A Comparative Study of the Antiemetic Effects of α2-Adrenergic Receptor Agonists Clonidine and Dexmedetomidine against Diverse Emetogens in the Least Shrew (Cryptotis parva) Model of Emesis.

In contrast to cats and dogs, here we report that the α2-adrenergic receptor antagonist yohimbine is emetic and corresponding agonists clonidine and dexmedetomidine behave as antiemetics in the least shrew model of vomiting. Yohimbine (0, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, and 3 mg/kg, i.p.) caused vomiting in shrews in a bell-shaped and dose-dependent manner, with a maximum frequency (0.85 ± 0.22) at 1 mg/kg, which was accompanied by a key central contribution as indicated by increased expression of c-fos, serotonin and substance P release in the shrew brainstem emetic nuclei. Our comparative study in shrews demonstrates that clonidine (0, 0.1, 1, 5, and 10 mg/kg, i.p.) and dexmedetomidine (0, 0.01, 0.05, and 0.1 mg/kg, i.p.) not only suppress yohimbine (1 mg/kg, i.p.)-evoked vomiting in a dose-dependent manner, but also display broad-spectrum antiemetic effects against diverse well-known emetogens, including 2-Methyl-5-HT, GR73632, McN-A-343, quinpirole, FPL64176, SR141716A, thapsigargin, rolipram, and ZD7288. The antiemetic inhibitory ID50 values of dexmedetomidine against the evoked emetogens are much lower than those of clonidine. At its antiemetic doses, clonidine decreased shrews' locomotor activity parameters (distance moved and rearing), whereas dexmedetomidine did not do so. The results suggest that dexmedetomidine represents a better candidate for antiemetic potential with advantages over clonidine.

RNA sequencing least shrew (Cryptotis parva) brainstem and gut transcripts following administration of a selective substance P neurokinin NK1 receptor agonist and antagonist expands genomics resources for emesis research.

The least shrew is among the subset of animals that are capable of vomiting and therefore serves as a valuable research model for investigating the biochemistry, molecular biology, pharmacology, and genomics of emesis. Both nausea and vomiting are associated with a variety of illnesses (bacterial/viral infections, bulimia, exposure to toxins, gall bladder disease), conditions (pregnancy, motion sickness, emotional stress, overeating) and reactions to drugs (chemotherapeutics, opiates). The severe discomfort and intense fear associated with the stressful symptoms of nausea and emesis are the major reason for patient non-compliance when being treated with cancer chemotherapeutics. Increased understanding of the physiology, pharmacology and pathophysiology underlying vomiting and nausea can accelerate progress for developing new antiemetics. As a major animal model for emesis, expanding genomic knowledge associated with emesis in the least shrew will further enhance the laboratory utility of this model. A key question is which genes mediate emesis, and are they expressed in response to emetics/antiemetics. To elucidate the mediators of emesis, in particular emetic receptors, their downstream signaling pathways, as well as the shared emetic signals, we carried out an RNA sequencing study focused on the central and peripheral emetic loci, the brainstem and gut. Thus, we sequenced RNA extracted from brainstem and gut tissues from different groups of least shrews treated with either a neurokinin NK1 receptor selective emetic agonist, GR73632 (5 mg/kg, i.p.), its corresponding selective antagonist netupitant (5 mg/kg, i.p.), a combination of these two agents, versus their corresponding vehicle-pretreated controls and drug naïve animals. The resulting sequences were processed using a de novo transcriptome assembly and used it to identify orthologs within human, dog, mouse, and ferret gene sets. We compared the least shrew to human and a veterinary species (dog) that may be treated with vomit-inducing chemotherapeutics, and the ferret, another well-established model organism for emesis research. The mouse was included because it does not vomit. In total, we identified a final set of 16,720 least shrew orthologs. We employed comparative genomics analyses as well as gene ontology enrichment, KEGG pathway enrichment and phenotype enrichment to better understand the molecular biology of genes implicated in vomiting.

Effects of low-doses of methamphetamine on d-fenfluramine-induced head-twitch response (HTR) in mice during ageing and c-fos expression in the prefrontal cortex.

