Disparities in Access to Bariatric Surgery in North Carolina.

BACKGROUND: This study sought to identify factors that contribute to disparities in access to bariatric surgery in North Carolina (NC). METHODS: Using the rate of bariatric surgery in the county with the best health outcome as the reference, we calculated the Surgical Equity Index (SEI) in the remaining counties in NC. RESULTS: Approximately 2.95 million individuals (29%) were obese in NC. There were 992 (.5%) bariatric procedures performed on a population of 194 209 individuals with obesity in the Reference County (RC). The mean SEI for bariatric surgery in NC was .47 (SD .17, range .15-.95). A statistically significant difference was observed in 89 counties. Univariable analyses identified the following variables to be significantly associated with the SEI: percent of population living in rural areas (% rural) (relative rate change in SEI [RR] = .994, 95% CI .92-.997; <.0001), median household income (RR = 1.0, 95% CI = 1.0-1.0; P = .0002), prevalence of diabetes (RR = .947, 95% CI .917-.977; .0006), the primary care physician ratio (RR = .995, 95% CI .991-.998; P = .006), and percent uninsured adults (RR = .955, 95% CI .927-.985; P = .003). By multivariable hierarchical regression analysis, only the % rural remained statistically associated with a low SEI (RR = .995 per 1% increase in % rural, 95% CI = .992, .998; P = .0002). DISCUSSION: The percent rural is the most significant predictor of disparities in access to bariatric surgery. For every 1% increase in % rural, the rate of surgery decreased by .5%. Understanding the characteristics of rurality that are barriers to access is crucial to mitigate disparities in bariatric surgical access in NC.

Fasting plasma lactate as a possible early clinical marker for metabolic disease risk.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Elevated fasting plasma lactate concentrations are evident in individuals with metabolic diseases. However, it has yet to be determined if these associations exist in a young, healthy population as a possible early marker for metabolic disease risk. The purpose of this study was to determine if indices of the metabolic syndrome are related to plasma lactate concentrations in this population. METHODS: Fifty (29 ± 7 yr) men (n = 19) and women (n = 31) classified as overweight (26.4 ± 1.8 kg/m2) participated in this observational study. Blood pressure and blood metabolites were measured after an overnight fast. Lactate was also measured before and after a three-day eucaloric high-fat (70 %) diet. The homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) was calculated as a measure of insulin resistance. Visceral adipose tissue mass was determined via dual X-ray absorptiometry. RESULTS: Triglycerides (r = 0.55, p=<0.0001), HOMA-IR (r = 0.53, p=<0.0001), and systolic and diastolic (both, r = 0.36, p = 0.01) blood pressures associated with fasting plasma lactate. No differences in visceral adipose tissue existed between the sexes (p = 0.41); however, the relationship between visceral adipose tissue and lactate existed only in females (r = 0.59, p = 0.02) but not in males (p = 0.53). Fasting lactate and HOMA-IR increased in males (p = 0.01 and p = 0.02, respectively), but not females, following a three-day high-fat diet. CONCLUSION: Indices of the metabolic syndrome associated with fasting plasma lactates in young relatively healthy individuals. Fasting lactate also increased in a sex-specific manner after a three-day high fat diet. Thus, lactate could become a clinical marker for metabolic disease risk.

MBSAQIP database: are the data reliable?

BACKGROUND: The Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) database collects data from all accredited centers in the US. A prior study showed data quality issues limiting use of up to 20% of the 2015 database. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the completeness and data quality (internal validity, accuracy, and consistency) of the MBSAQIP database between 2015 and 2019. SETTING: United States. METHODS: All subsets of data from the MBSAQIP Participant User Data File (PUDF) were compiled into one main file. Completeness, internal validity, accuracy, and consistency were evaluated. Completeness was determined via missing values. Internal validity was assessed using the percentage of patients with a body mass index (BMI) < 30 kg/m2 who underwent primary bariatric surgery. Accuracy was evaluated using reported versus calculated BMI. Consistency was assessed using the percentage of patients with a gain of >5 or a loss of >20 units of BMI change in 30 days. Effects across years were assessed using a chi-squared test. RESULTS: Missing data for age, BMI, and ASA was consistently low (<2.5%) with no significant difference across years. Only .02% of patients who underwent a primary bariatric procedure had a reported BMI <30 kg/m2. The mean difference between reported versus calculated BMI was -.02 units. A maximum of .33% of patients gained >5 units of BMI, and a maximum of .85% of patients lost > 20 units of BMI in early follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: While the MBSAQIP is a database with acceptable data quality and minimal changes from 2015-2019, ongoing efforts are needed to improve data.

An analysis of enhanced recovery pathways for bariatric surgery-preoperative fasting, carbohydrate loading, and aspiration risk: a position statement from the International Society for the Perioperative Care of Patients with Obesity.

Enhanced recovery pathways (ERPs) and recommendations have become widely accepted for metabolic and bariatric surgery, including recommendations for preoperative carbohydrate loading and duration of fasting status. There is still a lack of consensus regarding such protocols and the underlying issues of gastric emptying time, resting gastric volume and pH, and risk of aspiration in patients with severe obesity and in patients undergoing bariatric surgery. The goal of this position statement by the International Society for the Perioperative Care of Patients with Obesity (ISPCOP) is to provide an analysis of available data on preoperative fasting and loading with oral complex clear carbohydrate drinks as well its potential effects on perioperative risk of aspiration in the context of Enhanced Recovery Pathways for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ERAMBS).

Microaggressions and Implicit Bias in Surgical Training: An Undocumented but Pervasive Phenomenon.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the prevalence, nature, and source of microaggressions experienced by surgical residents during training. SUMMARY AND BACKGROUND DATA: The role of microaggressions in contributing to workplace culture, individual performance, and professional satisfaction has become an increasingly studied topic across various fields. Little is known about the prevalence and impact of microaggressions during surgical training. METHODS: A 46-item survey distributed to current surgical residents in training programs across the United States via the Association of Program Directors in Surgery listserv and social media platforms between January and May 2020. Survey questions explored the frequency and extent of events of experiencing, witnessing, and responding to microaggressions in the workplace. The primary outcome was the occurrence of microaggressions experienced by surgical residents. Secondary outcomes included the nature, impact, and responses to these events. RESULTS: A total of 1624 responses were collected, with an equal distribution by self-identified gender (female, n = 815; male, n = 809). The majority of trainees considered themselves heterosexual (n = 1490, 91.7%) and White (n = 1131, 69.6%). A majority (72.2%, n = 1173) of respondents reported experiencing microaggressions, most commonly from patients (64.1%), followed by staff (57.5%), faculty (45.3%), and co-residents (38.8%). Only a small proportion (n = 109, 7.0%) of residents reported these events to graduate medical education office/program director. Nearly one third (30.8%) of residents said they experienced retaliation due to reporting of micro-aggressions. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this large, national survey of general surgery and surgical subspecialty trainees, microaggressions appear to be pervasive in surgical training. Microaggressions are rarely reported to program leadership, and when reported, can result in retaliation.

Body mass index and risk of mortality in patients undergoing bariatric surgery.

