Transversus abdominis plane block for analgesia after Cesarean delivery. A systematic review.

Cesarean delivery is a major surgical procedure, after which a woman can experience substantial postoperative discomfort or pain. Inadequate postoperative analgesia is one of the most common reasons for poor patient satisfaction following cesarean delivery. Although spinal or systemic opioids are currently the gold standard to achieve effective analgesia, they are often associated with side effects. In the last few years there has been growing interest in abdominal plane blocks, with promising data on their efficacy. The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is a regional analgesic technique which is gaining acceptance in postoperative analgesia for lower abdominal surgeries. In this systematic review of articles published as of 31 December 2013, we searched the principal medical databases for randomized controlled trials that assessed the efficacy of ultrasound (US)-guided TAP block following cesarean delivery and reported on postoperative opioid consumption and pain score, opioid-related side-effects and patient satisfaction. Although controversy surrounds the utility of US-guided TAP block in cesarean section, evidence suggests that when correctly executed as part of a multimodal analgesic regimen, TAP block may reduce postoperative opioid consumption and opioid-related side effects, improving postoperative pain control and patient satisfaction. Further studies are necessary to explore this field of research.

Pilot double-blinded study to assess efficacy and tolerability of morphine sulphate oral solution (Oramorph®) given preoperatively as add-on therapy within a multimodal postoperative pain approach in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

BACKGROUND: This study aims at investigating the effect of a single pre-operative oral administration of morphine sulphate (Oramorph®) on pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). METHODS: Forty-one ASA I-III patients, aged 18-65 years, undergoing LC were randomly, double-blindly allocated to treatment (N.=20, 30mg Oramorph®, group M) or placebo (N.=21, group P). General anesthesia was maintained with propofol and remifentanil. All patients received ketamine 0.2 mg/kg iv at induction, intraoperative ketorolac 30mg iv and tramadol postoperatively (iv PCA: bolus 50 mg, lock-out 30 min, max 100 mg/4 hours). Numerical rating scale for pain (NRS), White's fast track and PADSS scores, tramadol consumption and adverse events were recorded for the first 24h. All patients underwent State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) and Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE). RESULTS: Anthropometric characteristics, MMSE, STAI, ASA status, NRS rest, White's and PADDS scores, PONV incidence were similar. Group M showed significantly lower NRS on movement during the first 3 hours after awakening. Cumulative tramadol consumption was lower in group M than in group P (185±142 mg versus 263±199 mg, P=0.199). CONCLUSION: Within a multimodal approach, a single preoperative oral administration of 30 mg of morphine sulphate in patients undergoing LC did not improve pain at rest, but improved NRS on movement during the first 3 hours after awakening. Group P required a higher mean dose of tramadol compared to Group M, although not significantly. The safety profile of Oramorph® allowed fast extubation and awakening times as well as prompt home discharge within 6 hours from surgery.

II Italian intersociety consensus statement on antithrombotic prophylaxis in orthopedics and traumatology.

Pharmacological prophylaxis for preventing venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a worldwide established procedure in hip and knee replacement surgery, as well as in the treatment of femoral neck fractures, but few data exist to its regard in other fields of orthopedics and traumatology. Indeed, no guidelines or recommendations are available in the literature, except for a limited number of weak statements about knee arthroscopy and lower limb fractures. The present paper represents the first multidisciplinary effort to provide suggestions on the prophylaxis of VTE in the remaining fields of orthopedic surgery (minor orthopedic surgery and orthopedic trauma). The Italian Society for Studies on Hemostasis and Thrombosis (SISET), the Italian Society of Orthopedics and Traumatology (SIOT) and the association of Orthopedic Traumatology of Italian Hospitals (OTODI) together with the Italian Society of Anesthesia, Analgesia, Resuscitation and Intensive Care (SIAARTI) and the Italian Society of General Medicine (SIMG) have set down quick and easy suggestions for VTE prophylaxis in a number of surgical conditions for which only scarce evidence is available. This inter-society consensus statement aims at simplifying the approach to VTE prophylaxis in the single patient with the goal of improving its clinical application.

II Italian intersociety consensus statement on antithrombotic prophylaxis in orthopaedics and traumatology: arthroscopy, traumatology, leg immobilization, minor orthopaedic procedures and spine surgery.