BACKGROUND: The head-twitch response (HTR) in mice is considered a behavioral model for hallucinogens and serotonin 5-HT2A receptor function, as well as Tourette syndrome in humans. It is mediated by 5-HT2A receptor agonists such as ( ±)- 2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodoamphetamine (DOI) in the prefrontal cortex (PFC). The 5-HT2A antagonist EMD 281014, can prevent both DOI-induced HTR during ageing and c-fos expression in different regions of PFC. Moreover, the nonselective monoamine releaser methamphetamine (MA) suppressed DOI-induced HTR through ageing via concomitant activation of inhibitory 5-HT1A receptors, but enhanced DOI-evoked c-fos expression. d-Fenfluramine is a selective 5-HT releaser and induces HTR in mice, whereas MA does not. Currently, we investigated whether EMD 281014 or MA would alter: (1) d-fenfluramine-induced HTR frequency in 20-, 30- and 60-day old mice, (2) d-fenfluramine-evoked c-fos expression in PFC, and (3) whether blockade of inhibitory serotonergic 5-HT1A- or adrenergic ɑ2-receptors would prevent suppressive effect of MA on d-fenfluramine-induced HTR. RESULTS: EMD 281014 (0.001-0.05 mg/kg) or MA (0.1-5 mg/kg) blocked d-fenfluramine-induced HTR dose-dependently during ageing. The 5-HT1A antagonist WAY 100635 countered the inhibitory effect of MA on d-fenfluramine-induced HTR in 30-day old mice, whereas the adrenergic ɑ2 antagonist RS 79948 reversed MA's inhibitory effect in both 20- and 30- day old mice. d-Fenfluramine significantly increased c-fos expressions in PFC regions. MA (1 mg/kg) pretreatment significantly increased d-fenfluramine-evoked c-fos expression in different regions of PFC. EMD 281014 (0.05 mg/kg) failed to prevent d-fenfluramine-induced c-fos expression, but significantly increased it in one PFC region (PrL at - 2.68 mm). CONCLUSION: EMD 281014 suppressed d-fenfluramine-induced HTR but failed to prevent d-fenfluramine-evoked c-fos expression which suggest involvement of additional serotonergic receptors in the mediation of evoked c-fos. The suppressive effect of MA on d-fenfluramine-evoked HTR is due to well-recognized functional interactions between stimulatory 5-HT2A- and the inhibitory 5-HT1A- and ɑ2-receptors. MA-evoked increases in c-fos expression in PFC regions are due to the activation of diverse monoaminergic receptors through increased synaptic concentrations of 5-HT, NE and/or DA, which may also account for the additive effect of MA on d-fenfluramine-evoked changes in c-fos expression. Our findings suggest potential drug receptor functional interaction during development when used in combination.

Evidence for Bell-Shaped Dose-Response Emetic Effects of Temsirolimus and Analogs: The Broad-Spectrum Antiemetic Efficacy of a Large Dose of Temsirolimus Against Diverse Emetogens in the Least Shrew (Cryptotis parva).

Temsirolimus is a prodrug form of sirolimus (rapamycin). With its analogs (everolimus, ridaforolimus, and rapamycin), it forms a group of anticancer agents that block the activity of one of the two mammalian targets of rapamycin (mTOR) complexes, mTORC1. We investigated the emetic potential of varying doses (0, 0.5, 1, 2.5, 5, 10, 20, and 40 mg/kg, i.p.) of temsirolimus in the least shrew. Temsirolimus caused a bell-shaped and dose-dependent increase in both the mean vomit frequency and the number of shrews vomiting with maximal efficacy at 10 mg/kg (p < 0.05 and p < 0.02, respectively). Its larger doses (20 or 40 mg/kg) had no significant emetic effect. We also evaluated the emetic potential of its analogs (5, 10, and 20 mg/kg, i.p.), all of which exhibited a similar emetic profile. Our observational studies indicated that temsirolimus can reduce the shrew motor activity at 40 mg/kg, and subsequently, we examined the motor effects of its lower doses. At 10 and 20 mg/kg, it did not affect the spontaneous locomotor activity (distance moved) but attenuated the mean rearing frequency in a U-shaped manner at 10 mg/kg (p < 0.05). We then determined the broad-spectrum antiemetic potential of a 20 mg/kg (i.p.) dose of temsirolimus against diverse emetogens, including selective and nonselective agonists of 1) dopaminergic D2/3 receptors (apomorphine and quinpirole); 2) serotonergic 5-HT3 receptors [5-HT (serotonin) and 2-methyl-5-HT]; 3) cholinergic M1 receptors (pilocarpine and McN-A-343); 4) substance P neurokinin NK1 receptors (GR73632); 5) the L-type calcium (Ca2+) channel (LTCC) (FPL64176); 6) the sarcoplasmic endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ ATPase inhibitor, thapsigargin; 7) the CB1 receptor inverse agonist/antagonist, SR141716A; and 8) the chemotherapeutic cisplatin. Temsirolimus prevented vomiting evoked by the aforementioned emetogens with varying degrees. The mechanisms underlying the pro- and antiemetic effects of temsirolimus evaluated by immunochemistry for c-fos expression demonstrated a c-fos induction in the AP and NTS, but not DMNX with the 10 mg/kg emetic dose of temsirolimus, whereas its larger antiemetic dose (20 mg/kg) had no significant effect. Our study is the first to provide preclinical evidence demonstrating the promising antiemetic potential of high doses of temsirolimus and possibly its analogs in least shrews.

An ontogenic study of receptor mechanisms by which acute administration of low-doses of methamphetamine suppresses DOI-induced 5-HT2A-receptor mediated head-twitch response in mice.

