Management of Patients with Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer in the Real-World Setting in the United States.

PURPOSE: This study provides a contemporary assessment of the treatment patterns, health care resource utilization (HRU) and costs among metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) patients in the U.S. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adults with mCSPC were selected from Optum's de-identified Clinformatics® Data Mart Database (Commercial insurance/Medicare Advantage [COM/MA]; January 1, 2014-July 31, 2019) or Medicare Fee-for-Service (FFS; January 1, 2014-December 31, 2017). The index date was the first metastatic disease diagnosis date on/after the first prostate cancer diagnosis (without prior evidence of castration resistance). Patients were observed for 12 months pre-index (baseline) through their mCSPC period (from index until castration resistance or followup end). First-line (1L) mCSPC therapy was assessed during the mCSPC period; all-cause HRU and health plan-paid costs per-patient-per-year (PPPY) were measured during baseline and mCSPC periods. RESULTS: Among 6,517 COM/MA and 13,324 Medicare-FFS mCSPC patients over ∼10 months (median mCSPC period), 38% and 48% remained untreated/deferred treatment, and 45% and 46% received 1L androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) monotherapy, respectively. 1L abiraterone acetate and docetaxel were used among 7% and 6% of COM/MA and 1% and 2% of Medicare-FFS patients, respectively. HRU increased from baseline to mCSPC period, resulting in increased health plan-paid costs from $21,201 to $108,767 in COM/MA and from $16,819 to $69,639 PPPY in Medicare-FFS. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the limited use of newer therapies that improve survival in men with mCSPC in the U.S. HRU and costs increased substantially after onset of metastasis. Given the emergence of newer effective mCSPC therapies, further evaluation of future real-world mCSPC treatment patterns and outcomes is warranted.

Identification of patients with metastatic castration-sensitive or metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer using administrative health claims and laboratory data.

OBJECTIVE: To develop algorithms to identify metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) patients and castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients, using health claims data and laboratory test results. METHODS: A targeted literature review summarized mCSPC and mCRPC patient selection criteria previously used in real-world retrospective studies. Novel algorithms to identify mCSPC and mCRPC were developed based on diagnosis codes indicating hormone sensitivity/resistance, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test results, and claims for castration and mCRPC-specific treatments. These algorithms were applied to claims data from Optum Clinformatics Extended DataMart (Date of Death) Databases (commercial insurance/Medicare Advantage [COM/MA]; 01 January 2014-31 July 2019) and Medicare Fee-for-Service (Medicare-FFS; 01 January 2014-31 December 2017). RESULTS: Previous real-world studies identified mCSPC primarily based on metastasis diagnosis codes, and mCRPC based on mCRPC-specific drugs. Using the current study's algorithms, 7034 COM/MA and 19,981 Medicare-FFS patients were identified as having mCSPC, and 2578 COM/MA and 11,554 Medicare-FFS as having mCRPC. Most mCSPC patients were identified based on evidence of being hormone/castration-naive. Patients were identified as having mCRPC most commonly based on rising PSA (COM/MA), or at the metastasis diagnosis date if it occurred after castration (Medicare-FFS). Among patients with mCSPC, 14-17% had evidence of progression to castration resistance during a median 1-year follow-up period, mostly based on use of mCRPC-specific drugs. CONCLUSIONS: Comprehensive algorithms based on claims and laboratory data were developed to identify and distinguish patients with mCSPC and mCRPC. This will facilitate appropriate identification of mCSPC and mCRPC patients based on health claims data and better understanding of patient unmet needs in real-world settings.

Preserving Well-being in Patients With Advanced and Late Prostate Cancer.

Androgen deprivation therapy, alone or in combination with androgen signaling inhibitors, is a treatment option for patients with advanced prostate cancer (PC). When making treatment decisions, health care providers must consider the long-term effects of treatment on the patient's overall health and well-being. Herein, we review the effects of these treatments on the musculoskeletal and cardiovascular systems, cognition, and fall risk, and provide management approaches for each. We also include an algorithm to help health care providers implement best clinical practices and interdisciplinary care for preserving the overall well-being of PC patients.

Pharmacokinetics and Safety of CSL112 (Apolipoprotein A-I [Human]) in Adults With Moderate Renal Impairment and Normal Renal Function.

