Effectiveness of fracture liaison service in reducing the risk of secondary fragility fractures in adults aged 50 and older: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

To determine and appraise the certainty of fracture liaison service (FLS) in reducing the risk of secondary fragility fractures in older adults aged ≥ 50 years and to examine the nature of the FLS and the roles of various disciplines involved in the delivery of the FLS. Medline, EMBASE, PubMed, CINAHL, SCOPUS, and The Cochrane Library were searched from January 1st, 2010, to May 31st, 2022. Two reviewers independently extracted data. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cohort studies and the PEDro scale for randomized trials, while the GRADE approach established the certainty of the evidence. Thirty-seven studies were identified of which 34 (91.9%) were rated as having a low risk of bias and 22 (59.5%) were meta-analyzed. Clinically important low certainty evidence at 1 year (RR 0.26, CI 0.13 to 0.52, 6 pooled studies) and moderate certainty evidence at ≥ 2 years (RR 0.68, CI 0.55 to 0.83, 13 pooled studies) indicate that the risk of secondary fragility fracture was lower in the FLS intervention compared to the non-FLS intervention. Sensitivity analyses with no observed heterogeneity confirmed these findings. This review found clinically important moderate certainty evidence showing that the risk of secondary fragility fracture was lower in the FLS intervention at ≥ 2 years. More high-quality studies in this field could improve the certainty of the evidence. Review registration: PROSPERO-CRD42021266408.

Effects of spinal manipulation or mobilization as an adjunct to neurodynamic mobilization for lumbar disc herniation with radiculopathy: a randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the long-term clinical effects of spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) or mobilization (MOB) as an adjunct to neurodynamic mobilization (NM) in the management of individuals with Lumbar Disc Herniation with Radiculopathy (DHR). DESIGN: Parallel group, single-blind randomized clinical trial. SETTING: The study was conducted in a governmental tertiary hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Forty (40) participants diagnosed as having a chronic DHR (≥3 months) were randomly allocated into two groups with 20 participants each in the SMT and MOB groups. INTERVENTIONS: Participants in the SMT group received high-velocity, low-amplitude manipulation, while those in the MOB group received Mulligans' spinal mobilization with leg movement. Each treatment group also received NM as a co-intervention, administered immediately after the SMT and MOB treatment sessions. Each group received treatment twice a week for 12 weeks. OUTCOME MEASURES: The following outcomes were measured at baseline, 6, 12, 26, and 52 weeks post-randomization; back pain, leg pain, activity limitation, sciatica bothersomeness, sciatica frequency, functional mobility, quality of life, and global effect. The primary outcomes were pain and activity limitation at 12 weeks post-randomization. RESULTS: The results indicate that the MOB group improved significantly better than the SMT group in all outcomes (p < 0.05), and at all timelines (6, 12, 26, and 52 weeks post-randomization), except for sensory deficit at 52 weeks, and reflex and motor deficits at 12 and 52 weeks. These improvements were also clinically meaningful for neurodynamic testing and sensory deficits at 12 weeks, back pain intensity at 6 weeks, and for activity limitation, functional mobility, and quality of life outcomes at 6, 12, 26, and 52 weeks of follow-ups. The risk of being improved at 12 weeks post-randomization was 40% lower (RR = 0.6, CI = 0.4 to 0.9, p = 0.007) in the SMT group compared to the MOB group. CONCLUSION: This study found that individuals with DHR demonstrated better improvements when treated with MOB plus NM than when treated with SMT plus NM. These improvements were also clinically meaningful for activity limitation, functional mobility, and quality of life outcomes at long-term follow-up. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Pan-African Clinical Trial Registry: PACTR201812840142310.

Knowledge and current practices of Nigerian physiotherapists on the physical activity and exercise training in the rehabilitation of patients with asthma.

OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to determine the knowledge and current practices of Nigerian physiotherapists on the physical activity and exercise training in the rehabilitation of patients with asthma and to determine if any difference exists between novice and expert professionals. METHODS: This was designed as a cross-sectional study. A total of 311 practicing physiotherapists in Nigeria participated in the study. An electronic questionnaire comprising 34 semi-structured questions with three domains; personal information, knowledge, and current practices, was used to collect data throughout 4-months. Data were analyzed using a pragmatist paradigm. RESULTS: Out of the physiotherapists, 51.8% (n = 161) had postgraduate degrees, 46.9% (n = 146) had bachelor's degrees, and 1.3% (n = 4) had a doctor of physiotherapy degrees. The result also indicates that 45.3% (n = 141) of the physiotherapists had insufficient knowledge about asthma, and 39.5% (n = 123) were not using current clinical practice in the rehabilitation of patients with asthma. The results also indicate that expert physiotherapist has more knowledge and also uses current practices when compared to novice physiotherapist. CONCLUSIONS: Even though expert physiotherapists have better knowledge and current practices when compared to the novice physiotherapists, the overall outcomes indicate that Nigerian physiotherapists had insufficient knowledge about asthma and were not using current clinical practice in the rehabilitation of patients with asthma.

Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) delivered via dorsolateral prefrontal cortex on central post-stroke pain and depression: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is effective in the management of patients with central post-stroke pain (CPSP) and post-stroke depression (PSD) individually. However, it is not known if tDCS delivered via dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) can be used to ameliorate both symptoms. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this case report was to share the effectiveness of using tDCS of the DLPFC with short inter-session intervals to reduce central pain and depression in a stroke survivor. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 45-year-old patient presented with CPSP and depression following a stroke. The CPSP and depression were diagnosed using the Douleur Neuropathique 4 Questionnaire (DN4Q) and the Beck Depression Index (BDI) respectively. The pain score was 10 on a visual analogue scale (VAS) and it was a hemi-body burning sensation, with a score of 7 on DN4Q, and the depression score was 25 on the BDI. The patient received anodal tDCS to the left DLPFC using two different application protocols. Initially, a stimulation session of 2 milliamperes (mA) intensity for 20 minutes was given every working day for 2 weeks. After 3 weeks, she then received 7 daily sessions of periodic stimulations of 2 mA intensity for 13 minutes each with 20 minutes inter-session intervals for 1 week. The patient was followed up for 6 months post-intervention. OUTCOMES: Immediately following the last session of the initial protocol of stimulation, the BDI score reduced from 25 to 7 and the pain became abolished. However, the symptoms relapsed at 3 weeks post-intervention to the initial BDI score of 25, VAS score of 10 and DN4Q score of 7. Following the application of the second protocol of stimulation, the BDI score improved to 18 at three weeks and later to 7 at six months post-intervention while the pain (both VAS and DN4Q) became completely abolished. CONCLUSIONS: Further research is needed to determine if a series of periodic tDCS with short-intersession intervals applied to the DLPFC may be more effective than a single tDCS with long inter-session intervals, in decreasing pain and inducing long-term improvement in mood in people with stroke.

A Comparison Between the Effect of Combined Chain Exercises Plus Kinesio Taping With Combined Chain Exercises Alone in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the effect of Kinesio taping as an adjunct to combined chain exercises compared with combined chain exercises alone in the management of individuals with knee osteoarthritis. METHODS: A total of 60 (27 male, 33 female) individuals (age range = 50-71 yrs and mean age = 54.26 ± 8.83 yrs) diagnosed as having mild to moderate knee osteoarthritis (based on the Kellgren and Lawrence grade I-III classification) were randomly allocated into two groups with 30 participants each in the Kinesio taping + combined chain exercises and combined chain exercises groups. Participants in the Kinesio taping + combined chain exercises group received Kinesio taping plus combined chain exercises and those in the combined chain exercises group received only combined chain exercises. Each participant was assessed for pain, range of motion, functional mobility, and quality of life at baseline and after 8 wks of intervention. A mixed-design multivariate analysis of variance was used to analyze the treatment effect. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed in the baseline characteristics of participants in both groups. The result indicated that there was a significant time effect for all outcomes, with a significant interaction between time and intervention (P < 0.001). The Bonferroni post hoc analyses of time and intervention effects indicated that the Kinesio taping + combined chain exercises group improved significantly better than the combined chain exercises group in all outcomes, pain (mean = 2.01 [0.64] vs. 3.94 [1.12], F[df] = 5.466[1,58], P = 0.011), flexion range of motion (mean = 121.15 [2.07] vs. 104.28 [3.24], F[df] = 26.722[1,58], P < 0.001), functional mobility (mean = 19.47 [1.95] vs. 31.01 [2.39], F[df] = 29.436[1,58], P < 0.001), and quality of life (mean = 68.76 [3.19] vs. 45.62 [2.87], F[df] = 71.984[1,58], P < 0.001), after 8 wks of intervention. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study concluded that Kinesio taping + combined chain exercises and combined chain exercises were both effective but Kinesio taping plus combined chain exercises was more effective in the management of individuals with knee osteoarthritis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Pan African Clinical Trial Registry: PACTR201810603949411.