BACKGROUND: Methamphetamine (MA) is a non-selective monoamine releaser and thus releases serotonin (5-HT), norepinephrine (NE) and dopamine (DA) from corresponding nerve terminals into synapses. DOI ((±)-2, 5-dimethoxy-4-iodoamphetamine) is a direct-acting serotonergic 5-HT2A/C receptor agonist and induces the head-twitch response (HTR) via stimulation of 5-HT2A receptor in mice. While more selective serotonin releasers such as d-fenfluramine evoke the HTR, monoamine reuptake blockers (e.g., cocaine) suppress the DOI-evoked HTR via indirect stimulation of serotonergic 5-HT1A- and adrenergic ɑ2-receptors. Since the induction of HTR by DOI is age-dependent, we investigated whether: (1) during development MA can evoke the HTR by itself, and (2) acute pretreatment with either the selective 5-HT2A receptor antagonist EMD 281014 or low-doses of MA can: (i) modulate the DOI-induced HTR in mice across postnatal days 20, 30 and 60, and (ii) alter the DOI-induced c-fos expression in mice prefrontal cortex (PFC). To further explore the possible modulatory effect of MA on DOI-induced HTR, we investigated whether blockade of inhibitory serotonergic 5-HT1A- or adrenergic ɑ2-receptors by corresponding selective antagonists (WAY 100635 or RS 79948, respectively), can prevent the effect of MA on DOI-induced HTR during aging. RESULTS: Although neither EMD 281014 nor MA by themselves could evoke the HTR, acute pretreatment with either EMD 281014 (0.01, 0.05 and 0.1 mg/kg, i.p.) or MA (1, 2.5, 5 mg/kg, i.p.), dose-dependently suppressed the DOI-induced HTR across ages. While WAY 100635 significantly reversed the inhibitory effect of MA in 20- and 30-day old mice, RS 79948 failed to significantly counter MA's inhibitory effect. Moreover, DOI significantly increased c-fos expressions in several PFC regions. EMD 281014 prevented the DOI-induced increases in c-fos expression. Despite the inhibitory effect of MA on DOI-induced HTR, MA alone or in combination with DOI, significantly increased c-fos expression in several regions of the PFC. CONCLUSION: The suppressive effect of MA on the DOI-evoked HTR appears to be mainly due to functional interactions between the HTR-inducing 5-HT2A receptor and the inhibitory 5-HT1A receptor. The MA-induced increase in c-fos expression in different PFC regions may be due to MA-evoked increases in synaptic concentrations of 5-HT, NE and/or DA.

Metabolic design in a mammalian model of extreme metabolism, the North American least shrew (Cryptotis parva).

Mitochondrial adaptations are fundamental to differentiated function and energetic homeostasis in mammalian cells. But the mechanisms that underlie these relationships remain poorly understood. Here, we investigated organ-specific mitochondrial morphology, connectivity and protein composition in a model of extreme mammalian metabolism, the least shrew (Cryptotis parva). This was achieved through a combination of high-resolution 3D focused ion beam electron microscopy imaging and tandem mass tag mass spectrometry proteomics. We demonstrate that liver and kidney mitochondrial content are equivalent to the heart, permitting assessment of mitochondrial adaptations in different organs with similar metabolic demand. Muscle mitochondrial networks (cardiac and skeletal) are extensive, with a high incidence of nanotunnels - which collectively support the metabolism of large muscle cells. Mitochondrial networks were not detected in the liver and kidney as individual mitochondria are localized with sites of ATP consumption. This configuration is not observed in striated muscle, likely due to a homogeneous ATPase distribution and the structural requirements of contraction. These results demonstrate distinct, fundamental mitochondrial structural adaptations for similar metabolic demand that are dependent on the topology of energy utilization process in a mammalian model of extreme metabolism. KEY POINTS: Least shrews were studied to explore the relationship between metabolic function, mitochondrial morphology and protein content in different tissues. Liver and kidney mitochondrial content and enzymatic activity approaches that of the heart, indicating similar metabolic demand among tissues that contribute to basal and maximum metabolism. This allows an examination of mitochondrial structure and composition in tissues with similar maximum metabolic demands. Mitochondrial networks only occur in striated muscle. In contrast, the liver and kidney maintain individual mitochondria with limited reticulation. Muscle mitochondrial reticulation is the result of dense ATPase activity and cell-spanning myofibrils which require networking for adequate metabolic support. In contrast, liver and kidney ATPase activity is localized to the endoplasmic reticulum and basolateral membrane, respectively, generating a locally balanced energy conversion and utilization. Mitochondrial morphology is not driven by maximum metabolic demand, but by the cytosolic distribution of energy-utilizing systems set by the functions of the tissue.

The Contribution of Phospholipase C in Vomiting in the Least Shrew (Cryptotis Parva) Model of Emesis.

Gq and Gßγ protein-dependent phospholipase C (PLC) activation is extensively involved in G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR)-mediated signaling pathways which are implicated in a wide range of physiological and pathological events. Stimulation of several GPCRs, such as substance P neurokinin 1-, dopamine D2/3-, histamine H1- and mu-opioid receptors, can lead to vomiting. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of PLC in vomiting through assessment of the emetic potential of a PLC activator (m-3M3FBS), and the antiemetic efficacy of a PLC inhibitor (U73122), in the least shrew model of vomiting. We find that a 50 mg/kg (i.p.) dose of m-3M3FBS induces vomiting in ∼90% of tested least shrews, which was accompanied by significant increases in c-Fos expression and ERK1/2 phosphorylation in the shrew brainstem dorsal vagal complex, indicating activation of brainstem emetic nuclei in m-3M3FBS-evoked emesis. The m-3M3FBS-evoked vomiting was reduced by pretreatment with diverse antiemetics including the antagonists/inhibitors of: PLC (U73122), L-type Ca2+ channel (nifedipine), IP3R (2-APB), RyR receptor (dantrolene), ERK1/2 (U0126), PKC (GF109203X), the serotoninergic type 3 receptor (palonosetron), and neurokinin 1 receptor (netupitant). In addition, the PLC inhibitor U73122 displayed broad-spectrum antiemetic effects against diverse emetogens, including the selective agonists of serotonin type 3 (2-Methyl-5-HT)-, neurokinin 1 receptor (GR73632), dopamine D2/3 (quinpirole)-, and muscarinic M1 (McN-A-343) receptors, the L-type Ca2+ channel (FPL64176), and the sarco/endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase inhibitor thapsigargin. In sum, PLC activation contributes to emesis, whereas PLC inhibition suppresses vomiting evoked by diverse emetogens.

Mechanisms of Nausea and Vomiting: Current Knowledge and Recent Advances in Intracellular Emetic Signaling Systems.

Nausea and vomiting are common gastrointestinal complaints that can be triggered by diverse emetic stimuli through central and/or peripheral nervous systems. Both nausea and vomiting are considered as defense mechanisms when threatening toxins/drugs/bacteria/viruses/fungi enter the body either via the enteral (e.g., the gastrointestinal tract) or parenteral routes, including the blood, skin, and respiratory systems. While vomiting is the act of forceful removal of gastrointestinal contents, nausea is believed to be a subjective sensation that is more difficult to study in nonhuman species. In this review, the authors discuss the anatomical structures, neurotransmitters/mediators, and corresponding receptors, as well as intracellular emetic signaling pathways involved in the processes of nausea and vomiting in diverse animal models as well as humans. While blockade of emetic receptors in the prevention of vomiting is fairly well understood, the potential of new classes of antiemetics altering postreceptor signal transduction mechanisms is currently evolving, which is also reviewed. Finally, future directions within the field will be discussed in terms of important questions that remain to be resolved and advances in technology that may help provide potential answers.

Signal transduction pathways involved in dopamine D2 receptor-evoked emesis in the least shrew (Cryptotis parva).

With its five receptor subtypes (D1-5), dopamine is implicated in a myriad of neurological illnesses. Dopamine D2 receptor-based agonist therapy evokes nausea and vomiting. The signaling mechanisms by which dopamine D2 receptors evoke vomiting remains unknown. Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinases (PI3K)- and protein kinase C (PKC)-related signaling cascades stimulate vomiting post-injection of various emetogens in emetically competent animals. This study investigated potential mechanisms involved in dopamine D2 receptor-mediated vomiting using least shrews. We found that vomiting evoked by the selective dopamine D2 receptor agonist quinpirole (2 mg/kg, i.p.) was significantly suppressed by: i) a dopamine D2 preferring antagonist, sulpiride (s.c.); ii) a selective PI3K inhibitor, LY294002 (i.p.); iii) a PKCαßII inhibitor, GF109203X (i.p.); and iv) a selective inhibitor of extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase1/2 (ERK1/2), U0126 (i.p.). Quinpirole-evoked c-fos immunofluorescence in the nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS) was suppressed by pretreatment with sulpiride (8 mg/kg, s.c.). Western blot analysis of shrew brainstem emetic loci protein lysates revealed a significant and time-dependent increase in phosphorylation of Akt (protein kinase B (PKB)) at Ser473 following a 30-min exposure to quinpirole (2 mg/kg, i.p.). Pretreatment with effective antiemetic doses of sulpiride, LY294002, GF109203X, or U0126 significantly reduced quinpirole-stimulated phosphorylation of emesis-associated proteins including p-85PI3K, mTOR (Ser2448/2481), PKCαßII (Thr638/641), ERK1/2 (Thr202/204), and Akt (Ser473). Our results substantiate the implication of PI3K/mTOR/Akt and PI3K/PKCαßII/ERK1/2/Akt signaling pathways in dopamine D2 receptor-mediated vomiting. Potential novel antiemetics targeting emetic proteins associated with these signaling cascades may offer enhanced potency and/or efficacy against emesis.

Central and peripheral emetic loci contribute to vomiting evoked by the Akt inhibitor MK-2206 in the least shrew model of emesis.

