A significant role for anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies and antibody-mediated rejection in the biopsy-for-cause population.

The role of anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies and antibody-mediated rejection is well known, but our comprehension and the preventive measures we take seem to be insufficient. One of the major causes of premature renal transplant loss is recepients' immunologic hyperactivity to donors' antigens. Monitoring of humoral alloreactivity gives hope for early diagnosis and adequate therapy. The goal of our analysis was the assessment of the influence of anti-HLA antibodies on the function and survival of transplants. In our study we included 60 consecutive renal transplant recipients who had a renal transplant biopsy-for-cause performed due to insufficiency. Transplant biopsies were performed between the 7th day and 12th year (median, 2 years) after transplantation. Anti-HLA antibodies were present in 20 patients (33%). The patients were divided into 2 groups according the presence of anti-HLA antibodies. In a 12-month observation, 10/20 (50%) patients in the anti-HLA(+) group returned to dialysis in contrast with 7/40 (17.5%; P = .014) in the anti-HLA(-) group. Also, 8/10 (80%) of the anti-HLA(+) patients who lost the transplant had anti-HLA Abs class II and only 2/10 (20%) had anti-HLA Abs class I. Anti-HLA antibodies were specific to a donor (donor-specific antibodies [DSA]) in 8/10 (80%) of the patients who lost the transplant. Anti-HLA antibodies appeared de novo in 50% of patients who lost the transplant. Nonadherence was suspected in 50% of patients. Acute humoral rejection occurred in 1 patient. Also, 8/10 (90%) developed chronic active humoral rejection. Our study revealed that graft loss in the renal transplant biopsy-for-cause population with the presence of anti-HLA Abs during a 12-month observation reached 50%. Nonadherence in these patients was very high and amounted to 50%. Monitoring of renal transplant recipients and individualization of therapy considering humoral activity should prolong renal graft survival.

Non-HLA antibodies: angiotensin II type 1 receptor (anti-AT1R) and endothelin-1 type A receptor (anti-ETAR) are associated with renal allograft injury and graft loss.

INTRODUCTION: Non-HLA antibodies specific for angiotensin II type 1 receptor (anti-AT1R) and endothelin-1 type A receptor (anti-ETAR) of vascular cells activate signaling pathways leading to cell proliferation and vascular injury. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of non-HLA antibodies on kidney allograft morphology and function in patients who underwent a kidney biopsy due to renal function impairment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 65 consecutive renal transplant patients who were evaluated for the presence of non-HLA and anti-HLA antibodies at the time of transplant biopsy. Results of pre-transplant CDC cross-match were negative. A kidney allograft biopsy was performed between 6 days and 13 years (42 ± 49 months) after transplantation, and the diagnosis was made on the basis of the Banff criteria. The level >9 U/L of anti-AT1R and anti-ETAR antibodies was considered high. RESULTS: A high level of non-HLA antibodies (anti-AT1R and/or anti-ETAR) was found in 7 (10.7%) of 65 patients at the time of biopsy. Graft loss in the non-HLA-positive patients was significantly higher (71% in non-HLA-positive cases after 7.8 ± 2.6 months vs 11% after 6 months in non-HLA-negative cases [P = .00099]). In these non-HLA-positive patients, the mean anti-AT1R level was 15.3 ± 9.4 U/L and the mean anti-ETAR level was 13.8 ± 8.6 U/L. In only 2 of these patients were anti-HLA antibodies additionally detected: anti-class I in 1 and anti-class II in both patients. The mean serum creatinine level was 2.34 ± 0.6 mg/dL at the time of biopsy. Results of an early biopsy revealed acute vascular rejection (Banff grade IIB). Chronic allograft injury was found (grading cg1-3, cv1-2, ci1-2, ct1-2) in the remaining 6 patients. C4d was present in 3 of 7 patients. CONCLUSIONS: High levels of anti-AT1R and/or anti-ETAR antibodies were associated with morphological and functional allograft injury and graft loss in these study patients. Non-HLA antibodies can be helpful in assessing the risk of graft failure.

The impact of de novo donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies on 5-year renal transplant outcome.

Numerous studies have shown that circulating donor-specific antibodies targeting human leukocyte antigen (HLA) are associated with accelerated renal transplant failure, but many patients with these antibodies have good graft function. The aim of our study was to investigate the long-term graft function and survival in patients with de novo post-transplant donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA). Our prospective study included 78 consecutive recipients with a negative crossmatch before transplantation. Recipient serum samples were assayed for DSA in week 2 and 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 months after transplantation using a complement-dependent lymphocytotoxic technique with donor lymphocytes. Additionally, patients with DSA and stable renal function in the first year were tested with a more sensitive flow-panel-reactive antibody. DSA were present in 34 (44%) of our patients during the first 12 months after transplantation. Biopsy-proved acute rejection occurred in 11 DSA-positive and 10 DSA-negative patients. Seven DSA-positive patients had antibody-mediated rejection and no DSA-negative ones developed humoral rejection. The serum creatinine level in DSA-positive patients was significantly higher (2.48 vs 1.43 mg/dL) in year 5. The 13 (38%) DSA-positive patients with good graft function in month 12 were stable during a 5-year follow-up: their serum creatinine was 1.46 ± 0.4 in year 1 and 1.56 ± 0.4 mg/dL in year 5 and nobody lost their allograft. One- and 5- year graft survivals were appropriately 85% and 59% in DSA-positive patients compared to 93% and 93% in DSA-negative patients. To sum up, post-transplant DSA had a significant influence on kidney function and graft survival but in 38% of patients the presence of DSA did not decrease a 5-year renal function. A good renal allograft function in the presence of DSA in the first year after transplantation and cessation of their production in the subsequent years may be a good prognostic marker for a long-term allograft function and survival.

Using metabolomics to monitor kidney transplantation patients by means of clustering to spot anomalous patient behavior.

BACKGROUND: NMR spectroscopy-based metabolomics is a system approach used to investigate the metabolic profile of biological fluids with multivariate data analysis tools. The aim of this study was to examine the kidney graft recovery process noninvasively through the examinations of urine samples using (1)H NMR spectroscopy combined with chemometric tools. METHODS: Urine samples were treated as the source of metabolites reflecting the pathological and clinical conditions of patients with transplanted kidneys. We observed 15 subjects (9 males and 6 females) during the graft recovery process and initial days thereafter. The patients provided at least 9 samples each, applying advanced statistical methods of analysis: Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Partial Least Square Discriminant Analysis PLS-DA). RESULTS: The PCA model (for all subjects exp. var. PC1 13.96% and PC2 9.88%) allowed us to clearly designate 3 stages of recovery: initially the kidney is not working; in the second stage, it regains functions, and the third stage includes follow-up during hospitalization. PCA analysis of a single patient follows graft recovery based on biochemical (metabolites) information, assigning the appropriate recuperation stage. CONCLUSIONS: NMR spectroscopy together with chemometric analysis allow monitoring of kidney graft recovery to identify patients who are not progressing within the normal range.