Utility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis and staging of colorectal carcinoma.

The objective of this study is to assess the utility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in the diagnosis and staging of colorectal cancer. The study includes patients who underwent EUS-FNA at our institution for staging of colorectal carcinoma or for evaluation peri-rectal masses or distal metastases from August 2000 to November 2010. We assessed the frequency with which EUS-FNA procedure confirms the diagnosis of malignancy and the percent of cases in which it modifies staging of colorectal carcinoma. Using histology as a reference standard, we also assessed the diagnostic performance. We identified 79 cases of EUS-FNA from 77 patients, mean (SD) age of 60 (12.5), 44 males. Twenty-seven (34%) aspirates were from patients with primary rectal/peri-rectal masses, 15 (19%) were from patients with suspected regional lymph node metastasis, and 37 (47%) were cases of suspected of distal metastasis. All lesions were clinically suspicious for primary or metastatic colorectal carcinoma. On cytologic examinations, 43 (54%) cases were confirmed as malignant, 6 (8%) were benign neoplasms, 4 (5%) were suspicious for malignant neoplasm, 2 (3%) showed atypical cells, and the rest 24 (30%) were negative for neoplasms. Fourteen of 27 (52%) of the local rectal masses were confirmed as colorectal carcinoma. Eleven of 15 (73%) regional lymph nodes were positive for metastasis-all, but two of these metastases, were of colorectal origin. Twenty of 37(54%) distal lesions were metastatic neoplasms and 15 of those were colorectal in origin. Diagnosis of primary colorectal carcinoma was confirmed in 52% of the clinically suspicious primary lesions and in 42% regional or distal metastatic lesions. Using histology as a reference standard in 27 of 79 (29%) cases, we calculated an overall sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (C.I) of EUS-FNA of 89% (74-100%), 79% (50-100%) 89% (74-100%), and 79% (51-100%). EUS-FNA is useful for assessing primary and metastatic colorectal lesion. This technique improves staging of suspected nodal or distant metastases.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of intrathoracic and intra-abdominal spindle cell and mesenchymal lesions.

BACKGROUND: The role of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in the evaluation of spindle cell and mesenchymal lesions is unclear. This study reviews the use of EUS-FNA in diagnosing intrathoracic and intra-abdominal spindle and mesenchymal cell lesions at an academic institution. METHODS: All EUS-FNA specimens with a significant spindle or mesenchymal cell component were retrieved. Follow-up was comprised of clinical correlation, chart review, or evaluation of subsequent tissue specimens, including FNAs, biopsies, and/or surgical resections. Lesions were categorized as either inflammatory/reactive or neoplastic. RESULTS: Forty-four EUS-FNA specimens were retrieved from 39 patients (21 men and 18 women with a median age of 61 years [range, 20-88 years]). Anatomic sites included 19 lymph node specimens, 15 gastrointestinal tract specimens, 7 pancreatic specimens, and 4 other anatomic site specimens. Twenty-two cases were inflammatory/reactive lesions, including 17 granulomatous lesions and 5 cases of chronic pancreatitis. Twenty-two cases were neoplastic, including 14 gastrointestinal stromal tumors, 2 smooth muscle tumors, 2 sarcomatoid carcinomas, 2 melanomas, 1 sarcoma, and 1 solitary fibrous tumor. A specific cytologic diagnosis was rendered in 30 cases (81%). Immunocytochemistry was performed on 21 neoplastic cases and contributed to the differential diagnosis in 18 cases. No false-positive findings were encountered. Three false-negative results were identified and were attributed to sampling error. CONCLUSIONS: Spindle cell neoplasms are rarely encountered on EUS-FNA. The differential diagnosis encompasses a wide variety of benign and neoplastic entities. Correlation of cytomorphology and ancillary studies yields a high diagnostic accuracy of spindle cell and mesenchymal lesions on EUS-FNA.

Probabilistic reporting of EUS-FNA cytology: Toward improved communication and better clinical decisions.

BACKGROUND: The objectives of this study were to determine threshold probabilities needed to perform endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) and those needed to treat patients suspected of having malignancy and then to compare these thresholds to the pre- and posttest probabilities of malignancy associated with benign, atypical, suspicious, and malignant diagnoses. The goal was to aid endoscopists in making appropriate clinical decisions based on both quantitative and qualitative approaches. METHODS: The study included 633 consecutive patients. A decision tree was constructed to estimate the "treatment" threshold. Using treatment threshold and likelihood ratios, the authors determined the "no-test-test" and "test-treatment" thresholds. Pretest probability was compared with no-test-test and test-treatment thresholds, and the post-EUS-FNA probability of malignancy for each diagnostic category with the treatment threshold. Results were stratified by lesion site, lesion size, and cytopathologist. RESULTS: EUS-FNA has a wide range of pretest probabilities within which it could be performed (0.06-0.98). The posttest probabilities for malignancy, 0.99 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.967-0.996) and 0.09 (95% CI, 0.057-0.126), after a positive or a negative result, respectively, were significantly different from the treatment threshold but not those of suspicious, 0.92 (95% CI, 0.767-0.994) diagnosis. The posttest probability of atypical diagnosis, 0.60 (95% CI, 0.407-0.772), was not significantly different from that of pretest probability. Results did not vary by lesion size, organ site, or cytopathologist. CONCLUSION: The authors demonstrated the uncertainty associated with EUS-FNA diagnostic categories and used the threshold approach to qualify quantitatively the decision to perform EUS-FNA and the decision to treat patients suspected of having malignancy.

Cytologic grade independently predicts survival of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Our objectives were to devise a cytologic grading system and determine whether it would predict survival of patients with solid-type pancreatic adenocarcinoma. We evaluated 116 consecutive patients from July 2000 to November 2002; they were followed up until September 2003. We scored the following features on rapid Romanowsky-stained endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration smears: cell group architecture, single cells, nuclear grade, mucus, bizarre cells, and necrosis. A cytologic grade (low vs high) was assigned. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of 6-month survival was 76% (SE, 7%) for patients with low-grade tumors vs 50% (SE, 6%) for patients with high-grade carcinoma. The median survival for patients with low-grade vs high-grade tumors was 1 year vs 6 months, respectively (chi2 = 4.45; P = .035). Cox proportional hazards regression showed tumor stage, cancer-specific treatment, and cytologic grade to be independent predictors of survival (P = .001). No other factors (age, mass location, placement of stent, presence of concomitant chronic pancreatitis, race, sex) predicted survival. We devised a grading system that independently predicted survival in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.