CSL112 (Apolipoprotein A-I [human]) is an intravenous preparation of apolipoprotein A-I (apoA-I), formulated with phosphatidylcholine (PC) and stabilized with sucrose, in development to prevent early recurrent cardiovascular events following acute myocardial infarction (AMI). This phase 1 study was designed to determine if moderate renal impairment (RI) influenced the pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety of CSL112. Thirty-two subjects, 16 with moderate RI (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] ≥ 30 and < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 ) and 16 age-, sex-, and weight-matched subjects with normal renal function (eGFR ≥ 90 mL/min/1.73 m2 ) were randomized 3:1 to receive a single infusion of CSL112 2 g (n = 6) or placebo (n = 2), or CSL112 6 g (n = 6) or placebo (n = 2). PK sampling was at prespecified times from 48 hours prior to 144 hours following infusions, with final safety assessments at 90 days. Renal and hepatic safety, and adverse events (AEs) were monitored throughout the study. Plasma apoA-I and PC PK profiles were similar between renal function cohorts at both doses. For CSL112 6 g mean ± SD apoA-I AUC0-last was 7670 ± 1900 and 9170 ± 2910 mg·h/dL in normal renal function and moderate RI subjects, respectively. Renal apoA-I clearance was <1% of CSL112 dose. In moderate RI, sucrose clearance was slower; however, approximately 70% was excreted within 48 hours in both renal function cohorts. No CSL112-related serious AEs or clinically significant renal or hepatic safety changes were observed. Dose adjustment of CSL112 is not required in subjects with moderate RI, supporting its further investigation in AMI patients with moderate RI.

Moderate Renal Impairment Does Not Impact the Ability of CSL112 (Apolipoprotein A-I [Human]) to Enhance Cholesterol Efflux Capacity.

CSL112 (apolipoprotein A-I [human]) is a novel intravenous formulation of plasma-derived apolipoprotein A-I (apoA-I) that enhances cholesterol efflux capacity. Renal impairment is a common comorbidity in acute myocardial infarction patients and is associated with impaired lipid metabolism. The aim of this phase 1 study was to assess the impact of moderate renal impairment on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of CSL112. Sixteen subjects with moderate renal impairment and 16 age-, sex-, and weight-matched subjects with normal renal function participated in the study. Within each renal function cohort, subjects were randomized 3:1 to receive a single intravenous infusion of CSL112 2 g (n = 6) or placebo (n = 2) or CSL112 6 g (n = 6) or placebo (n = 2). At baseline, subjects with moderate renal impairment versus normal renal function had higher total cholesterol efflux, ABCA1-dependent cholesterol efflux capacity, and pre-ß1-high-density lipoprotein (HDL) levels. Infusing CSL112 resulted in similar, immediate, robust, dose-dependent elevations in apoA-I and cholesterol efflux capacity in both renal function cohorts and significantly greater elevations in pre-ß1-HDL (P < .05) in moderate renal impairment. Lecithin-cholesterol acyltransferase activity, demonstrated by a time-dependent change in the ratio of unesterified to esterified cholesterol, did not differ by renal function. No meaningful changes in proatherogenic lipid levels were observed. Moderate renal impairment did not impact the ability of CSL112 to enhance cholesterol efflux capacity. CSL112 may represent a novel therapy to reduce the risk of early recurrent cardiovascular events following acute myocardial infarction in patients with or without moderate renal impairment.

Evaluation of potential antiplatelet effects of CSL112 (Apolipoprotein A-I [Human]) in patients with atherosclerosis: results from a phase 2a study.

