Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Intern Med J ; 53(7): 1256-1260, 2023 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37092797

RESUMO

Forty-four of 50 immunology patients with primary or secondary immunodeficiency receiving intravenous immunoglobulin at a hospital in New South Wales, Australia, were rapidly enrolled in the subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIg) programme at the onset of the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic. Health and economic outcomes demonstrated that SCIg provides clinical efficacy as evidenced by the number of infections and maintenance of IgG levels, and also facilitates cost reduction in immunoglobulin maintenance programmes.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Síndromes de Imunodeficiência , Humanos , Imunoglobulinas Intravenosas/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Pandemias , Síndromes de Imunodeficiência/tratamento farmacológico
2.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol ; 127(2): 232-235, 2021 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33865989

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Penicillin allergy labels are prevalent, and removal of incorrect labels improves patient outcomes and health economics. Labels may be classified as "low-risk" or "non-low-risk," of which the symptoms of the latter chiefly suggest immunoglobulin E-mediated etiology. Traditionally, "non-low-risk" allergy labels are evaluated by penicillin skin testing followed by graded multistep penicillin drug provocation testing (DPT). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety of assessing "non-low-risk" labels with single-step direct DPT. METHODS: We consecutively enrolled inpatients and outpatients of a teaching hospital in Sydney, Australia, with penicillin allergy labels requiring penicillin for first-line treatment. Patients were classified as "low-risk" or "non-low-risk" based on the allergy labels. All patients proceeded directly to amoxicillin DPT, unless there was a history of anaphylaxis within 10 years of assessment to a beta-lactam (except for cefazolin) or Gell and Coombs type 2, type 3, or severe type 4 reaction. This was followed by a course of amoxicillin. RESULTS: A total of 149 patients (41 inpatients, 108 outpatients) were enrolled. No patient was excluded from the study. No patient experienced life-threatening reactions to the protocol. There were 85 patients who reported "non-low-risk" allergy labels. One patient developed generalized pruritus and rash that resolved with standard-dose antihistamines, 2 developed delayed benign maculopapular exanthem, and 3 experienced diarrhea during the course of amoxicillin. CONCLUSION: In our cohort, direct single-step DPT was safe, with only 6 patients with "non-low-risk" allergy experiencing benign reactions. We hope that further studies can be performed into single-step direct DPT to evaluate "non-low-risk" penicillin allergy labels. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: LNR/16/HAWKE/452.


Assuntos
Amoxicilina/efeitos adversos , Amoxicilina/uso terapêutico , Testes de Provocação Brônquica/métodos , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/diagnóstico , Penicilinas/efeitos adversos , Penicilinas/uso terapêutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Amoxicilina/imunologia , Testes de Provocação Brônquica/efeitos adversos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Penicilinas/imunologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Risco , Medição de Risco , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA