RESUMO
PURPOSE: This investigation examined the trends for gender-based advancement in academic surgery by performing a comparative analysis of the rate of change in the percentage of medical students, surgery residents, and full professors of surgery who are women. METHODS: All available Women in Medicine Annual Reports were obtained from the American Association of Medical Colleges (AAMC). The gender compositions of medical graduates, surgery residents, and full professors were plotted. Binomial and linear trendlines were calculated to estimate the year when 50% of surgery full professors would be women. Additionally, the percentage distribution of men and women at each professorial rank was determined from 1995 to 2009 using these reports to demonstrate the rate of academic advancement of each gender. RESULTS: The slope of the line of increase for women full professors is significantly less than for female medical students and for female general surgery residents (0.36, compared with 0.75 and 0.99, respectively). This predicts that the earliest time that females will account for 50% of full professors in surgery is the year 2096. When comparing women and men in academic ranks, we find that women are much less likely than men to be full professors. CONCLUSIONS: The percentage of full professors in surgery who are women is increasing at a rate disproportionately slower than the increases in female medical students and surgery residents. The rates of increase in female medical students and surgery residents are similar. The disproportionately slow rate of increase in the number of female full professors suggests that multiple factors may be responsible for this discrepancy.
Assuntos
Docentes de Medicina/estatística & dados numéricos , Cirurgia Geral , Médicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Médicas/tendências , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Distribuição por Sexo , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados UnidosRESUMO
Experience with carotid artery stenting (CAS) as an alternative to carotid endarterectomy (CE) for management of carotid stenosis continues to evolve. We report the case of a 64-year-old man who was treated with bilateral CAS for stenoses, which developed 7 years following thyroidectomy, neck dissection, and radiotherapy. Although long considered an ideal alternative to CE in this clinical setting, CAS in this case was complicated by multiple episodes of recurrent stenosis in his left carotid, managed by balloon angioplasty. Severe, early recurrence in his right carotid associated with a type III stent fracture was managed by CE. Close surveillance and intervention prevented neurologic morbidity. This case, combined with emerging published experience, argues for reappraisal of the general consensus that CAS is an ideal alternative to CE for radiotherapy-associated carotid stenoses.