Early Postoperative Femur Fracture After Uncemented Collarless Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: Characterization and Results of Treatment.

Thirty Vancouver type B periprosthetic fractures occurred within 90 days of total hip arthroplasty were identified using two institutional databases. Twenty-eight of these fractures were of a stereotyped fracture pattern consisting of a displaced fracture of the femoral neck including the lesser trochanter and a variable amount of the proximal medial femoral cortex creating a roughly triangular fragment. Time from operation until fracture was 2-88 days (mean 28). Mechanism of injury was fall from standing height in 12, no defined trauma in 11, stumble without fall in 5, and twisting motion in 2. Fracture treatment consisted of femoral revision in 24, fracture fixation in two, and nonoperative in four. Of the 24 treated with revision, 21 had healed fractures and stable revision stems.

Primary hip arthroplasty with 28-mm Metasul articulation.

This follow-up study reports on 69 patients at mean 13 years with total hip arthroplasty using 28-mm Metasul (Zimmer, Winterthur, Switzerland) metal-on-metal articulation. These results are not transferable to large-diameter head metal-on-metal articulations. Four new revisions, 3 for disassociation of the liner and 1 for mechanical loosening of the acetabulum, occurred since the previous report of mean 7.3 years. The prevalent cause of late revision is disassociation, which suggests a high frictional torque or impingement in these articulation surfaces. No revision was done for osteolysis. Overall, of the original 127 hips, 116 (91%) were known to have maintained their original components.

Hip offset in total hip arthroplasty: quantitative measurement with navigation.

BACKGROUND: Offset in THA correlates to abductor muscle function, wear, and impingement. Femoral offset after THA is not independent of the cup center of rotation (COR) so hip offset, a combination of femoral offset and change in hip COR, becomes the important measurement. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We therefore asked whether hip offset in arthritic hips would correlate with cup COR; whether offset could always be balanced within 6 mm of contralateral normal hips; and whether hip length could also be kept within 6 mm. METHODS: We compared hip offset of arthritic and contralateral normal hips on radiographs in 82 patients (82 hips) who had THA. We used computer navigation in all patients with the aim of reconstructing the hip offset and to compare hip offset change to the quantitative change of the hip COR. RESULTS: The preoperative radiographic change to equalize the offset ranged from -12 to +21 mm (mean, 1.5); postoperatively the change was 1.4 ± 6.4 mm and was within ± 6 mm in 78 of 82 hips. As COR displaced superiorly from 3 to 6+ mm the offset had to be substantially increased. Only with COR 0-3 mm superior and 0-5 mm medial was offset always within 5 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Hip offset reconstruction was directly related to the position of the hip COR, and navigation allowed quantitative control of offset and hip length.

Failure of the Durom Metasul acetabular component.

UNLABELLED: Large-diameter metal-on-metal articulations reportedly provide better stability and range of motion than smaller diameter bearings. We therefore asked whether a large-diameter (44- to 50-mm) metal-on-metal articulation (Durom) would eliminate dislocation and provide similar functional scores and clinical and radiographic failure rates as those with 28-mm articulation. We prospectively followed 181 patients (207 hips) who had a large-diameter articulation implanted between May 2006 and November 2007. We compared these patients with a historical control of 54 patients who had a small-diameter (28-mm Metasul) articulation. All patients had a Harris hip score and a self-assessment of outcome and radiographic followup. The minimum followup was 1 year (mean, 1.6 years; range, 1-2 years). During the followup period, we performed revisions on 29 patients (30 hips [15%]) with 21 of 29 (72%) having radiographic criteria of loosening. Thirteen retrieved cups and acetabular tissue were examined histologically. Twenty-eight of 151 unrevised patients had radiographic impending failure; 12 without revision had clinical failure. Eight patients (nine hips) had both clinical failure and impending radiographic failure. Cup inclination was 41.3 degrees +/- 5.4 degrees and anteversion was 20.2 degrees +/- 7 degrees. The revision rate and quality of clinical results were unacceptable as compared with our historical controls. We do not recommend use of the Durom implant. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Wear and range of motion of different femoral head sizes.

Femoral head sizes greater than 32 mm are more prevalent with current total hip arthroplasty. We hypothesized that linear wear rates of Durasul highly cross-linked polyethylene would not differ with different head sizes. We also compared the range of motion of the hip. Ninety-four consecutive arthroplasties in 84 patients were studied for a mean 3.6 +/- 0.7 years. There was no statistical difference in linear wear rates and annual or total penetration rates when 28-mm and 32-mm heads were compared to 38-mm and 44-mm heads. Volumetric wear was 12.4 mm(3)/y higher with bigger heads. Range of motion did not differ. Larger femoral head sizes show no evidence of an accelerated wear pattern when used with Durasul.

Outpatient total hip arthroplasty.

