Emergency contraception for individuals weighing 80 kg or greater: A randomized trial of 30 mg ulipristal acetate and 1.5 mg or 3.0 mg levonorgestrel.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy of emergency contraception (EC) regimens used within 72 hours of unprotected intercourse in individuals weighing ≥80 kg. STUDY DESIGN: We enrolled reproductive-aged healthy women in a multicenter, single-blind, randomized study of levonorgestrel 1.5 mg (LNG1X) and 3.0 mg (LNG2X) and ulipristal acetate 30 mg (UPA) (enrollment goal 1200). Key eligibility requirements included regular cycles, weight >/= 80kg, unprotected intercourse within 72 hours, no recent use of hormonal contraception, a negative urine pregnancy test (UPT), and willingness to abstain from intercourse until next menses. To assess our primary outcome of incidence of pregnancy, participants completed home UPTs; if no menses by 2-weeks post-treatment, or a positive UPT, they returned for an in-person visit with quantitative serum human chorionic gonadotropin and ultrasound. RESULTS: We enrolled and randomized 532; 44 were not dosed or not evaluable for primary end point, leaving an analyzable sample of 488 (173 LNG1X, 158 LNG2X, 157 UPA) with similar demographics between groups (mean age 29.6 years [5.74], body mass index 37.09 kg/m2 [6.95]). Five pregnancies occurred (LNG1X n = 1, LNG2X n = 1, UPA n = 3); none occurred during the highest at-risk window (day of ovulation and the 3 days prior). We closed the study before achieving our enrollment goal because the low pregnancy rate in all groups established futility based on an interim blinded analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Although slow enrollment limited our study power, we found no differences in pregnancy rates between EC regimens among women weighing 80 kg or more. Our results are not able to refute or support differences between the treatment arms. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clincialtrials.gov Clinical trials#: NCT03537768. IMPLICATIONS: Women weighing 80 kg or more experienced no differences in pregnancy rates between oral EC regimens but due to several significant study limitations including sample size and the lack of a study population at high risk of pregnancy, our results are not able to determine if differences in treatment effectiveness exist.

Safety testing of Ovaprene: An investigational nonhormonal monthly vaginal contraceptive.

OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the safety of Ovaprene, an investigational nonhormonal vaginal contraceptive designed for monthly use. STUDY DESIGN: Open-label, multicenter study enrolling heterosexually-active women with previous permanent contraception who underwent assessments during five menstrual cycles: baseline postcoital test cycle, diaphragm postcoital test cycle, Ovaprene safety cycle, and two Ovaprene postcoital test cycles. Safety outcomes included treatment-emergent adverse events, systemic laboratory findings, pelvic examinations, colposcopies, Nugent scores, determination of community state types of vaginal microbiota, and anti-Escherichia coli activity and inflammatory markers in cervicovaginal fluids. RESULTS: We enrolled 38 participants. Of these, 33 used Ovaprene and completed 77 Ovaprene cycles. The most common product-related urogenital treatment-emergent adverse events were bacterial vaginosis and vaginal odor. The frequency of transitioning from Lactobacillus-dominated community state type to community state type IV (not Lactobacillus-dominated) was similar before Ovaprene use and afterwards. Mean Nugent scores were <4 at each visit without a discernible upward trend. Inflammatory markers showed wide variation but no upward trend, and E. coli inhibitory activity of cervical secretions did not change. We found no Staphylococcus aureus, the causative agent in toxic shock syndrome, on used Ovaprenes or in vaginal samples. No clinically important changes in systemic laboratory findings, pelvic examinations, or colposcopies occurred during Ovaprene use. CONCLUSIONS: Ovaprene use did not result in cervicovaginal irritation or adverse effects on resident vaginal microbiota and did not impact transitions from a Lactobacillus-dominated community state type to community state type IV. IMPLICATIONS: The finding that the use of Ovaprene, an investigational monthly user-controlled nonhormonal vaginal contraceptive, does not appear to result in adverse changes in vaginal health during short-term use supports further evaluation of the contraceptive potential of the device.

