Transfemoral amputees adapt their gait during cross-slope walking with specific upper-lower limb coordination.

BACKGROUND: Unilateral lower limb amputees have asymmetrical gaits, particularly on irregular surfaces and slopes. It is unclear how coordination between arms and legs can adapt during cross-slope walking. RESEARCH QUESTION: How do transfemoral amputees (TFAs) adapt their upper-lower limb coordination on cross-slope surfaces? METHODS: Twenty TFA and 20 healthy adults (Ctrl) performed a three-dimensional gait analysis in 2 walking conditions: level ground and cross-slope with prosthesis uphill. Sagittal joint angles and velocities of hips and shoulders were calculated. Continuous relative phases (CRP) were computed between the shoulder and the hip of the opposite side. The closer to 0 the CRP is, the more coordinated the joints are. Curve analysis were conducted using SPM. RESULTS: The mean CRP between the downhill shoulder and the uphill hip was higher in TFA compared to Ctrl (p = 0.02), with a walking conditions effect (p = 0.005). TFA showed significant differences about the end of the stance phase (p = 0.01) between level ground and cross-slope, while Ctrl showed a significant difference (p = 0.008) between these walking conditions at the end of the swing phase. In CRP between the uphill shoulder and the downhill hip, SnPM analysis showed intergroup differences during the stance phase (p < 0.05), but not in the comparison between walking conditions in TFA and Ctrl groups. SIGNIFICANCE: TFA showed an asymmetrical coordination in level ground walking compared to Ctrl. Walking on cross-slope led to upper-lower limb coordination adaptations: this condition impacted the CRP between downhill shoulder and uphill hip in both groups. The management of the prosthetic limb, positioned uphill, induced a reorganization of the coordination with the upper limb of the amputated side. Identifying upper-lower limb coordination adaptations on cross-slope surfaces will help to achieve rehabilitation goals for effective walking in urban environments.

Enhanced precision of ankle torque measure with an open-unit dynamometer mounted with a 3D force-torque sensor.

PURPOSE: Many studies have focused on maximum torque exerted by ankle joint muscles during plantar flexion. While strength parameters are typically measured with isokinetic or isolated ankle dynamometers, these devices often present substantial limitations for the measurement of torque because they account for force in only 1 dimension (1D), and the device often constrains the body in a position that augments torque through counter movements. The purposes of this study were to determine the contribution of body position to ankle plantar-flexion torque and to assess the use of 1D and 3D torque sensors. METHODS: A custom designed 'Booted, Open-Unit, Three dimension, Transportable, Ergometer' (B.O.T.T.E.) was used to quantify plantar flexion in two conditions: (1) when the participant was restrained within the unit (locked-unit) and (2) when the participant's position was independent of the ankle dynamometer (open-unit). Ten young males performed maximal voluntary isometric plantar-flexion contractions using the B.O.T.T.E. in open and locked-unit mechanical configurations. RESULTS: The B.O.T.T.E. was reliable with ICC higher than 0.90, and CV lower than 7 %. The plantar-flexion maximal resultant torque was significantly higher in the locked-unit compared with open-unit configuration (P < 0.001; +61 to +157 %) due to the addition of forces from the body being constrained within the testing device. A 1D compared with 3D torque sensor significantly underestimated the proper capacity of plantar-flexion torque production (P < 0.001; -37 to -60 %). CONCLUSIONS: Assessment of plantar-flexion torque should be performed with an open-unit dynamometer mounted with a 3D sensor that is exclusive of accessory muscles but inclusive of all ankle joint movements.