Characteristics of individuals with cystic fibrosis in the United States ineligible for ivacaftor and elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor.

BACKGROUND: We characterized people with cystic fibrosis (CF) ineligible by genotype (not age) for currently approved CFTR modulator therapy using data from the US CF Foundation Patient Registry (CFFPR). METHODS: We summarized clinical characteristics using CFFPR data from 2017 to 2022. Annual rate of change in percent predicted of forced expiratory volume in one second (ppFEV1) was estimated using generalized estimating equations. RESULTS: A total of 2,790 individuals with CF met inclusion criteria. In 2022, 12 % were less than 6 years old, 16 % were age 6-12 years, 18 % age 12-18 years and 54 % were ≥18 years. The proportion identified as White was 74 %, 17 % Black, and 26 % as Hispanic. The median (IQR) age at diagnosis was 1.2 (0.5, 9.1) months for children and 3.1 (0.3, 17.4) years for adults. Median (IQR) ppFEV1 among children was 91.9 (80.3; 102.4) and among adults, 74.3 (52.4; 90.4). Pancreatic enzymes were prescribed for 77.8 %. Population-level average (95 % CI) rates of decline in ppFEV1 among the pancreatic insufficient population was -1.5 per year (-1.8; -1.2) for ages 6 to <11 years, -2.2 per year (-2.6; -1.8) for ages 12 to <18 years, and -1.5 per year (-1.7; -1.3) for adults. CONCLUSIONS: We describe the CFTR modulator ineligible population in the US in 2017-2022. With a growing pipeline of therapies aimed at improving CFTR function for those who cannot benefit from modulators due to ineligibility, characterization of both the size and outcomes of these populations are critical to inform optimal clinical development plans and future clinical trials.

Complications and Practice Variation in the Use of Peripherally Inserted Central Venous Catheters in People With Cystic Fibrosis: The Prospective Study of Peripherally Inserted Venous Catheters in People With Cystic Fibrosis Study.

BACKGROUND: Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are used commonly to administer antibiotics to people with cystic fibrosis (CF), but their use can be complicated by venous thrombosis and catheter occlusion. RESEARCH QUESTION: Which participant-, catheter-, and catheter management-level attributes are associated with increased risk of complications of PICCs among people with CF? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a prospective observational study of adults and children with CF who received PICCs at 10 CF care centers in the United States. The primary end point was defined as occlusion of the catheter resulting in unplanned removal, symptomatic venous thrombosis in the extremity containing the catheter, or both. Three categories of composite secondary outcomes were identified: difficult line placement, local soft tissue or skin reactions, and catheter malfunction. Data specific to the participant, catheter placement, and catheter management were collected in a centralized database. Risk factors for primary and secondary outcomes were analyzed by multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Between June 2018 and July 2021, 157 adults and 103 children older than 6 years with CF had 375 PICCs placed. Patients underwent 4,828 catheter-days of observation. Of the 375 PICCs, 334 (89%) were ≤ 4.5 F, 342 (91%) were single lumen, and 366 (98%) were placed using ultrasound guidance. The primary outcome occurred in 15 PICCs for an event rate of 3.11 per 1,000 catheter-days. No cases of catheter-related bloodstream infection occurred. Other secondary outcomes developed in 147 of 375 catheters (39%). Despite evidence of practice variation, no risk factors for the primary outcome and few risk factors for secondary outcomes were identified. INTERPRETATION: This study affirmed the safety of contemporary approaches to inserting and using PICCs in people with CF. Given the low rate of complications in this study, observations may reflect a widespread shift to selecting smaller-diameter PICCs and using ultrasound to guide their placement.

Financial impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on cystic fibrosis care: lessons for the future.

BACKGROUND: Chronic care delivery models faced unprecedented financial pressures, with a reduction of in-person visits and adoption of telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic. We sought to understand the reported financial impact of pandemic-related changes to the cystic fibrosis (CF) care model. METHODS: The U.S. CF Foundation State of Care surveys fielded in Summer 2020 (SoC1) and Spring 2021 (SoC2) included questions for CF programs on the impact of pandemic-related restrictions on overall finances, staffing, licensure, and reimbursement of telehealth services. Descriptive analyses were conducted based on program type. RESULTS: Among the 286 respondents (128 pediatric, 118 adult, 40 affiliate), the majority (62%) reported a detrimental financial impact to their CF care program in SoC1, though fewer (42%) reported detrimental impacts in SoC2. The most common reported impacts in SoC1 were redeployment of clinical staff (68%), furloughs (52%), hiring freezes (51%), decreases in salaries (34%), or layoffs (10%). Reports of lower reimbursement for telehealth increased from 30% to 40% from SoC1 to SoC2. Projecting towards the future, only a minority (17%) of program directors in SoC2 felt that financial support would remain below pre-pandemic levels. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in financial strain on the CF care model, including challenges with reimbursement for telehealth services and reductions in staffing due to institutional changes. Planning for the future of CF care model needs to address these short-term impacts, particularly to ensure a lack of interruption in high-quality multi-disciplinary care.

Impact of Socioeconomic Position on Access to the U.S. Lung Transplant Waiting List in a Matched Cystic Fibrosis Cohort.

Rationale: Referrals for lung transplant and transplant rates in the United States are lower than in Canada for patients with advanced cystic fibrosis (CF) lung disease. Further study of factors limiting access are needed to optimize referral and transplant for this population.Objectives: To determine the effect of socioeconomic position, while accounting for disease severity, on the likelihood of wait-listing for lung transplant in the United States.Methods: A case-control study of 3,110 patients (1,555 wait-listed, 1,555 never wait-listed) in the linked CF Foundation Patient Registry/Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients was performed with 1:1 matching for age, forced expiratory volume in 1 second, and year. Logistic regression was performed with univariate and multivariate analyses accounting for eight clinical factors (sex, oxygen use, body mass index, hemoptysis, forced vital capacity, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and i.v. antibiotic days) and six socioeconomic factors (race, marital status, education, health insurance, median zip code income, and distance to transplant program). The CF Health Score and Socioeconomic Barrier Score were created based on summation of variables. Interactions between scores were calculated.Results: We found an inverse relationship between the probability of wait-listing and CF Health Score and Socioeconomic Barrier Score. As the CF Health Score decreased (less healthy), the probability of wait-listing increased by 69.3% from a score of 7 to 2. As the Socioeconomic Barrier Score decreased (fewer barriers), the probability of wait-listing increased by 31.7% from a score of ≥5 to 1). Regardless of illness severity, socioeconomic barriers presented an impediment to wait-listing. Individuals with higher Socioeconomic Barrier Scores accessed transplant about half as often as those with lower scores at the same level of medical severity. Analysis of interactions demonstrated a higher probability of wait-listing for individuals with moderate health severity and fewer social barriers compared with sicker individuals with more socioeconomic barriers.Conclusions: Accrual of socioeconomic barriers limits access to lung transplant irrespective of disease severity, a finding of substantial concern for patients with CF and for transplant providers. Future interventions can focus on this at-risk population early in the disease course.

Rapid lung function decline in adults with early-stage cystic fibrosis lung disease.

RATIONALE: The prevalence of adults living with cystic fibrosis (CF) who have early-stage lung disease is increasing. OBJECTIVES: Describe the prevalence and evaluate spirometric risk factors associated with the subgroup of patients with early-stage lung disease and FEV1 decline of ≥5% predicted/year. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of patients ≥18 years with FEV1% predicted ≥80% included in the US CF Foundation Patient Registry from 2010-2013. Regression models were developed to estimate FEV1 rate of decline. Multivariable logistic analysis was used to assess if spirometric risk factors were associated with FEV1 decline. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: 3,029 subjects were in the study cohort. Approximately 15% of the cohort had a substantial decline in lung function ≥5% predicted/year. In multivariable models adjusted for confounders, FEV1/FVC ratio <0.8 (Odds Ratio (OR) 1.63, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.31 to 2.02) and history of FEV1% predicted variability (OR 2.35,95%CI 1.74 to 3.18) were associated with rapid lung function decline. CONCLUSIONS: Even among adults with early-stage lung disease, approximately 15% are shown to progress and experience a large decline in lung function. This reinforces the concept that lung function in early-stage CF is not normal or mild. Rather, lung function decline may be delayed, but not avoided, in these individuals. Variability in FEV1% predicted and airway obstruction as measured by FEV1/FVC ratio may identify individuals at increased risk of decline. Adults with early-stage lung disease should be followed in clinic to monitor for onset of decline.

