The Effects of a Blended Care Intervention in Partners of Patients With Acquired Brain Injury - Results of the CARE4Carer Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To assess effects of the CARE4Carer blended care intervention on caregiver mastery and psychosocial functioning compared with usual care in partners of patients with acquired brain injury (ABI). DESIGN: Multicenter randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Nine sites for rehabilitation medicine. PARTICIPANTS: 120 partners of outpatients with ABI were randomly allocated to blended care (N=59) or usual care (N=61). INTERVENTION: The blended care intervention (20 weeks) was aimed at improving caregiving skills and consisted of 9 online sessions, combined with 2 face-to-face consultations with a social worker. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mastery was assessed with the Caregiver Mastery Scale, secondary outcome measures were caregiver strain (Caregiver Strain Index), family functioning (Family Assessment Device), anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), burden (self-rated), and quality of life (CarerQol). Assessments were performed at baseline, 24, and 40 weeks. RESULTS: The adjusted mean difference in caregiver mastery between intervention and control group at week 24 was 1.31 (SD3.48, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.12 to 2.74, P=.072) and at week 40 was 1.31 (SD3.69, 95% CI -0.26 to 2.88, P=.100). In the per protocol analysis, the adjusted mean difference in caregiver mastery at week 24 was 1.53 (SD3.38, 95% CI 0.10 to 2.96, P=.036) and at week 40 was 1.57 (SD3.63, 95% CI 0.01 to 3.14, P=.049). Regarding secondary outcomes, caregiver strain was lower in the intervention group in the per protocol analysis at week 40. Family functioning was higher in the intervention group in week 24, whereas anxiety was lower at both timepoints. CONCLUSIONS: In the subset of participants who were able to complete the intervention, caregiver mastery and psychosocial functioning improved. Future work should focus on improving adherence as this will optimize beneficial effects of blended care.

Burden, anxiety and depressive symptoms in partners - course and predictors during the first two years after stroke.

BACKGROUND: Partners of patients with stroke are at high risk for burden, anxiety and depressive symptoms. Previous studies have reported contradictory results and did not investigate these three courses simultaneously. In this study we comprehensively studied the courses and predictors of burden, anxiety and depressive symptoms in partners of patients with stroke during the first two years after stroke. They were analyzed as outcomes as well as predictors for each other. METHODS: Six general hospitals recruited 215 patients with stroke and their partners for a longitudinal cohort study. Mixed model analyses were performed for burden (CSI), anxiety (HADS-A) and depressive symptoms (HADS-D) as time-varying outcome variables, measured at four time points during two years after stroke. RESULTS: Burden and depressive symptoms did not significantly change over time, whereas anxiety symptoms initially decreased followed by an increase. Higher burden was predicted by partners' younger age, higher education, more symptoms of anxiety and depression, and by patients' greater stroke severity, lower cognitive functioning and more symptoms of anxiety and depression. More anxiety symptoms were predicted by higher burden, more depressive symptoms, and lower self-efficacy of the partner. More depressive symptoms were predicted by older age, higher burden, more symptoms of anxiety, less proactive coping strategies of the partner, and more depressive symptoms of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: Burden, anxiety and depressive symptoms are interrelated and become chronic in partners of patients with stroke. It is important to screen partners early after stroke to identify partners who are at risk for negative outcomes.

Agreement and differences regarding family functioning between patients with acquired brain injury and their partners.

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: To investigate the level of agreement and differences regarding the perception of family functioning between patients with acquired brain injury and their partners. Our hypothesis was that patients would report better family functioning than their partners. RESEARCH DESIGN: Cross-sectional studyMethods and Procedures: Baseline data were used from 77 patient-partner dyads (87.0% stroke) who were participating in the ongoing CARE4Patient and CARE4Carer trials. Family functioning was assessed using the General Functioning subscale of the McMaster Family Assessment Device (FAD-GF). Agreement was assessed with intraclass correlation coefficient, a Bland-Altman plot, percentages absolute agreement and weighted kappa values. Differences were tested with Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. MAIN OUTCOMES AND RESULTS: Patients and their partners differed in their perception of family functioning. Within-dyad agreement was poor regarding the overall FAD-GF scores with partners reporting significantly poorer family functioning compared to the patients (32.5% versus 18.2%). Agreement regarding the individual items ranged from slight to moderate. CONCLUSIONS: Health care professionals should assess family functioning after stroke in both patients and their partners, and any discrepancies should be discussed with both members of the patient-partner dyad.