CSL112 (Apolipoprotein A-I [Human]), an infusible, plasma-derived apolipoprotein A-I, is being developed to reduce cardiovascular events following acute myocardial infarction (AMI). A predecessor compound (CSL111) demonstrated a potential antiplatelet effect. A phase 2a multicentre, randomised, single-ascending dose study in patients with stable atherosclerotic disease receiving dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) assessed the potential additive effects of CSL112 administration on platelet function and increase bleeding risk in the subacute period after AMI. Patients (n = 44) on aspirin (75-325 mg/day) and either clopidogrel (75 mg/day, n = 37) or prasugrel (10 mg/day, n = 7) for > 30 days alongside standard-of-care therapy were randomised to a single dose of placebo or CSL112: 1.7, 3.4, or 6.8 g. Light transmission aggregometry was used to assess platelet aggregation in response to 2 mM arachidonic acid, 5 and 20 µM adenosine diphosphate, and 4 µg/mL collagen, pre-dose (baseline) and up to 48 h post-dosing. Compared to placebo, CSL112 had no clinically meaningful time- or dose-dependent effects on maximum platelet aggregation in response to any agonist, by either dose or renal function subgroup (p > 0.05). Coagulation parameters showed little variation over time or between treatment groups (p > 0.05). CSL112, when co-administered with standard DAPT, did not significantly influence platelet aggregation in response to agonists and is, therefore, not expected to significantly increase bleeding risk when administered with antiplatelet therapies.

CSL112 (Apolipoprotein A-I [Human]) Enhances Cholesterol Efflux Similarly in Healthy Individuals and Stable Atherosclerotic Disease Patients.

OBJECTIVE: CSL112 (apolipoprotein A-I [apoA-I; human]) is a novel formulation of apoA-I in development for reduction of early recurrent cardiovascular events after acute myocardial infarction. Cholesterol efflux capacity (CEC) is a marker of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) function that is strongly correlated with incident cardiovascular disease. Impaired CEC has been observed in patients with coronary heart disease. Here, we determined whether infused apoA-I improves CEC when administered to patients with stable atherosclerotic disease versus healthy volunteers. APPROACH AND RESULTS: Measurements of apoA-I, HDL unesterified cholesterol, HDL esterified cholesterol, pre-ß1-HDL, and CEC were determined in samples from patients with stable atherosclerotic disease before and after intravenous administration of CSL112. These measures were compared with 2 prior studies in healthy volunteers for differences in CEC at baseline and after CSL112 infusion. Patients with stable atherosclerotic disease exhibited significantly lower ATP-binding cassette transporter 1-mediated CEC at baseline (P<0.0001) despite slightly higher apoA-I levels when compared with healthy individuals (2 phase 1 studies pooled; P≤0.05), suggesting impaired HDL function. However, no differences were observed in apoA-I pharmacokinetics or in pre-ß1-HDL (P=0.5) or CEC (P=0.1) after infusion of CSL112. Similar elevation in CEC was observed in patients with low or high baseline HDL function (based on tertiles of apoA-I-normalized CEC; P=0.1242). These observations were extended and confirmed using cholesterol esterification as an additional measure. CONCLUSIONS: CSL112 shows comparable, strong, and immediate effects on CEC despite underlying cardiovascular disease. CSL112 is, therefore, a promising novel therapy for lowering the burden of atherosclerosis and reducing the risk of recurrent cardiovascular events.

Safety and Tolerability of CSL112, a Reconstituted, Infusible, Plasma-Derived Apolipoprotein A-I, After Acute Myocardial Infarction: The AEGIS-I Trial (ApoA-I Event Reducing in Ischemic Syndromes I).

BACKGROUND: Human or recombinant apolipoprotein A-I (apoA-I) has been shown to increase high-density lipoprotein-mediated cholesterol efflux capacity and to regress atherosclerotic disease in animal and clinical studies. CSL112 is an infusible, plasma-derived apoA-I that has been studied in normal subjects or those with stable coronary artery disease. This study aimed to characterize the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of CSL112 in patients with a recent acute myocardial infarction. METHODS: The AEGIS-I trial (Apo-I Event Reducing in Ischemic Syndromes I) was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging phase 2b trial. Patients with myocardial infarction were stratified by renal function and randomized 1:1:1 to CSL112 (2 g apoA-I per dose) and high-dose CSL112 (6 g apoA-I per dose), or placebo for 4 consecutive weekly infusions. Coprimary safety end points were occurrence of either a hepatic safety event (an increase in alanine transaminase >3 times the upper limit of normal or an increase in total bilirubin >2 times the upper limit of normal) or a renal safety event (an increase in serum creatinine >1.5 times the baseline value or a new requirement for renal replacement therapy). RESULTS: A total of 1258 patients were randomized, and 91.2% received all 4 infusions. The difference in incidence rates for an increase in alanine transaminase or total bilirubin between both CSL112 arms and placebo was within the protocol-defined noninferiority margin of 4%. Similarly, the difference in incidence rates for an increase in serum creatinine or a new requirement for renal replacement therapy was within the protocol-defined noninferiority margin of 5%. CSL112 was associated with increases in apoA-I and ex vivo cholesterol efflux similar to that achieved in patients with stable coronary artery disease. In regard to the secondary efficacy end point, the risk for the composite of major adverse cardiovascular events among the groups was similar. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with acute myocardial infarction, 4 weekly infusions of CSL112 are feasible, well tolerated, and not associated with any significant alterations in liver or kidney function or other safety concern. The ability of CSL112 to acutely enhance cholesterol efflux was confirmed. The potential benefit of CSL112 to reduce major adverse cardiovascular events needs to be assessed in an adequately powered phase 3 trial. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02108262.