Effect of Including Important Clinical Variables on Accuracy of the Lung Allocation Score for Cystic Fibrosis and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

Rationale: Clinical variables associated with shortened survival in patients with advanced-stage cystic fibrosis (CF) are not included in the lung allocation score (LAS).Objectives: To identify variables associated with wait-list and post-transplant mortality for CF lung transplant candidates using a novel database and to analyze the impact of including new CF-specific variables in the LAS system.Methods: A deterministic matching algorithm identified patients from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients and the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry. LAS wait-list and post-transplant survival models were recalculated using CF-specific variables. This multicenter, retrospective, population-based study of all lung transplant wait-list candidates aged 12 years or older from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2014, included 9,043 patients on the lung transplant waiting list and 6,110 lung transplant recipients between 2011 and 2014, comprising 1,020 and 677 with CF, respectively.Measurements and Main Results: Measured outcomes were changes in LAS and lung allocation rank. For CF candidates, any Burkholderia sp. (hazard ratio [HR], 2.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-6.6), 29-42 days hospitalized (HR 2.8; CI 1.3-5.9), massive hemoptysis (HR 2.1; CI 1.1-3.9), and relative drop in FEV1 ≥30% over 12 months (HR 1.7; CI 1.0-2.8) increased wait-list mortality risk; pulmonary exacerbation time 15-28 days (1.8; 1.1-2.9) increased post-transplant mortality risk. A relative drop in FEV1 ≥10% in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) candidates was associated with increased wait-list mortality risk (HR 2.6; CI 1.2-5.4). Variability in LAS score and rank increased in patients with CF. Priority for transplant increased for COPD candidates. Access did not change for other diagnosis groups.Conclusions: Adding CF-specific variables improved discrimination among wait-listed CF candidates and benefited COPD candidates.

Eradication of persistent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection in cystic fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in individuals with cystic fibrosis (CF) has increased significantly. While studies demonstrate that persistent MRSA infection in CF is associated with poor clinical outcomes, there are no randomized controlled studies informing management. METHODS: The Persistent MRSA Eradication Protocol was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study investigating a comprehensive 28-day treatment regimen with or without inhaled vancomycin for eradication of MRSA. Eligible participants had CF and documented persistent MRSA infection. All participants received oral antibiotics, topical decontamination, and environmental cleaning and were randomized to receive inhaled vancomycin or inhaled placebo. The primary outcome was the difference in MRSA eradication rates one month after completion of the treatment protocol. RESULTS: 29 participants were randomized. Four subjects in the inhaled vancomycin group required withdrawal from the study for bronchospasm before outcome data were collected and were excluded from analysis. There was no difference in the primary outcome: 2/10 (20%) of subjects in the intervention group and 3/15 (20%) in the placebo group had a MRSA negative sputum culture one month after treatment. There were no statistically significant differences in the rates of MRSA eradication at the end of treatment or three months after treatment completion. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that persistent MRSA infection is difficult to eradicate, even with multimodal antibiotics. The use of a single course of inhaled vancomycin may not lead to higher rates of MRSA eradication in individuals with CF and may be associated with bronchospasm. FUND: This trial was financially supported by the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation.

Cystic fibrosis patient registries: A valuable source for clinical research.

Cystic Fibrosis (CF) patient registries are valuable data sources for researchers studying the natural history, treatment paradigms, and long-term health outcomes of individuals with CF. In this review, we discuss the role of CF patient registries in facilitating comparative effectiveness research, particularly evaluating therapies and variation in health care delivery. We also discuss the limitations of registry-based research, particularly indication bias, as well as statistical methods that can be used to address these issues.

