 603 patients. The functional effect of COX-2 gene promoter polymorphism was analyzed by measuring serum levels of PGE2. Median follow-up was 8.7 and 7.9 years for the first and second cohort, respectively. Analysis of 603 patients identified 20 CC (3.3%), 179 GC (29.7%) and 404 GG (67%) carriers. Patients with the GG genotype had significantly higher serum PGE2 concentrations than patients with the C allele. Carriers with a C allele have an independent increased risk of graft loss (hazard ratio (HR) 2.43 [95% CI 1.19-4.97], p = 0.015 for cohort 1; HR 1.72 [95% CI 0.99-3.77], p = 0.051 for cohort 2) compared to GG patients. COX-2 gene promoter polymorphism at position -765 (G-->C) is associated with a higher rate of graft loss in RTRs. Such findings may be used to influence immunosuppressive strategies and optimize patient management.

[Immune monitoring of kidney transplant recipients: can markers predictive of over-immunosuppression be identified?]. / Surveillance biologique des patients transplantés rénaux : vers une prévision des complications associées à l'immunosuppression ?

While the use of nonspecific immunosuppressive drugs has significantly reduced the incidence of acute graft rejection, the benefits of such therapies on chronic rejection and overall long-term graft survival are uncertain. Persistent excessive immunosuppression after immunosuppressive drug treatment is associated with long-term toxicity including increased incidence of cancers, severe infectious complications and metabolic diseases (for example, diabetes, atherosclerosis). One of our team's aims is to identify immunological factors that can predict such toxicities. We have previously demonstrated that CD4T cell cytopenia was correlated with high risk of cancers and infections as well as atherosclerosis in renal transplant recipients. Now, we are investigating the mechanisms involved in CD4T cell cytopenia. We are also exploring how inflammation and cells from the innate immunity influence the complications associated with kidney transplantation. This was performed through the analysis of gene polymorphism on TLR-4, NOD2/CARD15 receptors and IL-6 promoter and correlation with transplantation outcome. We already correlated IL-6 promoter gene polymorphism at position -174 with new-onset diabetes after transplantation in overweight patients. Identification of gene polymorphisms or factors associated with complications after transplantation may help physicians to determine high-risk recipient profiles and optimize pre- and post-transplantation treatment strategies.