Pharmacological prophylaxis for preventing venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a worldwide established procedure in hip and knee replacement surgery, as well as in the treatment of femoral neck fractures, but few data exist in other fields of orthopaedics and traumatology. Thus, no guidelines or recommendations are available in the literature except for a limited number of weak statements about knee arthroscopy and lower limb fractures. In any case, none of them are a multidisciplinary effort as the one here presented. The Italian Society for Studies on Haemostasis and Thrombosis (SISET), the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology (SIOT), the Association of Orthopaedic Traumatology of Italian Hospitals (OTODI), together with the Italian Society of Anesthesia, Analgesia, Resuscitation and Intensive Care (SIAARTI) and the Italian Society of General Medicine (SIMG) have set down easy and quick suggestions for VTE prophylaxis in a number of surgical conditions for which only scarce evidence is available. This inter-society consensus statement aims at simplifying the approach to VTE prophylaxis in the single patient with the goal to improve its clinical application.

Prospective randomized comparison of ultrasound-guided and neurostimulation techniques for continuous interscalene brachial plexus block in patients undergoing coracoacromial ligament repair.

BACKGROUND: There are few data comparing the onset time of interscalene brachial plexus block performed using ultrasound (US) guidance or nerve stimulation (NS) technique for elective coracoacromial ligament repair. METHODS: Fifty ASA I-III patients were randomly allocated to receive a continuous interscalene brachial plexus block with 20 ml of 1% ropivacaine with either NS or US guidance. The time of block performance, number of skin punctures and needle redirections, inadvertent vascular punctures, and procedure-related pain scores were recorded. The onsets of sensory and motor blocks in the distribution of radial, axillary, and musculocutaneous nerves were blindly assessed every 5 min until 30 min from the end of local anaesthetic (LA) injection. Intraoperative fentanyl, general anaesthesia (GA) requirements, postoperative pain scores, LA consumption, and patients' requirements for subcutaneous morphine during the first 24 h were compared. RESULTS: Block onset times were similar. The time to complete the block and the number of skin punctures and vascular punctures were significantly lower in Group US. There were no differences in needle redirections, incidence of paraesthesiae, intraoperative fentanyl consumption, and requirements for GA or postoperative morphine. The US group required significantly less LA only at 16 h after surgery and had lower pain scores at rest at 24 h after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Block onset times and success rate were similar whether NS or US was used, although US guidance allowed shorter procedural times, fewer needle punctures, and fewer vascular punctures.

The nerve stimulation technique versus the loss of resistance technique for the posterior approach to lumbar plexus block: a randomized, prospective, observer-blinded, pilot study.

BACKGROUND: This prospective, randomized, observer-blinded, pilot study compares the effects of the nerve stimulation guidance technique (NS) with the loss of resistance technique (LOR) on readiness for surgery during the posterior approach to lumbar plexus block. METHODS: Thirty ASA status I-III patients who were 18-85 years old and who were undergoing hip fracture repair were enrolled. After parasacral sciatic nerve block, patients were randomly allocated to receive a continuous posterior lumbar plexus block using nerve stimulation (n=15) or a continuous psoas compartment block using the loss of resistance technique (n=15) with 20 ml of 1.5% mepivacaine. A blinded observer monitored for sensory and motor block onsets every 5 minutes. We defined readiness for surgery as complete numbness to the pinprick test and complete motor block on the surgical side. If incomplete, the lumbar plexus block was supplemented with 10 mL of 1.5% mepivacaine through the catheter before surgery. Intraoperative fentanyl or general anesthesia requirements, pain scores, local anesthetic consumption, morphine requirements for breakthrough pain and side effects were monitored. RESULTS: The mean time to readiness for surgery was 12±6 min Group NS and 22±6 min in Group LOR (P=0.03). Three patients in Group NS and 9 patients in Group LOR required additional boluses of local anesthetic through the lumbar plexus catheter before surgery (P=0.113). CONCLUSION: Nerve stimulation allowed faster readiness for surgery than loss of resistance. Nevertheless, the two techniques seem to be comparable in terms of local anesthetic consumption, morphine requirements and pain scores.

Postoperative pain treatment SIAARTI Recommendations 2010. Short version.

The aim of these recommendations is the revision of data published in 2002 in the "SIAARTI Recommendations for acute postoperative pain treatment". In this version, the SIAARTI Study Group for acute and chronic pain decided to grade evidence based on the "modified Delphi" method with 5 levels of recommendation strength. Analgesia is a fundamental right of the patient. The appropriate management of postoperative pain (POP) is known to significantly reduce perioperative morbidity, including the incidence of postoperative complications, hospital stay and costs, especially in high-risk patients (ASA III-V), those undergoing major surgery and those hospitalized in a critical unit (Level A). Therefore, the treatment of POP represents a high-priority institutional objective, as well as an integral part of the treatment plan for "perioperative disease", which includes analgesia, early mobilization, early enteral nutrition and active physiokinesitherapy (Level A). In order to improve an ACUTE PAIN SERVICE organization, we recommend: --a plan for pain management that includes adequate preoperative evaluation, pain measurement, organization of existing resources, identification and training of involved personnel in order to assure multimodal analgesia, early mobilization, early enteral nutrition and active physiokinesitherapy (Level A); --the implementation of an Acute Pain Service, a multidisciplinary structure which includes an anesthetist (team coordinator), surgeons, nurses, physiotherapists and eventually other specialists; --referring to high-quality indicators in establishing an APS and considering the following key points in its organization (Level C): --service adoption; --identifying a referring anesthetist who is on call 24 hours a day; --patient care during the night and weekend; --sharing, drafting and updating written therapeutic protocols; --continuous medical education; --systematic pain assessment; --data collection regarding the efficacy and safety of the implemented protocols; --at least one audit per year. --a preoperative evaluation, including all the necessary information for the management of postoperative analgesia (Level C); --to adequately inform the patient about the risks and benefits of drugs and procedures used to obtain the maximum efficacy from the administered treatments (Level D). We describe pharmacological and loco-regional techniques with special attention to day surgery and difficult populations. Risk management pathways must be the reference for early identification and treatment of adverse events and chronic pain development.

Ultrasound vs nerve stimulation multiple injection technique for posterior popliteal sciatic nerve block.

In this prospective, randomised, observer-blinded study we evaluated whether ultrasound guidance can shorten the onset time of popliteal sciatic nerve block as compared to nerve stimulation with a multiple injection technique. Forty-four ASA I-III patients undergoing posterior popliteal sciatic nerve block with 20 ml of 0.75% ropivacaine were randomly allocated to nerve stimulation or ultrasound guided nerve block. A blinded observer recorded onset of sensory and motor blocks, success rates, the need for fentanyl intra-operatively, the requirement for general anaesthesia, procedure-related pain, patient satisfaction and side-effects. Onset times for sensory and motor blocks were comparable. The success rate was 100% for ultrasound guided vs 82% for nerve stimulation (p = 0.116). Ultrasound guidance reduced needle redirections (p = 0.01), were associated with less procedural pain (p = 0.002) and required less time to perform (p = 0.002). Ultrasound guidance reduced the time needed for block performance and procedural pain.

Continuous lumbar epidural infusion of levobupivacaine: effects of small-or large-volume regimen of infusion.

BACKGROUND: The question of whether the dose, concentration or volume of a local anesthetic solution is the relevant determinant of the spread and quality of post-operative epidural analgesia is still open. In this prospective, randomized, double-blind study, we compared the effects of a large volume-low concentration with a small-volume-high-concentration lumbar epidural infusion of levobupivacaine. METHODS: Seventy patients scheduled for total hip replacement were enrolled. After surgery, patients were randomly allocated to receive a continuous epidural infusion of levobupivacaine (10.5 mg/h) using either 0.125% levobupivacaine infused at 8.4 ml/h (low concentration group, n=35) or 0.75% levobupivacaine infused at 1.4 ml/h (high concentration group, n=35). We blindly recorded the degree of pain relief at rest and during movement every 8 h for the first two post-operative days, as well as hip flexion, motor block, rescue analgesic consumption and adverse events. RESULTS: No difference in pain relief was observed between groups as estimated with the areas under the curve of the verbal Numerical Rating Scale for pain over time, both at rest and during movement. Similarly, there was no difference between groups in hip flexion degree, motor blockade and hemodynamic stability. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous lumbar epidural infusion of 0.75% levobupivacaine was as effective as continuous lumbar epidural infusion of 0.125% levobupivacaine, when administered at the same hourly dose of 10.5 mg, in achieving adequate analgesia both at rest and during movement, without differences in the incidence of hypotension and motor blockade.