Successful postcoital testing of Ovaprene: An investigational non-hormonal monthly vaginal contraceptive.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate reduction in progressively motile sperm per high power field (HPF) in midcycle cervical mucus after intercourse with Ovaprene: an investigational monthly non-hormonal vaginal contraceptive consisting of a vaginal ring and mechanical barrier, releasing spermiostatic ferrous gluconate. STUDY DESIGN: Open-label, multicenter study enrolling heterosexually-active women with previous permanent contraception. Participants underwent a baseline postcoital test cycle with no device to confirm the presence of sperm, followed by one diaphragm postcoital test cycle, one Ovaprene safety cycle, and two Ovaprene postcoital test cycles. In each postcoital test cycle, participants underwent a midcycle cervical mucus evaluation to confirm an Insler score ≥10 and absence of sperm, and then returned two to four hours after vaginal intercourse for repeat cervical mucus evaluation. We considered <5 progressively motile sperm/HPF indicative of preliminary contraceptive effectiveness. RESULTS: We enrolled 38 participants; 23 completed the study. All participants had ≥5 progressively motile sperm/HPF in the baseline cycle and <5 progressively motile sperm/HPF in all 49 Ovaprene cycles and all 35 diaphragm cycles, meeting the definition of a successful postcoital test. This was true regardless of examiner blinding, prior vaginal delivery or vaginal ring use, body mass index, or dislodgements noted by the participant or investigator. The mean of 27.2 (±17.9) progressively motile sperm/HPF in baseline postcoital test cycles was reduced to 0.5 (±1.1) and 0.5 (±1.3) progressively motile sperm/HPF in the first and second Ovaprene cycles, respectively. Ovaprene fit all participants and all could insert, position, and remove it. CONCLUSION: Use of Ovaprene resulted in meeting the prespecified criterion for contraceptive effect by all participants during all postcoital test cycles. IMPLICATIONS: The finding that use of Ovaprene, an investigational monthly non-hormonal vaginal contraceptive, resulted in postcoital testing of cervical mucus that met the pre-specified definition of success (<5 progressively motile sperm/HPF) supports further evaluation of contraceptive efficacy of the device in users at risk for pregnancy.

Design of an international male contraceptive efficacy trial using a self-administered daily transdermal gel containing testosterone and segesterone acetate (Nestorone).

Injectable male hormonal contraceptives are effective for preventing pregnancy in clinical trials; however, users may prefer to avoid medical appointments and injections. A self-administered transdermal contraceptive gel may be more acceptable for long-term contraception. Transdermal testosterone gels are widely used to treat hypogonadism and transdermal administration may have utility for male contraception; however, no efficacy data from transdermal male hormonal contraceptive gel are available. We designed and are currently conducting an international, multicenter, open-label study of self-administration of a daily combined testosterone and segesterone acetate (Nestorone) gel for male contraception. The transdermal approach to male contraception raises novel considerations regarding adherence with the daily gel, as well as concern about the potential transfer of the gel and the contraceptive hormones to the female partner. Enrolled couples are in committed relationships. Male partners have baseline normal spermatogenesis and are in good health; female partners are regularly menstruating and at risk for unintended pregnancy. The study's primary outcome is the rate of pregnancy in couples during the study's 52-week efficacy phase. Secondary endpoints include the proportion of male participants suppressing sperm production and entering the efficacy phase, side effects, hormone concentrations in male participants and their female partners, sexual function, and regimen acceptability. Enrollment concluded on November 1, 2022, with 462 couples and enrollment is now closed. This report outlines the strategy and design of the first study to examine the contraceptive efficacy of a self-administered male hormonal contraceptive gel. The results will be presented in future reports. IMPLICATIONS: The development of a safe, effective, reversible male contraceptive would improve contraceptive options and may decrease rates of unintended pregnancy. This manuscript outlines the study design and analysis plan for an ongoing large international trial of a novel transdermal hormone gel for male contraception. Successful completion of this and future studies of this formulation may lead to the approval of a male contraceptive.

