RESUMO
Although the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has created havoc with the U.S healthcare system and physicians, the financial and contractual implications for physicians are now beginning to come to the forefront. Financial assistance from the federal government has mainly been received by hospitals, which have borne the brunt of the COVID-19 illness. Some physician groups have, or are, receiving assistance through a few programs, although the accelerated and advance payments have been suspended. Employed surgeons are now being furloughed, terminated, or persuaded to agree to a significant cut in pay, forego bonuses, or take leave without pay as healthcare systems and some physician groups have started to experience the consequences of halting elective procedures. Newly hired surgeons might be forced in a few cases to agree to delays in starting their employment, new amendments, changes in employment status, and other terms for fear of losing their employment. In the present report, we have explained some agreement terminology and options available to allow physicians to understand the terms of their employment agreement and make their decisions after consulting with an expert healthcare attorney.
Assuntos
COVID-19/economia , Emprego/economia , Financiamento Governamental/economia , Renda , Reembolso de Seguro de Saúde/economia , Cirurgiões/economia , Assistência Ambulatorial/economia , COVID-19/legislação & jurisprudência , Emprego/legislação & jurisprudência , Financiamento Governamental/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , Reembolso de Seguro de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Formulação de Políticas , Administração da Prática Médica/economia , Cirurgiões/legislação & jurisprudência , Telemedicina/economia , Fatores de Tempo , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the surgical risks and long-term survival in alcoholic patients undergoing resection for non-small-cell lung cancer. METHODS: Nineteen resected patients comprising the alcoholic group were identified by either a Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-IV diagnosis of alcohol dependence/abuse, or an alcohol consumption of 60 oz/d or more. Alcoholic patients were compared with 37 nonalcoholic patients undergoing resection. RESULTS: Alcoholic patients had an increase in major infectious complications (37% [7 of 19] versus 5% [2 of 37], P = 0.005), respiratory failure (42% [8 of 19] versus 5% [2 of 37], P =0.001), and costs ($49,526 +/- $17,525 versus $18,385 +/- $3,260, P = 0.01). Alcohol abuse was the best predictor of perioperative respiratory and infectious complications (P = 0.002, B = 2.86, odds ratio = 17.5). Stage of disease (P = 0.03, B = 1.19, hazard ratio = 3.29) was a better predictor of long-term survival. CONCLUSIONS: Alcohol abuse significantly increases the risk and cost of lung cancer resection. For alcoholic patients surviving the perioperative period, long-term survival appears similar to non-alcohol-abusing patients.