Intrathecal ropivacaine 5 mg/ml for outpatient knee arthroscopy: a comparison with lidocaine 10 mg/ml.

PURPOSE: The aim of this prospective, randomised, blind study was to compare the evolution of spinal block produced with 50 mg lidocaine 10 mg/ml and 10 mg ropivacaine 5 mg/ml for outpatient knee arthroscopy. METHODS: Thirty outpatients undergoing knee arthroscopy received 50 mg of lidocaine 10 mg/ml (n=15) or 10 mg of ropivacaine 5 mg/ml (n=15) intrathecally. The evolution of spinal block was recorded until home discharge, while the occurrence of transient neurologic symptoms (TNS) was evaluated through phone-call follow-ups. RESULTS: The median onset time was 15 (10-21) min with lidocaine and 24 (11-37) min with ropivacaine (P=0.109). Spinal lidocaine resulted in a faster resolution of sensory block [148 (130-167) min vs. 188 (146-231) (P=0.022)], unassisted ambulation with crutches [176 (144-208) min vs. 240 (179-302) min (P=0.014)], and voiding [208 (163-254) min vs. 293 (242-343) min (P=0.001)] than ropivacaine. Recovery of motor function required 113 (95-131) min with lidocaine and 135 (87-183) with ropivacaine (P=0.219). Six lidocaine patients reported TNS (40%) as compared with no patient receiving ropivacaine (0%) (P=0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Spinal block produced with 10 mg ropivacaine 5 mg/ml is as effective as that produced by 50 mg of lidocaine 10 mg/ml. Recovery of unassisted ambulation and spontaneous voiding occurred earlier with lidocaine, but this was associated with a markedly higher incidence of TNS.

Effects of ultrasound guidance on the minimum effective anaesthetic volume required to block the femoral nerve.

BACKGROUND: We tested the hypothesis that ultrasound guidance may reduce the minimum effective anaesthetic volume (MEAV50) of ropivacaine 0.5% required to block the femoral nerve compared with nerve stimulation guidance. METHODS: After standard premedication and sciatic nerve block were given, 60 patients undergoing knee arthroscopy were randomly allocated to receive a femoral nerve block with ropivacaine 0.5% using either nerve stimulation (group NS, n = 30) or ultrasound (group US, n = 30) guidance. The volume of the injected solution was varied for consecutive patients based on an up-and-down staircase method according to the response of the previous patient. The initial volume was 12 ml. A double-blinded observer evaluated the occurrence of complete loss of pinprick sensation in the femoral nerve distribution, with concomitant block of the quadriceps muscle: positive or negative responses within 30 min after the injection determined a 3 ml decrease or increase for the next patient, respectively. RESULTS: The mean (sd) MEAV50 for femoral nerve block was 15 (4) ml (95% CI, 7-23 ml) in group US and 26 (4) ml (95% CI, 19-33 ml) in group NS (P = 0.002). The effective dose in 95% of cases (ED95) calculated with probit transformation and logistic regression analysis was 22 ml (95% CI, 13-36 ml) in group US, and 41 ml (95% CI, fs 24-66 ml) in group NS. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound guidance provided a 42% reduction in the MEAV of ropivacaine 0.5% required to block the femoral nerve as compared with the nerve stimulation guidance.