Rationale and design of Apo-I Event Reduction in Ischemic Syndromes I (AEGIS-I): A phase 2b, randomized, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging trial to investigate the safety and tolerability of CSL112, a reconstituted, infusible, human apoA-I, after acute myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Despite aggressive pharmacotherapy and stenting, there is a residual risk of major adverse cardiovascular events among patients with acute coronary syndrome. High-density lipoprotein (HDL) has been a major target for secondary acute coronary syndrome prevention; however, a better understanding of the physiologic function of HDL has demonstrated that a high cholesterol efflux capacity, rather than high HDL concentrations alone, may be critical to improving outcomes. CSL112, a reconstituted, infusible human apolipoprotein A-I, has been demonstrated to increase cholesterol efflux capacity and to have a protective effect in experimental models of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. DESIGN: The AEGIS-I trial (ClinicalTrials.govNCT02108262) is a phase 2b, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging clinical trial to evaluate the hepatic and renal safety of multiple administrations of 2 doses of CSL112 among subjects with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Approximately 1,200 subjects (400 per treatment group) with either normal renal function or mild renal impairment will be enrolled up to 7 days after an AMI and will be stratified by renal function and randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to either 1 of 2 doses of CSL112 (either 2 g or 6 g) or placebo as a weekly 2-hour infusion over the course of 4 consecutive weeks. The coprimary safety endpoints will be the incidence of hepatic and renal toxicity, defined as either confirmed ALT >3 × ULN, total bilirubin >2 × ULN, serum creatinine ≥1.5×baseline value, or a new requirement for renal replacement therapy through the end of the active treatment period. SUMMARY: The AEGIS-I trial will characterize the safety profile of CSL112, a reconstituted formulation of apolipoprotein A-I, and will assess if administration to patients with a recent AMI is associated with a clinically significant alteration in either liver or kidney function when compared with placebo.

Infusion of Reconstituted High-Density Lipoprotein, CSL112, in Patients With Atherosclerosis: Safety and Pharmacokinetic Results From a Phase 2a Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: CSL112 is a new formulation of human apolipoprotein A-I (apoA-I) being developed to reduce cardiovascular events following acute coronary syndrome. This phase 2a, randomized, double-blind, multicenter, dose-ranging trial represents the first clinical investigation to assess the safety and pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of a CSL112 infusion among patients with stable atherosclerotic disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients were randomized to single ascending doses of CSL112 (1.7, 3.4, or 6.8 g) or placebo, administered over a 2-hour period. Primary safety assessments consisted of alanine aminotransferase or aspartate aminotransferase elevations >3× upper limits of normal and study drug-related adverse events. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic assessments included apoA-I plasma concentration and measures of the ability of serum to promote cholesterol efflux from cells ex vivo. Of 45 patients randomized, 7, 12, and 14 received 1.7-, 3.4-, and 6.8-g CSL112, respectively, and 11 received placebo. There were no clinically significant elevations (>3× upper limit of normal) in alanine aminotransferase or aspartate aminotransferase. Adverse events were nonserious and mild and occurred in 5 (71%), 5 (41%), and 6 (43%) patients in the CSL112 1.7-, 3.4-, and 6.8-g groups, respectively, compared with 3 (27%) placebo patients. The imbalance in adverse events was attributable to vessel puncture/infusion-site bruising. CSL112 resulted in rapid (T(max)≈2 hours) and dose-dependent increases in apoA-I (145% increase in the 6.8-g group) and total cholesterol efflux (up to 3.1-fold higher than placebo) (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: CSL112 infusion was well tolerated in patients with stable atherosclerotic disease. CSL112 immediately raised apoA-I levels and caused a rapid and marked increase in the capacity of serum to efflux cholesterol. This potential novel approach for the treatment of atherosclerosis warrants further investigation. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01499420.

