Randomised clinical trial: Bifidobacterium lactis NCC2818 probiotic vs placebo, and impact on gut transit time, symptoms, and gut microbiology in chronic constipation.

BACKGROUND: Constipation is a prevalent gastrointestinal disorder. Patient dissatisfaction with prescribed medications is common, and there is need for alternative management strategies. Evidence shows that Bifidobacterium species may be beneficial in constipation. AIM: To investigate changes in physiological and clinical measures of gut function in patients with chronic constipation following the consumption of Bifidobacterium lactis NCC2818, compared to placebo. METHODS: Participants were randomised to a 4-week supplementation with B. lactis NCC2818 (1.5 x 1010 CFU/d) or placebo. Gut transit time was measured using a radio-opaque marker, while symptoms and quality of life were assessed using validated questionnaires. Gut microbiota composition was assessed using quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Analysis of covariance was used for normally distributed variables, and Mann-Whitney test for non-normally distributed variables. RESULTS: Seventy-five participants were randomised. There was no significant difference between the probiotic and placebo groups in gut transit time change from baseline to week 2 (-11.7 hours, SD 33.0 hours vs -12.9 hours, SD 33.6 hours; P = 0.863) or to week 4 (-20.4 hours, SD 32.5 h vs -8.7 hours, SD 33.8 hours; P = 0.103). There were also no improvements in stool output, symptoms, or quality of life. No differences were found in Bifidobacterium concentrations between the probiotic and placebo groups at week 4 (9.5 log10 /g dry faeces, SD 0.3 vs 9.4 log10 /g, SD 1.0; P = 0.509). CONCLUSIONS: Bifidobacterium lactis NCC2818 was not effective in the management of mild chronic constipation. This study highlights the importance of further studies and their publication to better understand the strain-specific effects of probiotics.

Short-Term Daily Intake of Polydextrose Fiber Does Not Shorten Intestinal Transit Time in Constipated Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Chronic constipation (CC) remains a common gastrointestinal (GI) disorder that conveys a substantial healthcare burden. Expert guidelines recommend increasing fiber intake, yet the clinical evidence to support this needs strengthening for specific fibers. The aim was to evaluate changes in intestinal transit time and GI symptoms in CC patients who consumed polydextrose. In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 128 adults with CC received 8 g or 12 g polydextrose, or placebo, daily for 4 weeks. Transit time, as primary outcome, was assessed by radiopaque marker distribution after 2-weeks intervention. Bowel habits, GI symptoms and quality of life (QOL) were assessed by questionnaire, including the Patient-Assessment of Constipation (PAC) Symptoms (SYM), and PAC-QOL. Following 2-weeks intervention, no reduction was seen in transit time in any group and following 2- or 4-weeks intervention, no improvements were seen in stool frequency or consistency in any group. After 2-weeks intervention with 8 g/day polydextrose an improvement was seen in the PAC-SYM rectal score (p = 0.041). After 4-weeks intervention both rectal (p = 0.049) and stool (p = 0.029) scores improved while improvement in the QOL satisfaction score did not reach significance (p = 0.071). Overall, the results suggest that 2-weeks consumption of 8 or 12 g/day polydextrose does not significantly improve physiological measures of gut function in CC adults. Longer term consumption may improve clinical measures, but further studies will be required to substantiate this.

The effects of CYP3A4 induction and inhibition on the pharmacokinetics of alisporivir in humans.

In vitro data suggest that alisporivir is a substrate and inhibitor of CYP3A4 and P-gp. Hence, the potential for drug-drug interactions when alisporivir is co-administered with CYP3A4 and/or P-gp inhibitors such as ketoconazole, azithromycin and CYP3A4 inducers such as rifampin were evaluated in three separate clinical studies. Co-administration with ketoconazole (a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor) increased the Cmax , AUC and terminal elimination half-life of alisporivir by approximately two-, eight- ,and threefold, respectively. Co-administration with azithromycin (a putative weak CYP3A4 inhibitor and substrate) had no impact on the Cmax and AUC of alisporivir. Rifampin (a CYP3A4 inducer) caused an approximate 90% reduction in alisporivir Cmax and AUC and a fourfold reduction in alisporivir terminal elimination half-life. Alisporivir as an inhibitor of CYP3A4 caused a 39% increase in azithromycin exposure. The results from these studies establish alisporivir as a sensitive CYP3A4 substrate in vivo. Consequently, co-administered potent CYP3A4 inhibitors and inducers are likely to cause clinically significant changes in the exposure to alisporivir.