RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Parathyroid cancers are rare and difficult to distinguish from benign parathyroid tumours. Prediction of malignancy often relies on intraoperative assessment of invasion. Standard histology is also inadequate; especially in the absence of local invasion, lymph nodal disease and metastasis. The aim of this project was to systematically review published literature on potential bio-markers used for the diagnosis of parathyroid cancer. METHODS: Pubmed, Web of Science and Medline databases were searched. Inclusion criteria included English language papers published after 1985 and reporting on biomarkers in human studies of parathyroid cancer and benign disease. RESULTS: 118 relevant papers were appraised; all were observational studies. At least 2 papers studied 8 serum, 4 urine and 27 tissue biomarkers on the diagnosis of parathyroid cancer. Of these, 5 serum and 13 tissue markers have been demonstrated in at least one study to be statistically different in benign and malignant disease. We present a synthesis of data for each biomarker and measures of diagnostic accuracy where possible. CONCLUSIONS: Consideration should be given to the use of a panel of biomarkers to review patients with suspected parathyroid cancer. A profile including serum calcium and PTH levels and tissue expression of APC, Parafibromin, PGP9.5, Galectin 3 and Ki67 is proposed. Systematic Review Registration Number - CRD42019127833.
Assuntos
Neoplasias das Paratireoides , Lesões Pré-Cancerosas , Biomarcadores , Biomarcadores Tumorais , Humanos , Imuno-Histoquímica , Neoplasias das Paratireoides/diagnóstico , Proteínas Supressoras de TumorRESUMO
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Multiple myeloma is a haematological malignancy of differentiated B lymphocytes, known as plasma cells. The disease is common in the UK (incidence of 9 cases per 100â000 people) and the most frequent presentation is bone pain caused by skeletal damage. Patients with myeloma also experience neuropathic pain induced by chemotherapy. The management of pain in multiple myeloma is frequently demanding and often sub-optimally addressed. This review seeks to summarize a rational approach to the management of pain experienced by multiple myeloma patients. RECENT FINDINGS: Bone pain has a dramatic detrimental impact on a patient's physical capacity, and therefore, quality of life. Various mechanisms of bone pain have been elucidated; however, neuropathic bone pain in multiple myeloma is not completely understood. Potential mechanisms for this phenomenon; namely increased intraosseous pressure and the acidity of the bone marrow in the disease state will be interrogated. The current analgesic pathways used to treat multiple myeloma bone pain and new advances in therapies that may confer future benefit to patients will briefly be reviewed. SUMMARY: Holistic care and the provision of an array of pain relief methods is required to achieve effective pain control in multiple myeloma bone pain and requires a concerted effort from the healthcare team to be realized.