Standardized Treatment of Pulmonary Exacerbations (STOP) study: Physician treatment practices and outcomes for individuals with cystic fibrosis with pulmonary Exacerbations.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary Exacerbations (PEx) are associated with increased morbidity and mortality in individuals with CF. PEx management practices vary widely, and optimization through interventional trials could potentially improve outcomes. The object of this analysis was to evaluate current physician treatment practices and patient outcomes for PEx. METHODS: The Standardized Treatment of Pulmonary Exacerbations (STOP) observational study enrolled 220 participants ≥12years old admitted to the hospital for PEx at 11 U.S. CF centers. Spirometry and daily symptom scores were collected during the study. Physicians were surveyed on treatment goals and their management practices were observed. Treatment outcomes were compared to stated goals. RESULTS: The mean (SD) duration of IV antibiotic treatment was 15.9 (6.0) days. Those individuals with more severe lung disease (<50% FEV1) were treated nearly two days longer than those with >50% FEV1. Physician-reported FEV1 improvement goals were 10% (95% CI: 5%, 14%) lower for patients with 6-month baseline FEV1 ≤50% predicted compared with those with 6-month baseline FEV1 >50% predicted. There were clinically and statistically significant improvements in symptoms from the start of IV antibiotic treatment to the end of IV antibiotic treatment and 28days after the start of treatment. The mean absolute increase in FEV1 from admission was 9% predicted at end of IV antibiotic treatment, and 7% predicted at day 28. Only 39% fully recovered lost lung function, and only 65% recovered at least 90% of lost lung function. Treatment was deemed successful by 84% of clinicians, although 6-month baseline FEV1 was only recovered in 39% of PEx. CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective observational study of PEx, treatment regimens and durations showed substantial variation. A significant proportion of patients did not reach physician's treatment goals, yet treatment was deemed successful.

Preliminary comparison of normalized T1 and non-contrast perfusion MRI assessments of regional lung disease in cystic fibrosis patients.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) techniques can be used to non-invasively assess lung disease in CF patients. In this study, we compare the sensitivity of normalized T1 (nT1) and non-contrast perfusion MRI techniques to detect regional lung disease in CF patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MRI data were obtained for eight adult CF patients without overt pulmonary exacerbation (FEV1=45-127%) and six healthy volunteers on a Siemens Espree 1.5T MRI scanner. Sagittal nT1 and perfusion data were acquired for each subject's left and right lungs. A region-of-interest analysis was used to calculate mean nT1 and perfusion values in the individual lobes of the left and right lungs for each subject. RESULTS: In comparison to healthy controls, CF subjects showed a significant decrease in nT1 values in the upper lobe of the left lung as well as in the upper and anterior lobes of the right lung (p<0.001). Similar nT1 differences were observed with in the CF cohort in comparison to their respective posterior lobes (p<0.001). Pulmonary perfusion for the CF subjects was also significantly reduced in the upper lobe of the right lung (p<0.05). Significant correlations with spirometry were also observed for both nT1 (left upper lobe: p<0.01) and perfusion (left and right upper lobes (p≤0.05)). Additionally, significant correlations were observed between nT1 and perfusion in the upper lobes of the left (p=0.05) and right lungs (p=0.005). CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study confirms that both the nT1 and non-contrast perfusion MRI techniques can sensitively detect regional lung changes in patients with CF. While both imaging methods were able to detect regional lung disease, the additional nT1 reductions in the CF patients suggests that nT1 may be more sensitive to regional CF lung disease.

Impact of lung allocation score on survival in cystic fibrosis lung transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: The lung allocation score (LAS) has changed organ allocation for lung transplantation in the United States. Previous investigations of transplant recipients reported an association between high LAS and an increased risk of death after lung transplantation. We hypothesize that a high LAS predicts survival in lung transplant recipients with cystic fibrosis (CF) in the United Network for Organ Sharing Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database. METHODS: A cohort study was conducted of 1,437 U.S. adult lung transplant recipients with CF from May 1, 2005, through December 31, 2012. The cohort was divided into a high-risk group and a low-risk group based on LAS. Survival data were examined using Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazard models to compare survival. The primary outcome was adjusted survival at 1 year after lung transplantation. RESULTS: The high-risk group of 318 patients with a median LAS of 69.6 (interquartile range 56.3-87.2) was compared with a low-risk group of 1,119 patients with a median LAS of 38.8 (interquartile range 36.3-42.3). Patients in the high-risk group had a 41% increased relative risk of cumulative mortality at 1 year after transplantation compared with the low-risk group (16.1% vs 12.0%). After adjustment for known predictors of mortality, the risk of death at 1 year after transplantation remained elevated (hazard ratio = 1.41; 95% confidence interval = 1.00-2.01). The high-risk group had worse survival at 90 days and 2 years after lung transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: High LAS are associated with worse survival in lung transplant recipients with CF.

