Emergency Department "Bounce-Back" Rates as a Function of Emergency Medicine Training Year.

INTRODUCTION: Since the 1990s, the emergency department (ED) unscheduled return visit (URV), or "bounce-back," has been used as a quality of care measurement. During that time, resident training was also scrutinized and uncovered a need for closer resident supervision, especially of second-year residents. Over the years, bounce-backs have continued to be analyzed with vigor, but research on residency training and supervision has lagged with few studies concurrently investigating residency supervision and bounce-backs. Other literature on resident supervision suggests that with adequate attending supervision, resident performance is equivalent to attending performance. With that in mind, it was hypothesized that resident bounce-back rates will be equivalent to attending bounce-back rates, and there will be no change among residency years. The primary objective of this study was to determine the rate at which patients are seen as a bounce-back visit within 72 hours of their initial visit to a community hospital ED during the study time frame. The secondary aims were to evaluate if the ED bounce-back rate is impacted by training level (residents or attending) and to describe bounce-back patient characteristics, including primary complaint/disease, age, comorbidities and issues with compliance. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of 1000 charts was conducted from September 2015 to September 2017. Charts were randomly selected by the Quality & Patient Safety (QPS) team and, after applying inclusion/exclusion criteria, 732 charts were analysed. Inclusion criteria included age ≥ 18 years, patients treated by an Emergency Medicine (EM) resident during their initial visit and patients with a "discharge" disposition. Exclusion criteria included patients seen as a scheduled return visit (e.g., two-day return for blood pregnancy recheck, wound check, etc.). Demographics, initial visit variables, comorbidities and bounce-back data were collected based on electronic record query or chart review. Data was analysed using means, standard deviations, medians and ranges for continuous variables. Logistic regression modelling techniques were used to examine factors that affect whether the patient had a bounce-back visit. RESULTS: The rate of URVs within 72 hours of the patient's initial visit was 4.65%. PGY1 and PGY2's bounce-back rate was 3.8% and 3.6%, respectively, and PGY3 and PGY4's bounce-back rate was 5.7% and 5.6%, respectively (p-value=.63). There was no statistically significant change among residency years. Most bounce-back characteristics analysed including primary complaint, age, and comorbidities demonstrated no statistical significance in the increased rate of bounce-back except for patients with a history of tobacco abuse, alcohol abuse and chronic pain. Current smokers were 6.5 times more likely to bounce back than former smokers (odds ratio=6.485, 95% confidence interval = 2.089 to 20.133, p-value=0.0012) and those with chronic pain were 2.5 times more likely to bounce back than those without chronic pain (odds ratio=2.518, 95% confidence interval =1.029 to 6.164, p=0.0431). CONCLUSION: EM residency training year does not increase the frequency of bounce-backs in a community hospital ED. Finally, patients with substance abuse and chronic pain were more likely to bounce back.

Leech Me Alone! Atraumatic Hemarthrosis after Hirudotherapy.

A 58-year-old male presented to the emergency department with a chief complaint of knee pain and swelling after performing hirudotherapy (leech therapy) approximately one week prior. Knee arthrocentesis demonstrated significant hemarthrosis. Hirudotherapy is being used for a broad array of reasons including treatment of osteoarthritis, to plastic and reconstructive surgery. Case reports and journal articles often discuss cutaneous reactions, bleeding, and infection as common adverse events. Intra-articular bleeding is not commonly mentioned. With hirudotherapy being utilized more as alternative therapy for osteoarthritis and joint pain, physicians should be aware of hemarthrosis as a possible adverse reaction.

Use of the Spencer Technique on Collegiate Baseball Players: Effect on Physical Performance and Self-Report Measures.

CONTEXT: Repeated overhead throwing in baseball players alters range of motion (ROM), contributing to shoulder injury. The Spencer technique has been used, anecdotally, to reduce the effects of throwing-induced limitations in ROM. OBJECTIVE: To quantify the effects of a single administration of the Spencer technique on the ROM and performance of collegiate baseball pitchers. METHODS: Pitchers from the Seton Hill University men's baseball team were randomly assigned to 2 treatment groups: Spencer technique or sham therapy. The first week consisted of baseline outcome measurements (1 week before treatment), including ROM (flexion, extension, abduction, adduction, internal rotation, and external rotation) of the dominant throwing arm, 10 maximum velocity throws, and self-reported performance using the Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic Shoulder and Elbow Score (KJOC-SES). The second week consisted of pretreatment ROM measurement, followed by a single treatment and repeated measurement of all outcomes. RESULTS: Of 16 players, 15 met inclusion criteria. An effect of training on ROM between weeks 1 and 2 for all players consisted of significantly decreased internal rotation (P=.02) and increased external rotation (P=.04). A differential effect of treatment was found on the mean difference in internal rotation after treatment, compared with the mean difference before treatment on the same day (P=.01). Additionally, a trend toward statistical significance for abduction (P=.08) was noted. Analyses reveal that these effects were caused by significant increases in the internal rotation and abduction for the Spencer group only (P=.02). All other analyses of ROM, as well as performance measured by maximum velocity throws and the KJOC-SES, revealed no differential effect of treatment. CONCLUSION: The results of this study support the use of the Spencer technique in counteracting the potentially negative effects of repeated throwing on internal rotation. However, a single administration did not affect functional ability in this study. Future studies of longer duration and including differing levels of play, injury status, and playing position will be needed to further evaluate the full potential of the Spencer technique in athletes who engage in repeated overhead arm movements.