CSL112 enhances biomarkers of reverse cholesterol transport after single and multiple infusions in healthy subjects.

OBJECTIVE: The ability of apolipoprotein A-I (apoA-I) to transport cholesterol from atherosclerotic plaque is thought to underlie its inverse correlation with cardiovascular risk. To gauge the potential of infused apoA-I to transport cholesterol, we quantified cholesterol transport markers in human subjects infused with a novel formulation of apoA-I (CSL112). APPROACH AND RESULTS: CSL112 was infused into human subjects in single (57 subjects) and multiple (36 subjects) ascending dose trials. Pharmacokinetic and biomarker assessments were conducted before and after infusions. CSL112 caused an immediate, up to 3-fold elevation of apoA-I and subsequent movement of tissue cholesterol into plasma. Cholesterol appeared first as unesterified cholesterol in the high-density lipoprotein (HDL) fraction and was promptly esterified by lecithin cholesterol acyltransferase. HDL cholesterol increased up to 81±16.5%. Underlying this movement of cholesterol was an immediate and strong rise in the ability of plasma to promote cholesterol efflux from cells ex vivo. CSL112 had its greatest impact on the fraction of efflux mediated by ATP-binding cassette transporter A1 (ABCA1), a cholesterol transporter induced in cholesterol-loaded tissues such as plaque. ABCA1-dependent efflux capacity increased ≤630±421% and total efflux capacity by ≤192±40%. In keeping with this finding, we observed a profound rise in very small HDL, also known as preß1-HDL, the preferred substrate for ABCA1. Very small HDL increased ≤3596±941%. Elevations in apoA-I, cholesterol efflux, and very small HDL were dose-proportional over a wide range. No significant changes in atherogenic lipids were observed at any dose. CONCLUSIONS: Infusion of CSL112 elevates the ability of plasma to withdraw cholesterol from cells. Preferential elevation of ABCA1-dependent efflux may target atherosclerotic plaque for cholesterol removal, making CSL112 a promising candidate therapy for acute coronary syndrome.

A multiple ascending dose study of CSL112, an infused formulation of ApoA-I.

CSL112 is apoA-I purified from human plasma and reconstituted with phosphatidylcholine (PC) to form high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-particles suitable for infusion. CSL112 is in development for the potential treatment of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) by optimizing cholesterol efflux. This study assesses the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety and tolerability of CSL112. Repeat doses of CSL112 or placebo were administered intravenously once- (3.4 g or 6.8 g) or twice-weekly (3.4 g) to healthy subjects in a placebo-controlled, randomized (3 CSL112: 1 placebo), ascending-dose study (NCT01281774). Twenty-seven subjects received CSL112 and nine received placebo. Study endpoints included plasma apoA-I and PC concentrations and specific PK parameters. CSL112 infusions immediately produced robust increases in apoA-I concentration in a dose-proportional manner, reaching levels higher than observed with currently available or investigational HDL products. After infusion of CSL112, apoA-I levels remained above baseline for approximately 3 days. Multiple infusions of CSL112 were safe and well tolerated with no evidence of major organ toxicity or immunogenicity. CSL112 may provide a novel option to rapidly transport cholesterol from atherosclerotic plaque to the liver and reduce early recurrent events following ACS. The data presented here support continued clinical development of CSL112 in patient populations.

Pharmacokinetics and excretion of 14C-bendamustine in patients with relapsed or refractory malignancy.

