Patient Outcomes Following Total Joint Replacement Surgery: A Comparison of Hospitals and Ambulatory Surgery Centers.

BACKGROUND: For several years, many orthopedic surgeons have been performing total joint replacements in hospital outpatient departments (HOPDs) and more recently in ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs). In a recent shift, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services began reimbursing for total knee replacement surgery in HOPDs. Some observers have expressed concerns over patient safety for the Medicare population particularly if Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services extends the policy to include total hip replacement surgery and coverage in ASCs. METHODS: This study used a large claims database of non-Medicare patients to examine inpatient and outpatient total knee replacement and total hip replacement surgery performed on a near-elderly population during 2014-2016. We applied propensity score methods to match inpatients with ASC patients and HOPD patients with ASC patients adjusting for risk using the HHS Hierarchical Condition Categories risk adjustment model. We conducted statistical tests comparing clinical outcomes across the 3 settings and examined relative costs. RESULTS: Readmissions, postsurgical complications, and payments were lower for outpatients than for inpatients. Within outpatient settings, readmissions and postsurgical complications were lower in ASCs than in HOPDs but payments for ASC patients were higher than payments for HOPD patients. CONCLUSION: Our findings support the argument that outpatient total joint replacement is appropriate for select patients treated in both HOPDs and ASCs, although in the commercially insured population, the latter services may come at a cost. Until further study of outpatient total joint replacement in the Medicare population becomes available, how this will extrapolate to the Medicare population is unknown.

Preoperative diagnosis of infection in patients with nonunions.

BACKGROUND: The surgical treatment of a fracture nonunion is complicated in the presence of infection. The purpose of the present study is to report on the utility of a standardized protocol to rule out infection in high-risk patients and to evaluate the efficacy of each component of the protocol. METHODS: A single protocol of preoperative laboratory tests (white blood-cell count, C-reactive protein level, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate) and a combined white blood cell/sulfur colloid scan were performed for patients with a high risk of fracture nonunion. Infection was diagnosed on the basis of positive intraoperative cultures, evidence of gross infection at the time of the procedure, or evidence of gross infection during the immediate postoperative period. With use of infection as the end point, univariate analysis and multiple logistic regression analysis were used to compare tests. A risk stratification method was used to combine tests. RESULTS: Ninety-three patients with ninety-five nonunions were evaluated. Thirty of the ninety-five nonunions were ultimately diagnosed as being infected. With use of a combination of elevated white blood-cell count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and C-reactive protein level and a positive scan, the predicted probabilities of infection associated with zero, one, two, and three positive tests were 18%, 24%, 50%, and 86%, respectively. With the elimination of the nuclear scan, the predicted probabilities for zero, one, two, and three risk factors were 20%, 19%, 56%, and 100%. CONCLUSIONS: The erythrocyte sedimentation rate and the C-reactive protein level were both independently accurate predictors of infection. Use of a risk stratification method showed that the likelihood of infection increased with each additional positive test. A combined white blood cell/sulfur colloid scan was the least predictive method of revealing infection and is not cost effective, even as part of a stratification scheme. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic level III. See instructions for authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Treatment of the stress positive ligamentous SE4 ankle fracture: incidence of syndesmotic injury and clinical decision making.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to review our experience with the treatment of stress positive (+) supination and external pattern injuries using shared decision making with the patients. DESIGN: Retrospective case review. SETTING: Level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS: Over a 9-year period, we treated 114 patients (aged 19-76 years, average 43 years) with stress (+) supination and external rotation type fibula fractures, who were included in the present study. INTERVENTION: X-rays were reviewed, and the medial clear space (MCS) measured on the presentation, stress, and final united radiographs. The decision for surgical or nonsurgical management was made by the patient and surgeon after a discussion of risks/benefits of both. Syndesmotic instability for the operative cases was diagnosed by medial widening and talar subluxation on abduction/external rotation stress after fibular fixation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: MCS measurement at union. RESULTS: Of the 114 cases, 54 were definitively treated in a cast, and 60 were treated operatively. Twenty-seven (45%) of the operative cases demonstrated syndesmotic instability on radiographic examination. The MCS on stress examination was statistically different, with greater widening seen for operatively treated patients (4.8 ± 0.5 vs. 6.9 ± 0.86) (P < 0.001). No patient healed with any subluxation on weight bearing x-rays. CONCLUSIONS: Stress (+) SE pattern fibular fractures with minimal MCS widening on stress examination may be treated in a cast to union with predictable healing. In those patients treated operatively, the treating surgeon should be aware of the high rate of syndesmotic injury. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Reuse of external fixation components: a randomized trial.

