Caribbean Latinx with moderate-severe asthma bear greater asthma morbidity than other Latinx.

BACKGROUND: Hispanic/Latinx (HL) ethnicity encompasses racially and culturally diverse subgroups. Studies suggest that Puerto Ricans (PR) may bear greater asthma-related morbidity than Mexicans, but these were conducted in children or had limited clinical characterization. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine whether disparities in asthma morbidity exist among HL adult subgroups. METHODS: Adults with moderate-severe asthma were recruited from US clinics, including from Puerto Rico, for the Person Empowered Asthma Relief (PREPARE) trial. Considering the shared heritage between PR and other Caribbean HL (Cubans and Dominicans [C&D]), the investigators compared baseline self-reported clinical characteristics between Caribbean HL (CHL) (PR and C&D: n = 457) and other HLs (OHL) (Mexicans, Spaniards, Central/South Americans; n = 141), and between CHL subgroups (C&D [n = 56] and PR [n = 401]). This study compared asthma morbidity measures (self-reported exacerbations requiring systemic corticosteroids, emergency department/urgent care (ED/UC) visits, hospitalizations, health care utilization) through negative binomial regression. RESULTS: CHL compared to OHL were similar in age, body mass index, poverty status, blood eosinophils, and fractional exhaled nitric oxide but were prescribed more asthma controller therapies. Relative to OHL, CHL had significantly increased odds of asthma exacerbations (odds ratio [OR]: 1.84; 95% CI: 1.4-2.4), ED/UC visits (OR: 1.88; 95% CI: 1.4-2.5), hospitalization (OR: 1.98; 95% CI: 1.06-3.7), and health care utilization (OR: 1.91; 95% CI: 1.44-2.53). Of the CHL subgroups, PR had significantly increased odds of asthma exacerbations, ED/UC visits, hospitalizations, and health care utilization compared to OHL, whereas C&D only had increased odds of exacerbations compared to OHL. PR compared to C&D had greater odds of ED/UC and health care utilization. CONCLUSIONS: CHL adults, compared with OHL, adults reported nearly twice the asthma morbidity; these differences are primarily driven by PR. Novel interventions are needed to reduce morbidity in this highly impacted population.

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic apical suspension: description of the spiral technique.

This video's objective was to describe our spiral technique and surgical steps of robotic-assisted laparoscopic apical suspension (RALAS) in the treatment of patients with symptomatic apical vaginal prolapse. A 70-year-old Caucasian woman, gravida 3, para 2 had symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse (POP) apical/anterior stage III. At pelvic ultrasound evaluation, the uterus was small and normal appearing of adnexa bilaterally. She failed pessaries and is sexually active. The most relevant complaints were vaginal bulging and pressure. She denied urinary incontinence. During the surgery, we used (1) 3-0, V-Loc™ (Covidien) and we reinforced these absorbable sutures with (2) 2-0, GORE-TEX® Suture (Gore Medical). The Si da Vinci Surgical System was used with 4 arms and 5 trocars configuration, docked on the patient's left side. On the right/left apical support, we used V-Loc and Gore-Tex and these provided the initial 2 points suspension on the uterosacral ligaments (USL). We like to attach the left to the right USL. We then developed the space between the bladder and vagina and proceed with a plication of the pubocervical fascia with V-loc sutures. Two anterior apical support sutures were taken from the vagina to the transversalis fascia on the anterior abdominal wall and then hid behind the bladder peritoneum. The tension of these sutures was maintained with Hem-o-lock (TeleFlex) and LAPRA-TY (Ethicon). With the spiral technique, we secured these sutures through aponeurosis of abdominal muscle inside-outside-inside using a Carter-Thomason (Cooper Surgical) laparoscopic port closure system. This technique may provide a better long-term support for the anterior apical compartment.