Akt (protein kinase B) signaling is frequently activated in diverse cancers. Akt inhibitors such as perifosine and MK-2206 have been evaluated as potential cancer chemotherapeutics. Although both drugs are generally well tolerated, among their most common side-effects vomiting is a major concern. Here we investigated whether these Akt inhibitors evoke emesis in the least shrew model of vomiting. Indeed, both perifosine and MK-2206 induced vomiting with maximal efficacies of 90% at 50 mg/kg (i.p.) and 100% at 10 mg/kg (i.p.), respectively. MK-2206 (10 mg/kg, i.p.) increased c-Fos immunoreactivity both centrally in the shrew brainstem dorsal vagal complex (DVC) emetic nuclei, and peripherally in the jejunum. MK-2206 also evoked phosphorylation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2) in both the DVC emetic nuclei and the enteric nervous system in the jejunum. The ERK1/2 inhibitor U0126 suppressed MK-2206-induced emesis dose-dependently. We then evaluated the suppressive efficacy of diverse antiemetics against MK-2206-evoked vomiting including antagonists/inhibitors of the: L-type Ca2+ channel (nifedipine at 2.5 mg/kg, subcutaneously (s.c.)); glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK-3) (AR-A014418 at 10 mg/kg and SB216763 at 0.25 mg/kg, i.p.); 5-hydroxytryptamine 5-HT3 receptor (palonosetron at 0.5 mg/kg, s.c.); substance P neurokinin NK1 receptor (netupitant at 10 mg/kg, i.p.) and dopamine D2/3 receptor (sulpride at 8 mg/kg, s.c.). All tested antagonists/blockers attenuated emetic parameters to varying degrees. In sum, this is the first study to demonstrate how pharmacological inhibition of Akt evokes vomiting via both central and peripheral mechanisms, a process which involves multiple emetic receptors.

Dopamine receptors in emesis: Molecular mechanisms and potential therapeutic function.

Dopamine is a member of the catecholamine family and is associated with multiple physiological functions. Together with its five receptor subtypes, dopamine is closely linked to neurological disorders such as schizophrenia, Parkinson's disease, depression, attention deficit-hyperactivity, and restless leg syndrome. Unfortunately, several dopamine receptor-based agonists used to treat some of these diseases cause nausea and vomiting as impending side-effects. The high degree of cross interactions of dopamine receptor ligands with many other targets including G-protein coupled receptors, transporters, enzymes, and ion-channels, add to the complexity of discovering new targets for the treatment of nausea and vomiting. Using activation status of signaling cascades as mechanism-based biomarkers to foresee drug sensitivity combined with the development of dopamine receptor-based biased agonists may hold great promise and seems as the next step in drug development for the treatment of such multifactorial diseases. In this review, we update the present knowledge on dopamine and dopamine receptors and their potential roles in nausea and vomiting. The pre- and clinical evidence provided in this review supports the implication of both dopamine and dopamine receptor agonists in the incidence of emesis. Besides the conventional dopaminergic antiemetic drugs, potential novel antiemetic targeting emetic protein signaling cascades may offer superior selectivity profile and potency.

Ultra-low doses of the transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 agonist, resiniferatoxin, prevents vomiting evoked by diverse emetogens in the least shrew (Cryptotis parva).

Published studies have shown that the transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 (TRPV1) receptor agonist, resiniferatoxin (RTX), has pro and antiemetic effects. RTX can suppress vomiting evoked by a variety of nonselective emetogens such as copper sulfate and cisplatin in several vomit-competent species. In the least shrew, we have already demonstrated that combinations of ultra-low doses of RTX and low doses of the cannabinoid CB1/2 receptor agonist delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ-THC) produce additive antiemetic effects against cisplatin-evoked vomiting. In the current study, we investigated the broad-spectrum antiemetic potential of very low nonemetic doses of RTX against a diverse group of specific emetogens including selective and nonselective agonists of serotonergic 5-hydroxytrptamine (5-HT3) receptor (5-HT and 2-Me-5-HT), dopaminergic D2 receptor (apomorphine and quinpirole), cholinergic M1 receptor (pilocarpine and McN-A-343), as well as the selective substance P neurokinin NK1 receptor agonist GR73632, the selective L-Type calcium channel agonist FPL64176, and the sarcoplasmic endoplasmic reticulum calcium ATPase (SERCA) inhibitor thapsigargin. When administered subcutaneously, ultra-low (0.01 µg/kg) to low (5.0 µg/kg) doses of RTX suppressed vomiting induced by the aforementioned emetogens in a dose-dependent fashion with 50% inhibitory dose values ranging from 0.01 to 1.26 µg/kg. This study is the first to demonstrate that low nanomolar nonemetic doses of RTX have the capacity to completely abolish vomiting caused by diverse receptor specific emetogens in the least shrew model of emesis.

Δ9-THC and related cannabinoids suppress substance P- induced neurokinin NK1-receptor-mediated vomiting via activation of cannabinoid CB1 receptor.

Δ9-THC suppresses cisplatin-induced vomiting through activation of cannabinoid CB1 receptors. Cisplatin-evoked emesis is predominantly due to release of serotonin and substance P (SP) in the gut and the brainstem which subsequently stimulate their corresponding 5-HT3-and neurokinin NK1-receptors to induce vomiting. Δ9-THC can inhibit vomiting caused either by the serotonin precursor 5-HTP, or the 5-HT3 receptor selective agonist, 2-methyserotonin. In the current study, we explored whether Δ9-THC and related CB1/CB2 receptor agonists (WIN55,212-2 and CP55,940) inhibit vomiting evoked by SP (50 mg/kg, i.p.) or the NK1 receptor selective agonist GR73632 (5 mg/kg, i.p.). Behavioral methods were employed to determine the antiemetic efficacy of cannabinoids in least shrews. Our results showed that administration of varying doses of Δ9-THC (i.p. or s.c.), WIN55,212-2 (i.p.), or CP55,940 (i.p.) caused significant suppression of SP-evoked vomiting in a dose-dependent manner. When tested against GR73632, Δ9-THC also dose-dependently reduced the evoked emesis. The antiemetic effect of Δ9-THC against SP-induced vomiting was prevented by low non-emetic doses of the CB1 receptor inverse-agonist/antagonist SR141716A (<10 mg/kg). We also found that the NK1 receptor antagonist netupitant can significantly suppress vomiting caused by a large emetic dose of SR141716A (20 mg/kg). In sum, Δ9-THC and related cannabinoids suppress vomiting evoked by the nonselective (SP) and selective (GR73632) neurokinin NK1 receptor agonists via stimulation of cannabinoid CB1 receptors.