BACKGROUND: Prior literature has demonstrated that bariatric surgery is a safe approach for patients with morbid obesity. However, the relationship between body mass index (BMI) and risk of mortality in these patients has not been fully elucidated. Primary objective of this study was to evaluate the relationship between BMI and risk of mortality using data obtained from a national database, with a special focus on patients with BMI ≥ 70.0 kg/m2. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of patients with morbid obesity (BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2) undergoing first-time bariatric surgery between 2015 and 2018 was performed using data from the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program. Primary outcome was intra-operative death or death within 30 days post-operatively. Patients were categorized into quartiles according to BMI. Multivariable analysis was performed to evaluate the association of BMI with risk of mortality. Relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) are provided as measures of strength of association and precision, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 463, 436 patients were included with a 30-day mortality rate of 0.11%. Mean BMI (SD) was 48.2 (7.3) kg/m2; 1.5% of patients had BMI ≥ 70.0 kg/m2. On multivariable analysis, highest quartile patients had a significantly higher risk of mortality than lowest quartile patients. For patients with BMI ≥ 70.0 kg/m2, the risk of mortality was more pronounced with an eightfold increase compared to the lowest quartile. In patients with BMI ≥ 70.0 kg/m2, although sleeve gastrectomy (SG) was the most common procedure, the risk of mortality was significantly higher in patients undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). CONCLUSIONS: BMI is associated with increased risk of 30-day mortality. The effect of BMI is more pronounced in patients with BMI ≥ 70.0 kg/m2. In these patients, RYGB is associated with increased risk of mortality compared to SG.

American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery 2020 estimate of metabolic and bariatric procedures performed in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS), despite being the only effective durable treatment for obesity, remains underused as approximately 1% of all patients who qualify undergo surgery. The American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery created a Numbers Taskforce to specify annual rate of utilization for obesity treatment interventions and to determine if patients in need are receiving appropriate treatment. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to provide the best estimated number of metabolic and bariatric procedures performed in the United States in 2020. SETTING: United States. METHODS: We reviewed data from the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP), National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, Bariatric Outcomes Longitudinal Database, and Nationwide Inpatient Sample. In addition, data from industry and state databases were used to estimate activity at nonaccredited centers. Data from 2020 were compared mainly with data from the previous 2 years. RESULTS: Compared with 2019, the total number of MBS performed in 2020 decreased from approximately 256,000 to 199,000. Sleeve gastrectomy continues to be the most common procedure. The gastric bypass procedure trend remained relatively stable, and the gastric band procedure trend continued to decline. The percentage of revision procedures and biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch procedures increased slightly. Single-anastomosis duodeno-ileostomy was listed for the first time in 2020. Intragastric balloons placement declined from the previous year. CONCLUSION: There was a 22.5% decrease in MBS volume from 2019 to 2020, which coincided with the COVID-19 pandemic. Sleeve gastrectomy continues to be the dominant procedure, and for the first time, single-anastomosis duodeno-ileostomy is reported in the MBSAQIP database.

First report from the American Society of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery closed-claims registry: prevalence, causes, and lessons learned from bariatric surgery medical malpractice claims.

BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery has demonstrated sustained improvements in quality. Malpractice closed claims have been offered as a means of assessing quality. Few studies have investigated malpractice closed claims and opportunities for improvement in bariatric surgery. OBJECTIVES: To examine the prevalence and causes of malpractice claims with examination of prospects for quality improvement. SETTING: University hospital, United States; private practice. METHODS: Four national malpractice insurers participated in the closed-claims registry. Data regarding patients, staff, procedures, and hospital status were gathered from closed-claims files. Following data collection, a clinical summary of each closed claim was collected and later assessed by an expert panel on the basis of the following: contributing diagnosis and treatment events; whether complications were potentially preventable by the surgeon; the role of language, fatigue, distraction, workload, or teaching hospital/trainee supervision; communication concerns; and final care determination. RESULTS: A total of 175 closed claims were collected from index bariatric surgeries within the period from 2006-2014. Of these, 75.9% of surgeons were board certified and 43.3% of the hospitals were accredited for bariatric surgery. Most clinical complications after bariatric surgery that led to malpractice lawsuits were mortality (35.1%) and leaks (17.5%). While they were not the common cause for malpractice suits, bleeding (5.3%), retained foreign body (5.3%), and vascular injury (4.4%) occurred at higher rates than national averages. CONCLUSION: Prevalence of malpractice claims regarding bariatric surgery is low. Failure to diagnose, delay in treatment, postoperative care, and communication domain responses indicate future opportunities for improvement.