BACKGROUND: Bendamustine is an alkylating agent with clinical activity against a variety of hematologic malignancies and solid tumors. To assess the roles of renal and hepatic drug elimination pathways in the excretion and metabolism of bendamustine, a mass balance study was performed in patients with relapsed or refractory malignancies. METHODS: A single 60-minute intravenous dose of 120 mg/m(2), 80-95 µCi (14)C-bendamustine hydrochloride was administered to six patients, followed by collection of blood, urine, and fecal samples at specified time points up to day 8 or until the radioactivity of the 24-hour urine and fecal collections was below 1% of the administered dose (whichever was longer). Total radioactivity (TRA) was measured in all samples, and concentrations of unchanged bendamustine and its metabolites γ-hydroxy-bendamustine (M3), N-desmethyl-bendamustine (M4), and dihydroxy bendamustine (HP2) were determined in plasma and urine, using validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry methods. RESULTS: The mean recovery of TRA in excreta was 76% of the radiochemical dose. Approximately half of the administered dose was recovered in urine and a quarter in feces. Less than 5% of the administered dose was recovered in urine as unchanged bendamustine. Bendamustine clearance from plasma was rapid, with a half-life of ~40 minutes. Plasma concentrations of M3, M4, and HP2 were very low relative to bendamustine concentrations. Plasma levels of TRA were higher and more sustained as compared with plasma concentrations of bendamustine, M3, M4, and HP2, suggesting the presence of one or more longer-lived (14)C-bendamustine-derived compounds. Fatigue (50%) and vomiting (50%) were the most frequent treatment-related adverse events. A grade 3/4 absolute lymphocyte count decrease occurred in all patients at some point during the study. CONCLUSION: Bendamustine is extensively metabolized, with subsequent excretion in both urine and feces. Accumulation of bendamustine is not anticipated in cancer patients with renal or hepatic impairment, because of the dose administration schedule and short half-life.

Pharmacokinetics of armodafinil and modafinil after single and multiple doses in patients with excessive sleepiness associated with treated obstructive sleep apnea: a randomized, open-label, crossover study.

BACKGROUND: Armodafinil (the R-isomer of racemic modafinil) and modafinil are wakefulness-promoting medications for excessive sleepiness associated with treated obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The R-isomer of racemic modafinil has a half-life of approximately15 hours; the S-isomer has a half-life of 4 to 5 hours. The R-and S-isomers are equipotent, producing equivalent pharmacologic activity at equal concentrations. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this work was to compare the pharmacokinetic profiles of armodafinil (R-modafinil) and modafinil (racemic mixture with equal quantities of R- and S-isomers) at equal doses in patients with residual excessive sleepiness associated with continuous positive airway pressure-treated OSA. METHODS: This open-label study was conducted at 5 US centers from July 2008 to March 2009. Patients were randomized to 1 of 2 crossover administration sequences, ABCD or BADC, where A was a single armodafinil 200-mg dose, B was a single modafinil 200-mg dose, C was multiple daily modafinil 200-mg doses, and D was multiple daily armodafinil 200-mg doses. During multiple-dose administration, patients received 100 mg once daily for days 1 and 2, and 200 mg once daily for days 3 through 10. The pharmacokinetic parameters of principal interest for assessing the bioequivalence of armodafinil and modafinil were maximum concentration at 7 to 11 hours after dosing and the concentration-versus-time curve for this period. Analysis was performed via achiral high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection using blood samples obtained over 72 hours after single-dose administration and over 24 hours after the multiple-dose regimen. For post hoc evaluation of bioequivalence, 90% CI values were also constructed for the geometric mean ratios of armodafinil to modafinil. Tolerability was assessed by the reported adverse events, clinical laboratory testing, vital sign measurements, ECGs, and physical exams. RESULTS: The study population was 83.3% male (35/42) and 76.2% white (32/42) with a mean (SD) age of 47.0 (8.30) years and a weight range of 66.3 to 127.4 kg. Plasma drug concentration-versus-time curves suggested comparable terminal half-lives (mean [SD] values were 16.5 [4.44] and 14.4 [3.22] hours for armodafinil and modafinil, respectively) but higher systemic exposure with armodafinil than modafinil (mean [SD] AUC(0-∞) values were 108.8 [31.66] and 66.4 [20.06] microg · h/mL for armodafinil and modafinil, respectively), as indicated by the high geometric mean ratios for the AUC (the AUC(0-∞)) ratio after a single dose was 1.64 [95% CI, 1.60-1.68; P < 0.001], and the AUC(0-τ) ratio after multiple doses was 1.69 [95% CI, 1.65-1.72; P < 0.001]) and, to a lesser extent, the ratio of the maximum plasma drug concentration after multiple doses (C(max) ratio = 1.37 [95% CI, 1.33-1.41; P < 0.001]). In addition, the ratios and associated 90% CIs for Cmax (137 [1.341.40]) and AUC(0-τ) (169 [1.66-1.75]) after multiple-dose administration did not meet the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) criteria for bioequivalence (ie, ratio of geometric means between 80% and 125%). Reported adverse events were mild to moderate in intensity. The most frequently reported adverse events while receiving armodafinil or modafinil were headache (29% and 2%, respectively), diarrhea (12% and 5%), nausea (10% and 2%), and dizziness (10% and 5%). CONCLUSIONS: In this crossover study of patients with treated OSA, overall systemic exposure after armodafinil 200-mg administration was greater than that following modafinil 200-mg administration after both single and multiple doses. The pharmacokinetic profiles of the 2 drugs were notably different and did not meet the FDA criteria for bioequivalence.