Ipsilateral shoulder pain after thoracotomy surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled evaluation of the efficacy of infiltrating the phrenic nerve with 0.2%wt/vol ropivacaine.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was to evaluate the efficacy of phrenic nerve infiltration with ropivacaine 0.2% on the incidence and severity of ipsilateral shoulder pain after thoracotomy in patients receiving continuous thoracic epidural analgesia. METHODS: Fifty ASA physical status II-III patients, receiving thoracic epidural analgesia for post-thoracotomy pain, were randomly allocated to receive infiltration of the ipsilateral phrenic nerve with either ropivacaine 0.2% 10 mL (ropivacaine, n = 25), or saline 0.9% (control, n = 25) just before lung expansion and chest closure. A blinded observer recorded the incidence and severity of ipsilateral shoulder pain 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 h after surgery. Postoperative respiratory function was also evaluated with blood gas analyses. RESULTS: The cumulative incidences of ipsilateral shoulder pain during the first 24 h after surgery were 8/25 in the ropivacaine and 16/25 in the control groups (P = 0.047), with median (range) onset times for shoulder pain of 2 (2-24) h with ropivacaine and 0.5 (0.5-24) h in controls (P = 0.005). No differences were reported on the second postoperative day. The areas under the curves of the amount of pain over time were 0 (0-2760) mm h for the ropivacaine and 350 (0-1900) mm h for the control groups (P = 0.06). Postoperatively, similar reductions in indices of oxygenation were observed in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Phrenic nerve infiltration with ropivacaine 0.2% 10 mL reduced the incidence and delayed the onset of ipsilateral shoulder pain during the first 24 h after open lung resection, with no clinically relevant effects on respiratory function.

Stimulating or conventional perineural catheters after hallux valgus repair: a double-blind, pharmaco-economic evaluation.

BACKGROUND: We prospectively evaluated direct analgesia-related costs of continuous sciatic nerve block using either a stimulating or conventional catheter after hallux valgus repair. METHODS: The perineural catheter was inserted through a stimulating introducer either blindly (group Conventional, n= 38) or while stimulating via the catheter (group Stimulating, n= 38). Nerve block was induced with 25 ml of mepivacaine 15 mg/ml, and was followed 3 h later by a patient-controlled infusion of ropivacaine 2 mg/ml (basal infusion: 3 ml/h; incremental dose: 5 ml; lock-out time: 30 min). Rescue tramadol [100 mg intravenous (i.v.)] was given if required. Local anesthetic consumption, need for rescue tramadol and post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) treatment, and patient's satisfaction were recorded during first 24-h infusion. Cost calculations were based on the acquisition cost of drugs and devices. RESULTS: Both techniques were similarly effective, but local anesthetic consumption and need for rescue analgesics were lower in the Stimulating group [respectively, 120 vs. 153 ml (P= 0.004) and 21% vs. 60% (P= 0.001)]. The analgesia-related costs for 24 h were similar when 100-ml bags of ropivacaine 2 mg/ml were used (66 euro vs. 67 euro; P= 0.26). When 200-ml bags of ropivacaine were used, the analgesia-related costs were higher in the Stimulating group than the Conventional group (75 euro vs. 55 euro; P= 0.0005). CONCLUSIONS: Direct costs of continuous sciatic nerve block ranged from 55 to 75 euro. Stimulating catheters reduced local anesthetic consumption and need for rescue analgesics. This was only cost effective when 100-ml bags of 2 mg/ml ropivacaine were used, while the cheapest combination was the use of conventional catheters and 200-ml bags of ropivacaine.

Locoregional anesthesia and coagulation.

The introduction of low molecolar weith heparin (LMWE) and the strong antithromboembolic prophylaxis protocols used in the USA, underlined the risk of spinal hemorrhage in patients receveing a neuraxial blockade. On the other side, the efficacy of these techniques over general anesthesia doesn't allow the anesthesist to miss this pratice, where possible. So it's necessary to quantify the spinal hematoma risk in patients assuming these drugs. Unfortunately, routine investigations on coagulation factors and platelets count are not reliable if patients are receiving LMWE. Waiting for dynamic tests concerning the coagulative status such as thromboelastography (TEG), many hospitals follow many different guidelines. For these reasons peripherical nerve block techniques are a good alternative, since they are not influenced by the efficacy of the coagulation system.

0.2% ropivacaine with or without sufentanil for patient-controlled epidural analgesia after anterior cruciate ligament repair.