Real-world retrospective analysis of outcomes in patients undergoing bariatric surgery with class 1 obesity.

BACKGROUND: NIH-established indications for bariatric surgery were set close to 3 decades ago. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate outcomes in patients undergoing bariatric surgery with class I obesity, a class that does not fall into current indications. SETTING: University Hospital. METHODS: De-identified records from a clinic system's Electronic Health Record database were accessed to identify adult patients undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) (n = 566) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) (n = 730). Patients were compared in terms of resolution of co-morbidities and weight loss outcomes at 3 years following surgery. A mixed effects model was used, adjusting for the type of surgery, the number of quarters after the surgery when the averaged measurements were taken, and the interaction between these two variables. RESULTS: Patients lost up to 20% of their initial body mass index (BMI). Being of younger age, female, and having an obesity-related co-morbidity were associated with greater weight loss. At around 2 years after the surgery, the likelihood of being in remission from type 2 diabetes reached 45%. Remission probabilities for hypertension are 60% for RYGB and 50% for SG, 3 years after the surgery. On the other hand, the probabilities of remission from hyperlipidemia are close to 50% and 25% for RYGB and SG at 2 years. There was no difference between the BMI trajectories and remission from type 2 diabetes (T2D) when comparing the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Bariatric surgery is effective in weight loss and resolution of comorbidities in patients with class I obesity. This data further supports the need to revisit the current indication criteria.

The US Prevalence of Metabolic Surgery in Patients with Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes Has Not Increased Despite Recommendations from the American Diabetes Association.

PURPOSE: Metabolic surgery dramatically improves type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). In 2017, the American Diabetes Association (ADA) recommended metabolic surgery as the optimal treatment for patients with T2DM and Body Mass Index (BMI) > 40. We sought to evaluate whether or not that recommendation is being implemented. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the trend of bariatric surgery 2 years prior and 2 years following the ADA statement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of primary bariatric procedures on patients with class III obesity (BMI > 40 kg/m2) and T2DM performed between 2015 and 2018, using the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation Quality and Improvement Project (MBSAQIP) database. RESULTS: From 2015 to 2018, 164,535 patients with T2DM underwent bariatric surgery. The majority had a BMI > 40 kg/m2 (n = 117,422, 71.4%) and most were not using insulin. Majority of the patients with T2D and class III obesity were female (72.1%), Caucasian (71.5%), and mean age (SD) 48.5 (11.5). Although the numbers of patients with T2DM and class III obesity increased during this time period, there was not a significant change in the overall percentage of patients who were treated with surgery: from 25.99% in 2015 to 24.96% in 2018. In addition, this group is associated with higher rates of complications and mortality compared to patients with BMI > 40 kg/m2 without T2DM. CONCLUSION: Utilization of metabolic surgery in patients with obesity and T2DM has not improved following the updated 2017 ADA guidelines. There is a clear need for more awareness of these guidelines among providers, patients, and the public.

Retrospective comparative study of the effectiveness of bariatric surgery on 3-year outcomes in the real-world clinical setting.

BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery has shown an improvement in obesity and obesity-related disease in many clinical trials and single center studies. However, real-world data, including data from non-centers of excellence, is sparse. OBJECTIVES: To provide clinical outcomes of patients who underwent bariatric surgery in real-world clinical setting. SETTING: Academic Institution. METHODS: Adults with obesity undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), sleeve gastrectomy (SG), and a control group (CG) between 2007 and 2019 were identified. The CG represented patients with a previous visit to a bariatric surgeon without a subsequent surgery. Cohorts were matched on age, gender, ethnicity, baseline body mass index (BMI), and presence of diabetes and hypertension. Groups were compared in terms of co-morbidities, weight loss, and chronic conditions for three years. RESULTS: A total of 61 313 patients were identified. From these, 14 916 RYGB and 20 867 SG patients were matched to the CG (n = 16 562). The median BMI loss three years after surgery was 28.7% (interquartile range [IQR] 20.8%-36.2%) and 20.5% (IQR 13.5%-28.6%) for RYGB and SG groups, respectively. The CG had a median BMI loss of 6.7% with IQR of 20.4% decrease to 1.78% gain. At three years postoperatively, HbA1C decreased by 13% for RYGB and 5.9% for the SG group. The probabilities of remission from diabetes, hypertension, and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol were significantly higher among patients who had surgery compared to the CG. For both RYGB and SG, the estimated probabilities of remission were similar. CONCLUSION: This study shows that bariatric surgery performed in the real-world clinical setting is an effective therapy for various expressions of the metabolic syndrome with results that are comparable to randomized control trials.