Rate of Uptake of Ivacaftor Use after U.S. Food and Drug Administration Approval among Patients Enrolled in the U.S. Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry.

RATIONALE: Chronic cystic fibrosis (CF) therapies have variable rates of prescribed use, and therapies are rarely prescribed to more than 80% of eligible patients. Ivacaftor was approved in the United States in January 2012 for patients ages 6 years and older with a G551D mutation in their CF gene. OBJECTIVES: To examine the rate of uptake and patterns of documented ivacaftor use among U.S. patients with CF during the first year after approval, to compare eligible patients with and without reported use, and to describe characteristics of early adopters of ivacaftor use. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of patients in the U.S. Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry in 2012 with at least one encounter in which ivacaftor use was documented. Ivacaftor-eligible patients were defined as any individual 6 years of age or older with a G551D mutation. We performed bivariate and multivariate regression analyses, stratified by age group, to compare clinical and demographic characteristics of (1) eligible patients with and without documented ivacaftor use in 2012 and (2) early (February-June) versus late (July-December) adopters in 2012. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 1,087 patients with CF with G551D mutations were in the U.S. Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry in 2012. By June 2012, 64% of eligible patients had documented ivacaftor use, which increased to 81% by the end of 2012. Among eligible patients younger than 18 years of age, 85% were prescribed ivacaftor, with significantly lower odds among those with higher BMI percentile, fewer clinical encounters in 2011, and later age at diagnosis. Among eligible patients age 18 years or older, 79% were prescribed ivacaftor, with significantly lower odds in nonwhite patients and those with later age at diagnosis. Documented prescriptions of ivacaftor also varied by state of residence, with a range of 42-100% of eligible patients across states. The only association with early adoption of ivacaftor in 2012 was a decreased likelihood in adults with fewer than four encounters in 2011. CONCLUSIONS: Uptake of ivacaftor use among eligible patients in the United States was rapid, with the majority of use initiated within 4 months of regulatory approval. Differences in ivacaftor prescriptions appear to be related to patient age, older age at diagnosis, and less frequent clinical encounters. Nutritional status also appears to play a role in children, and race seems to have an association in adults.

Utilization of antibiotics for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection in cystic fibrosis.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to characterize the utilization of antibiotics for chronic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients with acute pulmonary exacerbations (PEx). METHODS: An anonymous national cross-sectional survey of CF Foundation accredited care programs was performed using an electronic survey tool. RESULTS: Fifty-eight percent (152/261) CF Foundation accredited programs completed the survey. Ninety-eight percent (149/152) of respondents reported using antibiotics (oral or intravenous) against MRSA. Variability exists in the use of antibiotics amongst the programs and in the dosages utilized. For oral outpatient treatment, sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim was the most commonly utilized antibiotic by both pediatric (109/287, 38%) and adult (99/295, 34%) respondents, of which, ten percent of reported to use it in combination with rifampin. For inpatient treatment, linezolid (both intravenous (IV) and oral) was most commonly utilized in both pediatric (IV 35/224, 16%; oral 41/224, 18%), and adult (IV 44/235, 19%; oral 38/235, 16%) respondents for inpatient treatment. IV vancomycin was the second most commonly utilized antibiotic by pediatric (70/224, 31%) and adult (71/235, 30%) respondents. Most respondents reported dose titration to achieve a vancomycin trough level of 15-20 mg/L (150/179, 84%). Topical or inhaled antibiotic utilization was reported to be an uncommon practice with approximately 70% of pediatric and adult respondents reporting to use them either rarely or never. The concomitant use of anti-MRSA and anti-pseudomonal antibiotics was common with 96% of pediatric and 99% of adult respondents answering in the affirmative. CONCLUSION: We conclude that anti-MRSA antibiotics are utilized via various dosage regimens by a majority of CF Foundation accredited care programs for the treatment of chronic MRSA in PEx, and there is no consensus on the best treatment approach.

Association between the introduction of a new cystic fibrosis inhaled antibiotic class and change in prevalence of patients receiving multiple inhaled antibiotic classes.