Acceptability of Single-dose Clindamycin Gel for Bacterial Vaginosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to assess the acceptability of a single-dose bioadhesive 2% clindamycin vaginal gel for bacterial vaginosis (BV). METHODS: This double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study compared a new clindamycin gel with placebo gel (2:1 ratio). The primary objective was efficacy; secondary objectives were safety and acceptability. Subjects were evaluated at screening, days 7 to 14 (Day 7-14), and days 21 to 30 (test-of-cure [TOC]). An acceptability questionnaire with 9 questions was administered at the Day 7-14 visit, and a subset of questions (#7-#9) was asked again at the TOC visit. At Visit 1, subjects were provided with a daily electronic diary (e-Diary) to collect information regarding study drug administration, vaginal discharge, odor, itching, and any other treatments used. Study site staff reviewed e-Diaries at the Day 7-14 and TOC visits. FINDINGS: A total of 307 women with BV were randomized to treatment (204 to the clindamycin gel group and 103 to the placebo gel group). Most (88.3%) reported at least one previously diagnosed BV episode, and more than one half (55.4%) had experience with other vaginal treatments for BV. At the TOC visit, almost all (91.1%) of the clindamycin gel subjects described their overall experience with the study drug as "satisfied" or "very satisfied," 95.8% indicated that they would be "likely" or "very likely" to use the product again if it became available after the study and they had BV again, and 93.7% would be "likely" or "very likely" to recommend their treatment to a friend who had BV. Almost all (90.2%) clindamycin-treated subjects responded that application was "clean" or "fairly clean," as opposed to "neither clean nor messy," "fairly messy," or "messy." Although 55.4% experienced leakage in the days after application, only 26.9% of those indicated that it was bothersome. Subjects receiving clindamycin gel also reported improvement in both odor and discharge, commencing shortly after dosing and continuing through the assessment period, regardless of whether they met the critical cure criteria. IMPLICATIONS: A single dose of a new bioadhesive 2% clindamycin vaginal gel showed rapid resolution of symptoms and was highly acceptable as a treatment for bacterial vaginosis. CLINICALTRIALS: gov identifier: NCT04370548.

Continuation rates of two different-sized copper intrauterine devices among nulliparous women: Interim 12-month results of a single-blind, randomised, multicentre trial.

Background: The most widely used copper intrauterine device (IUD) in the world (the TCu380A), and the only product available in many countries, causes side effects and early removals for many users. These problems are exacerbated in nulliparous women, who have smaller uterine cavities compared to parous women. We compared first-year continuation rates and reasons/probabilities for early removal of the TCu380A versus a smaller Belgian copper IUD among nulliparous users. Methods: This 12-month interim report is derived from a pre-planned interim analysis of a sub population and focused on key secondary comparative endpoints. In this participant-blinded trial at 16 centres in the USA, we randomised participants aged 17-40 in a 4:1 ratio to the NT380-Mini or the TCu380A. In the first year, participants had follow-up visits at 6-weeks and 3, 6, and 12-months, and a phone contact at 9 months; we documented continued use, expulsions, and reasons for removal. Among participants with successful IUD placement, we compared probabilities of IUD continuation and specific reasons for discontinuation using log-rank tests. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT03124160 and is closed to recruitment. Findings: Between June 1, 2017, and February 25, 2019, we assigned 927 nulliparous women to either the NT380-Mini (n = 744) or the TCu380A (n = 183); the analysis population was 732 (NT380-Mini) and 176 (TCu380A). Participants using the NT380-Mini, compared to the TCu380A, had higher 12-month continuation rates (78·7% [95% CI: 72·9-84·5%] vs. 70·2% [95% CI: 59·7-80·7], p = 0·014), lower rates of removal for bleeding and/or pain (8·1% vs. 16·2%, p = 0·003) and lower IUD expulsion rates (4·8% vs. 8·9%, p = 0·023), respectively. Interpretation: The NT380-Mini offers important benefits for a nulliparous population compared to the TCu380A in the first twelve months, when pivotal experiences typically occur. Higher continuation rates with the NT380-Mini may avert disruptions in contraceptive use and help users avoid unintended pregnancy. Funding: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, and Mona Lisa, N.V. (Belgium).