Examining the Rates of Obesity and Bariatric Surgery in the United States.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the change in rate of increase of bariatric surgery performed compared to the growth of obesity and severe obesity in the United States (US). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The number of primary adult bariatric procedures performed in the US between 2015 and 2018 was obtained from the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation Quality and Improvement Project (MBSAQIP) database. The US Census database was used to derive age-adjusted obesity and severe obesity prevalence among adults. Prevalence of bariatric surgery, by year, was estimated as the ratio of the number of patients undergoing surgery and the projected number of eligible individuals for that year. RESULTS: There were 627,386 bariatric procedures performed for body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m2, of which 73.3% (n = 459,800) were performed for BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2. Although the rate of obesity increased by 3.32% per year during this period (RR = 1.0332 per year increase; 95% CI = 1.0313, 1.0352), the rate of surgery per eligible population increased by only 2.47% (RR = 1.0247 per year increase; 95% CI = 1.0065, 1.0432). The prevalence of severe obesity increased from 7.70% (n = 17,494,910) in 2015 to 9.95% (n = 23,135,039) in 2018 while the prevalence of surgery decreased from 0.588 per 100 eligible population in 2015 to 0.566 per 100 eligible population in 2018. CONCLUSION: The rate of utilization has not kept up with the rate of increase in this disease, our costliest illness. There is a strong need to educate the public, healthcare professionals, insurance carriers, and legislators.

Ockham's razor and the metabolic syndrome.

The broad effects of bariatric/metabolic surgery on virtually every tissue and organ system remain unexplained. Weight loss, although a major factor, does not fully account for the rapid, full, and durable remission of type 2 diabetes, return of islet function, reduction of the prevalence of cancers, increase in gray matter of the brain, and decrease in all-cause mortality. This review supports the thesis that the metabolic syndrome is not a group of separate diseases but rather multiple expressions of a shared defect in the utilization of carbohydrates and lipids. That error is probably caused by a dysmetabolic signal from the foregut, stimulated by food, that limits entry of 2-carbon fragments into the tricarboxylic acid cycle, the accumulation of lactate and, in turn, increases in glucose and insulin. Surgery limits that signal by reducing contact between food and foregut mucosa. Speciation of that signal(s) may offer a new pathway for drug development.

ASMBS position statement on the rationale for performance of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy before and after metabolic and bariatric surgery.

The following position statement is issued by the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery in response to inquiries made to the Society by patients, physicians, society members, hospitals, health insurance payors, the media, and others regarding the need and possible strategies for screening endoscopic examination before metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS), as well as the rationale, indications, and strategies for postoperative surveillance for mucosal abnormalities, including gastroesophageal reflux disease and associated esophageal mucosal injuries (erosive esophagitis and Barrett's esophagus) that may develop in the long term after MBS, specifically for patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. The general principles described here may also apply to procedures such as biliopancreatic diversion (BPD) and BPD with duodenal switch (DS); however, the paucity of procedure-specific literature for BPD and DS limits the value of this statement to those procedures. In addition, children with obesity undergoing MBS may have unique considerations and are not specifically addressed in this position statement. This recommendation is based on current clinical knowledge, expert opinion, and published peer-reviewed scientific evidence available at this time. The statement is not intended to be and should not be construed as stating or establishing a local, regional, or national standard of care. The statement will be revised in the future as additional evidence becomes available.