Bendamustine pharmacokinetic profile and exposure-response relationships in patients with indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

PURPOSE: The pharmacokinetic profiles of bendamustine and active metabolites were defined in patients with rituximab-refractory, relapsed indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, and supported understanding of exposure-response relationships for efficacy and safety. METHODS: Bendamustine was administered as a 60-min 120 mg/m(2) intravenous infusion on days 1 and 2 of six 21-day cycles. Pharmacokinetic models were developed, with covariate assessment. Correlations between bendamustine exposure and responder status or occurrence of neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, fatigue, nausea, and vomiting were examined. RESULTS: Following a single dose of bendamustine HCl, concentrations declined in a triphasic manner, with rapid distribution, intermediate, and slow terminal phases. The intermediate t (1/2) (40 min) was considered the pharmacologically relevant (beta elimination) t (1/2) since the initial phases accounted for 99% of the AUC. Age, sex, mild/moderate renal, or mild liver impairment did not alter pharmacokinetics. Metabolite concentrations were low relative to parent. No correlation was observed between exposure and safety or efficacy measures because of the limited range of exposures after 120 mg/m(2) administration, except bendamustine C (max) was a significant (P value = 0.013) predictor of the probability of nausea in patients, most of whom were pretreated with antiemetics. CONCLUSIONS: The BSA-based dosing regimen for bendamustine achieved the targeted exposure and was associated with a high incidence of therapeutic response. Given the short t (1/2) and low concentrations of bendamustine observed by 12 h after dosing, the single-dose profile for bendamustine described by these analyses is expected to be representative of the multiple-dose profile. The occurrence of nausea was significantly related to bendamustine exposure, with the probability of nausea increasing as bendamustine C (max) increases.

A pharmacokinetic and safety study of intravenous arsenic trioxide in adult cancer patients with renal impairment.

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the pharmacokinetic and safety profiles of arsenic trioxide given twice per week in adult cancer patients with advanced malignancies and varying degrees of renal function. METHODS: Patients received intravenous arsenic trioxide 0.15 mg/kg twice weekly for 4 weeks, followed by a 2-week rest period. The pharmacokinetic profiles of the pharmacologically active arsenical species, arsenious acid (As(III)), and its metabolites, monomethylarsonic acid (MMA(V)) and dimethylarsinic acid (DMA(V)), were evaluated during the first cycle for 72 h following doses on days 1 and 22. Safety assessments were made at each treatment visit. RESULTS: Twenty patients received an average of 11 doses. Compared with normal renal function, mild to severe renal impairment decreased urinary excretion of As(III) and increased exposure to MMA(V) and DMA(V) 1.4- to 8-fold after multiple dose administration. Only severe renal impairment substantially increased exposure to As(III) (AUC(0-t ) increased by 18% after a single dose and 40% after multiple doses). The safety profile of arsenic trioxide after limited treatment on a twice-per-week schedule was comparable across all renal function groups. CONCLUSION: Renal impairment did increase the systemic exposure to arsenic and its methylated metabolites following standard daily dosing of arsenic trioxide. The data from the limited number of patients with severe renal dysfunction did not suggest that severe renal impairment affected the safety profile of arsenic trioxide in cancer patients who received limited treatment with arsenic trioxide.