Single-Dose, Bioadhesive Clindamycin 2% Gel for Bacterial Vaginosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To assess efficacy and safety of a single-dose vaginal clindamycin gel for bacterial vaginosis treatment. METHODS: We conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study comparing clindamycin gel with placebo (2:1 ratio). Entry required clinical diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis, that is, all four Amsel's criteria, without other genital infections. Nugent scores of 7-10 were required for efficacy assessment, per updated 2019 U.S. Food and Drug Administration guidance. Patients were evaluated at screening, day 7-14, and day 21-30 (test of cure). Clinical cure was defined as resolution of three of four Amsel's criteria. Bacteriologic cure was defined as Nugent score lower than 4. Therapeutic cure was both clinical and bacteriologic cure. Primary outcome was clinical cure at the test-of-cure visit. Secondary endpoints were clinical cure at day 7-14, and bacteriologic and therapeutic cures at day 7-14 and test of cure. A sample size of 188 patients in the clindamycin group compared with 94 patients in the placebo group had 90% power to detect statistically significant difference (P=.05, 2-tailed). RESULTS: Participants were seen between July 9, 2020, and November 12, 2020. Of 307 randomized women, 56.0% were Black and 88.3% reported one or more previous bacterial vaginosis episodes. In the modified intention-to-treat population, 70.5% of patients in the clindamycin group and 35.6% in the placebo group achieved clinical cure at test of cure (primary outcome) (difference of 34.9, 95% CI 19.0-50.8), as did 77.5% of patients in the clindamycin group and 42.6% of patients in the placebo group in the per-protocol population (difference of 34.9, 95% CI 17.0-52.7). Statistically significant differences between groups were seen for all secondary endpoints. Clinical cure rate in patients in the clindamycin group with more than three bacterial vaginosis episodes in the prior year was 70.0%. Approximately 15% (15.3%) of patients in the clindamycin group experienced one or more treatment-emergent adverse events related to study treatment, as did 9.7% of patients in the placebo group. The most frequent treatment-related, treatment-emergent adverse event was vulvovaginal candidiasis. CONCLUSION: A new, single-dose clindamycin vaginal gel was highly effective, with excellent safety, in women disproportionately affected by bacterial vaginosis, with Nugent scores of 7-10 at study entry. FUNDING SOURCE: The study was funded by Daré Bioscience, Inc. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04370548.

Sexual Satisfaction Results With the Vaginal pH Modulator From the Phase 3 AMPOWER Study.

BACKGROUND: The novel vaginal pH modulator (VPM; Phexxi) is a non-hormonal, woman-controlled, on-demand, water-based, surfactant-free contraceptive vaginal gel; VPM has also been cleared by the Food and Drug Administration for use as a personal lubricant. AIM: The aim of this study is to report on sexual satisfaction results from the phase 3 AMPOWER study. METHODS: AMPOWER was a single-arm, open-label, multicenter study to assess the safety and efficacy of VPM in preventing pregnancy. Women were enrolled who were healthy, age 18-35 years, and sexually active with regular cyclic menses. OUTCOMES: Women's satisfaction (including sexual satisfaction) was an exploratory endpoint measured at Baseline and Visits 3-5; sexual satisfaction-related patient reported outcomes (PROs) were assessed via 3 different questions: (i) a question related to the impact on a woman's sex life; (ii) a question from the Sexual Function Questionnaire (SFQ) related to the frequency of ten sexual problems; and (iii) a question from the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) related to lubrication. RESULTS: For sexual satisfaction-related PRO measures with baseline assessments, the majority of women reported the same or improved scores at Visit 5 (ranging from 85.8% to 98.4%). The percentage of women who reported that their sex life was improved and/or maintained was higher in Visit 3, 4, and 5 (95.4%, 95.1%, and 93.6%, respectively) compared to Baseline (87.6%). The mean impact on sex life score significantly improved at Visit 5 compared to Baseline (P < .001). In the SFQ, the mean score significantly improved (P < .005) at Visit 5 vs Baseline in 7 of the 10 variables measured (vaginal dryness, lack of sexual interest and/or desire, vaginal tightness, pain, anxiety, unable to orgasm, and vaginal bleeding or irritation). In women who reported sexual activity in the last 4 weeks, the mean FSFI score also significantly improved from Baseline to Visit 5 (P = .037). CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: In this post-hoc analysis of the phase 3 AMPOWER study, the PRO results demonstrate a high level of sexual satisfaction with VPM. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: The primary strength of this analysis was the large study size of 1,330 women. Limitations included the non-randomized study design, the post-hoc nature of the analysis, and the fact that sexual satisfaction was an exploratory endpoint. CONCLUSION: As a non-hormonal, woman-controlled, on-demand, lubricating contraceptive gel, VPM offers women a unique set of benefits with positive impacts on their sexual health. Thomas MA, Morlock R, Dart C, Howard B. Sexual Satisfaction Results With the Vaginal pH Modulator From the Phase 3 AMPOWER Study. J Sex Med 2022;19:975-982.