Participation Restrictions and Satisfaction With Participation in Partners of Patients With Stroke.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate participation restrictions and satisfaction with participation in partners of patients with stroke. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Five rehabilitation centers and 3 hospitals in The Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: A consecutive sample of 54 partners of patients with stroke. The patients were participating in a multicenter randomized controlled trial. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Participation restrictions as a result of the patient's stroke and satisfaction with participation measured with the Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation-Participation. RESULTS: The number of participation restrictions differed between partners of patients with stroke. The median number of participation restrictions experienced was 2 for the 11 activities assessed. Most participation restrictions were reported regarding paid work, unpaid work, or education, relationship with partner (ie, patient), and going out. Partners were least satisfied regarding going out, sports or other physical exercise, and day trips and other outdoor activities. The participation restrictions and satisfaction with participation were significantly correlated (ρ=0.65; P<.001), although this relation between participation restrictions and satisfaction with participation differed for the various activities. Differences between satisfied partners with participation restrictions and dissatisfied partners concerned anxiety (U=93.0; P=.026), depression (U=81.5, P=.010), and the number of restrictions experienced (U=50.0; P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: There is great variety in restrictions experienced by partners regarding different activities and in their satisfaction with these activities. Specific assessment is therefore important when supporting partners of patients with stroke.

Evaluating the CARE4Carer Blended Care Intervention for Partners of Patients With Acquired Brain Injury: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Support programs for partners of patients with acquired brain injury are necessary since these partners experience several unfavorable consequences of caregiving, such as a high burden, emotional distress, and poor quality of life. Evidence-based support strategies that can be included in these support programs are psychoeducation, skill building, problem solving, and improving feelings of mastery. A promising approach would seem to be to combine web-based support with face-to-face consultations, creating a blended care intervention. OBJECTIVE: This paper outlines the protocol of a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the CARE4Carer blended care intervention for partners of patients with acquired brain injury. METHODS: A multicenter two-arm randomized controlled trial will be conducted. A total of 120 partners of patients with acquired brain injury will be recruited from five rehabilitation centers in the Netherlands. The blended care intervention consists of a nine-session web-based support program and two face-to-face consultations with a social worker. Themes that will be addressed are: giving partners insight into their own situation, including possible pitfalls and strengths, learning how to cope with the situation, getting a grip on thoughts and feelings, finding a better balance in the care for the patient with acquired brain injury, thinking about other possible care options, taking care of oneself, and communication. The intervention lasts 20 weeks and the control group will receive usual care. The outcome measures will be assessed at baseline and at 24- and 40-week follow-up. The primary outcome is caregiver mastery. Secondary outcome measures are strain, burden, family functioning, emotional functioning, coping, quality of life, participation, and social network. RESULTS: The effect of the intervention on the primary and secondary outcome measures will be determined. Additional a process evaluation will be conducted. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study will be used to improve the care for partners of patients with acquired brain injury. Barriers and facilitators that emerge from the process evaluation will be used in the nationwide implementation of the intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch Trial Register NTR6197; http://www.trialregister.nl/trialreg/admin/rctview.asp?TC=6197 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6xHBAxx0y).

A validation study of the Caregiver Mastery Scale for partners of patients with acquired brain injury.

OBJECTIVE: To validate the Caregiver Mastery Scale for partners of patients with acquired brain injury. DESIGN: The score distributions, internal consistency and convergent validity of the Caregiver Mastery Scale were determined. SUBJECTS: A total of 92 partners (53% male, age 62 years) of patients with acquired brain injury (91% stroke) discharged from inpatient rehabilitation (time since injury 32 months). MAIN MEASURES: Outcome measure: Caregiver Mastery Scale. Reference measures: Caregiver Strain Index, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and CarerQoL. RESULTS: The Caregiver Mastery Scale has a normal distribution, with no floor or ceiling effects. Its internal consistency is acceptable (Cronbach's alpha: 0.75). The convergent validity analyses confirmed our hypothesis that higher scores on the Caregiver Mastery Scale correlate with less burden, lower levels of anxiety and depression and greater well-being. Furthermore, partners scoring high on the Caregiver Mastery Scale mostly scored below the clinical cut-off scores on the Caregiver Strain Index and the anxiety and depression subscales of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, whereas partners scoring low on the Caregiver Mastery Scale were more likely to score above the cut-off points. CONCLUSION: The Caregiver Mastery Scale is a valid instrument to assess the caregiver mastery of partners of patients with acquired brain injury.

Influence of recruitment strategy on the reach and effect of a web-based multiple tailored smoking cessation intervention among Dutch adult smokers.

This study investigated the influence of two different recruitment strategies on the reach and effect of a web-based multiple tailored smoking cessation program. From May 2009 until June 2010, Dutch adult smokers were recruited via mass media or general practices. Those who completed the baseline questionnaire were followed up during 6 weeks (two follow-ups). Differences between the two samples were assessed regarding baseline characteristics, retention rates, quit attempts and 24-hour point prevalence abstinence. Smokers recruited via general practices (N = 409) were significantly lower educated, less addicted, more motivated to quit smoking and to maintain non-smoking, more often female and more often suffering from cardiovascular or respiratory diseases than mass media respondents (N = 1154). They showed higher retention rates and were more likely to report a quit attempt (64.3 versus 50.7%) and abstinence (43.3 versus 33.1%). More respondents could be recruited via mass media, while general practices respondents showed higher retention rates and were more successful in quitting smoking, though these effects became non-significant when controlling for experimental condition and baseline differences. The choice for a particular recruitment strategy appeared to determine the number and type of smokers recruited and might consequently influence the intervention's potential public health impact.