Microplastic contamination in the agri-food chain: The case of honeybees and beehive products.

Microplastics, MPs, plastic fragments with a dimension lower than 5 mm, and microfibers, MFs, synthetic and natural/artificial fibrous fragments with a diameter lower than 50 µm, are ubiquitous pollutants identified in different environmental compartments. In this work the occurrence of MPs and MFs on honeybees, Apis mellifera, and beehive products was evaluated, using Fourier transform infrared microspectroscopy, confirming that MPs and MFs are widely present as air contaminants in all the apiary's areas (high and low urbanized areas) in Southern Italy. Results indicated that independently from the site, both honeybees and honey samples, are contaminated by MFs with non-natural color. The majority of MFs were of natural origin followed by artificial MFs and synthetic MFs. Moreover, the chemical composition of MFs isolated from honeybees reflect that used in synthetic fabrics, leading to the hypothesis that they are released from textile to air where are captured by bees. Results highlight that MFs represent a class of ubiquitous airborne anthropogenic pollutants. The identification of polytetrafluoroethylene, PTFE, MPs in honeybees confirm the recent findings that PTFE MPs are diffuse soil and air contaminants while the identification of polyethylene, PE, based MPs in honey samples, from low density urban sites, could be correlated to the large use of PE in agriculture. In the honey samples, also polycaprolactone, PCL, MPs were identified, mainly in high density urban sites, confirming that biodegradable materials could be further pollutants in the environments. The results indicate that honeybees are contaminated by MPs and MFs during their flights or picking up from the hive components, flowers, from other nest mates, from the clothes of the beekeeper, among others and some of them could be transferred to honey samples that could be also affected by soil contamination.

Hemoperfusion in Poisoning and Drug Overdose.

Hemoperfusion (HP) is an extracorporeal blood purification therapy that is used to remove poisons or drugs from the body. This chapter provides a brief overview of the technical aspects and the potential indications and limitations of HP, with the focus being on the use of HP for acute poisoning cases reported from January 1, 2000, to April 30, 2022.

Safety and Effectiveness of Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Combined With Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy.

Patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) often suffer from acute kidney injury (AKI), requiring continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). In our clinical practice, we connected the inlet line of a CRRT machine to the postoxygenator Luer port and the outlet line to the inlet Luer port of the oxygenator. In this case series, we analyzed the interaction between the two machines. Between December 31, 2017, and December 31, 2019, we enrolled 15 patients from the ICU of the San Matteo Hospital, Pavia, Italy. All of them suffered from severe acute respiratory distress syndrome and AKI stage 3. We analyzed 570 hours of CRRT combined with venovenous ECMO and collected 261,751 CRRT data. No discontinuation of CRRT occurred before 48 hours. Most of the alarms occurred within 24 hours of the connection: 22/10,831 (0.2%) showed an outranged inlet pressure, 11/10831 (0.11%) showed an outranged transmembrane pressure, 14/10,831 (0.13%) showed an outranged inlet pressure, and 138/10,831 (1.27%) an outranged effluent pressure. The rate per minute set for the ECMO circuit was correlated with the inlet (ß = 5.38; CI, 95% 1.42-9.35; p = 0.008), transmembrane (ß = 4.6; CI, 95% 1.97-7.24; p = 0.001), effluent (ß = 3.02; CI, 95% 1.15-4.90; p = 0.002), and outlet pressures (ß = 597; CI, 95% 2.31-9.63; p = 0.001) of the CRRT circuit. We reported that our configuration could be safe and effective, however well-designed studies would be beneficial for determining the potential risks and benefits.

Clinical Assessment of Continuous Hemodialysis with the Medium Cutoff EMiC®2 Membrane in Patients with Septic Shock.

INTRODUCTION: At the time of renal replacement therapy, approximately 20% of critically ill patients have septic shock. In this study, medium cutoff (MCO) continuous venovenous hemodialysis (CVVHD) was compared to high-flux membrane continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) in terms of hemodynamic improvement, efficiency, middle molecule removal, and inflammatory system activation. METHODS: This is a monocenter crossover randomized study. Between December 31, 2017, and December 31, 2019, 20 patients with septic shock and stage 3 acute kidney injury (AKI) admitted to 2 Italian ICUs were enrolled. All patients underwent CVVHD with Ultraflux® EMiC®2 and CVVHDF with AV1000S® without washout. Each treatment lasted 24 h. RESULTS: Compared to AV1000S®-CVVHDF, EMIC®2-CVVHD normalized cardiac index (ß = -0.64; p = 0.02) and heart rate (ß = 5.72; p = 0.01). Interleukin-8 and myeloperoxidase removal were greater with AV1000S®-CVVHDF than with EMiC®2-CVVHD (ß = 0.35; p < 0.001; ß = 0.43; p = 0.03, respectively). Leukocytosis improved over 24 h in EMiC®2-CVVHD-treated patients (ß = 4.13; p = 0.03), whereas procalcitonin levels decreased regardless of the modality (ß = 0.89; p = 0.01) over a 48-h treatment period. Reduction rates, instantaneous plasmatic clearance of urea, creatinine, and ß2-microglobulin were similar across modalities. ß2-Microglobulin removal efficacy was greater in the EMiC®2 group (ß = 0-2.88; p = 0.002), while albumin levels did not differ. Albumin was undetectable in the effluent in both treatments. DISCUSSION: In patients with septic shock and severe AKI, the efficacy of uremic toxin removal was comparable between MCO-CVVHD and CVVHDF. Further, MCO-CVVHD was associated with improved hemodynamics. Fraction of filtration and transmembrane pressure reduction and the maintenance of equal efficacy might be the key features of CVVHD with MCO membranes in critically ill patients.