The use of serum segesterone acetate levels to assess adherence of trial participants with a contraceptive vaginal ring.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the incidence of out-of-range segesterone acetate (NES) concentrations in participants of a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic trial of a continuous use contraceptive vaginal ring (CVR) releasing NES and estradiol (E2). We hypothesized that out-of-range concentrations reflect nonadherent ring use and predict ovulation risk. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a secondary analysis of data from a prospective, multi-centered, randomized, Phase IIa dose-finding trial for a CVR releasing NES and E2. Our primary outcome was the risk of ovulation associated with out-of-range NES events. We calculated the 5th and 95th percentile NES concentrations of subjects at steady state to determine high and low cutoffs. We used a Fisher's exact test to determine group differences, and calculated the relative risk of ovulation for each group. RESULTS: We analyzed available serum NES data from cycles 2 (n = 172), 3 (n = 156) and 7 (n = 115) to determine the 5th and 95th percentile of all NES concentrations (64, 296 pg/mL). In the 443 cycles of observation, no ovulations occurred in participants with NES concentrations within the expected range. In contrast, we found ovulatory elevations of progesterone in 21 cycles with out-of-range values. Of these, 15 (71%) cycles had evidence of one or more nonadherent low and 6 (29%) one or more unexpected peak. The relative risk of ovulation increased with evidence of multiple non-adherent levels. CONCLUSIONS: We found out-of-range NES concentrations, suggestive of improper use of a CVR associated with an increased risk of ovulation, with a direct relationship between the number of out-of-range events and the relative risk. IMPLICATIONS: The results of this study support the use of out-of-range serum NES values as a marker of adherence in contraceptive clinical trials of continuous vaginal rings, and suggest that nonadherence occurs even in early phase clinical trials with close monitoring.

A novel vaginal pH regulator: results from the phase 3 AMPOWER contraception clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to evaluate the contraceptive effectiveness, safety, and acceptability of a novel vaginal pH regulator over seven cycles of use. STUDY DESIGN: A single-arm, open-label, phase 3 study was conducted across 112 sites in the United States in sexually active 18-35-year-old women at risk of pregnancy. Women administered the study treatment ≤ 1 h before each episode of intercourse. Women recorded use of study drug, coital information, and any symptoms experienced in electronic diaries. The primary outcome was the seven-cycle cumulative pregnancy rate as calculated using the Kaplan-Meier methodology; secondary outcomes included safety. Overall satisfaction was assessed via written questionnaires. RESULTS: A total of 1384 women were enrolled in the study from July 2017 to November 2018. Mean age was 27.7 ±â€¯4.4 years; most women were white (69.0%). The seven-cycle cumulative pregnancy percentage was 13.7% [95% confidence interval (CI): 10.0%-17.5%], meeting the prespecified primary endpoint of having the upper bound 95% CI ≤ 21%. Most common adverse events (AEs) occurring in ≥ 2% of women were vulvovaginal burning sensation, vulvovaginal pruritus, urinary tract infection, vulvovaginal pain, mycotic infection, bacterial vaginosis, and nasopharyngitis. Of 1330 women who used the study drug at least once, fewer than 2% of women discontinued due to any AEs, and < 1% of women discontinued due to genitourinary symptoms. Overall, > 80% of women reported being "very satisfied" or "satisfied" with study treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In this phase 3 study, the novel vaginal pH regulator demonstrated 86.3% contraceptive effectiveness, was safe and well tolerated, and was highly acceptable. IMPLICATIONS: This novel vaginal pH regulator is a safe, nonhormonal, woman-controlled method of contraception that expands women's options.

Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of a New Low-Dose Copper and Nitinol Intrauterine Device: Phase 2 Data to 36 Months.

