RESUMO
Sudden oak death (SOD), caused by the oomycete Phytophthora ramorum, has been actively managed in Oregon since its discovery there in 2001. SOD is a devastating disease affecting an ecologically and culturally important tree species in southwestern Oregon. Initially infested with the NA1 lineage, the more virulent EU1 lineage was discovered in 2015. Management has adapted over time in response to experimental findings and administrative limitations. Current management practices present an opportunity to compare the efficacy of treatment on these lineages by analyzing P. ramorum inoculum at untreated and treated sites. Current treatment includes herbicide treatment on host stems followed by felling, piling, and burning on site. Infested sites were visited between 2018 and 2020 (n = 88), where understory vegetation and soil was collected. Generalized linear modeling demonstrated that treatment had a significant impact on P. ramorum prevalence from vegetation samples, with an average of 33% (± 10%) fewer positive samples at treated sites. Linear mixed-effects modeling of a subpopulation of EU1 sites visited before and after treatment showed a similar effect of treatment, with a 43% (± 15%) reduction in P. ramorum prevalence. Prevalence of P. ramorum in soil was not affected by treatment in either analysis. A third analysis taking into consideration recent wildfire incursion into infested areas revealed that wildfire alone is insufficient to reduce prevalence of P. ramorum. These results strongly suggest that management is successfully reducing P. ramorum inoculum found on understory vegetation, and that treatment remains necessary to reduce the spread of this major forest pathogen.
Assuntos
Phytophthora , Doenças das Plantas , Quercus , Florestas , Oregon , Phytophthora/patogenicidade , Doenças das Plantas/prevenção & controle , Quercus/microbiologiaRESUMO
Sudden oak death caused by Phytophthora ramorum has been actively managed in Oregon since the early 2000s. To date, this epidemic has been driven mostly by the NA1 clonal lineage of P. ramorum, but an outbreak of the EU1 lineage has recently emerged. Here, we contrast the population dynamics of the NA1 outbreak first reported in 2001 to the outbreak of the EU1 lineage first detected in 2015. We performed tests to determine whether any of the lineages were introduced more than once. Infested regions of the forest were sampled between 2013 and 2018 (n = 903), and strains were genotyped at 15 microsatellite loci. Most genotypes observed were transient, with 272 of 358 unique genotypes emerging during one year and disappearing the next year. The diversity of EU1 was very low and isolates were spatially clustered (less than 8 km apart), suggesting a single EU1 introduction. Some forest isolates are genetically similar to isolates collected from a local nursery in 2012, suggesting the introduction of EU1 from this nursery or simultaneous introduction to both the nursery and latently into the forest. In contrast, the older NA1 populations were more polymorphic and spread more than 30 km2. A principal component analysis supported two to four independent NA1 introductions. The NA1 and EU1 epidemics infest the same area but show disparate demographics because of the initial introductions of the lineages spaced 10 years apart. Comparing these epidemics provides novel insight regarding patterns of emergence of clonal pathogens in forest ecosystems.