Effects of implementing a vaccination tool in the electronic medical record on vaccination coverage of patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The rising incidence of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMID) requires innovative management strategies, including effective vaccination. We aimed to assess the impact of an electronic medical record (EMR)-integrated vaccination tool on vaccination coverage among patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), rheumatological and dermatological conditions. METHODS: A prospective observational study compared vaccination coverage before (2018) and after (2021) implementing the module. Vaccination data for influenza, pneumococcus, hepatitis B and tetanus, and potential predictors were collected from 1430 IMID patients (44.9% male, median age (interquartile range [IQR]) 54 (40-66) years, 789 with IBD, 604 with rheumatological and 37 with dermatological conditions). Data were analysed using McNemar, chi-square tests and multinominal logistic regression. RESULTS: Significant increases in pneumococcus (56.6% to 73.1%, p < .001) and hepatitis B vaccination (62.2% to 75.9%, p < .001) were observed. Influenza vaccination rates increased among IBD (76.2% to 80.5%, p = .006) but remained stable overall (73.1% to 73.2%, p = 1.000). Tetanus vaccination rates decreased (71.5% to 55.0%, p < .001). The proportion of fully vaccinated patients (against influenza in the past year for patients >50 years old and/or under immunosuppressive therapy, against pneumococcus in the past 5 years for patients >65 years old and/or under immunosuppressive therapy and additionally against hepatitis B for IBD patients) rose from 41.3% to 54.8% (p < .001 all using McNemar). Factors associated with vaccinations included age, immunosuppressive therapy and education level. CONCLUSIONS: Increased vaccination coverage was measured after implementing the vaccination tool. The COVID19 pandemic and the 2018 measurement might have increased vaccination awareness. Education of patients and healthcare professionals remains crucial.

Effects of Corticosteroid Treatment and Antigen Avoidance in a Large Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis Cohort: A Single-Centre Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Although the third most frequent interstitial lung disease, hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) remains an enigmatic disease without clear diagnostic and therapeutic guidelines. We assessed the effect of the commonly used therapeutic interventions (i.e. exposure avoidance and corticosteroid treatment) in an HP cohort. METHODS: We collected clinical data of all HP patients followed at our centre between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2016. HP patients were stratified according to the presence of fibrosis on chest CT. Survival was analysed using the multivariate Cox proportional hazards model. Forced vital capacity (percent predicted, FVC%) and diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (percent predicted, DLCO%) evolution were analysed using linear mixed-effect models. RESULTS: Two hundred and two HP patients were identified: 93 non-fibrotic HP (nfHP) and 109 fibrotic HP (fHP), experiencing a monthly FVC% decline before treatment of 0.93% and 0.56%, respectively. While nfHP had an excellent survival, fHP patients experienced a median survival of 9.2 years. Corticosteroid treatment and exposure avoidance did not result in survival differences. Although nfHP patients showed FVC% and DLCO% increase after corticosteroid initiation, no therapeutic effect was seen in fHP patients. FVC% and DLCO% increased in nfHP patients after exposure avoidance, while a positive numerical trend was seen for FVC% after exposure avoidance in fHP patients (p = 0.15). CONCLUSIONS: nfHP patients experienced an excellent survival with good therapeutic effect on pulmonary function tests with both corticosteroid initiation as well as antigen avoidance. In contrast, fHP patients experienced a dismal prognosis (median survival of 9.2 years) without any therapeutic effect of corticosteroid treatment. Whether antigen avoidance is useful in fHP patients is still unclear.

Clinical behaviour of patients exposed to organic dust and diagnosed with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Although idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) patients experience a worse survival compared with chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (CHP), organic dust exposure is a known risk factor for both IPF and CHP. METHODS: We divided patients diagnosed with IPF, based on their exposure to moulds/birds (absent: group A; present: group B). We retrospectively compared pulmonary function and survival between groups A and B, and a separate CHP cohort (group C). RESULTS: A total of 293 patients were included (group A: n = 171, group B: n = 73, group C: n = 49). Demographics and baseline pulmonary function did not differ between groups A and B, but significant differences were seen between groups B and C. Median survival of group B was 84 months, which was longer than group A (43 months, P = 0.002), but lower than group C (157 months, P = 0.04), in both univariate and multivariate analyses. Antifibrotic treatment resulted in a better outcome in group A (hazard ratio (HR): 0.44) and group B (HR: 0.12) without interaction between exposure and antifibrotic use (P = 0.20). Forced vital capacity (FVC) decline was not associated with mould/bird exposure in this cohort. CONCLUSION: Group B patients experienced a better outcome compared with (non-exposed) IPF patients, although worse compared with CHP patients. Antifibrotic treatment in group B resulted in a similar beneficial effect compared with group A. Further research is needed to ascertain the diagnostic designation in this exposed usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) patient group without other CHP features.

CYFRA 21.1 in bronchoalveolar lavage of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis patients.

AIM: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is one of the most aggressive forms of interstitial lung diseases, however, clinically relevant biomarkers of diagnosis or prognosis are lacking. In this study, we investigated the levels of a fragment of Cytokeratin 19 (CYFRA 21.1) in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) of IPF patients at time of diagnosis. We further evaluated associations between CYFRA 21.1, pulmonary function evolution, mortality, and BAL cell count. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using the Lumipulse® G1200, CYFRA 21.1 was measured in BAL samples of 81 IPF patients and 9 controls. Based upon the median detected level (1.2 ng/mL) of CYFRA 21.1 in IPF patients, they were subdivided into an IPF CYFRA 21.1 low group (≤ 1.2 ng/mL) and IPF CYFRA 21.1 high group (> 1.2 ng/mL). RESULTS: The CYFRA 21.1 levels were significantly higher in BAL of IPF patients compared to controls (P = .0015).Worse survival was observed, but no changes in pulmonary function, for IPF patients with high CYFRA 21.1 levels versus patients with low CYFRA 21.1 levels [P = .030, HR: 0.41, (0.18-0.92)[. The CYFRA 21.1 level correlated with both neutrophils (%: R = 0.60, P < .0001; #: R = 0.47, P < .0001) and eosinophils (%: R = 0.38, P = .0005; #: R = 0.30, P < .0072). CONCLUSIONS: CYFRA 21.1 is increased in BAL of IPF patients. IPF patients with a high CYFRA 21.1 concentration have a worse survival. CYFRA 21.1 levels correlate with eosinophils and neutrophils. Further studies are warranted in using CYFRA 21.1 as a biomarker for IPF prognosis.