OBJECTIVE: To assess in parous and nulliparous women, the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of a new, low-dose copper (175 mm) intrauterine contraceptive with a flexible nitinol frame provided in a preloaded applicator. METHODS: Institutional review boards at 12 U.S. sites approved this commercially funded project. Patients met standard inclusion and exclusion criteria for a copper-based intrauterine device (IUD), generally consistent with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use, 2016. Intrauterine device placement occurred at any day in the eligible patient's menstrual cycle after assuring she was not pregnant. The primary outcome measure assessed efficacy (measured by the Pearl Index) in this 1-year study with a 2-year extension. Secondary outcomes included placement success, ease of placement, safety as measured by adverse events, and tolerability assessed by discontinuation rate and bleeding and spotting patterns. RESULTS: A total of 286 women provided 5,640 cycles evaluable for pregnancy. Patients averaged 27.1 years of age. Nulliparous women represented 60.8% of the patients. Over 36 months of observation, we identified two pregnancies (Pearl Index 0.46 [95% CI 0.06-1.67]) and 10 serious adverse events; none were study-related. Successful placement occurred in 283 participants (99.0%). Median (range) continuation times were 2.7 years (0-3.4). We identified five expulsions (1.8%), zero uterine perforations, and one report of pelvic inflammatory disease. Adverse events prompted 30 women (10.6%) to discontinue early in the first year of use with 23 (8.1%) discontinuing for issues of bleeding, pain, or both. Altogether, 107 (37.8%) completed 36 months of device use. Mean bleeding days per cycle decreased from 7.6 in cycle 1 to 5.2 in cycle 13. CONCLUSION: The novel, low-dose copper and nitinol IUD demonstrated high efficacy and safety in this phase 2 U.S. Food and Drug Administration trial and warrants further expanded study in a phase 3 clinical trial. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02446821. FUNDING SOURCE: Sebela Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Daily Oral Administration of the Novel Androgen 11ß-MNTDC Markedly Suppresses Serum Gonadotropins in Healthy Men.

BACKGROUND: 11ß-methyl-19-nortestosterone (11ß-MNT) is a modified testosterone (T) with androgenic and progestational activity. A single oral dose of the prodrug, 11ß-MNT dodecylcarbonate (11ß-MNTDC), was well tolerated in healthy men. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, double-blind study at 2 academic medical centers. 42 healthy men (18-50 years) were randomized to receive oral placebo or 11ß-MNTDC, 200 or 400 mg daily, for 28 consecutive days. Primary outcome (safety and tolerability) measures were assessed twice per week. Subjects underwent serial blood sampling over 24 hours on days 1 and 28 to assess secondary outcomes: pharmacokinetics (serum drug concentrations); pharmacodynamics of 11ß-MNTDC (serum sex steroids and gonadotropins); and mood and sexual function (via validated questionnaires). RESULTS: There were no serious adverse events. No participants discontinued because of an adverse event or laboratory test abnormality. 11ß-MNTDC resulted in a dose-related increase in serum 11ß-MNTDC and 11ß-MNT concentrations sustained over 24 hours. Administration of 11ß-MNTDC resulted in a marked suppression of serum gonadotropins, T, calculated free T, estradiol, and SHBG over the treatment period (P < 0.01). Adverse effects that may be related to 11ß-MNTDC included weight gain, acne, headaches, fatigue, and mild mood changes, with 5 men reporting decreased libido and 3 decreased erectile/ejaculatory function. Serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, weight (~2 kg), hematocrit, and hemoglobin increased and serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol decreased in both 11ß-MNTDC groups. CONCLUSION: Daily oral 11ß-MNTDC for 28 days in healthy men markedly suppressed serum gonadotropin and T concentrations without serious adverse effects. These results warrant further evaluation of 11ß-MNTDC as a potential male oral contraceptive.

Efficacy of the 1-year (13-cycle) segesterone acetate and ethinylestradiol contraceptive vaginal system: results of two multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 3 trials.

BACKGROUND: A ring-shaped, contraceptive vaginal system designed to last 1 year (13 cycles) delivers an average of 0·15 mg segesterone acetate and 0·013 mg ethinylestradiol per day. We evaluated the efficacy of this contraceptive vaginal system and return to menses or pregnancy after use. METHODS: In two identically designed, multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 3 trials (one at 15 US academic and community sites and one at 12 US and international academic and community sites), participants followed a 21-days-in, 7-days-out segesterone acetate and ethinylestradiol contraceptive vaginal system schedule for up to 13 cycles. Participants were healthy, sexually active, non-pregnant, non-sterilised women aged 18-40 years. Women were cautioned that any removals during the 21 days of cyclic use should not exceed 2 h, and used daily paper diaries to record vaginal system use. Consistent with regulatory requirements for contraceptives, we calculated the Pearl Index for women aged 35 years and younger, excluding adjunctive contraception cycles, as the primary efficacy outcome measure. We also did intention-to-treat Kaplan-Meier life table analyses and followed up women who did not use hormonal contraceptives or desired pregnancy after study completion for 6 months for return to menses or pregnancy. The trials are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, numbers NCT00455156 and NCT00263341. FINDINGS: Between Dec 19, 2006, and Oct 9, 2009, at the 15 US sites, and between Nov 1, 2006, and July 2, 2009, at the 12 US and international sites we enrolled 2278 women. Our overall efficacy analysis included 2265 participants (1130 in the US study and 1135 in the international study) and 1303 (57·5%) participants completed up to 13 cycles. The Pearl Index for the primary efficacy group was 2·98 (95% CI 2·13-4·06) per 100 woman-years, and was well within the range indicative of efficacy for a contraceptive under a woman's control. The Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed the contraceptive vaginal system was 97·5% effective, which provided further evidence of efficacy. Pregnancy occurrence was similar across cycles. All 290 follow-up participants reported return to menses or became pregnant (24 [63%] of 38 women who desired pregnancy) within 6 months. INTERPRETATION: The segesterone acetate and ethinylestradiol contraceptive vaginal system is an effective contraceptive for 13 consecutive cycles of use. This new product adds to the contraceptive method mix and the 1-year duration of use means that women do not need to return to the clinic or pharmacy for refills every few months. FUNDING: Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development of the National Institutes of Health, the US Agency for International Development, and the WHO Reproductive Health Research Department.

