Diagnostic Performance of ASL-MRI and FDG-PET in Frontotemporal Dementia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: While the diagnosis of frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is based mostly on clinical features, [18F]-FDG PET has been investigated as a potential imaging golden standard in ambiguous cases, with arterial spin labeling (ASL) MRI gaining recent interest. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis on the diagnostic performance of ASL MRI in FTD patients and compare it to that of [18F]-FDG PET. DATA SOURCES: A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus and EMBASE was conducted until March 13, 2024. STUDY SELECTION: Inclusion criteria were: original articles, patients with FTD and/or its variants, use of ASL MR perfusion imaging with or without [18F]-FDG PET, presence of sufficient diagnostic performance data. Exclusion criteria were: meeting abstracts, comments, summaries, protocols, letters and guidelines, longitudinal studies, overlapping cohorts. DATA ANALYSIS: The quality of eligible studies was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) for [18F]-FDG PET and ASL MRI were calculated, and a summary receiver operating characteristic curve was plotted. DATA SYNTHESIS: Seven eligible studies were identified, which included a total of 102 FTD patients. Aside from some of the studies showing at worst an unclear risk of bias in patient selection, index test, flow and timing, all studies showed low risk of bias and applicability concerns in all categories. Data from 4 studies was included in our meta-analysis for ASL MRI and 3 studies for [18F]-FDG PET. Pooled sensitivity, specificity and DOR were 0.70 (95% CI: 0.59-0.79), 0.81 (95% CI: 0.71-0.88) and 8.00 (95% CI: 3.74-17.13) for ASL MRI, and 0.88 (95% CI: 0.71-0.96), 0.89 (95% CI: 0.43-0.99) and 47.18 (95% CI: 10.77-206.75) for [18F]-FDG PET. LIMITATIONS: The number of studies was relatively small, with a small sample size. The studies used different scanning protocols as well as a mix of diagnostic metrics, all of which might have introduced heterogeneity in the data. CONCLUSIONS: While ASL MRI performed worse than [18F]-FDG PET in the diagnosis of FTD, it exhibited a decent diagnostic performance to justify its further investigation as a quicker and more convenient alternative. ABBREVIATIONS: 3DPCASL, 3D pseudocontinuous ASL; AD, Alzheimer's disease; ASL, arterial spin labeling; AUC, area under the curve; CI, confidence interval; DOR, diagnostic odds ratio; FN, false negative; FP, false positive; FTD, frontotemporal dementia; LE, limbic encephalitis; NLR, negative likelihood ratio; PASL, pulsed ASL; PLD, post-label delay; PLR, positive likelihood ratio; PRISMA, PSP, progressive supranuclear palsy; Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis; SROC, summary receiver operative characteristic; TN, true negative; TP, true positive; QUADAS-2, Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2.

Artificial intelligence/machine learning for neuroimaging to predict hemorrhagic transformation: Systematic review/meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Early and reliable prediction of hemorrhagic transformation (HT) in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is crucial for treatment decisions and early intervention. The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis on the performance of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) models that utilize neuroimaging to predict HT. METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science was conducted until February 19, 2024. Inclusion criteria were as follows: patients with AIS who received reperfusion therapy; AI/ML algorithm using imaging to predict HT; or presence of sufficient data on the predictive performance. Exclusion criteria were as follows: articles with less than 20 patients; articles lacking algorithms that operate solely on images; or articles not detailing the algorithm used. The quality of eligible studies was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 and Checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were calculated using a random-effects model, and a summary receiver operating characteristic curve was constructed using the Reitsma method. RESULTS: We identified six eligible studies, which included 1640 patients. Aside from an unclear risk of bias regarding flow and timing identified in two of the studies, all studies showed low risk of bias and applicability concerns in all categories. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and DOR were .849, .878, and 45.598, respectively. CONCLUSION: AI/ML models can reliably predict the occurrence of HT in AIS patients. More prospective studies are needed for subgroup analyses and higher clinical certainty and usefulness.

Detecting Alzheimer's Disease Stages and Frontotemporal Dementia in Time Courses of Resting-State fMRI Data Using a Machine Learning Approach.