The first modified Delphi consensus statement on sleeve gastrectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is the commonest bariatric procedure worldwide. Yet there is significant variation in practice concerning its various aspects. This paper report results from the first modified Delphi consensus-building exercise on SG. METHODS: We established a committee of 54 globally recognized opinion makers in this field. The committee agreed to vote on several statements concerning SG. An agreement or disagreement amongst ≥ 70.0% experts was construed as a consensus. RESULTS: The committee achieved a consensus of agreement (n = 71) or disagreement (n = 7) for 78 out of 97 proposed statements after two rounds of voting. The committee agreed with 96.3% consensus that the characterization of SG as a purely restrictive procedure was inaccurate and there was 88.7% consensus that SG was not a suitable standalone, primary, surgical weight loss option for patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE) without dysplasia. There was an overwhelming consensus of 92.5% that the sleeve should be fashioned over an orogastric tube of 36-40 Fr and a 90.7% consensus that surgeons should stay at least 1 cm away from the angle of His. Remarkably, the committee agreed with 81.1% consensus that SG patients should undergo a screening endoscopy every 5 years after surgery to screen for BE. CONCLUSION: A multinational team of experts achieved consensus on several aspects of SG. The findings of this exercise should help improve the outcomes of SG, the commonest bariatric procedure worldwide, and guide future research on this topic.

Development and Assessment of a Systematic Approach for Detecting Disparities in Surgical Access.

Importance: Although optimal access is accepted as the key to quality care, an accepted methodology to ascertain potential disparities in surgical access has not been defined. Objective: To develop a systematic approach to detect surgical access disparities. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used publicly available data from the Health Cost and Utilization Project State Inpatient Database from 2016. Using the surgical rate observed in the 5 highest-ranked counties (HRCs), the expected surgical rate in the 5 lowest-ranked counties (LRCs) in North Carolina were calculated. Patients 18 years and older who underwent an inpatient general surgery procedure and patients who underwent emergency inpatient cholecystectomy, herniorrhaphy, or bariatric surgery in 2016 were included. Data were collected from January to December 2016, and data were analyzed from March to July 2020. Exposures: Health outcome county rank as defined by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the proportional surgical ratio (PSR), which was the disparity in surgical access defined as the observed number of surgical procedures in the 5 LRCs relative to the expected number of procedures using the 5 HRCs as the standardized reference population. Results: In 2016, approximately 1.9 million adults lived in the 5 HRCs, while approximately 246 854 lived in the 5 LRCs. A total of 28 924 inpatient general surgical procedures were performed, with 4521 being performed in those living in the 5 LRCs and 24 403 in those living in the 5 HRCs. The rate of general surgery in the 5 HRCs was 13.09 procedures per 1000 population. Using the 5 HRCs as the reference, the PSR for the 5 LRCs was 1.40 (95% CI, 1.35-1.44). For emergent/urgent cholecystectomy, the PSR for the 5 LRCs was 2.26 (95% CI, 2.02-2.51), and the PSR for emergent/urgent herniorrhaphy was 1.83 (95% CI, 1.33-2.45). Age-adjusted rate of obesity (body mass index [calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared] greater than 30), on average, was 36.6% (SD, 3.4) in the 5 LRCs vs 25.4% (SD, 4.6) in the 5 HRCs (P = .002). The rate of bariatric surgery in the 5 HRCs was 33.07 per 10 000 population with obesity. For the 5 LRCs, the PSR was 0.60 (95% CI, 0.51-0.69). Conclusions and Relevance: The PSR is a systematic approach to define potential disparities in surgical access and should be useful for identifying, investigating, and monitoring interventions intended to mitigate disparities in surgical access that effects the health of vulnerable populations.