Digital Planning on Guided Endodontics Technology.

The aim of this review is to discuss the digital planning and the use of guided technology in Endodontics. The complexity of the root canals anatomy and the challenges in the microorganism's control represent risk factors for failure after the infected root canal's treatment. Scientific improvements associated with technological advances have enabled better predictability of therapeutic procedures results. The development of efficient and modern devices provided safer root canal treatments, with shorter clinical visits and greater patient comfort. Digital endodontics incorporated different tools and developed its own, advancing even further in resolving complex cases. The faithful copy of the internal anatomy provided by the advancement of CBCT devices and software's, associated with the digital resources of 3D planning and printing, enabled the advent of guided endodontics. This technique is used at different stages of endodontic treatment, with specific indications and greater result predictability. Therefore, this study critically reviewed the potential clinical application of this guided access technique, and the operative steps for its safe performance in managing complex endodontic cases. The main indications are accessing calcified root canals, performing endodontic surgeries in difficult access areas, removing fiberglass posts, and accessing teeth with developmental anomalies. In summary, guided endodontics has been a precise strategy, effective, safe, and clinically applicable. This procedure represents incorporating technological resources and digital planning in the Endodontist clinical practice, increasing predictability to complex cases.

Digital Planning on Guided Endodontics Technology

Abstract The aim of this review is to discuss the digital planning and the use of guided technology in Endodontics. The complexity of the root canals anatomy and the challenges in the microorganism's control represent risk factors for failure after the infected root canal's treatment. Scientific improvements associated with technological advances have enabled better predictability of therapeutic procedures results. The development of efficient and modern devices provided safer root canal treatments, with shorter clinical visits and greater patient comfort. Digital endodontics incorporated different tools and developed its own, advancing even further in resolving complex cases. The faithful copy of the internal anatomy provided by the advancement of CBCT devices and software's, associated with the digital resources of 3D planning and printing, enabled the advent of guided endodontics. This technique is used at different stages of endodontic treatment, with specific indications and greater result predictability. Therefore, this study critically reviewed the potential clinical application of this guided access technique, and the operative steps for its safe performance in managing complex endodontic cases. The main indications are accessing calcified root canals, performing endodontic surgeries in difficult access areas, removing fiberglass posts, and accessing teeth with developmental anomalies. In summary, guided endodontics has been a precise strategy, effective, safe, and clinically applicable. This procedure represents incorporating technological resources and digital planning in the Endodontist clinical practice, increasing predictability to complex cases.

Resumo O objetivo desta revisão é discutir o planejamento digital e o uso da tecnologia guiada em Endodontia. A complexidade e variabilidade da anatomia dos canais radiculares, em conjunto com o desafio no processo de sanificação e controle de micro-organismos representam fatores de risco ao fracasso após o tratamento dos canais radiculares infectados. O aprimoramento técnico-científico e os avanços tecnológicos tem possibilitado uma melhor previsibilidade de resultados nos procedimentos terapêuticos. O desenvolvimento de ferramentas de trabalho eficientes e modernas proporcionou tratamentos endodônticos seguros, com menor tempo clínico operacional e maior conforto ao paciente. A endodontia digital incorporou diferentes ferramentas e desenvolveu suas próprias, avançando ainda mais na resolução de casos complexos. A cópia fiel da anatomia interna proporcionada pelo avanço dos aparelhos e softwares de TCFC, associada aos recursos digitais de planejamento e impressão 3D possibilitaram o surgimento da endodontia guiada. Esta técnica é utilizada em diferentes etapas do tratamento endodôntico, com indicações específicas e maior previsibilidade de resultados. Este estudo revisou criticamente o potencial de aplicação clínica da técnica de acesso guiado, e os passos operatórios para sua realização de forma segura no manejo de casos endodônticos complexos. As principais indicações da Endodontia Guiada incluem o acesso a canais radiculares calcificados; as cirurgias parendodônticas em áreas de difícil acesso; a remoção de pinos de fibra de vidro; e o acesso a dentes com anomalias de desenvolvimento. Em síntese, a endodontia guiada é uma técnica precisa, eficaz e de fácil aplicação clínica. Esta técnica representa a incorporação dos recursos tecnológicos e planejamentos digitais do Endodontista, dando maior previsibilidade aos casos em que é aplicada na prática clínica.

Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Detection of Separated Endodontic Instruments.

INTRODUCTION: This study compared the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of different imaging diagnostic protocols, cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and digital periapical radiography (DPR), in identifying separated endodontic instruments in filled root canals. METHODS: One hundred eight root canals from 36 mandibular molars were prepared and obturated. Of these, 84 were filled without separated instruments, and 24 were filled with the presence of a separated instrument (stainless steel hand file or reciprocating instrument). Subsequently, different CBCT imaging protocols were acquired: i-CAT Classic (ICC) (0.25-mm isotropic voxel), i-CAT Next Generation (ICN) (0.125-mm isotropic voxel), and PreXion 3D (PXD) (0.09-mm isotropic voxel). Moreover, a DPR exam was obtained (08 mA, 70 kVp, and exposure time of 0.2 seconds). Two calibrated endodontists evaluated each image for the presence or absence of fractured files on a 5-point scale, ranging from definitely absent to definitely present. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity measures for each method were estimated. The data were evaluated by Fisher exact test and binomial test. RESULTS: Nine instruments were identified in DPR (37.5%) and none in the CBCT protocols (P > .05). The type of instrument (stainless steel hand file or reciprocating instrument) did not influence the identification of the separated instrument (P > .05). This study showed that DPR is the most accurate and sensitive imaging technique, with 83.3% and 37.5%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: DPR is the better imaging diagnostic exam to evaluate the presence of separated endodontic instruments inside a root canal in comparison with the ICC, ICN, and PXD tomographic protocols. However, most of the separated instruments were not identified.