Prevalence and associated factors of low bone mass in adults with systemic lupus erythematosus.

Background Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients are often treated with glucocorticoids, which place them at risk of bone loss. Objectives The objectives of this article are to determine: (1) the prevalence of low bone mineral density (BMD) and factors associated with low BMD and (2) the prevalence of symptomatic fragility fractures in inception patients of the Toronto Lupus Cohort (TLC). Methods Prospectively collected data from the TLC (1996-2015) of inception patients' first BMD were analyzed. For pre-menopausal women/males <50 years, BMD 'below expected range for age' was defined by Z-score ≤ -2.0 SD. For post-menopausal women/males age 50 or older, osteoporosis was defined by T-score ≤ -2.5 SD and low bone mass by T-score between -1.0 and -2.5 SD. Patients' BMDs were defined as abnormal if Z-score ≤ -2.0 or T-score < -1.0 SD, and the remainder as normal. Descriptive analysis and logistic regression were employed. Results Of 1807 patients, 286 are inception patients with BMD results (mean age 37.9 ± 13.7 years); 88.8% are female. The overall prevalence of abnormal BMD is 31.5%. In pre-menopausal women ( n = 173), the prevalence of BMD below expected range is 17.3%. In post-menopausal women ( n = 81), the prevalence of osteoporosis and low BMD are 12.3% and 43.2%, respectively. Age and cumulative dose of glucocorticoids are statistically significantly associated with abnormal BMD in multivariate analysis. Of 769 inception patients from TLC, 11.1% experienced symptomatic fragility fractures (peripheral and vertebral) over the course of their disease. Conclusion The prevalence of low BMD is high in SLE patients, and is associated with older age and higher cumulative glucocorticoid dose.

Predictive factors for well-being in advanced cancer patients referred for palliative radiotherapy.

AIM: Well-being falls within a broad category of quality of life indicators and encompasses both physical and emotional factors. Identification of the most important factors affecting overall well-being may allow health care practitioners to target these symptoms and improve patients' quality of life. The purpose of this study was to determine factors most predictive of well-being in advanced cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients referred to the Rapid Response Radiotherapy Program completed the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) at consultation. ESAS scores and demographics were analysed for their predictive ability for well-being via regression analysis of the raw and categorical scores. RESULTS: In total, 1439 ESAS assessments were analysed; the median age was 69 years (range 21-95). The most common primary cancers were of the lung (36%), breast (21%) and prostate (18%). Greater distress in all ESAS items, lower Karnofsky performance status (KPS) and referral for bone metastases significantly predicted for worse well-being (all P < 0.0001). However, referral for brain metastases predicted for better well-being. In multivariate analysis, the most predictive factors for worse well-being were lower KPS (P = 0.003) and greater distress in drowsiness (P = 0.01), pain (P < 0.0001), fatigue (P < 0.0001), depression (P < 0.0001) and appetite loss (P < 0.0001). Repeated analyses with categorical scores led to similar results. CONCLUSION: Greater distress in physical and emotional symptoms assessed by ESAS contributes significantly to poorer well-being. Management for patients with advanced cancer should be directed towards these symptoms, as they form the basis for well-being. Although emotional symptoms may be scored lower than physical symptoms by patients, both significantly affect well-being.