Chemotherapy prescribing errors: an observational study on the role of information technology and computerized physician order entry systems.

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy administration is a high-risk process. Aim of this study was to evaluate the frequency, type, preventability, as well as potential and actual severity of outpatient chemotherapy prescribing errors in an Oncology Department where electronic prescribing is used. METHODS: Up to three electronic prescriptions per patient record were selected from the clinical records of consecutive patients who received cytotoxic chemotherapy between January 2007 and December 2008. Wrong prescriptions were classified as incomplete, incorrect or inappropriate. Error preventability was classified using a four-point scale. Severity was defined according to the Healthcare Failure Mode and Effect Analysis Severity Scale. RESULTS: Eight hundred and thirty-five prescriptions were eligible. The overall error rate was 20%. Excluding systematic errors (i.e. errors due to an initially faulty implementation of chemotherapy protocols into computerized dictionaries) from the analysis, the error rate decreased to 8%. Incomplete prescriptions were the majority. Most errors were deemed definitely preventable. According to error presumptive potential for damage, 72% were classified as minor; only 3% had the potential to produce major or catastrophic injury. Sixty-eight percent were classified as near misses; adverse drug events had no or little effect on clinical outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Chemotherapy prescribing errors may arise even using electronic prescribing. Although periodic audits may be useful to detect common errors and guide corrective actions, it is crucial to get the computerized physician order entry system and set-ups correct before implementation.

Discontinuation of bevacizumab and FOLFIRI administered up to a maximum of 12 cycles as first-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective Italian study.

BACKGROUND: Bevacizumab significantly improves progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) when added to chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The hypothesis that bevacizumab discontinuation could lead to an angiogenesis flare and eventually to an accelerated tumor progression has not been confirmed in a recent large pooled analysis. Therefore the optimal duration of bevacizumab still remains undefined. PATIENTS AND METHODS: PFS and OS were retrospectively analyzed in patients with previously untreated mCRC who received bevacizumab 5 mg/Kg and standard FOLFIRI regimen (leucovorin, infusional fluorouracil and irinotecan) up to a maximum of 12 cycles. RESULTS: Data from 209 patients were collected and analyzed. The median follow-up was 24 months. Fifty-five (26.3%) patients received at least 6 administrations and 114 (54.5%) received a maximum of 12 administrations of bevacizumab. Median exposure to bevacizumab was 148 days (4.9 months). Median PFS and OS were 10.7 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 9.2-12.2 months] and 31.6 months (95% CI 25.8-37.3 months), respectively. Overall objective response rate was 49.8% (95% CI 42.9-56.6) and the disease control rate 81.8%. Approximately 65% and 30% of patients received some form of second- and third-line therapy, respectively. The toxicity profile of bevacizumab was consistent with that documented in previous trials. CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective analysis remarkably long PFS and OS were obtained with a first-line therapy duration limited to a maximum of 12 cycles. Our data does not support a decreased PFS or increased mortality after discontinuation of bevacizumab in mCRC patients.

Neurosurgical management and postoperative whole-brain radiotherapy for colorectal cancer patients with symptomatic brain metastases.

BACKGROUND: New systemic treatments for advanced colorectal cancer have conferred a survival advantage, allowing patients to reach a median survival of almost 2 years. Due to this remarkable life extension, the incidence of brain metastases, though still low, is progressively increasing over time. There is little reported data on the optimal strategy to manage brain lesions from colorectal cancer. METHODS: To explore the role of an aggressive approach to colorectal cancer brain metastases, we retrospectively collected and analyzed data from 30 patients who underwent neurosurgical resection + whole-brain radiotherapy between March 1998 and December 2006. Univariate (logrank) and multivariate (Cox's model) analyses were used to identify prognostic factors. RESULTS: Median age at the time of surgery was 66 years, median ECOG PS was 1, most patients (87%) had concomitant lung and/or liver metastases. Median number of previous chemotherapies was two, with half of the patients being exposed both to oxaliplatin and irinotecan. A median of 27 Gy of radiotherapy were administered to 16 patients after resection. At the time of the analysis, 29 out of 30 patients had died, with a median survival time after brain metastasectomy of 167 days (8-682). Only one patient died within a month from surgery. Median survival was significantly longer in patients who received postsurgical radiotherapy (7.6 vs. 4.7 months, P = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: Neurosurgical management of symptomatic brain metastases from colorectal cancer is feasible, relatively safe, and offers a chance of prolonged survival. Patients who received radiotherapy after resection experienced a better outcome.