OBJECTIVES: External fixation devices are sold in the United States as single-use devices and can be costly. Approved processes for refurbishment of nonimplantable components are available. We evaluated one such program for safety, efficacy, and fiscal ramifications. DESIGN: Randomized clinical trial SETTING: Single center, Level I trauma center PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: During the 30-month enrollment period (November 16, 2001 to May 16, 2004), 41 patients (13%) of 315 patients were not able to consent and were excluded. A total of 178 (65%) of the 274 eligible patients who were offered entry into a randomized trial of new versus refurbished external fixation components for their injury refused to participate, leaving 96 (35%) of the 274 eligible patients entered into the study. INTERVENTION: Consented patients were entered into a trial of new versus refurbished nonimplantable external fixation components for their injury (all pins were new). MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The frames were evaluated at the time of removal for efficacy and the complications of pin tract infections, loss of fixation, or loosening of components. RESULTS: A total of 48 distal radius fractures, 29 pilon fractures, and 19 tibial plateau fractures were entered into the study. With the 96 fractures treated in our study (50 new frames, 46 reused frames), we found no statistical differences in the incidence of pin tract infections (46% versus 52%, P=0.32), loss of fixation (4% versus 4%, P=0.70), or loosening of the components (1% versus 1%, P=1.0). CONCLUSIONS: Sixty-five percent of consentable patients did not wish to have an external fixation frame with refurbished clamps. Our study demonstrated that this type of program is safe and effective with an actual cost savings of $65,452. The potential savings of such a program is 25% of the cost of all new frames.

Syndesmotic instability in Weber B ankle fractures: a clinical evaluation.

OBJECTIVE: Syndesmotic instability may coexist with unstable Weber B supination-external rotation (SE) lateral malleolar fractures. Current recommendations suggest that Weber B injuries should not have associated syndesmotic instability after open reduction and internal fixation of the lateral malleolus. The purpose of this study was to evaluate syndesmotic stability with respect to the current recommendations for syndesmotic fixation in Weber B SE pattern lateral malleolar fractures. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort, consecutive series. SETTING: Academic Level I trauma center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Over a 7-year period, 238 skeletally mature patients with unstable SE pattern Weber B lateral malleolus fractures with deltoid ligament incompetence were evaluated. INTERVENTION: After lateral malleolar fixation, syndesmotic stability was evaluated by an external rotation stress examination under direct vision and fluoroscopy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The incidence of syndesmotic instability as defined by previously reported criteria. RESULTS: Syndesmotic instability was found in 93 of the 238 (39%) fractures after fixation. Instability was identified in the operating room in 92 of the 93 ankles. One case of instability was missed intraoperatively and diagnosed 2 weeks after surgery. All other patients were followed to union without displacement. CONCLUSIONS: We found syndesmotic instability to be common after anatomic and stable bony fixation in unstable Weber B SE pattern lateral malleolar fractures. Previously published criteria for syndesmotic instability based on cadaveric studies are not representative of the clinical situation. Syndesmotic instability in conjunction with unstable Weber B SE pattern lateral malleolar fractures must be sought out in the operating room with an intraoperative stress examination.

Diagnosis of femoral neck fractures in patients with a femoral shaft fracture. Improvement with a standard protocol.

BACKGROUND: An ipsilateral fracture of the femoral neck is seen in association with 1% to 9% of femoral shaft fractures, and 20% to 50% of these injuries are missed initially. Recognition of an associated femoral neck fracture prior to stabilization of the femoral shaft fracture is imperative to avoid or minimize complications of displacement and osteonecrosis. METHODS: A protocol to look for a femoral neck fracture in all patients with a femoral shaft fracture was instituted at a single level-I trauma center. This protocol consisted of a dedicated anteroposterior internal rotation plain radiograph, a fine (2-mm) cut computed tomographic scan through the femoral neck, and an intraoperative fluoroscopic lateral radiograph prior to fixation as well as postoperative anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of the hip in the operating room prior to awakening the patient. A chi-square analysis comparing pre-protocol and post-protocol fracture prevalences was used to assess the relative risk of missing an associated femoral neck fracture. RESULTS: Two hundred and sixty-eight consecutive patients with a femoral shaft fracture formed the basis of the study group. Of 254 who were followed for at least two months, sixteen were identified as having an associated ipsilateral femoral neck fracture with use of the protocol. Thirteen associated femoral neck fractures were identified before the patient entered the operating room for definitive fixation, and twelve of them were identified with the fine-cut computed tomographic scan. One fracture was identified intraoperatively. There was one iatrogenic fracture and one delayed diagnosis of a femoral neck fracture. With this protocol, we reduced the delay in diagnosis by 91% as compared with our experience in the year prior to the initiation of the protocol. CONCLUSIONS: In the presence of a femoral shaft fracture, evaluation of the femoral neck with fine-cut computed tomography and dedicated internal rotation hip radiographs significantly improves the ability to diagnose an associated femoral neck fracture.