Platelet-Derived Biomarkers: Potential Role in Early Pediatric Serious Bacterial Infection and Sepsis Diagnostics.

Fever is the most common complaint of children who are attending a pediatric emergency department (PED). Most of the fever cases are of viral origin; however, the most common markers, such as leucocyte, neutrophil count, or C-reactive protein, are not sensitive or specific enough to distinguish the etiology of fever, especially if children present at the early phase of infection. Currently, platelets have been attributed a role as important sentinels in viral and bacterial infection pathogenesis. Thus, our aim was to analyze different platelet indices, such as PNLR (platelet-to-neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio), PNR (platelet-to-neutrophil ratio) as well as specific secreted proteins, such as sP-selectin, CXCL4, CXCL7, and serotonin. We included 68 children who were referred to PED with the early onset of fever (<12 h). All children with comorbidities, older than five years, and psychiatric diseases, who refused to participate were excluded. All the participants were divided into viral, bacterial, or serious bacterial infection (SBI) groups. All the children underwent blood sampling, and an additional sample was collected for protein analysis. Our analysis revealed statistically significant differences between leucocyte, neutrophil, and CRP levels between SBI and other groups. However, leucocyte and neutrophil counts were within the age norms. A higher PNLR value was observed in a bacterial group, PNR-in viral. As we tested CXCL7 and sP-selectin, alone and together those markers were statistically significant to discriminate SBI and sepsis from other causes of infection. Together with tachypnoe and SpO2 < 94%, it improved the prediction value of sepsis as well as SBI. CXCL4 and serotonin did not differ between the groups. Concluding, CXCL7 and sP-selectin showed promising results in early SBI and sepsis diagnosis.

Blood biomarkers in early bacterial infection and sepsis diagnostics in feverish young children.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: While most feverish children have self-limiting diseases, 5-10% develop a serious and potentially life-threatening bacterial infection (BI). Due to potential risk, prompt recognition of BI and sepsis in the pediatric emergency department (PED) remains a clinical priority. The aim of the study was to evaluate the role of certain cytokines and chemokines separately and in combination with routine blood tests in early BI and sepsis diagnostics at PED. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively studied children younger than 5 presenting to the PED with fever lasting for under 12 hours with high risk for serious illness. Clinical data, routine blood analysis, and inflammatory cytokine and chemokine panels were evaluated for their diagnostic abilities. Two separate analyses were carried out on the patients' data: one contrasting BI and viral infection (VI) groups, the other comparing septic and non-septic patients. RESULTS: The sample comprised 70 patients (40% with BI). IL-2 was found to be the most specific biomarker to identify BI with specificity of 100%. The best discriminative ability was demonstrated by combining IL-2, IL-6, CRP, WBC, and neutrophil count: AUC 0.942 (95% Cl 0.859-0.984). IL-10 exhibited a greater AUC (0.837. 95% CI: 0.730-0.915 p<0.05) than CRP (0.807. 95% CI: 0.695-0.895 p<0.05) when predicting sepsis and showed high specificity (98%) and moderate sensitivity (75%). CONCLUSIONS: IL-6 and IL-2 could increase the diagnostic ability of routine blood tests for predicting BI, as IL-10 raises specificity for recognizing sepsis in the early hours of disease onset.

Evolution in acute pain assessment and treatment in the paediatric emergency department of a tertiary health care centre.

BACKGROUND: Paediatric pain remains one of the most misunderstood, under-diagnosed and under-treated medical problems in children. AIM: To investigate the accuracy of acute pain assessment and management in the Paediatric Emergency Department in Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Hospital. METHODS: We performed a retrospective record analysis before (the year 2017) and after (the year 2018) paediatric pain training course was conducted. In total, 1,000 randomly selected outpatient records were analysed. We divided all patients into two groups: group A records from 2017 and group B from 2018. Patients were further divided into trauma and non-trauma and subdivided into four different age groups. We collected patient age, the origin of pain, pain characteristics, pain score and medication. RESULTS: We compared 500 children in each group. Groups A and B consisted of 154 (30.8%) and 116 (23.2%) trauma patients, respectively. The pain was scored less in group A (420 children; 84%) compared to group B (94.4% of all 500 patients, p < .001). In all age groups, the pain was assessed more often, and pain medication was prescribed more often in group B compared to group A (p < .001). There was a tendency to assess pain more often in group A non-trauma patients (p = .054). However, pain relief in trauma patients was less adequate compared to non-trauma. CONCLUSION: Our research showed improvement in pain evaluation and treatment after systemic and local changes in paediatric emergency department (PED). In group B, pain was evaluated more frequently, and patients received pain medication more often than in group A. Teenagers are still less likely to receive analgesics than toddlers. Tendency remains to give fewer painkillers to trauma patients compared to non-trauma children. SIGNIFICANCE: This is one of the few studies in the Baltic region analysing changes in children's pain assessment and management in the PED after systemic and local adjustments. Our data show an impact of systemic changes and a specialized education focused on improving knowledge in acute pain diagnostics and management of medical professionals leading to better patient care.

Early Blood Biomarkers to Improve Sepsis/Bacteremia Diagnostics in Pediatric Emergency Settings.

