Type 3 long QT syndrome: Is the effectiveness of treatment with beta-blockers population-specific?

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of beta-blocker treatment in type 3 long QT syndrome (LQT3) remains debated. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that beta-blocker use is associated with cardiac events (CEs) in a French cohort of LQT3 patients. METHODS: All patients with a likely pathogenic/pathogenic variant in the SCN5A gene (linked to LQT3) were included and followed-up. Documented ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation, torsades de pointes, aborted cardiac arrest, sudden death, and appropriate shocks were considered as severe cardiac events (SCEs). CEs also included syncope. RESULTS: We included 147 patients from 54 families carrying 23 variants. Six of the patients developed symptoms before the age of 1 year and were analyzed separately. The 141 remaining patients (52.5% male; median age at diagnosis 24.0 years) were followed-up for a median of 11 years. The probabilities of a CE and an SCE from birth to the age of 40 were 20.5% and 9.9%, respectively. QTc prolongation (hazard ratio [HR] 1.12 [1.0-1.2]; P = .005]) and proband status (HR 4.07 [1.9-8.9]; P <.001) were independently associated with the occurrence of CEs. Proband status (HR 8.13 [1.7-38.8]; P = .009) was found to be independently associated with SCEs, whereas QTc prolongation (HR 1.11 [1.0-1.3]; P = .108) did not reach statistical significance. The cumulative probability of the age at first CE/SCE was not lower in patients treated with a beta-blocker. CONCLUSION: In agreement with the literature, proband status and lengthened QTc were associated with a higher risk of CEs. Our data do not show a protective effect of beta-blocker treatment.

Gene-specific effect of beta-adrenergic blockade on corrected QT interval in the long QT syndrome.

BACKGROUND: In the long QT syndrome (LQTS) the effects of beta-blocker treatment on prevention of cardiac events differs according to the genotype. We aimed to assess the effect of beta-blocker treatment on QT/QTc duration in Type 1 LQTS (LQT1) and Type 2 LQTS (LQT2) patients. METHODS: 24-hour digital Holter ECG were recorded before and after beta-blocking therapy initiation in LQT1 (n = 30) and LQT2 patients (n = 16). QT duration was measured on consecutive 1-minute averaged QRS-T complexes leading to up to 1440 edited QT-RR pairs for each recording. We computed subject- and treatment-specific log/log QT/RR relationships which were used to correct the QT intervals. The QT duration was also evaluated at predefined heart rates and after correction using Bazett and Fridericia coefficients. RESULTS: At baseline, individual QT/RR coefficients were higher in LQT2 than in LQT1 patients (0.53 ± 0.10 vs. 0.40 ± 0.11, P < 0.001) and QT1000 was longer in LQT2 than in LQT1 patients (521 ± 38 vs. 481 ± 39 ms, P < 0.01). Beta-blockers significantly prolonged the mean RR interval (from 827 ± 161 to 939 ± 197 ms, P < 0.0001). The individual QT/RR coefficients were not significantly modified by beta-blockers. Beta-blocker treatment was associated with a prolongation of the QT1000 interval (from 481 ± 39 to 498 ± 43 ms, P < 0.01) in LQT1 patients but with a shortening in LQT2 patients (from 521 ± 38 to 503 ± 32 ms, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The effect of beta-adrenergic blockade on QTc duration is different in LQT1 and LQT2 patients. Our data suggest that, in LQT1 patients, the well-known positive effect of beta-blockade might be associated with a prolongation of QTc duration. The mechanisms of beta-blockade protection may be different in LQT1 and in LQT2 patients.

Comparison of semiautomated and fully automated methods for QT measurement during a thorough QT/QTc study: variability and sample size considerations.

This study compares the ability of 2 semiautomated methods with a fully automated method for QT measurement to minimize the sample size required to detect a moxifloxacin effect and exclude a placebo effect in a thorough QT/QTc study. The fully automated and 1 of 2 semiautomated methods used a global QT measurement in 12 leads, whereas the other semiautomated method used a tangent method on single lead raw complexes. Mean QTcF intervals were greater when measured on a global QT electrocardiogram than on raw complexes, but the mean magnitudes of DeltaQTcF were similar for all methods. The 3 methods detected a statistically significant increase in QTcF for moxifloxacin compared to placebo and were able to exclude a placebo effect on QTcF in all 62 participants. However, due to a smaller variability, the semiautomated methods allowed these detections with fewer than 20 participants, whereas the fully automated required at least 27 participants.