Does exercise program of endurance and strength improve health-related quality of life in persons living with HIV-related distal symmetrical polyneuropathy? A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The most common HIV neurological comorbidity, Distal Symmetrical Peripheral Neuropathy (DSPN), is characterized by severe symptoms and reduced quality of life. Exercise has consistently been mentioned as one of the non-pharmacological therapies for the rehabilitation of individuals with HIV, but little is known about an exercise program to recommend to people living with HIV (PLWHIV)-related DSPN. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of aerobic (AE) or progressive resisted exercise (PRE) on quality of life (QOL) in a person living with HIV-related DSPN. METHOD: A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 136 persons living with HIV-related Neuropathy, including 6 domains of QOL within WHOQOL-BREF, 45 in the AE (used ergometer), 44 in the PRE (used quadriceps bench), and 47 in the control group (CG). The outcome measures (QOL) data were analyzed using the inferential statistic of Friedman for within-group with post hoc analysis of Wilcoxon signed Test. A Kruskal-Wallis test was carried out for between-groups with post hoc analysis of Mann-Whitney to find where significant differences exist. RESULTS: The results indicated significant differences within experimental groups in all six domains p < 0.05. Similarly, the result indicated significant differences within the CG in Physical, level of independence, and Spirituality/Religions domains (p = 0.002, p = 0.035, p = 0.006). However, the results indicated significant differences between experimental groups and CG. CONCLUSION: These findings indicated that strength and endurance exercise of moderate intensity have a positive effect on QOL in PLWHIV-related DSPN. Clinical trial No. http://apps.who.int/trialsearch/default.aspx (PACTR201707002173240).

Knowledge and current practices of physiotherapists on the physical activity and exercise in the rehabilitation of children with epileptic seizures.

BACKGROUND: Physiotherapists play a key role in the rehabilitation of children with epileptic seizures. Regular physical exercise generates psychological and physiological benefits for people with epilepsy. DESIGN: This study was a cross-sectional design. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the knowledge and current practices of physiotherapists on the physical activity and exercise in the rehabilitation of children with epileptic seizures in Nigeria. METHODS: Physiotherapists with minimum bachelor's degrees were invited to participate in the study using an electronic questionnaire. The subjects (N = 117) answered a questionnaire comprising 33 simple closed-ended questions with three domains: personal information, knowledge, and current practices. RESULTS: Out of the 117 physiotherapists, 77.7% (n = 91) had postgraduate degrees, 16.2% (n = 19) had bachelor's degree in physiotherapy, and only 5.9% (n = 7) had Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT). The results also indicated that 79.5% (n = 93) of physiotherapists had sufficient knowledge about epilepsy, and 86.3% (n = 101) of physiotherapists were using current skills/physical activity to rehabilitate children with epileptic seizures. CONCLUSIONS: It was concluded that physiotherapists had sufficient knowledge about epilepsy and were using current skills/physical activity in the rehabilitation of children with epileptic seizures.

Comparative Effectiveness of 2 Manual Therapy Techniques in the Management of Lumbar Radiculopathy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of Dowling's and Mulligan's manual therapy techniques on pain and disability in the management of lumbar disc herniation with radiculopathy (LDHR). METHODS: A total of 40 individuals with LDHR were randomly allocated into 2 groups, 20 participants each in PINS and SMWLM groups. Each participant was assessed at baseline, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks postintervention. The primary outcomes measured were pain (visual analog scale) and disability (Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire). Secondary variables were quality of life (Short-Form 36 Health Survey), sciatica bothersomeness (Sciatica Bothersomeness Index), sciatica frequency (Sciatica Frequency Index), and general perception of recovery (Global Rating of Change Scale). Repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to compute within-group and between-groups interactions. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed in the baseline characteristics of participants in both groups. The results indicate that there were significant time effects for all outcomes in the study (P < .001) within each group. However, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups on any outcome variable (P > .05). CONCLUSION: The findings indicate that there was no difference in pain or disability between the 2 manual therapy techniques in the management of LDHR.