AIM: The aim of this prospective, randomized, double-blind study was to evaluate the effects of adding 0.5 microg/ml sufentanil to 0.2% ropivacaine for patient controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) on the quality of postoperative pain control in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. METHODS: Twenty ASA physical status I-II patients, scheduled to have elective ACL repair were studied. Combined spinal-epidural anesthesia was performed at the L3-L4 or L4-L5 interspace using a needle-through-needle technique. Spinal anesthesia was induced with 10 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine. Postoperative epidural analgesia was started at the end of surgery using a continuous epidural infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine alone (n=10) or 0.2% ropivacaine/0.5 mg mL(-1) sufentanil (n=10). The degree of pain was evaluated at 1, 8, 16, 24 and 48 hours after surgery; at the same observation times the degree of motor block, sedation, oxygen saturation, total consumption of PCEA solution and incremental doses given to the patient were also recorded. RESULTS: No differences in the quality of intraoperative anesthesia was observed, and in no case general anesthesia was required to complete surgery. Patients receiving the combination of ropivacaine and sufentanil showed lower levels of VAS from 16 hours after surgery as compared with ropivacaine group (P=0.02). However, no differences in the degree of pain were observed between the 2 groups during continuous passive mobilization. CONCLUSION: Adding 0.5 microg/ml sufentanil to 0.2% ropivacaine for patient controlled epidural analgesia improved pain control at rest but did not result in significant improvement of postoperative analgesia during continuous passive mobilization.

Spinal block or total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol and remifentanil for gynaecological outpatient procedures.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The aim of this prospective, randomized study was to compare the preparation and discharge times, the side-effects and patient satisfaction after gynaecological outpatient procedures performed using either spinal block or total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol and remifentanil. METHODS: With Ethics Committee approval and written informed consent, 40 healthy females scheduled for hysteroscopic ablation of endometrial neoplasm were randomly allocated to receive either a spinal block with bupivacaine 0.5% hyperbaric solution 10 mg (n = 20) or total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol and remifentanil (n = 20). Preparation and discharge times, as well as occurrence of untoward events and anaesthesia-related costs, were recorded. RESULTS: The median (range) preparation time was 7 (7-10) min with general anaesthesia, and 11 (7-21) min with spinal block (P = 0.00005). No differences in discharge time from the postanaesthesia care unit and incidence of hypotension or bradycardia, or both, were reported between the two groups. Hospital discharge times were 156 (101-345) min after general anaesthesia and 296 (195-720) min after spinal anaesthesia (P = 0.0005). Acceptance of the anaesthesia technique was better after general (100%) than after spinal anaesthesia (75%) (P = 0.04). No differences in total costs were reported between spinal block ([symbol: see text] 155 ([symbol: see text] 117-[symbol: see text] 224)) and propofol-remifentanil general anaesthesia ([symbol: see text] 143 ([symbol: see text] 124-[symbol: see text] 203) (P = 0.125)). CONCLUSIONS: Accurate titration of short-acting intravenous anaesthetic drugs such as propofol and remifentanil results in shorter preparation times and earlier home discharge after outpatient gynaecological procedures compared with spinal anaesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine 10 mg, with better patient acceptance and no increased costs.

[Spinal cord stimulation and quality of life in patients with refractory angina]. / Stimolazione elettrica epidurale e qualità della vita nei pazienti affetti da angina pectoris refrattaria.

BACKGROUND: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a treatment that exploits the antalgic and vasodilatory effects on the microcirculation produced by a stimulating electrode positioned in the peridural space. This therapy has been used for years in the treatment of refractory angina pectoris. The aim of this study was to monitor the clinical effectiveness of the technique in terms of symptomatic benefits and, above all, improved quality of life in angina patients undergoing SCS. METHODS: From November 1998 to December 2000 we used SCS to treat 17 patients with refractory angina (functional class III or IV Canadian Cardiovascular Society) with onset more than one year earlier. All patients had undergone one or more traditional revascularisation procedures and were receiving maximum drug therapy. Patients were assigned to SCS because it was not technically possible to perform other revascularisation procedures. Quality of life was measured before and after treatment using a multidimensional index (QL Spitzer's index). We also noted the mortality, acceptance and morbidity of the procedure during a follow-up lasting 10 months on average. Lastly, the number of weekly anginal pain attacks, weekly nitrate consumption and CCS functional class were recorded before treatment and 1, 3 and six months after therapy. RESULTS: SPC was effective in 13 patients out of 17 (76.47%). In responders the quality of life improved by 70%: in these patients, the number of weekly angina attacks reduced from 11.76+/-7.56 to 2.14+/-2.54, and the functional class from 3.30+/-0.75 to 1.5+/-0.53. No major periprocedural complications were reported. The annual mortality rate was 6.6%. The technique was easy to use. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study show that SCS is effective, safe, easy to use and well tolerated by patients with refractory angina who fail to respond to traditional revascularisation. This technique substantially improves the quality of life of patients suffering from refractory angina.

