RESUMO
Background: Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) is a sensitive method with high specificity. However, its routine use in the clinical laboratory is hampered by its high complexity and lack of automation. Studies demonstrate excellent analytical performance using the first fully automated LC-MS/MS for 25-hydroxy vitamin D and immunosuppressant drugs (ISD) in hospital routine laboratories. Objectives: Our objectives were (1) to verify the suitability of an automated LC-MS/MS in a commercial laboratory, which differs from the needs of hospital laboratories, and (2) examine its usability among operators with various professional backgrounds. Methods: We assessed the analytical assay performance for vitamin D and the ISDs cyclosporine A and tacrolimus over five months. The assays were compared to an identical analyzer in a hospital laboratory, to in-house LC-MS/MS methods, and to chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassays (CMIA). Nine operators evaluated the usability of the fully automated LC-MS/MS system by means of a structured questionnaire. Results: The automated system exhibited a high precision (CV < 8%), accuracy (bias < 7%) and good agreement with concentrations of external quality assessment (EQA) samples. Comparable results were obtained with an identical analyzer in a hospital routine laboratory. Acceptable median deviations of results versus an in-house LC-MS/MS were observed for 25-OH vitamin D3 (-10.6%), cyclosporine A (-4.3%) and tacrolimus (-6.6%). The median bias between the automated system and immunoassays was only acceptable for 25-OH vitamin D3 (6.6%). All users stated that they had had a good experience with the fully automated LC-MS/MS system. Conclusions: A fully automated LC-MS/MS can be easily integrated for routine diagnostics in a commercial laboratory.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Patients with malignancies have an increased risk for thromboembolic events due to the release of tissue factor by the tumor, damage to the vessel wall, and immobilization. Moreover, tumors may improve their growth and metastatic spread by utilizing the coagulation system. To date, no information is available on the additional role of prothrombotic mutations in these patients. METHODS: The prevalence of the factor V Leiden mutation (FVL) and the prothrombin G20210A mutation and of homozygosity for the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T substitution has been analyzed in a cohort of 175 patients with gastrointestinal adenocarcinoma by the polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism technique. RESULTS: 6.9% of the patients were heterozygous for FVL, 5.7% were heterozygous for the prothrombin mutation, and 9.7% were homozygous for the MTHFR C677T mutation was detected in 9.7% of patients. Compared with the normal population, we found an increased prevalence of the prothrombin G20210A substitution (5.7% vs. 0.8%, P = 0.028). Thromboses were absent in 147 patients (Group A), whereas 28 of the patients suffered from thromboses during the period following tumor diagnosis (Group B). In Group A, 6.8% of the patients and 21.4% of the patients in Group B had a thrombosis before the diagnosis of cancer (P = 0.025, odds ratio [OR] 3.7). Heterozygous FVL was present in 4.8% of the patients in Group A and in 17.9% of the patients in Group B (P = 0.026, OR 4.4). In patients with thromboses before the detection of the tumor, the risk was elevated 6.3-fold (25.0% vs 5.0%, P = 0.015). Heterozygosity for the prothrombin mutation and homozygosity for the MTHFR C677T substitution did not increase the incidence of thromboses. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated a significant effect of FVL on thrombosis in patients with malignant disease. Most thromboses occurred during the first months after tumor diagnosis, implicating diagnostic and therapeutic procedures as important nongenetic risk factors for venous thromboembolism. Our data also indicate that the prothrombin G20210A mutation may be a possible cofactor in cancer pathogenesis.