Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 100(44): e27398, 2021 Nov 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34871206

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Bleeding is an untoward outcome in the management of elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Although the potent oral P2Y12 inhibitor, ticagrelor is clinically beneficial, its association with bleeding events in elderly ACS patients (≥75 years) is poorly understood. METHODS: We conducted a systematic search of 7 databases up to May 20, 2020 to identify studies which examined the risk of bleeding (defined according to each study) among elderly ACS patients (≥75 years) receiving ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel. Summary risk ratios (RR) were estimated using the random effects model. RESULTS: Eight studies consisting of 5 observational studies and 3 randomized controlled trials involving 7032 elderly patients met the eligibility criteria. The mean age of the patients was 77.8 years, and the mean follow-up duration was 12 months. Overall, the pooled RRs showed higher risk of a bleeding event with ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel (RR 1.20, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.03-1.40; P = .017). No statistically significant heterogeneity was observed among the studies (Q = 6.93; P = .44; I2 = 0). Also, pooled RRs did not show a higher risk of major bleeding (RR 1.32, 95% CI 0.91-1.92; P = .15) or minor bleeding (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.76-1.58; P = .64) when comparing the ticagrelor to the clopidogrel group. CONCLUSIONS: There is a 20% increased risk of a bleeding event in elderly ACS patients treated with ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel; for such patients, clopidogrel may be considered as an alternative agent to ticagrelor due to its lower risk of bleeding.


Assuntos
Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/tratamento farmacológico , Hemorragia/induzido quimicamente , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/uso terapêutico , Antagonistas do Receptor Purinérgico P2Y/uso terapêutico , Ticagrelor/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Clopidogrel/efeitos adversos , Clopidogrel/uso terapêutico , Hemorragia/epidemiologia , Humanos , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/efeitos adversos , Antagonistas do Receptor Purinérgico P2Y/efeitos adversos , Arábia Saudita/epidemiologia , Ticagrelor/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 100(51): e28118, 2021 Dec 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34941056

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Critically ill adults with acute kidney injury (AKI) experience considerable morbidity and mortality. This systematic review aimed to compare the effectiveness of continuous renal replacement therapy (CCRT) versus sustained low efficiency dialysis (SLED) for individuals with AKI. METHODS: We carried out a systematic search of existing databases according to standard methods and random effects models were used to generate the overall estimate. Heterogeneity coefficient was also calculated for each outcome measure. RESULTS: Eleven studies having 1160 patients with AKI were included in the analyses. Meta-analysis results indicated that there was no statistically significant difference between SLED versus continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) in our primary outcomes, like mortality rate (rate ratio [RR] 0.67, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.44-1.00; P = .05), renal recovery (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.83-1.42; P = .56), and dialysis dependence (RR = 1.03, 95% CI 0.69-1.53; P = .89). Also, no statistically significant difference was observed for between SLED versus CRRT in the secondary outcomes: that is, length of intensive care unit stay (mean difference -0.16, 95% CI -0.56-0.22; P = .41) and fluid removal rate (mean difference -0.24, 95% CI -0.72-0.24; P = .32). The summary mean difference indicated that there was a significant difference in the serum phosphate clearance among patients treated with SLED and CRRT (mean difference -1.17, 95% CI -1.90 to -0.44, P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: The analysis indicate that there was no major advantage of using continuous renal replacement compared with sustained low efficiency dialysis in hemodynamically unstable AKI patients. Both modalities are equally safe and effective in treating AKI among critically ill patients.


Assuntos
Injúria Renal Aguda/terapia , Terapia de Substituição Renal Contínua/métodos , Terapia de Substituição Renal Híbrida/métodos , Adulto , Estado Terminal , Humanos , Diálise Renal , Terapia de Substituição Renal
3.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 100(17): e25714, 2021 Apr 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33907158

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We performed a meta-analysis to determine whether a consistent relationship exists between the use of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and the risk of lung cancer. Accordingly, we summarized and reviewed previously published quantitative studies. METHODS: Eligible studies with reference lists published before June 1st, 2019 were obtained from searching several databases. Random effects' models were used to summarize the overall estimate of the multivariate adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Thirteen observational studies involving 458,686 ACEI users were included in the analysis, Overall, pooled risk ratios indicate that ACEIs use was not a risk factor for lung cancer (RR 0.982, 95% C.I. 0.873 - 1.104; P = .76). There was significant heterogeneity between the studies (Q = 52.54; P < .001; I2 = 86.07). There was no significant association between ACEIs use and lung cancer in studies with over five years of ACEIs exposure (RR 0.95, 95% C.I. 0.75 - 1.20; P = .70); and ≤ 5years of exposure to ACEIs (RR 0.98, 95% C.I. 0.83 - 1.15; P = .77). There were no statistically significant differences in the pooled risk ratio obtained according to the study design (Q = 0.65; P = .723) and the comparator regimen (Q = 3.37; P = .19). CONCLUSIONS: The use of ACEIs was not associated with an increased risk of lung cancer. Nevertheless, well-designed observational studies with different ethnic populations are still needed to evaluate the long-term (over 10 years) association between ACEIs use and lung cancer.