BACKGROUND: In 2010, aztreonam for inhalation solution joined aminoglycosides and colistimethate as a new cystic fibrosis (CF) chronic inhaled antimicrobial therapy. We studied how the introduction of this new inhaled antibiotic class changed the management of US CF patients. METHODS: The use of inhaled aminoglycosides, colistimethate, and aztreonam among patients followed in the CF Foundation Patient Registry was analyzed by age group, lung disease stage, and microbiologic status both annually, and at individual visits between 2009 and 2012. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of inhaled antibiotic use did not change during the period, but the prevalence of annual and any visit treatment with >1 inhaled antibiotic class more than doubled. Adults, those with advanced lung disease, and those with >1 Pseudomonas aeruginosa respiratory culture were more likely to receive >1 antibiotic class. CONCLUSIONS: Inhaled antibiotic management of US CF patients has dramatically changed in association with the introduction of a third inhaled antibiotic class.

Antibiotic management of lung infections in cystic fibrosis. I. The microbiome, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, gram-negative bacteria, and multiple infections.

Despite significant advances in treatment strategies targeting the underlying defect in cystic fibrosis (CF), airway infection remains an important cause of lung disease. In this two-part series, we review recent evidence related to the complexity of CF airway infection, explore data suggesting the relevance of individual microbial species, and discuss current and future treatment options. In Part I, the evidence with respect to the spectrum of bacteria present in the CF airway, known as the lung microbiome is discussed. Subsequently, the current approach to treat methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, gram-negative bacteria, as well as multiple coinfections is reviewed. Newer molecular techniques have demonstrated that the airway microbiome consists of a large number of microbes, and the balance between microbes, rather than the mere presence of a single species, may be relevant for disease pathophysiology. A better understanding of this complex environment could help define optimal treatment regimens that target pathogens without affecting others. Although relevance of these organisms is unclear, the pathologic consequences of methicillin-resistant S. aureus infection in patients with CF have been recently determined. New strategies for eradication and treatment of both acute and chronic infections are discussed. Pseudomonas aeruginosa plays a prominent role in CF lung disease, but many other nonfermenting gram-negative bacteria are also found in the CF airway. Many new inhaled antibiotics specifically targeting P. aeruginosa have become available with the hope that they will improve the quality of life for patients. Part I concludes with a discussion of how best to treat patients with multiple coinfections.

Antibiotic management of lung infections in cystic fibrosis. II. Nontuberculous mycobacteria, anaerobic bacteria, and fungi.

Airway infections are a key component of cystic fibrosis (CF) lung disease. Whereas the approach to common pathogens such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa is guided by a significant body of evidence, other infections often pose a considerable challenge to treating physicians. In Part I of this series on the antibiotic management of difficult lung infections, we discussed bacterial organisms including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, gram-negative bacterial infections, and treatment of multiple bacterial pathogens. Here, we summarize the approach to infections with nontuberculous mycobacteria, anaerobic bacteria, and fungi. Nontuberculous mycobacteria can significantly impact the course of lung disease in patients with CF, but differentiation between colonization and infection is difficult clinically as coinfection with other micro-organisms is common. Treatment consists of different classes of antibiotics, varies in intensity, and is best guided by a team of specialized clinicians and microbiologists. The ability of anaerobic bacteria to contribute to CF lung disease is less clear, even though clinical relevance has been reported in individual patients. Anaerobes detected in CF sputum are often resistant to multiple drugs, and treatment has not yet been shown to positively affect patient outcome. Fungi have gained significant interest as potential CF pathogens. Although the role of Candida is largely unclear, there is mounting evidence that Scedosporium species and Aspergillus fumigatus, beyond the classical presentation of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis, can be relevant in patients with CF and treatment should be considered. At present, however there remains limited information on how best to select patients who could benefit from antifungal therapy.