Early, accurate diagnosis of neurodegenerative dementia subtypes such as Alzheimer's disease (AD) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is crucial for the effectiveness of their treatments. However, distinguishing these conditions becomes challenging when symptoms overlap or the conditions present atypically. Resting-state fMRI (rs-fMRI) studies have demonstrated condition-specific alterations in AD, FTD, and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) compared to healthy controls (HC). Here, we used machine learning to build a diagnostic classification model based on these alterations. We curated all rs-fMRIs and their corresponding clinical information from the ADNI and FTLDNI databases. Imaging data underwent preprocessing, time course extraction, and feature extraction in preparation for the analyses. The imaging features data and clinical variables were fed into gradient-boosted decision trees with fivefold nested cross-validation to build models that classified four groups: AD, FTD, HC, and MCI. The mean and 95% confidence intervals for model performance metrics were calculated using the unseen test sets in the cross-validation rounds. The model built using only imaging features achieved 74.4% mean balanced accuracy, 0.94 mean macro-averaged AUC, and 0.73 mean macro-averaged F1 score. It accurately classified FTD (F1 = 0.99), HC (F1 = 0.99), and MCI (F1 = 0.86) fMRIs but mostly misclassified AD scans as MCI (F1 = 0.08). Adding clinical variables to model inputs raised balanced accuracy to 91.1%, macro-averaged AUC to 0.99, macro-averaged F1 score to 0.92, and improved AD classification accuracy (F1 = 0.74). In conclusion, a multimodal model based on rs-fMRI and clinical data accurately differentiates AD-MCI vs. FTD vs. HC.

Umbrella review and network meta-analysis of diagnostic imaging test accuracy studies in Differentiating between brain tumor progression versus pseudoprogression and radionecrosis.

PURPOSE: In this study we gathered and analyzed the available evidence regarding 17 different imaging modalities and performed network meta-analysis to find the most effective modality for the differentiation between brain tumor recurrence and post-treatment radiation effects. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive systematic search on PubMed and Embase. The quality of eligible studies was assessed using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews-2 (AMSTAR-2) instrument. For each meta-analysis, we recalculated the effect size, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, and diagnostic odds ratio from the individual study data provided in the original meta-analysis using a random-effects model. Imaging technique comparisons were then assessed using NMA. Ranking was assessed using the multidimensional scaling approach and by visually assessing surface under the cumulative ranking curves. RESULTS: We identified 32 eligible studies. High confidence in the results was found in only one of them, with a substantial heterogeneity and small study effect in 21% and 9% of included meta-analysis respectively. Comparisons between MRS Cho/NAA, Cho/Cr, DWI, and DSC were most studied. Our analysis showed MRS (Cho/NAA) and 18F-DOPA PET displayed the highest sensitivity and negative likelihood ratios. 18-FET PET was ranked highest among the 17 studied techniques with statistical significance. APT MRI was the only non-nuclear imaging modality to rank higher than DSC, with statistical insignificance, however. CONCLUSION: The evidence regarding which imaging modality is best for the differentiation between radiation necrosis and post-treatment radiation effects is still inconclusive. Using NMA, our analysis ranked FET PET to be the best for such a task based on the available evidence. APT MRI showed promising results as a non-nuclear alternative.

Effects of video modeling with video feedback on vocational skills of adults with autism spectrum disorder.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effectiveness of a video modeling (VM) with video feedback (VFB) intervention to teach vocational gardening skills to three adults with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). METHOD: A multiple probe design across skills was used to assess the effects of the intervention on the three participants' ability to perform skills accurately. RESULTS: The use of VM with VFB led to improvements across skills for two of the participants. The third participant required video prompting (VP) for successful skill acquisition. Skill performance generalized across personnel and settings for two of the participants, but it was not assessed for the third. Skill performance maintained at follow-up for all three participants. Social validity data gathered from participants, parents, and co-workers were positive. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that VM with VFB and VP with VFB were effective and socially acceptable interventions for teaching vocational gardening skills to young adults with ASD.