Intracellular emetic signaling evoked by the L-type Ca2+ channel agonist FPL64176 in the least shrew (Cryptotis parva).

Ca2+ plays a major role in maintaining cellular homeostasis and regulates processes including apoptotic cell death and side-effects of cancer chemotherapy including vomiting. Currently we explored the emetic mechanisms of FPL64176, an L-type Ca2+ channel (LTCC) agonist with maximal emetogenic effect at its 10 mg/kg dose. FPL64176 evoked c-Fos immunoreactivity in shrew brainstem sections containing the vomit-associated nuclei, nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS) and dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus. FPL64176 also increased phosphorylation of proteins ERK1/2, PKCα/ßII and Akt in the brainstem. Moreover, their corresponding inhibitors (PD98059, GF 109203X and LY294002, respectively) reduced FPL64176-evoked vomiting. A 30 min subcutaneous (s.c.) pretreatment with the LTCC antagonist nifedipine (10 mg/kg) abolished FPL64176-elicited vomiting, c-Fos expression, and emetic effector phosphorylation. Ryanodine receptors (RyRs) and inositol trisphosphate receptors (IP3Rs) mediate intracellular Ca2+ release from the sarcoplasmic/endoplasmic reticulum. The RyR antagonist dantrolene (i.p.), or a combination of low doses of nifedipine and dantrolene, but not the IP3R antagonist 2-APB, significantly attenuated FPL64176-induced vomiting. The serotonin type 3 receptor (5-HT3R) antagonist palonosetron (s.c.), the neurokinin 1 receptor (NK1R) antagonist netupitant (i.p.) or a combination of non-effective doses of netupitant and palonosetron showed antiemetic potential against FPL64176-evoked vomiting. Serotonin (5-HT) and substance P immunostaining revealed FPL64176-induced emesis was accompanied by an increase in 5-HT but not SP-immunoreactivity in the dorsomedial subdivision of the NTS. These findings demonstrate that Ca2+ mobilization through LTCCs and RyRs, and subsequent emetic effector phosphorylation and 5-HT release play important roles in FPL64176-induced emesis which can be prevented by 5-HT3R and NK1R antagonists.

The anti-asthmatic drug pranlukast suppresses the delayed-phase vomiting and reverses intracellular indices of emesis evoked by cisplatin in the least shrew (Cryptotis parva).

The introduction of second generation serotonin 5-HT3 receptor (5-HT3) antagonist palonosetron combined with long-acting substance P neurokinin NK1 receptor (NK1) antagonists (e.g. netupitant) has substantially improved antiemetic therapy against early- and delayed-phases of emesis caused by highly emetogenic chemotherapeutics such as cisplatin. However, the improved efficacy comes at a cost that many patients cannot afford. We introduce a new class of antiemetic, the antiasthmatic leukotriene CysLT1 receptor antagonist pranlukast for the suppression of cisplatin-evoked vomiting. Pranlukast (10mg/kg) by itself significantly reduced the mean frequency of vomits (70%) and fully protected least shrews from vomiting (46%) during the delayed-phase of cisplatin (10mg/kg)-evoked vomiting. Although, pranlukast tended to substantially reduce both the mean frequency of vomits and the number of shrews vomiting during the early-phase, these reductions failed to attain significance. When combined with a first (tropisetron)- or a second (palonosetron)-generation 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, pranlukast potentiated their antiemetic efficacy during both phases of vomiting. In addition, pranlukast by itself prevented several intracellular signal markers of cisplatin-evoked delayed-vomiting such as phosphorylation of ERK1/2 and PKA. When pranlukast was combined with either palonosetron or tropisetron, these combinations suppressed the evoked phosphorylation of: i) ERK1/2 during both acute- and delayed-phase, ii) PKCα/ß at the peak acute-phase, and iii) PKA at the peak delayed-phase. The current and our published findings suggest that overall behavioral and intracellular signaling effects of pranlukast via blockade of CysLT1 receptors generally appear to be similar to the NK1 receptor antagonist netupitant with some differences.

Ca2+ signaling and emesis: Recent progress and new perspectives.

