An Ex Vivo Pilot Study to Assess the Feasibility of 3D Printing of Orbital Implants in Horses.

Severe ophthalmic conditions such as trauma, uveitis, corneal damage, or neoplasia can lead to eye removal surgery. Poor cosmetic appearance resulting from the sunken orbit ensues. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the feasibility of manufacturing a custom-made 3D-printed orbital implant made of biocompatible material for the enucleated horse and usable in conjunction to a corneoscleral shell. Blender, a 3D-image software, was used for prototype design. Twelve cadaver heads of adult Warmbloods were collected from the slaughterhouse. On each head, one eye was removed via a modified transconjunctival enucleation while the contralateral eye was kept intact as control. Ocular measurements were collected on each enucleated eye with the help of a caliper and used for prototype sizing. Twelve custom-made biocompatible porous prototypes were 3D-printed in BioMed Clear resin using the stereolithography technique. Each implant was fixated into the corresponding orbit, within the Tenon capsule and conjunctiva. Heads were frozen and thin slices were then cut in the transverse plane. A scoring system based on four criteria (space for ocular prosthesis, soft-tissue-coverage, symmetry to the septum, and horizontal symmetry), ranging from A (proper fixation) to C (poor fixation), was developed to evaluate implantation. The prototypes reached our expectations: 75% of the heads received an A score, and 25% a B score. Each implant cost approximately 7.30€ and took 5 hours for 3D-printing. The production of an economically accessible orbital implant made of biocompatible porous material was successful. Further studies will help determine if the present prototype is usable in vivo.

Apprendre l'anatomie radiographique en présentiel ou en ligne ? Une étude randomisée contrôlée.

Résumé L'enseignement de l'anatomie repose sur diverses techniques: les cours, les dissections, les modèles 3D ou encore les supports en ligne. Ces derniers sont généralement considérés comme des moyens d'apprentissage complémentaires. Cette étude vise à comparer les performances des étudiants vétérinaires (N=83) en anatomie radiographique (radioanatomie) après un apprentissage en ligne ou conventionnel, et de voir dans quelle mesure ces méthodes sont interchangeables. Trois stratégies sont comparées : apprentissage en ligne exclusif, apprentissage en ligne avec des os de chevaux, apprentissage sur radiographies conventionnelles avec des os de chevaux. Les performances au test de rotation mentale et au test de connaissance en radioanatomie sont similaires entre les 3 groupes à la base, lors du test préliminaire. Après l'apprentissage (test final), les scores de rotation mentale et de radioanatomie augment significativement de 6.7/40 points (CI : 5.2­8.2; p < .001) et de 5.1/20 points (CI: 4.3­5.9; p< .001). Il n'y a pas de différence entre les groupes pour les scores de rotation mentale et de radioanatomie après l'apprentissage. Le score de rotation mentale est influencé par le genre, et significativement plus élevé chez les hommes que chez les femmes au test préliminaire (M= 23.0, SD = 8.8 vs. M= 16.5, SD= 6.9; p= .001) et au test final (M= 32.1, SD= 5.5 vs. M= 22.7, SD= 8.6; p< .001). Les performances en radioanatomie ne sont pas influencées par le genre. Ces résultats suggèrent que l'enseignement de la radioanatomie peut être réalisé en présentiel avec des radiographies conventionnelles ou en ligne. Cette interchangeabilité entre apprentissage en présentiel et en distanciel est intéressante au regard des impératifs liés aux crises sanitaires, et des besoins d'adaptation rapide en distanciel. This translation was provided by the authors. To view the original article visit: https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme-2021-0153.

Can Online Teaching of Radiographic Anatomy Replace Conventional On-Site Teaching? A Randomized Controlled Study.

Different modalities such as lectures, dissections, 3D models, and online learning are used for teaching anatomy. To date, online learning has been considered a useful additional didactic tool. This study aimed to compare veterinary students' performance in radiographic anatomy (radio-anatomy) after online or classroom-based teaching to assess the extent to which the two methods were interchangeable. Three strategies were compared in a cohort of 83 learners. Students were committed to online learning only, online learning with the use of specimen equine bones, or learning on conventional radiographs with specimen equine bones. At baseline (pre-test), scores from a mental rotation test and radio-anatomy knowledge test were similar between groups. After training (post-test), scores in mental rotation and radio-anatomy significantly increased by 6.7/40 units (95% CI: 5.2-8.2; p < .001) and 5.1/20 units (95% CI: 4.3-5.9; p < .001), respectively. There was no difference in scores for mental rotation and radio-anatomy knowledge between groups at post-test. Gender influenced the mental rotation, with men scoring significantly higher than women at pre-test (M = 23.0, SD = 8.8 vs. M = 16.5, SD = 6.9; p = .001) and post-test (M = 32.1, SD = 5.5 vs. M = 22.7, SD = 8.6; p < .001). However, radio-anatomy knowledge was not influenced by gender. These results suggest radio-anatomy teaching can be safely achieved with either conventional radiographs or online resources. This is of interest since, due to the COVID-19 outbreak, rapidly changing from on-site to online methods for teaching veterinary medical education proved necessary.