A Novel Approach for Fluoroscopic Guided Intra-articular Hip Injections: Technique Description and Case Series.

ABSTRACT: Fluoroscopic guided intra-articular hip injections generally utilize a standard anterior-posterior view. However, this approach can expose patients to inadvertent femoral nerve or vessel infiltration owing to the proximity of the neurovascular bundle to the joint space. This case-series study describes a novel technique using fluoroscopic ipsilateral oblique angulation and caudal tilt of the image intensifier. With this view, the clinician can advance the needle in a lateral to medial trajectory to obtain intra-articular access and minimize the risk of complications. This method was performed in five patients with refractory chronic hip osteoarthritis, which resulted in notable pain improvements and no reported adverse events. The suggested technique could provide a safer alternative to the anterior-posterior imaging technique for intra-articular hip injections by avoiding the femoral neurovascular bundle, limiting needle repositioning, and offering a satisfactory postprocedural analgesic effect.

Health Professionals' Views on Lifestyle Advice Delivery to Teenage and Young Adult Cancer Patients: A Qualitative Study.

BACKGROUND: Many health professionals working with teenage and young adult cancer patients (TYA-HPs) do not provide advice on physical activity, dietary intake, smoking cessation, and alcohol consumption as part of routine cancer care. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to understand TYA-HPs' perspectives on the provision of health behavior advice and preferences on an intervention to help develop their health promotion skills. METHODS: In-depth, semistructured interviews were conducted with 26 TYA-HPs (12 nurses, 8 clinicians, and 6 allied health professionals) whose average time working with teenage and young adult (TYA) cancer patients was 8 years. Each interview followed the same semistructured guide, which was based upon constructs of the COM-B model of behavior change (capability, physical opportunity, social opportunity, reflective motivation, and automatic motivation), transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using the Framework analysis. RESULTS: Overall, TYA-HPs recognized the value and importance of promoting health behaviors but felt that their capability to provide health behavior advice was limited by the availability of, and access to, good-quality evidence linking health behavior to cancer outcomes. The TYA-HPs expressed confusion over professional responsibility to provide choices. CONCLUSIONS: The TYA-HPs recognize health behavior promotion to be a core part of TYA cancer care but feel ill-equipped to provide such advice to patients. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Mapped to constructs of the COM-B model of behavior, these findings suggest that TYA-HPs would benefit from cross-multidisciplinary team support for improved access to TYA-specific resources covering key health behaviors and skills-based training on delivering lifestyle advice.

Use of Social Media to Promote Cancer Screening and Early Diagnosis: Scoping Review.

BACKGROUND: Social media is commonly used in public health interventions to promote cancer screening and early diagnosis, as it can rapidly deliver targeted public health messages to large numbers of people. However, there is currently little understanding of the breadth of social media interventions and evaluations, whether they are effective, and how they might improve outcomes. OBJECTIVE: This scoping review aimed to map the evidence for social media interventions to improve cancer screening and early diagnosis, including their impact on behavior change and how they facilitate behavior change. METHODS: Five databases and the grey literature were searched to identify qualitative and quantitative evaluations of social media interventions targeting cancer screening and early diagnosis. Two reviewers independently reviewed each abstract. Data extraction was carried out by one author and verified by a second author. Data on engagement was extracted using an adapted version of the key performance indicators and metrics related to social media use in health promotion. Insights, exposure, reach, and differing levels of engagement, including behavior change, were measured. The behavior change technique taxonomy was used to identify how interventions facilitated behavior change. RESULTS: Of the 23 publications and reports included, the majority (16/23, 70%) evaluated national cancer awareness campaigns (eg, breast cancer awareness month). Most interventions delivered information via Twitter (13/23, 57%), targeted breast cancer (12/23, 52%), and measured exposure, reach, and low- to medium-level user engagement, such as number of likes (9/23, 39%). There were fewer articles about colorectal and lung cancer than about breast and prostate cancer campaigns. One study found that interventions had less reach and engagement from ethnic minority groups. A small number of articles (5/23, 22%) suggested that some types of social media interventions might improve high-level engagement, such as intended and actual uptake of screening. Behavior change techniques, such as providing social support and emphasizing the consequences of cancer, were used to engage users. Many national campaigns delivered fundraising messages rather than actionable health messages. CONCLUSIONS: The limited evidence suggests that social media interventions may improve cancer screening and early diagnosis. Use of evaluation frameworks for social media interventions could help researchers plan more robust evaluations that measure behavior change. We need a greater understanding of who engages with these interventions to know whether social media can be used to reduce some health inequalities in cancer screening and early diagnosis. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033592.