Eradication strategy for persistent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection in individuals with cystic fibrosis--the PMEP trial: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) respiratory infection in cystic fibrosis (CF) has increased dramatically over the last decade, and is now affecting approximately 25% of patients. Epidemiologic evidence suggests that persistent infection with MRSA results in an increased rate of decline in FEV1 and shortened survival. Currently, there are no conclusive studies demonstrating an effective and safe treatment protocol for persistent MRSA respiratory infection in CF. METHODS/DESIGN: The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a 28-day course of vancomycin for inhalation in combination with oral antibiotics in eliminating MRSA from the respiratory tract of individuals with CF and persistent MRSA infection. This is a two-center, randomized, double-blind, comparator-controlled, parallel-group study with 1:1 assignment to either vancomycin for inhalation (250 mg twice a day) or taste-matched placebo for 28 days in individuals with cystic fibrosis. In addition, both groups will receive oral rifampin, a second oral antibiotic - trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) or doxycycline, protocol determined - mupirocin intranasal cream, and chlorhexidine body washes. Forty patients with persistent respiratory tract MRSA infection will be enrolled: 20 will be randomized to vancomycin for inhalation and 20 to a taste-matched placebo. The primary outcome will be the presence of MRSA in sputum respiratory tract cultures 1 month after the conclusion of treatment. Secondary outcomes include the efficacy of the intervention on: FEV1% predicted, patient reported outcomes, pulmonary exacerbations, and MRSA colony-forming units found in respiratory tract sample culture. DISCUSSION: Results of this study will provide guidance to clinicians regarding the safety and effectiveness of a targeted eradication strategy for persistent MRSA infection in CF. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01594827, received 05/07/2012) and is funded by the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation (Grants: PMEP10K1 and PMEP11K1).

Normalized T1 magnetic resonance imaging for assessment of regional lung function in adult cystic fibrosis patients--a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Cystic fibrosis (CF) patients would benefit from a safe and effective tool to detect early-stage, regional lung disease to allow for early intervention. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is a safe, non-invasive procedure capable of providing quantitative assessments of disease without ionizing radiation. We developed a rapid normalized T1 MRI technique to detect regional lung disease in early-stage CF patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Conventional multislice, pulmonary T1 relaxation time maps were obtained for 10 adult CF patients with normal spirometry and 5 healthy non-CF control subjects using a rapid Look-Locker MRI acquisition (5 seconds/imaging slice). Each lung absolute T1 map was separated into six regions of interest (ROI) by manually selecting upper, central, and lower lung regions in the left and right lungs. In order to reduce the effects of subject-to-subject variation, normalized T1 maps were calculated by dividing each pixel in the absolute T1 maps by the mean T1 time in the central lung region. The primary outcome was the differences in mean normalized T1 values in the upper lung regions between CF patients with normal spirometry and healthy volunteers. RESULTS: Normalized T1 (nT1) maps showed visibly reduced subject-to-subject variation in comparison to conventional absolute T1 maps for healthy volunteers. An ROI analysis showed that the variation in the nT1 values in all regions was ≤2% of the mean. The primary outcome, the mean (SD) of the normalized T1 values in the upper right lung regions, was significantly lower in the CF subjects [.914 (.037)] compared to the upper right lung regions of the healthy subjects [.983 (.003)] [difference of .069 (95% confidence interval .032-.105); p = .001). Similar results were seen in the upper left lung region. CONCLUSION: Rapid normalized T1 MRI relaxometry obtained in 5 seconds/imaging slice may be used to detect regional early-stage lung disease in CF patients.

Isoflurane and ketamine anesthesia have different effects on ventilatory pattern variability in rats.

We hypothesize that isoflurane and ketamine impact ventilatory pattern variability (VPV) differently. Adult Sprague-Dawley rats were recorded in a whole-body plethysmograph before, during and after deep anesthesia. VPV was quantified from 60-s epochs using a complementary set of analytic techniques that included constructing surrogate data sets that preserved the linear structure but disrupted nonlinear deterministic properties of the original data. Even though isoflurane decreased and ketamine increased respiratory rate, VPV as quantified by the coefficient of variation decreased for both anesthetics. Further, mutual information increased and sample entropy decreased and the nonlinear complexity index (NLCI) increased during anesthesia despite qualitative differences in the shape and period of the waveform. Surprisingly mutual information and sample entropy did not change in the surrogate sets constructed from isoflurane data, but in those constructed from ketamine data, mutual information increased and sample entropy decreased significantly in the surrogate segments constructed from anesthetized relative to unanesthetized epochs. These data suggest that separate mechanisms modulate linear and nonlinear variability of breathing.