A new combination of testosterone and nestorone transdermal gels for male hormonal contraception.

CONTEXT: Combinations of testosterone (T) and nestorone (NES; a nonandrogenic progestin) transdermal gels may suppress spermatogenesis and prove appealing to men for contraception. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to determine the effectiveness of T gel alone or combined with NES gel in suppressing spermatogenesis. DESIGN AND SETTING: This was a randomized, double-blind, comparator clinical trial conducted at two academic medical centers. PARTICIPANTS: Ninety-nine healthy male volunteers participated in the study. INTERVENTIONS: Volunteers were randomized to one of three treatment groups applying daily transdermal gels (group 1: T gel 10 g+NES 0 mg/placebo gel; group 2: T gel 10 g+NES gel 8 mg; group 3: T gel 10 g+NES gel 12 mg). MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLE: The main outcome variable of the study was the percentage of men whose sperm concentration was suppressed to 1 million/ml or less by 20-24 wk of treatment. RESULTS: Efficacy data analyses were performed on 56 subjects who adhered to the protocol and completed at least 20 wk of treatment. The percentage of men whose sperm concentration was 1 million/ml or less was significantly higher for T+NES 8 mg (89%, P<0.0001) and T+NES 12 mg (88%, P=0.0002) compared with T+NES 0 mg group (23%). The median serum total and free T concentrations in all groups were maintained within the adult male range throughout the treatment period. Adverse effects were minimal in all groups. CONCLUSION: A combination of daily NES+T gels suppressed sperm concentration to 1 million/ml or less in 88.5% of men, with minimal adverse effects, and may be further studied as a male transdermal hormonal contraceptive.

Comparative controlled trial of a novel oral estrogen therapy, estradiol acetate, for relief of menopause symptoms.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of a new oral estradiol prodrug, estradiol acetate, with micronized estradiol or conjugated equine estrogens for alleviation of postmenopausal vasomotor and urogenital symptoms. DESIGN: A total of 249 postmenopausal women experiencing seven or more moderate or severe vasomotor symptoms daily for 1 week or 60 or more symptoms in 1 week were randomized to 0.9 mg of estradiol acetate (n = 79), 1 mg of micronized estradiol (n = 85), or 0.625 mg of conjugated equine estrogens therapy (n = 85). Efficacy endpoints were the change in frequency and severity of vasomotor symptoms from baseline to week 12, participant-assessed urogenital symptoms, and investigator-assessed signs of vaginal atrophy. Efficacy results were considered equivalent if estradiol acetate was at least 80% as effective as estradiol and conjugated estrogens. RESULTS: At week 12, frequency of vasomotor symptoms decreased comparably in all groups, and at weeks 4 and 12, the decrease in frequency of symptoms was statistically equivalent for estradiol acetate and conjugated estrogens. Severity of vasomotor symptoms also improved comparably for all groups, with least squares mean decreases of 1.05 for estradiol acetate, 1.34 for estradiol, and 1.17 for conjugated estrogens at week 12. Urogenital symptoms and vaginal signs showed similar improvement in all groups. Overall, the majority of adverse events were mild or moderate and consistent with estrogen therapy. CONCLUSION: Estradiol acetate 0.9 mg was comparable to 1 mg of estradiol and 0.625 mg of conjugated equine estrogens in reducing the number and severity of vasomotor and urogenital symptoms in postmenopausal women. Oral estradiol acetate was well tolerated.