The Role of Microsurgery in Coverage of Defects of the Hand.

Soft tissue defects of the hand may result from trauma, infection, vascular disease, and after resection of tumors. Microsurgery has evolved to a stage where it is relatively commonplace today but procedures such as free flaps still incur significant time, manpower, cost, and material resources. The aim of this article is to articulate the specific situations in hand reconstruction when microsurgery is superior to nonmicrosurgical reconstructive options. The benefits of microsurgical reconstruction include a variety of important metrics, such as improved function, better tissue match, less donor site morbidity, and reduced downtime for the patient.

Revisiting the reconstructive ladder for soft tissue reconstruction in the lower extremity.

Soft tissue reconstruction of the lower limb has seen a paradigm shift over the past two decades. Typically, these defects arise from trauma, infection or tumor. It is no longer enough to simply achieve coverage. Factors like patient-reported outcomes and aesthetic considerations are essential in the decision-making process. This is especially in light of increasing technological advancement, availability of dermal substitutes, microsurgical expertise and development of the field of microsurgical reconstruction as a whole with more novel flaps and techniques. Advancements in reconstructive modalities have also been equally matched by better emergency medical mobilization, transportation and access, early initiation of subspecialty care, accessibility and types of imaging, as well as oncological advances in radiotherapy and chemotherapy regimens. Yet, this has also meant that our patient profile has expanded to include older patients with more co-morbidities and other considerations such as frailty or the irradiated field which could influence what reconstructive modality is suitable and the goals of reconstruction specific to the patient. Previously deemed unsalvageable limbs are now being successfully reconstructed with good function and aesthesis. In the lower limb, this implicates the ability for early mobilization, range of motion and weight bearing which allow the patient to successfully partake in early rehabilitation. Expedient and reliable healing is also important in the oncological population where a proportion of these patients would need to go on to receive post-operative chemotherapy or radiotherapy. The reconstructive ladder has been what many reconstructive surgeons have been taught upon with regard to the basic principles of pre-operative planning and choosing the appropriate reconstructive modality. In this article, we examine the relevance of the reconstructive ladder in modern practice and the additional considerations in the approach to a soft tissue defect in the lower extremity.

Challenges and Solutions in Prosthetic Fitting of Digits after Flap Reconstruction.

Surgical reconstruction can restore length and function, but cannot adequately resolve the problem of disfigurement. Prosthetic fitting can play a complementary role in enhancing the aesthetic outcomes post reconstruction. However, complex reconstruction involving flaps coupled with the surgical imperative for limb length preservation can lead to outcomes where the reconstructed stumps are challenging to fit with prosthesis. This article describes how prosthetic fitting was tackled in a case of a triple-digit amputation after reconstruction that presented with finger stumps that were bulky, long and stiff in extension contracture, compounded by the presence of substantive scar tissues. We discuss major prosthesis modifications that were unconventional but necessary to enable fitting, the techniques involved, as well as the aesthetic and functional considerations behind the modifications. The results showed that enhanced aesthetic appearance, together with a marginal improvement in hand function, was achieved post-prosthetically, meeting the patient's and the clinical team's fitting objective. Level of Evidence: Level V (Therapeutic).