Background: Sepsis is the leading cause of death in children worldwide. Early recognition and treatment are essential for preventing progression to lethal outcomes. CRP and Complete Blood Count (CBC) are the initial preferred tests to distinguish between bacterial and viral infections. Specific early diagnostic markers are still missing. Aim: To investigate diagnostic value of Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR), Mean Platelet Volume (MPV) and Platelet-MPV ratio (PLT/MPV) to distinguish sepsis/bacteremia and viral infection. Methods: We conducted a retrospective data analysis of case records of 115 children from 1 month to 5 years of age. All cases were divided into two groups-sepsis/bacteremia (n = 68) and viral (n = 47) patients, and further subdivided according to the time of arrival into early or late (≤12 or 12-48 h post the onset of fever, respectively). Analysis of CBC and CRP results was performed. NLR and PLT/MPV were calculated. Results: Sepsis/bacteremia group demonstrated higher absolute platelets count (370.15 ± 134.65 × 108/L versus 288.91 ± 107.14 × 108/L; p = 0.001), NLR (2.69 ± 2.03 versus 1.83 ± 1.70; p = 0.006), and PLT/MPV (41.42 ± 15.86 versus 33.45 ± 17.97; p = 0.001). PLT/MPV was increased in early arrival sepsis/bacteremia infants (42.70 ± 8.57 versus 31.01 ± 8.21; p = 0.008). NLR and MPV were significantly lower in infants (≤12 months) with viral infection on late arrival (1.16 ± 1.06 versus 1.90 ± 1.25, p = 0.025 for NLR and 8.94 ± 0.95fl versus 9.44 ± 0.85fl, p = 0.046 for MPV). Conclusion: Together with standard blood biomarkers, such as CRP, neutrophils, or platelets count, PLT/MPV is a promising biomarker for clinical practice to help discriminate between viral disease or sepsis/bacteremia in all children, especially in early onset of symptoms. NLR and MPV could support exclusion of sepsis/bacteremia in late arrival cases.

[Economic evaluation of nosocomial infections in pediatric intensive care units in Lithuania]. / Hospitalines infekcijos ekonominis ivertinimas vaiku intensyviosios terapijos skyriuose Lietuvoje.

UNLABELLED: The aim of this study was to estimate direct costs related to nosocomial infection in three pediatric intensive care units in Lithuania and to overview the effectiveness of preventive programs of nosocomial infections. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective empirical surveillance study was launched in 3 Lithuanian pediatric intensive care units during the period of January 2005 to December 2007. Using the method of targeted selection, all children aged from 1 month and 18 years, treated in pediatric intensive care units for more than 48 hours, were enrolled into the study. Direct costs of nosocomial infections in pediatric intensive care units were calculated for each patient and each case of nosocomial infection. For calculation of average expenditures per patient-day, data from nosocomial infection registry and from analysis of hospital income for services provided at pediatric intensive care units according to price-list of health care price approved by the order of the Minister of Health of the Republic of Lithuanian (No. V-802, October 27, 2005) were used. According to length of stay, costs of intensive care services, and costs caused by nosocomial infections, all the patients were divided into two groups: those who did and did not acquire an infection. For the evaluation of economic efficiency, the patients were divided into other two groups: pre- and postintervention groups. All economic evaluation was made in national currency (litas). RESULTS: The data of 755 patients were used. Multiple linear regression analysis (R(2)=0.47) revealed a 6.32-day increase (95% CI, 4.32-8.33; P=0.003) in hospital stay in a pediatric intensive care unit if a patient acquired nosocomial infection. Costs related to nosocomial infections for one patient made up 5215.47 litas (95% CI, 3565.00-6874.19). Average costs caused by one nosocomial infection case were 4070.61 litas (95% CI, 2782.44-5365.22). Nosocomial infection prevention programs (interventions) gave a total economical effect of 20046.14 litas. Prevention of one patient from nosocomial infection caused a reduction of 1336.41 litas, and one avoided nosocomial infection case resulted in a 1113.67-litas reduction; cost-to-effect ratio was 1:4. CONCLUSIONS: Total costs related to nosocomial infections in pediatric intensive care units were high. The implementation of nosocomial infection prevention program resulted in a positive economic effect - 1 litas spent for the prevention of nosocomial infections saved 4 litas.

Reduction of nosocomial infections and mortality attributable to nosocomial infections in pediatric intensive care units in Lithuania.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to identify the most important risk factors for nosocomial infections, evaluate the incidence rates and risk changes after the multimodal intervention, and to assess mortality attributable to nosocomial infections. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a prospective surveillance study. Data were collected from January 2005 until December 2007 in three pediatric intensive care units. All patients aged between 1 month and 18 years hospitalized in units for more than 48 hours were included in the study. The patients were divided into preintervention (2006) and postintervention (2007) groups. The multimodal intervention included education of the staff and implementation of evidence-based infection control measures. RESULTS: A total of 755 children were included in the study. Major risk factors for nosocomial infections were identified: mechanical ventilation, central line, intracranial pressure device, and tracheostomy. Overall, the incidence rate (15.6 vs. 7.5 cases per 100 patients, P=0.002), incidence density (19.1 vs. 10.4 cases per 1000 patient-days, P=0.015), and the incidence of pneumonia (5.6 vs. 1.9 per 100 patients, P=0.016) have decreased in the postintervention as compared with the preintervention group. The relative risk reduction, absolute risk reduction, and number needed to treat were statistically significant for ventilator-associated pneumonia (66.5%, 3.7%, 27, respectively; P=0.016). There was no significant difference in survival time by the presence of nosocomial infection (83.67 patient-days without vs. 74.33 patient-days with infection, P>0.05) CONCLUSIONS: The most important risk factors for nosocomial infections were mechanical ventilation, central line, intracranial pressure device, and tracheostomy. After the multimodal intervention, there was a statistically significant decrease in the incidence rates of nosocomial infections and the risk reduction for ventilator-associated pneumonia. No significant impact of nosocomial infections on mortality was determined.