Cisplatin-like chemotherapeutics cause vomiting via calcium (Ca2+)-dependent release of multiple neurotransmitters (dopamine, serotonin, substance P, etc.) from the gastrointestinal enterochromaffin cells and/or the brainstem. Intracellular Ca2+ signaling is triggered by activation of diverse emetic receptors (including tachykininergic NK1, serotonergic 5-HT3, dopaminergic D2, cholinergic M1, or histaminergic H1), whose activation in vomit-competent species can evoke emesis. Other emetogens such as cisplatin, rotavirus NSP4 protein and bacterial toxins can also induce intracellular Ca2+ elevation. Netupitant is a highly selective neurokinin NK1 receptor (NK1R) antagonist and palonosetron is a selective second-generation serotonin 5-HT3 receptor (5-HT3R) antagonist with a distinct pharmacological profile. An oral fixed combination of netupitant/palonosetron (NEPA; Akynzeo(®)) with >85% antiemetic efficacy is available for use in the prevention of acute and delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). Cannabinoid CB1 receptor agonists possess broad-spectrum antiemetic activity since they prevent vomiting caused by a variety of emetic stimuli including the chemotherapeutic agent cisplatin, 5-HT3R agonists, and D2R agonists. Our findings demonstrate that application of the L-type Ca2+ channel (LTCC) agonist FPL 64176 and the intracellular Ca2+ mobilizing agent thapsigargin (a sarco/endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase inhibitor) cause vomiting in the least shrew. On the other hand, blockade of LTCCs by corresponding antagonists (nifedipine or amlodipine) not only provide broad-spectrum antiemetic efficacy against diverse agents that specifically activate emetogenic receptors such as 5-HT3, NK1, D2, and M1 receptors, but can also potentiate the antiemetic efficacy of palonosetron against the non-specific emetogen, cisplatin. In this review, we will provide an overview of Ca2+ involvement in the emetic process; discuss the relationship between Ca2+ signaling and the prevailing therapeutics in control of vomiting; highlight the evidence for Ca2+-signaling blockers/inhibitors in suppressing emetic behavior in the least shrew model of emesis as well as in the clinical setting; and also draw attention to the clinical benefits of Ca2+-signaling blockers/inhibitors in the treatment of nausea and vomiting.

Intracellular vomit signals and cascades downstream of emetic receptors: Evidence from the least shrew (Cryptotis parva) model of vomiting.

Nausea and vomiting are often considered as stressful symptoms of many diseases and drugs. In fact they are the most feared and debilitating side-effects of many cancer chemotherapeutics and the main cause of patient noncompliance. Despite years of substantial research, the intracellular emetic signals are at best poorly understood or remain unknown. Among different receptor-mediated emetic signaling cascades, one potential converging signal appears to be changes in the cytosolic concentration of Ca2+. In this editorial, we focus on Ca2+-related intracellular signals underlying emesis mediated by various emetogens. This strategy will help us understand common signaling mechanisms downstream of diverse emetogens and should therefore promote development of new antiemetics for the treatment nausea and vomiting caused by diverse diseases, drugs, as well as viruses and bacterial infections.

Thapsigargin-induced activation of Ca(2+)-CaMKII-ERK in brainstem contributes to substance P release and induction of emesis in the least shrew.

Cytoplasmic calcium (Ca(2+)) mobilization has been proposed to be an important factor in the induction of emesis. The selective sarcoplasmic/endoplasmic reticulum Ca(2+)-ATPase (SERCA) inhibitor thapsigargin, is known to deplete intracellular Ca(2+) stores, which consequently evokes extracellular Ca(2+) entry through cell membrane-associated channels, accompanied by a prominent rise in cytosolic Ca(2+). A pro-drug form of thapsigargin is currently under clinical trial as a targeted cancer chemotherapeutic. We envisioned that the intracellular effects of thapsigargin could cause emesis and planned to investigate its mechanisms of emetic action. Indeed, thapsigargin did induce vomiting in the least shrew in a dose-dependent and bell-shaped manner, with maximal efficacy (100%) at 0.5 mg/kg (i.p.). Thapsigargin (0.5 mg/kg) also caused increases in c-Fos immunoreactivity in the brainstem emetic nuclei including the area postrema (AP), nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS) and dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus (DMNX), as well as enhancement of substance P (SP) immunoreactivity in DMNX. In addition, thapsigargin (0.5 mg/kg, i.p.) led to vomit-associated and time-dependent increases in phosphorylation of Ca(2+)/calmodulin kinase IIα (CaMKIIα) and extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2) in the brainstem. We then explored the suppressive potential of diverse chemicals against thapsigargin-evoked emesis including antagonists of: i) neurokinin-1 receptors (netupitant), ii) the type 3 serotonin receptors (palonosetron), iii) store-operated Ca(2+) entry (YM-58483), iv) L-type Ca(2+) channels (nifedipine), and v) SER Ca(2+)-release channels inositol trisphosphate (IP3Rs) (2-APB)-, and ryanodine (RyRs) (dantrolene)-receptors. In addition, the antiemetic potential of inhibitors of CaMKII (KN93) and ERK1/2 (PD98059) were investigated. All tested antagonists/blockers attenuated emetic parameters to varying degrees except palonosetron, however a combination of non-effective doses of netupitant and palonosetron exhibited additive antiemetic efficacy. A low-dose combination of nifedipine and 2-APB plus dantrolene mixture completely abolished thapsigargin-evoked vomiting, CaMKII-ERK1/2 activation and SP elevation. In addition, pretreatment with KN93 or PD98059 suppressed thapsigargin-induced increases in SP and ERK1/2 activation. Intracerebroventricular injection of netupitant suppressed vomiting caused by thapsigargin which suggests that the principal site of evoked emesis is the brainstem. In sum, this is the first study to demonstrate that thapsigargin causes vomiting via the activation of the Ca(2+)-CaMKII-ERK1/2 cascade, which is associated with an increase in the brainstem tissue content of SP, and the evoked emesis occurs through SP-induced activation of neurokinin-1 receptors.