Patients younger than 65 years were studied to determine what percentage of patients would enroll in a study of outpatient total hip arthroplasty, its safety, and benefits of the program. Of 192 eligible patients, 69 (36%) enrolled, and 53 (77%) of these went home the same day of surgery. Of 53, 44 maintained a diary for the first 3, weeks and 52 completed a satisfaction questionnaire at 6 weeks. Patients were followed for 6 months for occurrence of complications. There were no medical readmissions. Of 52 patients who completed a 6 week questionnaire, 50 (96%) were satisfied with the decision to have outpatient total hip arthroplasty. There were no objective physical benefits identified. This study reports the distribution of acceptance and completion of same day discharge for patients with total hip arthroplasty in a metropolitan population. It confirms safety in selected patients.

A comparison of surgeon estimation and computed tomographic measurement of femoral component anteversion in cementless total hip arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The intraoperative estimation of the anteversion of the femoral component of a total hip arthroplasty is generally made by the surgeon's visual assessment of the stem position relative to the condylar plane of the femur. Although the generally accepted range of intended anteversion is between 10 degrees and 20 degrees, we suspected that achieving this range of anteversion consistently during cementless implantation of the femoral component was more difficult than previously thought. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated the accuracy of femoral component anteversion in 109 consecutive total hip arthroplasties (ninety-nine patients), in which we implanted the femoral component without cement. In all hips, we measured femoral stem anteversion postoperatively with three-dimensional computed tomography reconstruction of the femur, using both the distal femoral epicondyles and the posterior femoral condyles to determine the femoral diaphyseal plane. The bias and precision of the measurements were calculated. RESULTS: The surgeon's estimate of femoral stem anteversion was a mean (and standard deviation) of 9.6 degrees +/- 7.2 degrees (range, -8 degrees to 28 degrees). The anteversion of the stem measured by computed tomography was a mean of 10.2 degrees +/- 7.5 degrees (range, -8.6 degrees to 27.1 degrees) (p = 0.324). The correlation coefficient between the surgeon's estimate and the computed tomographic measurement was 0.688; the intraclass coefficient was 0.801. Anteversion measured by computed tomography found that forty-nine stems (45%) were between 10 degrees and 20 degrees of anteversion; forty-three stems (39%) were between 0 degree and 9 degrees of femoral anteversion; eight stems (7%) were in anteversion of >20 degrees; and nine stems (8%) were in retroversion. CONCLUSIONS: The surgeon's estimation of the anteversion of the cementless femoral stem has poor precision and is often not within the intended range of 10 degrees to 20 degrees of anteversion. The implications of this finding increase the importance of achieving a safe range of motion by evaluating the combined anteversion of the stem and the cup.

Combined anteversion technique for total hip arthroplasty.

UNLABELLED: Combined cup and stem anteversion in THA based on femoral anteversion has been suggested as a method to compensate for abnormal femoral anteversion. We investigated the combined anteversion technique using computer navigation. In 47 THAs, the surgeon first estimated the femoral broach anteversion and validated the position by computer navigation. The broach was then measured with navigation. The navigation screen was blocked while the surgeon estimated the anteversion of the broach. This provided two estimates of stem anteversion. The navigated stem anteversion was validated by postoperative CT scans. All cups were implanted using navigation alone. We determined precision (the reproducibility) and bias (how close the average test number is to the true value) of the stem position. Comparing the surgeon estimate to navigation anteversion, the precision of the surgeon was 16.8 degrees and bias was 0.2 degrees ; comparing the navigation of the stem to postoperative CT anteversion, the precision was 4.8 degrees and bias was 0.2 degrees , meaning navigation is accurate. Combined anteversion by postoperative CT scan was 37.6 degrees +/- 7 degrees (standard deviation) (range, 19 degrees -50 degrees ). The combined anteversion with computer navigation was within the safe zone of 25 degrees to 50 degrees for 45 of 47 (96%) hips. Femoral stem anteversion had a wide variability. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty does equally well in osteonecrosis and osteoarthritis.

Many previous reports suggest total hip arthroplasty performs suboptimally in young patients with osteonecrosis. We retrospectively compared the performance of metal-on-metal articulation in a select group of 107 patients with 112 hips (98 uncemented and 14 cemented stems) 60 years of age or younger with either osteonecrosis (27 patients, 30 hips) or primary osteoarthritis (80 patients, 82 hips). We evaluated all patients with patient-generated Harris hip score forms and serial radiographs. Five mechanical complications were caused by impingement, two with pain, two dislocations, and one liner dissociation. At a minimum followup of 2.2 years (mean, 5.5 years; range, 2.2-11.7 years), we observed no osteolysis or aseptic loosening in the osteonecrosis group, whereas one osteoarthritic hip had cup revision for loosening (none showed evidence of osteolysis). None of the stems were loose. Patients with osteonecrosis or primary osteoarthritis were similar in clinical and radiographic performance. The patients with metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty for osteonecrosis had no revisions for aseptic loosening, but did have one liner change in a cup for painful impingement.