Implementing sevoflurane anesthesia with small doses opioid for upper abdominal surgery. Postoperative respiratory function after either remifentanil or fentanyl.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this prospective, randomized study was to compare the effects on intraoperative cardiovascular homeostasis, recovery profile and postoperative oxygen saturation after sevoflurane anesthesia with small doses of either remifentanil or fentanyl in combination with postoperative epidural analgesia. METHODS: With Ethical Committee approval and written patient consent, 30 ASA physical status I-II patients scheduled for elective upper abdominal surgery were randomly allocated to receive sevoflurane general anesthesia implemented with small doses of either remifentanil (n = 15) or fentanyl (n = 15), followed by postoperative epidural analgesia. Remifentanil group patients received a 1 mg kg-1 bolus infused during a 60 sec period followed by a 0.15 mg kg-1 min-1 infusion; while patients of Fentanyl group were given a 3 mg kg-1 initial dose followed by 50 mg boluses as requested (according to the time to peak effect of the two drugs, the initial dose was given 5 min before induction in Fentanyl group, and 1 min before induction in Remifentanil group). Postoperatively, oxygen saturation was continuously recorded and stored on a computer during the first 12 h after surgery. SpO2 decrease < 90% for more than one minute was considered as a minor respiratory complication. RESULTS: The median sevoflurane's MAC-hour was 2.7 (1.4 - 4.9) in patients receiving remifentanil infusion and 4.1 (2.2 - 5.7) in those patients receiving fentanyl during surgery (P = 0.005). However, no differences in the recovery times were observed between the two groups. Similar pain relief was reported during coughing in the two studied groups at discharge from the recovery area and during the following study period. No major respiratory complication was observed throughout the study. Oxygen therapy was required in three patients of Fentanyl group only 20% (P = 0.22); however, 11 patients in the same group (73%) showed at least one minor respiratory complication (SpO2 < 90% for more than 1 min), with a median of 1 (range 0 - 12) episode per patient, compared with no episode in Remifentanil group (P = 0.0005). CONCLUSIONS: Implementing sevoflurane anesthesia with very small remifentanil infusion provides a safe and effective hemodynamic control reducing sevoflurane consumption during the procedure, and produces less respiratory effects postoperatively as compared with intermittent bolus administration of fentanyl.

The minimum effective dose of 0.5% hyperbaric spinal bupivacaine for cesarean section.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this prospective, blind study was to determine the minimum effective dose of hyperbaric bupivacaine required for cesarean section. METHODS: With Ethical Committee approval and written consent, 24 healthy women undergoing elective cesarean section received a combined spinal epidural anesthesia. We sought to determine the minimum effective dose of spinal bupivacaine using a staircase method. In each patient an arbitrary dose of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine in relation to patient height was used. The initial dose was 0.075 mg/cm height, while the outcome of each patient's response determined the dose for the subsequent patient. When successful spinal block (sensory level = or < T4 with complete motor blockade) was achieved within 20 min from spinal injection, the dose of spinal bupivacaine for the next patient was decreased by 0.01 mg/cm height. Conversely, when successful spinal block was not observed, the dose of spinal bupivacaine for the next patient was increased by 0.01 mg/cm height. Sensory and motor blocks were evaluated every 5 min by an independent, blinded observer. If successful spinal block was not achieved within the designed period, a 5-8 ml epidural bolus of 2% lidocaine was given to achieve adequate surgical anesthesia. RESULTS: No complications were reported during the study, and all women delivered their baby uneventfully (APGAR scores 5 min after delivery ranged from 9 to 10) within 5 min from uterus incision. The duration of surgical procedure ranged from 30 to 48 minutes. The dose of hyperbaric bupivacaine providing adequate surgical anesthesia within 20 min from spinal injection in 50% of subjects was 0.036 mg/cm height (95% confidence intervals: 0.031-0.041 mg/cm height). The ED95 calculated from the probit transformation to provide effective spinal anesthesia for cesarean section was 0.06 mg/cm height. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective, blind study demonstrated that a dose as low as 0.06 mg/cm height represents the dose of intrathecal bupivacaine providing effective spinal block in 95% of women undergoing elective cesarean section.