[The role of interdisciplinary communication in the proper diagnostics of jaw cyst]. / Az interdiszciplináris kommunikáció jelentosége az állcsonti cysták megfelelo kórismézésében.

Összefoglaló. Bevezetés: Az állcsonti cysták helytálló diagnosztikája a klinikai, radiológiai és patológiai leletek együttes értékelésével lehetséges. Korábbi munkánk során többször tapasztaltuk a klinikoradiopatológiai kommunikáció és korreláció hiányát, és ez olykor inadekvát diagnózisok felállításához vezetett. Célkituzés: Célunk ezen kommunikációs probléma mértékének becslése és annak bemutatása, hogy ez a hiányosság hogyan befolyásolhatja a diagnosztikát. Módszer: Korábbi, más célú retrospektív elemzés újraértékelése történt a klinikai (radiológiai) adatközlés, a revízió kapcsán módosuló diagnózisok számszerusítése céljából, valamint további 3 egyetemi patológiai intézet 10-10 anonimizált leletének vizsgálata az adatközlések vonatkozásában. Eredmények: 2 intézményben 85 odontogen cysta diagnózisakor csupán a betegek életkora, neme volt 100%-osan ismert. A lokalizációra vonatkozó adekvát információ 62%-ban, a méretre vonatkozó csupán 29%-ban fordult elo a szövettani kérolapokon. Összességében a diagnózist segíto releváns információt csak 52%-ban adtak meg. Az utólagos klinikoradiopatológiai korrelációra törekvo revízió során 38/85 esetben (45%) módosult a végso diagnózis kisebb vagy nagyobb mértékben. A megküldött leletek alapján a klinikai/radiológiai adatok közlése <50% és 100% közöttinek becsülheto más intézetekben is. Az 5 intézmény közül csak az egyikben utalt specializációra az, hogy minden leletet egy patológus véleményezett, általában sok patológus (n = 25) valamelyike véleményezte a kevés tömlot (n = 105). A diagnózis kommunikáció hiányán alapuló kisiklásának lehetoségét 5 példával illusztráljuk: cysta radicularisként leletezett paradentalis, lobos follicularis és lateralis periodontalis cysta, ductus nasopalatinus cysta és radicularis cysta differenciáldiagnosztikáját példázó tömlo, valamint botryoid odontogen cysta kerül bemutatásra. Következtetés: Az odontogen tömlok precíz diagnosztikája mind a klinikai, mind a patológiai oldalról javítást igényel, amelynek egyik része az ilyen irányú képzés lehet. Orv Hetil. 2021; 162(12): 458-467. Summary. Introduction: Proper diagnosis of jaw cysts requires the parallel evaluation of clinical, radiological and histopathological findings. Lack of clinico-radio-pathological correlation can lead to inconsistent diagnoses. Objective: To evaluate the rate of lacking clinico-pathological communication and demonstrate how this may influence diagnostics. Method: Data of a former retrospective analysis were re-evaluated to quantify the lack of clinical data communicated to pathologists and estimate the rate of final diagnoses requiring alteration after review of all available clinical data. 10 anonymized reports on odontogenic cysts from 3 university pathology departments each were analysed for the lack of relevant clinical information. Results: Only the age and gender of patients were documented in 100% for 85 jaw cysts diagnosed in 2 departments of pathology. Adequate information about cyst localization and size were communicated in 62% and 29%, respectively. Overall, information relevant to the diagnosis was given in 52% of the cases. Revision based on clinico-radio-pathological correlation led to alterations of the diagnosis in 38/85 cases (45%). Based on reports from other institutions, the communication of clinical data is estimated to be between <50% and 100%. 25 pathologists were involved in reporting 105 cysts. 5 cases illustrate how diagnosis may fail without good communication: a paradental, an inflamed dentigerous and a lateral periodontal cyst, each misdiagnosed as radicular cyst; a cyst raising the differential diagnosis of nasopalatine duct versus radicular cyst; a botryoid odontogenic cyst. Conclusion: Proper diagnosis of jaw cysts requires improvements from both pathological and clinical sides, and could probably be improved through education. Orv Hetil. 2021; 162(12): 458-467.

A Clinicopathological Approach to Odontogenic Cysts: the Role of Cytokeratin 17 and bcl2 Immunohistochemistry in Identifying Odontogenic Keratocysts.

Odontogenic keratocysts (OKCs) are developmental cysts of the jaws that require proper diagnosis due to their potential for local aggressive growth and recurrences. OKCs have a typical parakeratotic epithelium demonstrating transepithelial cytokeratin 17 (CK17) and basal bcl2 staining on immunohistochemistry (IHC), which distinguishes them from other common jaw cysts. Secondary to inflammation, the epithelial lining may be altered and loses the typical IHC phenotype. The aim of the present study was to analyse a series of consecutive jaw cysts for their expression of CK17 and bcl2 and assess how these IHC stains may help in their diagnosis. All cysts were retrospectively assessed for available clinical, radiological and pathological findings and diagnoses were revised whenever needed. 85 cysts from 72 patients were collected from two departments. The series had 21 OKCs, the remaining non-OKCs included radicular/residual, dentigerous, paradental, lateral periodontal, botryoid odontogenic cysts. OKCs with typical epithelium showed the typical IHC phenotype, which was generally lost in inflammation-associated altered epithelium. Contrarily to earlier descriptions, a wide variety of CK17 positivity was seen in the majority of non-OKCs, including focal transepithelial staining. Basal bcl2 staining was also seen in 16 non-OKCs. These stainings were never as strong in intensity as seen in OKCs. One case was histopathologically identified as OKC due to focally maintained IHC profile. CK17 and bcl2 IHC may help in the diagnosis of OKCs, but must be interpreted with caution and is not a yes or no tool in the diagnostic puzzle.

Immunohistochemical Characterization of Reactive Epithelial Changes in Odontogenic Keratocysts.

Odontogenic keratocysts (OKCs) have a diagnostic thin epithelial lining characterised by a linear epithelial connective tissue interface generally lacking inflammatory changes, basal palisading of the nuclei and a wavy parakeratotic layer on the surface. This typical epithelium may convert to a thicker non-keratinizing one with rete pegs and a relatively flat surface after operative decompression. The aim was to characterize this type of epithelial change by immunohistochemistry for bcl2, keratin17, 10 and 19. Eleven out of 33 archived OKCs demonstrated an altered epithelium related to previous biopsy, decompressing drainage or inflammation. The typical basal bcl2 staining was lost in 10/11 cases; transepithelial CK17 was lost or markedly reduced in 9/11 cases. CK10 displayed a segmental upper layer staining in OKCs, and its loss or partial loss in the altered epithelium did not differ from negative areas of OKCs. CK19 displayed various staining patterns in the altered epithelium from lost to maintained in a patchy transepithelial distribution, the latter of which did not differ from the typical OKC staining pattern. Three of four non-keratinizing epithelial linings with basal palisading displayed immunostaining reminiscent of typical OKC epithelium. The lack of a typical epithelium is not sufficient to exclude the diagnosis of OKC if the sampling is not generous (e.g. biopsy), and the presence of non-keratinizing epithelium with basal palisading and an immunophenotype characteristic of OKC (basal bcl2, patchy or diffuse CK17 and upper layer CK10 positivity) may be consistent with the OKC diagnosis even in the absence of typical epithelial lining.