Outcome Evaluation of a Public Health Intervention on Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) Prevention Among Women Aged 40-64 with Low Incomes in Nebraska.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of the program interventions on cardiovascular disease in Nebraska women who are low income and have no health insurance. DESIGN: This evaluation used pre- and post-comparison approach. Paired t test and McNemar's test were used to examine the changes after the program interventions. PARTICIPANTS: Nebraska women aged 40 to 64 years, without health insurance, and with household incomes up to 225% Federal Poverty Level. SETTING AND INTERVENTION: A network of community-clinical linkages in which medical providers provided preventive screening services and risk reduction counseling in clinical settings and community health workers provided lifestyle interventions in community settings either over the phone or in person. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The data included weight, blood pressure measures, self-blood pressure monitoring and management, total cholesterol, fasting glucose or A1C, smoking status, nutrition, and physical activities. RESULTS: Among 2649 participants, 82.2% were overweight, 50.3% had hypertension, 52.7% had high cholesterol, 20.7% had diabetes, 22.5% were current smokers, and 56.4% had more than 1 risk factor. A total of 1312 participants (57.3%) participated in at least 1 lifestyle intervention session, and among them, 65.8% completed at least 3 sessions. Paired t test and McNemar's test indicated significant improvement in hypertension control and self-management; a significant amount of weight loss with 24.1% losing at least 5 pounds; and an increase in healthy eating and physical activity. CONCLUSIONS: These participants benefited from the Nebraska program. Utilizing a statewide clinical network and participating in lifestyle interventions through local health departments, participants improved some chronic health conditions and decreased their risks of developing cardiovascular diseases.

Who Is Leading the Field in 2020?: AAIDD Students and Early Career Professionals.

The American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (AAIDD) has been a leader in the field of intellectual and developmental disabilities since its founding in 1876. Today, student and early career professionals make up approximately 8.5% of the organization, with their engagement supported by the Student and Early Career Professional Interest Network (SECP). An article by Havercamp et al. (2003), "Who Will Lead the Field Beyond 2020?", recommended organizational changes that have been largely addressed in the years following by SECP. The present research replicates Havercamp et al.'s (2003) original survey of the organization's student and early career professionals, and results support the effectiveness of SECP as a welcoming platform from which students and early career professionals can establish themselves in the organization.

Getting comfortable with disability: The short- and long-term effects of a clinical encounter.

BACKGROUND: Physicians report discomfort when interacting with patients with disabilities, which can negatively impact the quality of healthcare they provide. OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: An intervention structured around a formative clinical encounter was assessed for its effectiveness in changing comfort towards treating patients with disabilities. It was predicted that this encounter would have a positive short- and long-term impact on medical students. METHOD: During the 2017-2018 academic year, 169 third-year medical students conducted a patient encounter with a person who had a disability. Students met individually with the "patient" and completed a brief social and medical history as if they were meeting a new patient to establish care. A measure of perceived comfort caring for patients with disabilities was administered to students before and after the encounter. One year after the patient encounter, 59 students were surveyed about their satisfaction and the impact of the patient encounter. RESULTS: The impact of encountering people with disabilities in a clinical setting was positive, with statistically significant improvements across all items on the measure of perceived comfort. Students were highly satisfied with the experience and anticipated feeling more confident, more comfortable, less awkward, and more skilled and efficacious when encountering a person with a disability in their future practice. A thematic analysis of the one year follow-up data suggest that students valued the encounter and desired more content on disability throughout their education. CONCLUSIONS: Medical education should include dedicated exposure to persons with disabilities and a simulated patient experience allowing for a safe environment to gain skills and confidence.

Who thrives as a direct support professional? Personal motivation and resilience in direct support.

Direct support professionals (DSPs) are an essential part of the lives of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD). High rates of DSP turnover and vacancy have spurred much research into the occupational stress and burnout experienced by DSPs. There are, however, DSPs who remain motivated by and successful in the profession. Less research has been done on what makes these DSPs resilient to the same stressors that negatively affect other DSPs. The present study used the tenets of sensitivity theory to examine the relationships between motivation and outcome measures relevant to DSP success, namely vocational strain, depersonalization, and personal accomplishment. The motive of family related positively and vengeance related negatively with the three outcome variables. To a lesser extent, citizenship and social contact were positively related and prestige was negatively correlated with outcomes. The relevance of these findings and their potential applications to DSP recruitment and training are discussed.