L-type calcium channels contribute to 5-HT3-receptor-evoked CaMKIIα and ERK activation and induction of emesis in the least shrew (Cryptotis parva).

Activation of serotonergic 5-HT3 receptors by its selective agonist 2-methyl serotonin (2-Me-5-HT) induces vomiting, which is sensitive to selective antagonists of both 5-HT3 receptors (palonosetron) and L-type calcium channels (LTCC) (amlodipine or nifedipine). Previously we demonstrated that 5-HT3 receptor activation also causes increases in a palonosetron-sensitive manner in: i) intracellular Ca(2+) concentration, ii) attachment of calmodulin (CaM) to 5-HT3 receptor, and iii) phosphorylation of Ca(2+)/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase IIα (CaMKIIα) and extracellular-signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2). Here, we investigate the role of the short-acting LTCC blocker nifedipine on 2-Me-5-HT-evoked intracellular Ca(2+) increase and on downstream intracellular emetic signaling, which have been shown to be coupled with 2-Me-5-HT׳s emetic effects in the least shrew. Using the cell-permeant Ca(2+) indicator fluo-4 AM, here we present evidence for the contribution of Ca(2+) influx through LTCCs (sensitive to nifedipine) in 2-Me-5-HT (1µM) -evoked rise in cytosolic Ca(2+) levels in least shrew brainstem slices. Nifedipine pretreatment (10mg/kg, s.c.) also suppressed 2-Me-5-HT-evoked interaction of 5-HT3 receptors with CaM as well as phosphorylation of CaMKIIα and ERK1/2 in the least shrew brainstem, and 5-HT3 receptors -CaM colocalization in jejunum of the small intestine. In vitro exposure of isolated enterochromaffin cells of the small intestine to 2-Me-5-HT (1µM) caused CaMKIIα phosphorylation, which was also abrogated by nifedipine pretreatment (0.1µM). In addition, pretreatment with the CaMKII inhibitor KN62 (10mg/kg, i.p.) suppressed emesis and also the activation of CaMKIIα, and ERK in brainstem caused by 2-Me-5-HT (5mg/kg, i.p.). This study provides further mechanistic explanation for our published findings that nifedipine can dose-dependently protect shrews from 2-Me-5-HT-induced vomiting.

Differential and additive suppressive effects of 5-HT3 (palonosetron)- and NK1 (netupitant)-receptor antagonists on cisplatin-induced vomiting and ERK1/2, PKA and PKC activation.

To better understand the anti-emetic profile of the 5-HT3 (palonosetron)- and the tachykinin NK1 (netupitant) -receptor antagonists, either alone or in combination, we evaluated the effects of palonosetron and/or netupitant pretreatment on cisplatin-evoked vomiting and changes in the phosphorylation of brainstem kinases such as the extracellular signal-regulated protein kinases 1 and 2 (ERK1/2), protein kinase C alpha/beta (PKCα/ß), and protein kinase A (PKA) in the least shrew. Our results demonstrate that cisplatin (10mg/kg, i.p.) causes emesis in the least shrew over 40h with respective peak early- and delayed-phases occurring at 1 - 2 and 32 - 34h post-injection. During the early phase (0 - 16h post cisplatin), palonosetron (0.1mg/kg, s.c.) significantly protected shrews from vomiting with a near complete suppression of vomit frequency. Palonosetron also significantly protected shrews from vomiting during the delayed phase (27 - 40h post cisplatin), but the reduction in mean vomit frequency failed to achieve significance. On the other hand, netupitant (5mg/kg, i.p.) totally abolished vomiting during the delayed phase, and tended to suppress the mean vomit frequency during the acute phase. The combined treatment protected shrews almost completely from vomiting during both phases. Brainstem pERK1/2 levels were significantly elevated at all time-points except at 40h post-cisplatin administration. PKA phosphorylation tended to be elevated throughout the delayed phase, but a significant increase only occurred at 33h. Brainstem pPKCα/ß levels were enhanced during acute-phase with a significant elevation at 2h. Palonosetron, netupitant or their combination had no effect on elevated pERK1/2 levels during acute phase, but the combination reversed ERK1/2 phosphorylation at 33h post-cisplatin treatment. In addition, only the combined regimen prevented the cisplatin-induced PKCα/ß phosphorylation observed at the acute phase. On the other hand, palonosetron and netupitant, either alone or in combination, were effective in reducing the induced elevated pPKA levels during the delayed phase. These effects on cisplatin-related emetic signals downstream of 5-HT3- and NK1-receptors help us to better understand the intracellular basis of cisplatin-induced vomiting.