Novel lamin A/C mutations in two families with dilated cardiomyopathy and conduction system disease.

BACKGROUND: The LMNA gene, one of 6 autosomal disease genes implicated in familial dilated cardiomyopathy, encodes lamins A and C, alternatively spliced nuclear envelope proteins. Mutations in lamin A/C cause 4 diseases: Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy, limb girdle muscular dystrophy type 1B, Dunnigan-type familial partial lipodystrophy, and dilated cardiomyopathy. METHODS AND RESULTS: Two 4-generation white families with autosomal dominant familial dilated cardiomyopathy and conduction system disease were found to have novel mutations in the rod segment of lamin A/C. In family A a missense mutation (nucleotide G607A, amino acid E203K) was identified in 14 adult subjects; disease was manifest as progressive conduction disease in the fourth and fifth decades. Death was caused by heart failure. In family B a nonsense mutation (nucleotide C673T, amino acid R225X) was identified in 10 adult subjects; disease was also manifest as progressive conduction disease but with earlier onset (third and fourth decades), ventricular dysrhythmias, left ventricular enlargement, and systolic dysfunction. Death was caused by heart failure and sudden cardiac death. Skeletal muscle disease was not observed in either family. CONCLUSIONS: Novel rod segment mutations in lamin A/C cause variable conduction system disease and dilated cardiomyopathy without skeletal myopathy.

Familial dilated cardiomyopathy: echocardiographic diagnostic criteria for classification of family members as affected.

BACKGROUND: Echocardiographic criteria for left ventricular enlargement (LVE) used to classify subjects as affected in families with familial dilated cardiomyopathy (FDC) have been inconsistent. A recent report from a large Framingham echocardiographic study provides an opportunity to improve the assignment of LVE and FDC in kindreds, principally with a dilated phenotype. The objective of this study is to evaluate an alternative diagnostic criteria for FDC based only on LVE with no measure of fractional shortening (FS). METHODS AND RESULTS: We compared our proposed criteria for LVE and FDC with previous approaches by applying them to 166 adults derived from three large FDC pedigrees. Our proposed FDC diagnostic criteria are a sex- and height-specific method based only on LVE, without regard for FS, set as a 97.5% upper limit for left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD) from the Framingham study. Other methods used to assign LVE were (1) a 95% upper limit for LVEDD by the Framingham study; (2) the method of Henry et al. (1980) based on age and body surface area (BSA); and (3) the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) method with a cut point of LVEDD greater than 2.7 cm/BSA. Three other commonly used diagnostic criteria for FDC were based on various LVE standards combined with an FS of 27% to 30%. For LVE, the Framingham-97.5% was the most stringent (21 of 134 subjects identified; 15.7%), the NHLBI standard the least stringent (57 of 161 subjects identified; 35.4%), and the Henry-112% method intermediate (44 of 161 subjects identified; 27.3%). More women were identified with the Framingham method (57.1%) versus the Henry-112% (40.9%). The Henry-112% and NHLBI methods identified 11.4% and 7.0% of subjects with body mass indices (BMIs) of 35 or greater, respectively. For FDC, our proposed FDC diagnostic criteria identified similar numbers of subjects (21 subjects) as the three other criteria (range, 22 to 27 subjects), but inconsistency was noted (54.2% to 66.7%), with kappa values from 0.49 to 0.55 resulting from different sensitivities to sex, LVE, FS, and BMI. CONCLUSION: Our proposed FDC diagnostic criteria are stringent to assign FDC family members as affected compared with other commonly used criteria. The use of LVEDD alone may be preferable for FDC family screening, although further validation of this approach with phenotypic and genotypic data from other large FDC pedigrees is needed.

Clinical profiles of four large pedigrees with familial dilated cardiomyopathy: preliminary recommendations for clinical practice.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to characterize the clinical profile of familial dilated cardiomyopathy (FDC) in the families of four index patients initially diagnosed with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDC) and to provide clinical practice recommendations for physicians dealing with these diseases. BACKGROUND: Recent evidence indicates that approximately one-half of patients diagnosed with IDC will have FDC, a genetically transmissible disease, but the clinical profile of families screened for FDC in the U.S. has not been well documented. Additionally, recent ethical guidelines suggest increased responsibilities in caring for patients with newly found genetic cardiovascular disease. METHODS: After identification of four families with FDC, we undertook clinical screening including medical history, physical examination, electrocardiogram and echocardiogram. Diagnostic criteria for FDC-affected status of asymptomatic family members was based on left ventricular enlargement (LVE). Subjects with confounding cardiovascular diagnoses or body mass indices >35 were excluded. RESULTS: We identified 798 living members from the four FDC pedigrees, and screened 216 adults and 129 children (age <16 years). Twenty percent of family members were found to be affected with FDC; 82.8% of those affected were asymptomatic. All four pedigrees demonstrated autosomal dominant patterns of inheritance. The average left ventricular end-diastolic dimension was 61.4 mm for affected and 48.4 mm for unaffected subjects, with an average age of 38.3 years (+/- 14.6 years) for affected and 32.1 years for unaffected subjects. The age of onset for FDC varied considerably between and within families. Presenting symptoms when present were decompensated heart failure or sudden death. CONCLUSIONS: We propose that with a new diagnosis of IDC, a thorough family history for FDC should be obtained, followed by echocardiographic-based screening of first-degree relatives for LVE, assuming their voluntary participation. If a diagnosis of FDC is established, we suggest further screening of first-degree relatives, and all subjects with FDC undergo medical treatment following established guidelines. Counseling of family members should emphasize the heritable nature of the disease, the age-dependent penetrance and the unpredictable clinical course.

Lyme disease: an elusive diagnosis.

Lyme disease presents health care practitioners with a complex set of challenges. The history, physical assessment, and clinical evaluation must all be meticulously performed, as Lyme disease can prove to be an exceptionally elusive entity. This article details the pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, nursing history, and health care implications of Lyme disease. Education is emphasized as the key to both the detection and prevention of this rapidly increasing syndrome.