Assuntos
Inibidores da Enzima Conversora de Angiotensina/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Medição de Risco , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiologia , Estudos Observacionais como Assunto , Medição de Risco/métodos , Medição de Risco/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores de Risco
4.
Neurosciences (Riyadh) ; 26(1): 4-14, 2021 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33530037

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the prevalence and the factors associated with recurrence of myasthenia gravis following thymectomy. METHODS: Six electronic databases which reported on recurrence of myasthenia gravis following thymectomy and/or its risk factors from 1985 to 2018 were searched. Summary prevalence and risk values obtained based on the random effect models were reported. RESULTS: Seventy (70) papers containing 7,287 individuals with myasthenia gravis who received thymectomy as part of their management were retrieved. The patients had a mean follow-up of 4.65 years post-thymectomy. The prevalence of myasthenia gravis recurrence post-thymectomy was 18.0% (95% CI 14.7-22.0%; 1865/7287). Evident heterogeneity was observed (I2=93.6%; p<0.001). Recurrence rate was insignificantly higher in male compared with female patients (31.3 vs. 23.8%; p=0.104). Pooled recurrence rates for thymomatous (33.3%) was higher than the rate among non-thymomatous (20.8%) myasthenia gravis patients (Q=4.19, p=0.041). Risk factors for recurrence include older age, male sex, disease severity, having thymomatous myasthenia gravis, longer duration of the myasthenia gravis before surgery, and having an ectopic thymic tissue. CONCLUSION: A fifth of individuals with myasthenia gravis experience recurrence after thymectomy. Closer monitoring should be given to at-risk patients and further studies are needed to understand interventions to address these risks.


Assuntos
Miastenia Gravis/epidemiologia , Miastenia Gravis/cirurgia , Timectomia , Bases de Dados Factuais , Humanos , Prevalência , Recidiva , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
5.
Int J Health Sci (Qassim) ; 14(6): 44-51, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33192231

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Whether aminophylline administration can prevent or treat AKI among pediatric patients are not clear. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy and effectiveness of aminophylline for pediatric AKI. METHODS: We carried out a systematic search of six databases: PubMed, EMBASE/Excerpta Medica, Scopus, Cochrane library, and Google Scholar from January 1995 up till May 2019. Summary measures of risk ratios and standard mean difference were calculated using the random effects model. RESULTS: We identified seven papers containing data on aminophylline use in children with AKI. Meta-analysis of single-arm studies indicated no statistically significant difference in mean rate of serum creatinine clearance (-0.39 [-0.80-1.58], P = 0.52), mean urine output (1.99 [-1.43-5.42]; P = 0.25), or mean blood urea nitrogen levels (0.83 [-1.86-3.03], P = 0.54) before and after aminophylline administration. However, among double-arm studies, aminophylline administration in the intervention arm significantly reduced the serum creatinine level as compared to control arm (mean diff = -34 [-55.18--12.83]; P = 0.002). Mean urine output (-112.68 [-27.43-48.9], P = 0.17), incidence of AKI (RR = 1.05 [0.80-1.37], P = 0.72), and mortality rates (RR = 0.79 [0.42-1.47], P = 0.45) were found to be statistically insignificant. CONCLUSIONS: Aminophylline administration in children with AKI reduces serum creatinine level without significant adverse effects or effect on the incidence of AKI, urine output, or mortality. Further, large-scale well-planned randomized controlled trials are needed to evaluate its use and its potential long-term effects.

6.
Int J Health Sci (Qassim) ; 13(4): 56-62, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31341456

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: There is limited evidence of studying the associated factors of acute kidney injury (AKI) among patients with influenza A (H1N1) virus infection pandemic in 2009. AKI is one of the most prevalent complications in the intensive care unit. Its incidence is associated with high mortality and negative impacts on long-term survival. The aim of this narrative review was to determine the prevalence and mortality due to AKI, among patients admitted with the H1N1 virus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A narrative review of studies reporting about treatment measures and mortality associated with AKI during the H1N1 pandemic over a 10-year period (from September 2009 to August 2018), was performed. We searched the following databases; EMBASE, Medline/PubMed, NHS evidence, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library. Our inclusion revealed 20 studies of patients (n = 3579) who were admitted with H1N1 infection and developed AKI. RESULTS: In this study, 33% of patients (n = 1164) who were admitted with H1N1 infection had developed AKI. Within the first 5 years (2009 to 2013), 36% of patients (n = 1013) developed AKI. Within the next 5 years (2014-2018), 812 patients were admitted with the H1N1 infection and 18% of patients (n = 150) had developed AKI. Over the 10 years, there was a 50% reduction in the number of patients who developed AKI (2009 and 2018) (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Patients showed varied responses to treatment measures, depending on their geographical location, comorbidities, and other characteristics. Despite a reasonable prevalence of AKI among patients with the H1N1 virus infection, the mortality over the last 10 years was reduced, with renal replacement therapy as a common therapy in most studies.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA